Friday, December 06, 2013

Blind Item #7

This Academy Award winner/nominee actress is not allowed to be alone with her children for fear that she might hurt them.

35 comments:

PickyNicky said...

Catherine Zeta-Jones.

FrenchGirl said...

if she's CZJ,it's untrue (you can find some pics with her and her kids without nannies recently )

Harlow17 said...

The nannies might just be outta camera range

Renoblondee said...

Yikes

trainrides said...

Halle Berry

MISCH said...

Have there been any Halle sighting since the birth of the baby ?

Kassandra said...

seriously?

Eros said...

Definitely not halle. Her ex would be all over that like white on rice if she was deemed unfit to raise her kids. I got no guesses.

feraltart said...

Thank goodness someone, somewhere in Hollywood, has put the children's well being first. Much better to have supervision & keep the mother in their lives then to keep her away or put them at risk. I personally think this is a kindness blind.

Craig said...

Dubious. For someone to not be allowed to be alone with their kids requires a court supervision order. If there was a court order it would be in the public domain and as such the cess-pit of Hollywood reporting would be all over it.
If there is not a court order then it's just rumour and unenforceable. Said parent could easily say "fuck you" when told she can't be alone with her kids.
can't deny someone their basic rights as a parent without legal enforcement.

Erin Keith said...

Hey Craig - Hollywood is way different than our world. I could see someone easily agreeing to only have supervised visits without a court order to avoid having to PUBLICLY go through the court system.

Cheryl said...

Or perhaps the husband has threatened to withhold money and make life generally miserable for her if she doesn't agree to his conditions for visitation. He might might have some powerful friends who will make it impossible for her to get work, even if she does have an Oscar.

auntliddy said...

Well, it should be Brooke Mueller, but its prob CZJ. And didnt we have this already?

auntliddy said...

You know what tho, Sharon Stone is batshit, maybe its her. I dont even know how she got kids!!!!

ms snarky said...

Maybe Angie. I can definitely see her losing control.

FrenchGirl said...

@auntliddy:
she's adopted her kids

MadLyb said...

I was going to say "Angelina" as a joke, but after seeing the above and then thinking about it, it could be her.

sarah.estell said...

FrenchGirl, what does that mean? They are still her kids.

MadLyb said...

In addition, she was a cutter, and if she sees her children as an extension of herself, and is still abusing substances, that could be a problem.

trainrides said...

@MadLyb Makes sense. I'm changing my guess to St, Ange

Eros said...

I keep waiting for ange to flip her lid and go all mommy dearest. I hope its not her tho. I think she would sooner kill herself than hurt her babies.

izz said...

Didn't we already have this blind a few months ago, just after CZJ and Michael took a break? She was the popular guess then

Anna said...

The wonderful Mariah Carey seems unable to walk without assistance in those heels and tight mermaid dresses she wears, so maybe everyone is fearful she will topple over and spill the babies down the stairs or onto the tile floor if she tries to walk and hold them at the same time.

auntliddy said...

French, thats what i meant, i dont know how she passed muster!!

auntliddy said...

True. Shes not a mom u will EVER see on a school run!!! When you babies i thought you may have meant those huge blowups on her chest. Lol

Krissie said...

My vote is for Mariah, she seems to be a boozy idiot all the time. I doubt she's been sober in years.

As for how Sharon Stone got her kids, I think pretty much every Hollywood star who adopts kids gets them the same way and that is with $$$. The only time I can think of a celebrity running into any problems with adoption was when Madonna was initially denied her youngest, and then the court went back on that anyways. (I remember reading that when he judge said Madonna was denied she screamed "WHAT?" at the top of her lungs right there in court.)

B. Profane said...

"Dubious. For someone to not be allowed to be alone with their kids requires a court supervision order. If there was a court order it would be in the public domain and as such the cess-pit of Hollywood reporting would be all over it."

Wrong in just about every aspect. Custody orders are almost always sealed, and one parent is often able to get supervision ordered temporarily for fairly small cause. It's sleazy, but it's quite common. A long-term supervised-only visitation order would take substantial proof of possible harm, but any kind of serious drug use or psych diagnosis would be sufficient.

texas rose said...

Agree B Profane but the blind may also just be figuratively saying that she is not allowed to be alone with kids, as in another family member or nanny has been instructed by non-crazy parent to watch out for her behavior and avoid leaving kids alone with her for any length of time.

B. Profane said...

Yes, it could be informal supervision of course.

Hegg said...

CZJ due to all the pill popping??

jennybct said...

Not CZJ. Her daughter takes dance with my friend's daughter and she takes her to dance class and waits with the other moms.

jennybct said...

Not CZJ. Her daughter takes dance with my friend's daughter and she takes her to dance class and waits with the other moms.

Jacq said...

If it is CZJ, I think this blind is inappropriate. It isn't like she uses and abuses like Mueller. She has a legitimate illness from which she suffers. It is sad for everyone involved.

Goodnight said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Brooke Meuller certainly can't be alone with her children and she would either hurt them or neglect them to the point they would be a danger to themselves because she's evil and broken, her only interests are drugs and money. One parent can use the threat of going to court and making something public to keep another parent away from kids. This would be easy to do with most abusers whether you were famous or not. Can you imagine the company keeping you employed if something like that became public? It's a powerful threat if you have evidence that's irrefutable.