I know that you are thinking to yourself that you could come up with 100 different women who would be a better choice for Glamour's Woman Of The Year than Selena Gomez. Then again, you probably could come up with 1M better mothers than the former mother of the year winner Dina Lohan. No, seriously, she did win a mother of the year prize not that many years ago. At the time Lindsay had been only arrested five or six times, so Dina was still considered to have done a good job. Selena Gomez is a woman. I know it seems like she is only 14 because she dates Justin Bieber sometimes, and when anyone stands next to him they look ten years younger, but she is over the age of 18. In fact, in the magazine article she says that if she had stayed in Texas she would probably have been a teen mom so already she is being a good role model. Of course, the fact that she is 20 means that if she had kids now would also mean that she would not actually be a teen mom, but we get the point. Glamour wants to draw in the younger crowd and you are not going to get that by naming Oprah as woman of the year. Besides, Oprah has her own magazine and names herself woman of the year every year. The vote is never even close, although one year, Jada Pinkett Smith was a write in candidate and then Oprah started spending some serious money to win and then realized she is the owner of the magazine and controls the ballots and won unanimously. Glamour can do whatever they want with their magazine, I just have a tough time believing there are no worthier candidates.