I haven't really felt the need to post about the Bruce Springsteen affair up until now, because it is just kind of ho hum. But, the woman in the alleged affair went to court to try and get the divorce filings sealed from public view and failed. A judge ruled that "The family court is not unique in presiding over cases that involve enormous personal embarrassment. Openness is the norm, it is not the exception." That means those affair denials from Bruce and the woman might come back to bite them in the butt. Sure, the details alleged by the husband may or may not be true, but if there is nothing to hide, then why seal the records? The woman says it is to save her children from further embarrassment and harm. I understand that, but if she did have an affair with Bruce, maybe she should have thought about not only her children then, but also Bruce's children.
Oh, and Bruce isn't blameless here himself. I mean he has proven in the past that he is a cheater. That is how he ended up with his current wife. She was the other woman once herself. This should all get very interesting in the next few days.