Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Blind Item #9

This foreign born A++ list celebrity probably can't back out without looking foolish, but a lot more people are whispering about the past of his significant other. One thing that is very noticeable is at a recent event, the significant other worked hard to get the attention on herself rather than him. Further, there were only about 20 people who showed up and the year previous with that first couple in attendance the number was about ten times higher.

84 comments:

sandybrook said...

Prince Hot Ginge and Meghan

MontanaMarriott said...

Megan Markle and the Ginga Prince?

Smalls said...

Backing out of...the wedding?

Orvilla Bedinbacher said...

The new royal engaged couple.

SkittleKitty said...

How did their relationship get this far without him knowing her past? Were they both that naive??????

JGC said...

He should just back out now. It isn't the first time he's looked foolish. He'll get over it.

When the engagement was announced I said the marriage wasn't going to happen. They'll go along with it for a while to keep up the we're so modern and totally not racist look, but something will make the marriage not happen. That was before I ever heard about yachting allegations.

HH314 said...

Complete and utter nonsense. The wedding is happening, folks

plot said...

Okay what was this event. If Harry and Meghan are filling in for Kate and William, then sure, there might be less people there. To be expected.

Harry probably knows more about Meghan than we do.

Biboh said...

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

Sandy said...

Oh believe me, Meghan will make sure she gets him to the altar. There's no way she's giving up her Prince and become a yacht girl again.

Jen S said...

I like Meghan, so I'm choosing not to believe this.

LurkyLoo said...

There is no way she wasn't vetted to the max before the proposal was able to happen. This is the British Royal Family, not someone getting engaged to a Kartrashian.

Nutty_Flavor said...

I think it's probably very lonely being Harry. Most of his friends are married and have children. Who is he going to spend his days with? Even if he's starting to sense that Meghan may not be the right woman for him, I'm sure it would be very difficult to go back to being lonely again.

SDaly said...

Any takers on whether or not Merkel is protected by blackmail material against the Royal Family?

Unknown said...

It might be referring to the lack of a turn-out of well-wishers for their visit to Brixton, which is viewed by many Brixton residents as a PR stunt (well, more of a PR stunt than the usual Firm visit).

lefthandscissors said...

A neighbour's brother works at KP and always has good gossip when he comes to visit every other weekend or so. The vetting done on anyone that will be in the public eye is insane.. we're talking MI-5/6 level stuff. If something "narsty" would have cropped up I doubt she'd be where she is now. However there were long deliberations (from what I've been told) over the fact that she's a divorcee. But since Harry really isn't "in-line" as much as he was before (and nearly everyone in the family is divorced at this point..) the decision was made that if it keeps "them" (royal "them".. LOL) from going through another public divorce, all the better. The bonus is that she's an American and could bring even more tourists in solely due to being "the American princess".

What hasn't been said is what hasn't been printed about Harry's "pre-Meghan" shenanigans that were wiped and paid off before they could become even the tiniest bit of news. If I go by what my neighbour's brother has to say... he'd not be the least bit surprised if there were a few ginger babies out there whose father isn't really their father.

cheesegrater15 said...

Never trust anybody with an alliterative name.

lefthandscissors said...

@cheesegrater15

LOLOL maybe that explains my feelings toward my sister... alliterative name. LMAO.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Isn't PR the whole point of the Firm? It's one of the things I think is useful about the Royals, dividing the ceremonial from the administrative.

When something awful happens, they can show up and express the condolences of the nation.

Whatever one's view on Donald Trump, I don't think many people would want him to show up at the scene of a national tragedy.

DDonna Tarttty said...

There must be pictures of her, since there seem to be pictures of every one nowadays (except Jennifer Garner, I guess). Maybe they'll come out right before the wedding or right after.

But MM's history is definitely becoming better known. I've seen that picture of her w/ George Soros's kid at that weird Hamptons event with the people eating bloody life-sized cakes made to look like dead human beings. That can't be good for her.

I give the wedding a 50/50 chance of happening. They've got five months to come up with a legit reason. Though from what I've seen of the stupid masses, you don't even need a legit explanation for things like the Hawaii nuke, Las Vegas shooting, and so on, so maybe they can just say "She wants to do more TV" or some dumb shit and people will believe.

Or they'll just kill her, like Diana. Ah, that wacky "royal" family.

Secrets said...

How did Sofia Hellqvist become a princess in sweden? Are they more lenient??

Nutty_Flavor said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nutty_Flavor said...

Sofia married the second-in-line in the throne after the first in line (Crown Princess Victoria) had already produced a heir, Princess Estelle. But she was very controversial when they first started dating.

MyMyMy said...

This chick has been vetted up the wazoo by the Royal’s people. No way she was a prostitute.

Secrets said...

@Nutty yeah..but its the same deal with Harry (second in line) marrying Meghan. Meghan has a shady past sort of like Sofia, but for some reason Meghan's seems to be a bigger scandal... weirdly I like Sofia, I've always thought she had sort of a beautiful/exotic look, can't get into Meghan... don't care

Unknown said...

I will say that even with a thorough top secret clearance, people can still hide stuff from their vetters (especially if a top person on the inside is vouching for them and pushing them through). Look at all of the rogues that have popped up in US security who had what should have been red flags prior to being approved (Reality Winner, Chelsea Manning, Jon Snowden are the three biggest names, but there are a lot more out there).

Nutty_Flavor said...

@Secrets Sofia was born in Sweden, which is a plus when you're going to join the Swedish Royal Family, and seems to be a friendly person who connects well with people via the media.

Meghan doesn't seem to be breaking through in the same way. Not sure if it's because of her race, her nationality, her previous marriage, her previous employment, or all of the above.

I don't think Meghan will bring in any more American tourists, but perhaps The FIrm was hoping to duplicate the success the Danish Royals have had with Crown Princess Mary from Australia.

Mary is very popular in Denmark. Her previous job was as a travel agent in Hobart, Tasmania.

Secrets said...

@Nutty - gotcha! Thank you for the info. Always liked Sofia. I think Meghan is just... basic. And seems a little thirsty, Sofia is more natural.

O Howard said...

I think Meghan has a hard time connecting with people because she's just put on so many masks in the last few years. When she was with the first husband, she was a party girl doing wheelbarrow races on the beach at her wedding. With the chef boyfriend, she was a foodie travel blogger who wanted to have a show on the Food Network. With Harry, she's a globetrotting humanitarian. They've even tried several personas since the engagement. First it was confident, brash American who was going to take the world by storm. Now, after the $75,000 dress debacle, they're trying on the "shy Meghan" look. It's confusing.

Megley said...

Markel once said that she wants an acting career like Aniston's. Well, it was a possibility then--she's a shitty actress just like JA.
MM was the worst thing about Suits.
IMNSHO.

jonesy said...

oh boy...
ginger prince & markle

Amy said...

The show totally played into that too, making her character part of the literal (Mike) Ross & Rachel couple.

Somebody light my fire--if you can find it said...

@Megley: Spot. On!! You said what I couldn't figure out how!! Those two WILL marry. The monarchy evolved too much thanks to Diana. There was someone here, maybe Cail, who said he lives there and they could give a shit about anyone other then the ones who ascend the throne. And the only ones who would fail are the ones who "don't get on" with just doing their job, per se, wanting the spotlight would be a hindrance, essentially, the UK doesn't give a shit about them! haha
I certainly don't blame a girl for trying to get what she wants. Catherine did and she had to wait, what 9 years or so.

Gator said...

Yeah, right, coming from a royal family that's FULL of skeletons in their closet.

delete account said...

PHG and Thirsty Maggie.
Ha ha ha! Serves PHG right, and I used to adore him. But lately he has become so stuck on himself that I just can't fantasize about him anymore without regurgitating my tea. This is one of the reasons I've gotten so into the football, what with Aaron Rodgers (yes I know but I can still dream!) and Jimmy G and all that.

Xpensive Hobutt said...

This blog has been occupied by The Professionals.
Martial law has been imposed.
Civil liberties have been suspended.
Habeus corpus has been overruled.
The brothels are operational.
You cannot win.
You can only admit.
You can only submit.

delete account said...

@O Howard That sounds like textbook borderline personality disorder to me (which many celebs do indeed have). Changing herself to go all mitchy-match with every new man is a major red flag.

piglet said...

It's the outspoken family that people are wary of.She seems down to earth, but the step-sibs need to STFU

Hanniam said...

Honestly, I think Harry’s past hijinks are more scandalous than anything MM could possibly have gotten up to. I doubt any of it surprised either of them.

Boldblonde said...

Exactly! You’d think that as a prince. he would look into the person’s past, when he starts dating them.

MovieBuff said...

Which is worse buying coochie or selling coochie?

He has paid for cooch before
She has sold cooch before (allegedly)

The pot calling the kettle black.

MovieBuff said...

He has purchased coochie
She has sold coochie

He’s a whoremonger
She’s a whore

Seems like a match to me

Manhattan Vibe said...


Can this get any more predictable? This came from a Tumblr Nut (Skippy,Jersey or Felix). They've been photoshopping pictures of Meghan as some porn star and contacting Royal Journalist on Twitter about Meghan's shady past that they've made up. I think they're up to like 3 marriages, a child, Prostitute, her mother was in Prison for 12 years and her dad has a warrant for his arrest, Markus is her pimp, she's cheated on everyone and their father- I'm really only scratching the surface here. There a whole load of things they claim to "know" about her but provide absolutely no proof other than Anonymous "tips" that I believe they send each other.

If you don’t’ believe me, head to their Tumblrs and they’ve been saying that only 19 people showed up to meet them despite the fact that someone did a quick count on Twitter based on a video and saw way more than that. Ironically this mentions "about 20" for the event. Literally no one else is reporting that but THEM and now you here? Enty has people on the ground in the UK?

They will now use this Blind Item to support their claims and show everyone that “it’s coming soon!” (like they said when they broke up in December and Meghan was supposed to be out. Or she stalked him at the polo match and forced a kiss to boot. And how she got kicked out a week after their engagement was announced with her bags packed and her crying back to LA.)but it’s just a continuous circle of BS- they send this stuff out (to each other and others) and use that as proof that something exists.


Once they get married and pregnant (I expect so soon), I fully expect to see blinds about Harry being sterile and Meghan cheated on him. Felix has already mentioned that a kid won't happen because Harry is sterile (so they say).

John Doe said...

Everybody knows that Meghan did a little whoring back in the day. No big deal. Enty even did a blind about it recently. Its what you do when you're a Hollywood actress who can't get parts and waiting tables can't cover the bills.

Of course people are going to avoid the embarrassment by avoiding THEM. The Royal family has a closet that's full of ghosts and skeletons but the thing is that the scandals are all about them and their own. They are all related to one another via bloodlines, and they cover for each other.

Meghan is an interloper who does not belong in that universe at all. People keep talking about love. These people do not marry for love. They marry to breed and continue the bloodline within their circle of exclusivity and prestige. I called it weeks ago that this marriage will either not take place or not last long. They are going to find a way to get rid of her. I will not be surprised to read that she dies in an 'accident'.

Annyoung Bluth said...

I’m sorry but the idea that the Royal family didn’t have her vetted is too absurd. Like MI-5 couldn’t find dirt but now Enty can?

And, honestly, even if she sold herself in the past who cares? Consensual sex isn’t a scandal. And sometimes desperate people do desperate things. Like Harry was always a shining beacon of purity? Charles was?

boredatwork boredatwork said...

She's extremely unlikeable. And super basic, like others have pointed out.
Harry has turned out to be an idiot.

I too give this wedding a 50/50 chance of happening.

The palace might have pulled a reverse psychology thing with Harry: if your kid goes out with someone you dislike, you don't forbid them to see them. What you do is leave them be, and let them find out for themselves how unsuitable that person really is.
It works 9 out of 10 times. Has worked for myself, with my parents has worked with my son, has worked with my brother and my sister, it's a trick as old as time.

LizOz said...

Wow @bored we agree again. Will wonders never cease? See what’s possible if we avoid politics 😇

boredatwork boredatwork said...

@LizOz: problem is everything has become political nowadays :)

Asher215 said...

I see the marriage happening however, I just don't see it lasting...

Meghan said she wanted to be an actress like Aniston? I am dying that she picked such a minimally talented actress as her idol. But it makes sense.. Michelle Williams is a more talented actress but Aniston is more famous than her. And Meghan wanted fame. Many of Harry's previous relationships didn't work because the girls (Cressida and Chelsy come to mind) didn't want to abandon their careers to join the firm. Meanwhile, Meghan is giving her up Aniston sh*tty rom-com aspirations to be royal.

Harry should've listened to everyone who told him to wait longer before proposing. He could've gotten out of this.

Nutty_Flavor said...

The thing is, if Harry breaks up with Meghan, is there anyone waiting in the wings? It can be difficult to find a convivial woman who wants to take on the responsibilities of The Firm.

Harry is not in the military anymore. What's he going to do with his time - wild parties and charity appearances, a sort of Royal Leonardo diCaprio? A swinging bachelor at 25 can be a fun guy; a swinging bachelor at 40 or 45 is a little sad.

At any rate, I wouldn't be surprised if Harry had used the services of sex workers in the past.

As we've seen in the Aziz Ansari case, inviting a civilian for a hookup carries risks.

Manhattan Vibe said...

@bored

She's far from basic. Kate is basic. Pippa is about as basic as one can get as well. Only DM, Tumblr nuts and a few royal boards who want Harry with an English Rose dislike her. That's not good company or a good sample of people. They are usually the more bitter and unpopular of opinions.

This is the Royal family, not your around Block family. They can't waste time, money, and publicity with those kind of games. Are you delusional? They are not some Kardashian. This wedding is happening. They would never risk the public fall out behind this and Meghan's gained enough attention to have everyone knocking on her door for an interview. Why risk her going the Diana route and talkIng?

The let them be thing works when they're dating. When Harry has to get permission and official things start happening for a wedding, you've reached the no turning back stage. Again, this is no regular family.

lefthandscissors said...

@manhattan vibe

THANK. YOU. I mean.. I don't get the hate towards her. I'm not putting myself out there and saying "oh my god I love her to bits!" either, but she is who she is. If the event is referring to the youth radio appearance in Brixton then someone has that shit flipped the wrong damn way. It was PACKED AF. I work all over London and had colleagues who were complaining about the crowds waiting on the surrounding streets just to see their car pass. All of the papers (including the legit papers.. LOL) and BBC stated that it was the largest turnout for a royal engagement in Brixton.

I like how these people have selective memory about the royals. I mean, just about all of them (except for Edward and Sophie, afaik) have had some pervy shit come rolling out of their collective closets. Hell, Andrew is still friends with fucking Epstein but no one gives a flying fuck about that.. no.. it's OMFG basic Meghan. PUHLEASE. I think we need to be far more ocupado with Andrew (and f'ing "I'll do just about anything for cash... including take $15k as a gift from Epstein!!" Fergie) than who the hell Harry is marrying. I mean FFS people. PRIORITIES!!

Manhattan Vibe said...

I like Enty but Hollywood doesn't have shit on the royal family. Two different worlds. If they didn't like her, she would have never gotten this far. Simple as that. This idea that she could hide anything from them, in this day and age, is hilarious and considering we've never seen any pictures or have a clear timeline should be obviously that it's made up. Either way, I like her and I think the British media is going to give her Harry's treatment- the fuck up who can't get it right in comparison to William who did it all perfectly. Comparisons will be endless and the not so passive racism will be on display.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Could you source me a bit on this “the largest turnout for a Royal engagement in Brixton”?

Spent a few minutes over lunch trying to track it down without success. The current video on the BBC site doesn’t mention it, nor does the BBC online story, which shows an image of a small crowd - maybe 30 people.

The BBC online story, the Sun and the Guardian all say “hundreds” of people were there, but don’t show crowd images, or people waiting on surrounding streets for a car to pass.

Could you recommend another source?

lefthandscissors said...

Here's a video (had to do digging on my own lunch as well, LOL).. you don't see the crowd until the second half of the video.. there's a lot of cameras but there's quite a few people behind the temp fencing as well (it was the "largest turnout in Brixton"... Only posting because I remember seeing it on last Tuesday's evening news.. https://youtu.be/MSUeqAxUNIU

I don't really get the bile towards her. Give her a f'ing chance. As I said before, there are far slimier royals that no one seems to give a toss about at this point. Who cares if she has a past.. Diana didn't and we see what happened there. *shrug*

Nutty_Flavor said...

Thank you. For anyone else who's looking but has a limited lunch hour, the best crowd shots are at 3:30 and again after 5:40.

The whole crowd is not visible, and it's hard to tell who is media (lots of media) and who is an ordinary British citizen, but I would put it at 150-200 people if you combine both groups.

The truth is, a lack of a crowd doesn’t mean Meghan isn’t popular. The Brixton event could have been poorly publicized, or the publicity might have been restricted for security reasons. It might have been at an inconvenient time of day for many working people to attend, or held in a place where it was difficult for a large crowd to gather.

Also, media outlets tend to copy each other’s crowd numbers. If one outlet had said 300 people, one had said 450, and one had said 700, I’d believe they were all doing their own reporting and coming up with imperfect estimates. Everyone saying “hundreds” sounds like several outlets were relying on a single report.

As a journalist, if I were covering this event I would definitely have focused on the British subjects waiting to meet their new princess. Particularly when some openly racist public figures have recent spoken out against that potential princess. Journalists love conflict. “Look, some people say she’s not welcome, but these people waiting love her!”

Insert image of dozens? hundreds? of supporters here. This wasn't done; not sure if that was sloppy reporting, a lower-than-expected turnout, or something else.


LizOz said...

I think the reason the royal family has tolerated her this far is that she makes them look less out of touch at a time when their role/necessity/expense continues to be questioned. Agree also with the points that Harry isn’t as desirable as he might seem at face value - especially for girls of his generation, fame and money don’t outweigh the burden of role and publicity (as we saw w Cressy et al). It will be interesting to see if they make it down the aisle - I don’t think either of them is a catch...she seems a little too climbery to last in that family but who knows..maybe they are really “modernizing”

lefthandscissors said...

@Nutty_Flavor

The original story from the BBC last week had loads of crowd shots, that (and my colleagues bitching about congestion in the area) was really the only reason why I was like "WTF" with this BI. Personally, IDGAF who he marries, I'm not salty at Meghan for snagging him (actually I'm more like "good luck with that..").. but the people who plant these clearly have some kind of thirst (it's blatantly obvious..). There's a reason Cressida didn't hang around and Chelsy bounced (they both didn't want the public intrusion), that being said they also were of the demographic that royals have tended to marry into. Meghan is not.. far from it. I don't know if we have some pissed off Daily Mail readers sending in shit, Meghan's ex-husband or step-sister making up some shit, or what, but it reeks of jealousy IMO. Good luck to both of them.. they're going to need it.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

Manhattan vibe: if you ever come to London, go to Top Shop on Oxford Circus. You will see 100 Markles , and 99 of them will have an edge over Me-again.

I am not talking about looks, but aura. Kate might not be a beauty Queen, but she radiates kindness and genuineness. She looks real, her smiles are real and she's lovely to look at.
Markle is super common, with her Hollywood actress smile and Instagram poses. She was blowing kisses for suck's sake, like she's just won a pageant. As common as muck.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Yeah, I dunno. You play in the big leagues, you get big league headaches. The British royals are very big league.

In general, I get the impression that the press has been more positive than the population at large. The coverage of the Brixton appearance was adoring, particularly from fashion media like Elle.

A few months ago, when I saw that group photo of all the "Deal or No Deal" ladies with their glittery dresses and big hair, I couldn't help but think: what if one of these cheesy white spokesmodels had been Harry's choice for a partner?

Same marital, educational, and professional history, same U.S. nationality, but basic white girl.

Would the people who support Meghan so vehemently have supported Jessica or Ashley or Crystal or whoever as much?

Halloweenie said...

We can all google Melania and get an eyeful of nudie pictures and some lesbian ones where she's writhing with other nude ladies. Unless the T minions have had them scrubbed from the internet , I'm too lazy to look and of course there are the rumors of her past illustrious "career "So are we being two faced as per , looking at the past of our own first lady, or should we just call it what it is: racism with a tinge of judgemental hypocrisy? I hope they do divorce and he dates rhianna or someone even darker next. I would love to see the hysterically funny foaming at the mouth .

Nutty_Flavor said...

LOL. Nobody cares about Melania's past - they're too busy having conniption fits about her husband.

But you're proving my point. Your undertone is "If you don't like Meghan Markle, you are a RACIST."

True for some, I'm sure, but not true for everyone. As I said, an American white girl with the same personal history would probably be even less popular, particularly among the fashionistas.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

Wait a minute Halloweenie - if I don't like Me-again then I'm racist and judgemental, but you not linking Melania does NOT make you racist or judgemental? I thought all of this women empowerment bs was for all women, or is it only for those that aren't married to a president you despise? LOL, you are such an imbecile.

John Doe said...

Wow, a swinging bachelor at 40 or 45 is pretty sad? I'm not so sure about that one. It used to be an expected thing in our culture since the distant past that people would marry and breed by a certain age. Many people nowadays reject that mentality and are choosing not to marry or have any children at any age. I don't know that that is a bad thing. Being in relationships and marriage are not for everybody, and that's probably the reason why so many marriages end in divorce and why many who divorce don't marry again.

Are we 100% sure that the event that Enty is talking about is the thing that took place in Brixton? I doubt it. The blind says that it was an event, and that William and Kate had done the same venue with a much bigger crowd. The Brixton thing was hardly an 'event'. They were just walking around on the street, waving and chatting to people...toured a radio station...more walking around and waving. And Meghan didn't do anything to upstage Harry in any of the videos that I have seen. The blind specifically stays that she worked hard to get the attention on herself rather than him. That did not happen in Brixton. Seems to me as though Enty is talking about a more structured type of event to which people are invited---something that William and Kate had attended as a couple a year ago that had a much bigger turnout.

I'm really surprised that people here take such exception to the idea that Enty does have the scoop on these folks. These people live in a fantasy world where they do little for themselves because they have lots of servants and minions around them all the time tending to their every want. The downside to having such people around you all the time doing things for you is that they get to see, hear, and know private things about you...often, from you yourself. And people do gossip...just like we are doing on this site. Yes, they are sworn to secrecy but they still discretely talk about what they know. That's how the tabloids get juicy stories, and most of the time the rumors in the gossip are true. It really doesn't matter who you are, as long as one other person finds out something about you then its no longer a secret. Harry and Meghan are no exception to this.

And why would people NOT be whispering about Meghan's past? She used to be an escort and she comes from a trashy family. These things were never a secret, its just that people are expressing shock that Harry would actually go through with marrying her. He has dated and screwed many whores and other assorted low class types in the past, but he has never offered to marry them. If the stories are true and there are naked pictures and a video then of course they are going to gossip about it. I have heard that the website that has the naked photos are waiting until the wedding plans are finalized and the date draws closer before dropping the pics on the internet. Perhaps a bit mean, but oh so funny!

Bobby Digital said...

I think the whole eating the bloody body cake with soros’ son was just an “appetizer” for the real shit she will have to do with the royal family sickos. They make Soros look like a saint

Manhattan Vibe said...

@bored

You’ve never meet Meghan in person.

Majority of the journalist and person who has met her has said that she has this calming aura that makes her personable, charming and she’s very beautiful (not only on the outside). You don’t see that with Meghan because you don’t want too. Kate always came off as fake and her interactions with people show little effort or care for who they are and what they do. That’s not only a problem with her but also with William. He puts little effort into his work. Harry, on the other hand, seems more hands on, charming and just a people person (he got that from his mother). The same thing has been said about Meghan.

The DJ from Representz Radio said that her and Harry came there with questions and they did their homework on them, hugged them, and treated them like friends. When has that ever been said about Kate? Or William?

Kate’s smile is clownish. It looks like someone told her to “LOOK ALIVE” and well, she over does it. That’s not to say I don’t like Kate but I feel like she’s a woman outside of her element a lot. She’s not a people person and never will be. I pity her because everyone wants her to be Diana 2.0 but she doesn't have the personality, care or charm for it. It's not her.

LizOz said...

That’s why we come to cdan *drops hint* 😘

LizOz said...

@halloweenie they’re all bad

Manhattan Vibe said...

@Nutty_Flavor

It’s not that if you don’t like Meghan you’re being a racist but I do notice that biracial, black or just some minorities in general have to “prove themselves” to people and their success is often written off and the worse things about them are believed because it’s not palpable for them to be good and successful people- there is always something else behind it. We see it with Obama, Michelle, Beyonce- the list goes on. I will even add women (as a whole) to the bunch, we’re so quick to believe and see (no matter how incorrect we are) the worse in them while willingly turning a blind eye to the BS of others.

Everyone is so quick to think the worst of Meghan with no proof but “blinds” (that magically appeared when she started dating Harry) and Tumblr stories (that repeat the same shit) because you can’t fathom that Harry would date and now marry a woman like her. She has to be some vixen that has him caught up in her web. It’s typical and reveals our own prejudice, rather that is racial or sex based doesn’t matter much.

She’s been on Suits for years but none of this stuff has been mentioned before. All of a sudden she dates Harry and it’s WOW- she was an escort and a terrible person and I was just like “WHAT?! Where is this coming from?”. I've been following her from her start on Suits and I've never heard a bad word about her. Like Never. She dates Harry and sudden she's boiling children!!

plot said...

"With Harry, she's a globetrotting humanitarian."

Meghan had an African charity that she sponsored and visited long before she met Harry.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

Manhatta Vibe: now I just feel sad for you. You seem a bit too invested in Me-again Markle, a D rated actress and ex hooker, to come across as somebody I should take seriously. Are you going to write essays about her every time she comes up? I stopped reading after the first sentence to be honest.
It's nice for her that she has one fan though.
But you, seriously, try getting a life darling.

Manhattan Vibe said...

@Bored

Feel sad for the people that sit on the internet spreading and believing lies about someone they actually know nothing about because their own lives pales in comparison. That’s who I feel sad for: Skippy, Felix and Jersey. NYC from Tumblr got the message and moved on when egg got splattered on her face from her lies. The rest, and you, should do the same..

She’s D-Rated and yet the “blinds” on here called her B-List. Which one is it?

You were never going to like her and that has nothing to do with Meghan and everything to do with you.

Have a good day, Boring!

Manhattan Vibe said...

@leftandthescissors

I don’t get it but I’ve realized that people who hate her don’t get it either. Ask them and they’ll site something they’ve read on the Internet (a bunch of stuff from her past that magically was found out with nothing but BI and Anonymous post to “confirm”). I remember when some called her a fake feminist and claimed her letter she wrote to a company about gender and tv commercials was false (she said it in the UN speech). Then they got engaged and the video surfaced and all of a sudden everyone was hush about it.

The Royals are beyond messy and not a thing Meghan has done will compare to some of their stuff. Andrew alone is a whole ass mess. You just scratch the surface with his garbage. Of course some of it is made up (see Harry not being Charles son) but some of it is true and old, old news.

If anything, I don’t wish the Royal family on any woman. Kate, Meghan, Diana and Fergie go through/ have gone through hell for the men they marry/love.

My only hope is that Harry seems to be a bit different from the rest (Charles and William), he is not passive. His letter in November showed me that he’s not going to take things lightly and will push back against others for Meghan. And I think they are equals in their relationship. I always felt that Charles and William view their wives as a bit inferior to him. Not Charles with Camilla but definitely Charles with Diana.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Hey, time will tell. If Meghan is indeed a lovely person, that will become apparent over time and she will win over some of her detractors. Better that then the other way around - to start out strong and become hated. That’s what happened to Princess Alexandra in Denmark, who is also biracial. (Part Chinese). The Danes adored her when she arrived and quickly learned Danish, but she played hooky on her charity duties while still taking public money, and now she is detested.

In the mean time, @Manhattan Vibe, wouldn’t you be happier if you stopped reading Floofy or Felix or Fatty or whoever on Tumblr? Nobody here reads them and I’m sure no one at The Firm reads them either. And they seem to be making you upset.

cecelia obrien said...

Manhattan Vibe is that Meghan again? She cannot stand have her false narrative disrupted. This is a business arrangement one she forced. Got a job yet Megsy (or Manhattan Vibe or San or Michelle Bell or Lisa Ling any of the pseudonyms you use)?

Behavior is the issue here and she has a long list of deplorable behaviors not tabloid or blog innuendo. But she tries to distract from the behavior by screaming racist or WOC.

She used both Trevor and Cory to climb and then cheated and dumped both men. She has no resect for the Monarchy nor the British people as witnessed by her remarks here and her behavior. Yet she expects the British people to fund her fantasy luxury lifestyle. She attaches herself to a male to get the fame and attention she could not get on her own yet she wants you to believe she is an independent feminist. She is a fake and that she is will certainly be revealed.

She does not like the idea that her real self her real past is going to come out so she has her narcissistic rage fits on comments and fake twitter accounts.

Manhattan Vibe said...

@Nutty Flavor

I know you guys don’t read them but they submit Blinds here. It’s possible to submit Blinds to Enty. I know because Aliasvaughn used to submit them on Kerry Washington/Tony Goldwyn blinds. I don’t recall any reveals but all the language was always about them and she too would use it as “Proof” of things.

I try not to go there- their bad for your skin, honestly. It’s just interesting to see how long they can hold up with their denial.
Their nastiness pisses me off and it’s why I try hard to avoid them. They call Meghan all kinds of animals and stuff- it’s disgustingly racist. However, I can assure you that 90 percent of the “bad stuff” out there originates from the stuff they’ve said. They go to RoyalDish and RoyalGossip (see windsor2 who post their stuff) to get word out. It’s pretty sad and Skippy actually got blocked by Richard Palmer (Royal Journalist) on twitter for her hounding.

Wait for the Blind Item about Meghan having a third marriage that was annulled. They’re trying to claim she got married and it was annulled to Joe-something (Italian). He took her to prom.

This one was obvious because of the “almost 20 people” that only they seemed to have said arrived. I had to say something because it was like “Jesus, Does Enty accept Blinds from Anyone”? It also showed how bullshit these are.

Manhattan Vibe said...

@ Cecelia Obrien
The inevitable “Is she Meghan?” post!

Yeah, sure. I’m Meghan Markle located in NYC. Check the IP address, if you can.

She also has a twttier profile that she tweets from with a location in NYC. She RT’ed something wishing Michelle Obama and Betty White a happy birthday, try to find it!

Are you kidding me?

LMAO! \

Narcissistic? Ya’ll nuts use that all the time and I don’t think you know what it truly means.


Deanne Masters said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
it took forever said...

Nothing MM has done can compare to the shit load of scandals the royals have weathered.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

Manhattan vibe: you getting payed to write all that garbage, but not enough. NOBODY likes MM THIS much, not even Harry.

Manhattan Vibe said...

@Bored

You flatter me.

Yes, Meghan is paying me in the non-existent Pay Pal Account that I have. If you know a way to get paid to defend people online- please let me know. I'm sure the link is sitting somewhere next to the "paid protesters" paid via Soro's link.

Clearly he likes her enough to marry her and he sure as hell liked it enough to release a statement via Kensington Palace in November of 2016. But let me guess, her and her lawyer forced him to do so?

BTW, I've officially made it to Skippy's tumblr! They referenced your comment too if you want to check it out!

iamstillskippy.tumblr.com

Manhattan Vibe said...

Also To Windsor2 who thinks she's a special bird who got the attention of "Meghan", I referenced you when you posted their links on Royal Gossip. Not saying you called her animal, they did- unless you're Skippy or Felix (Jersey stays away from that stuff-Skippy is the number one offender).

And ask your mods if there is an request for a new user under Manhattan Vibe. I think I sent it on Sunday (maybe Monday). They can see my IP address. The email is yahoo and the IP is located in NY.

MichiganMama59 said...

I think he is line to the throne after William's kids.

MichiganMama59 said...

She looks like Melissa Gorga.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days

 

Video