What I don't like about radar's story is they spend the first half of it convincing you the couple has split and then spend the second half saying that if we see them in photos or hanging out or they deny they are splitting we shouldn't believe them and they really have split.
What good does a story like that do? That would be like someone writing Adam Sandler and his wife have split but if they deny it or you see them together or get photographed together or have another kid together don't even pay attention to it because they really have split.
If people are taking photos together and denying they have split and not getting with other people then they are together. A split is when they are no longer together. Using Radar's logic they have never been together. I don't think they have ever had sex and I think she has been with other guys and who knows what he has been doing but they are still "together." I would rather have a tabloid or myself go out on a limb and take a posirtion and not hedge your bets like a fortune teller.