Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Your Turn

What do you think the realistic percentage is of nuclear war in our lifetime? Not even necessarily involving the US.

19 comments:

sandybrook said...

50-50 because you have a deranged lunatic who doesn't appear afraid to set one off and another deranged lunatic egging him on to try it and see what happens. I don't think Iran ever will because Israel will know about it and destroy it before it's ever capable of doing damage. And the rest of the world is under agreement.

Former CNN Anchor Candy Crowley said...

I once dated a leading government figure from a nuclear-armed country. But it didn't work out. We had Iraqunconciliable differences.

Former CNN Anchor Candy Crowley said...

When I interviewed Kim Jong-un, he offered me a job with his army, because he thought I was a bombshell.

just sayin' said...

i'd say 80%...we have 2 mental patients who are champing at the bit to play nuclear war. i don't think it will go to full-scale world destruction, but at least one will be set off that kills people.

Sd Auntie said...

Yes. Kim dumb In, Trump or Putin. And throw in Iran or Pakistan. I'm in Hawaii and the local govt met to plan Emergency plans in case of nuclear bomb. Scary times indeed

Barbara RiceHand said...

I just love a laid back celebrity gossip blog bringing in politics to the discussion. Dumb.

monteverde said...

I love how nobody mentions how Obama gave nukes to a people who celebrate a national holiday called DEATH TO AMERICA day lol

That was clever...

hothotheat said...

Soure?

austin said...

Trump was a celebrity long before getting elected. Hello.

8==D KermitGosnellKnobjob said...

About zero, fatman the rocket has too flawed nukes to do real harm, the USA would wipe NK out without using nukes to avoid bad publicity, Europeans are unlikely to use nukes until they become muslims in the next decades, Russia is like a part of Europe without the risk of islamization, Chinese will not use them, neither will Israel, South Africa is an AfricanAfrican shithole whose enemies are inside and will not nuke zimbabwe or other cesspool around, India will not use them, and the only left is Pakistan which will not use them unless an islamic coup.

meagan said...

To close for comfort, in my opinion. At least 50/50. I have anxiety attacks about this subject on a regular basis.

Wee Kitty said...

Kermit, Shawty has yet to figure out how to get his rio kets not to burn up upon re-entry, but he will eventually figure it out. I don't think it's gonna happen. It's a whole lot of severe sabre rattling but that's about it. Dirty bombs and globalists are far more dangerous.

Fairylights said...

50-50, way too high a chance for my liking.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

IDK but if you go to Al-Jazeera's YouTube channel there's a video entitled "WH calls North Korea claim that US declared war 'absurd'," and toward the end there's something about South Korean intelligence saying that North Korean soldiers have been ordered to report to higher commande suggesting they're not actually as aggressive/serious as their hard talk. That caught my attention last night... Actions speak louder than words.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

*Have been told to report to higher command BEFORE TAKING ANY ACTION.

Sd Auntie said...

Supposedly aiming for the volcano on Big Island.

auntliddy said...

10% or lower. Thrre is just too much risk for everyone

monteverde said...

Kermit, you are the voice of logical reasoning, in a sea of hysterical imbeciles. Well said.
Even a frog has more brains than sandy lol

bunny honey said...

Somebody forgot their meds.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days