Sunday, February 04, 2018

Blind Item #1 - Arranged Couplings

This actress is someone all of you know. I can't give her usual identifier here because all of you would guess her in a second. I would venture to say almost everyone in the world knows who she is. Her position in life allows her a lot of freedom. She has many people working for her on a variety of different visas and passports. Many of those people have diplomatic passports even though they are not diplomats or really entitled to carry them. Instead, those who are holding them in her house are young female teens. Not super young, but 15-17 or so. There are about four of them and they come from a couple different countries. Those teens are there solely as sexual companions for a couple of her children. It is the strangest thing ever. The actress rotates the teens every six months or so because she doesn't want the children to get too emotionally close to them.

182 comments:

Violet said...

Angelin Jolie

cc423 said...

Think you got it Violet

Manhattan said...

Angie

Jen S said...

Angelina Jolie?

LondonGirl said...

Jolie, for sure. She's fucked up.

nancer said...

i'm afraid i don't believe half the shit i see here anymore.

Krab said...

+1 @nancer

lab lover said...

Must be why she seems to only take the younger ones out. The older boys are home being otherwise occupied.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

She's "rotating" her children's friends so they don't get "too attached"? What a fucking idiot. She's inflicting the TCK experience where it's not necessary: http://www.cmhnetwork.org/media-center/morning-zen/the-trouble-with-third-culture-kids

They will have attachment issues when they grow up.

Also, isn't this technically sex trafficking of minors?

This is so incredibly messed up.

austin said...

+1 nancer & Krab

Tierney said...

.....yup, what nancer said.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

My siblings are still emotionally-attached to our childhood nannies/maids to this day (we see them during the holidays, even). WTF.

Lau Ra said...

I won't be surprised ..

FrenchGirl said...

Jolie.
It is sex trafficking

Guesser said...

If this stuff is true why doesn't Brad do something? She must really have something on him.

Trisha said...

Isn't this considered trafficking?

Sara, Making It Work said...

Pam Anderson
She's been up to some sketchy international shit lately.

Sarahlou said...

Don't believe a word of this whoever it's about

Maz Misandrist said...

This site has gone to shit. I remember when you could troll Trump/clinton, love or hate the count (where is he?) ,safely say that Chris Cornell was washed up or the LP guy a never was. Now you get psychos foaming about NWO pedo rings. As a social worker I know there is dark shit out there but as a Jew who followed the 'holocaust on trial' before it got made into a shit movie I have seen how little evidence there needs to be for people to believe in conspiracies. This site hit the mark with HW JF & KS but they weren't alone. Thankgod for popbitch otherwise I will get no fun gossip toswitch my mind off after a day of dealing with the REAL child abuse that is actually happening that doesnt get enough attention.
Also love AJ but what a weird blind

ancoranonhocapito said...

Here's the thinking:

"Gosh. My children are masturbating! MY children! Like... oh! like c-common people who can't get laid! I must put an end to this. It cannot be that MY kids resort to this."

This isn't about the kids, it's about her.

ancoranonhocapito said...

@Maz Misandrist: "but as a Jew who..." stopped reading right there.

Annyoung Bluth said...

WTF?!?!

So Outrageous said...

part of Brad Pitt's issue with her was how she was raising the kids. He wanted them to have structured normal schooling. But the kids are home schooled. What opportunities do they have to make friends and form special relationships with other kids their age?

BIBS said...

@nancer I’m so with you on this! The blinds are becoming ever more outrageous and implausible. People can write in with anything now and it will get published

GeeWallyThatWouldBeWrong said...

She needs the surrogates to prevent "incest". Those kids are unrelated, adopted a sex soup.

Neil said...

ancorano, wow.

Maz Misandrist, you mentioned the holocaust on trial and the movie....what movie do you mean, please.

Thanks.

Her said...

Now see, this blind makes ne want to tear that shit down. Not fair. These children need to be protected.

Rafael said...

Jolie, Clooney, Penn and lots of others are on CIA payroll. And you must be a satanic pedo piece of shit to be involved with CIA. So...it´s probably true.

Krab said...

I'm sure Angie is doing it on direct orders from the Clinton Foundation. Probably the teens are whoever Killary and Huma are finished with for now. David Geffen has the teens shipped in via his yacht Rising Sun through the house in New Orlenas, after their parents are killed via injectable cancer. Jerry Van Dyke found out about this nefarious scheme and was killed on direct orders of George Clooney.

IT ALL FITS

Maz Misandrist said...

The movie is Denial, here is the book it is based on http://books.wwnorton.com/books/The-Holocaust-on-Trial/ very good read.

Tweet_That_ish said...

I wonder what it takes to get a blind on this site.. Is this heresay, a friend-of-a-friend, a "reliable source" or an assumption?? Some of these blinds are gossipy and others like these are dangerous accusations.. I hope there is a lot of vetting before posting.

Maz Misandrist said...

Blame millennials! If they just listened to Angsty rock music Chris Cornells wife wouldnt have had to shoot John Lennon

Terry Teratoma said...

+111 nancer, krab, & maz.

Do Tell said...

I would have said Salma Hayek but she just has the one kid. Who else has billionaire ties?

Malignment said...

yeah Krab, this is so crazy! because it’s not like there isn’t video and transcript in huff post article of Brad Pitt talking about becoming a satanist.

and Angelina talking about fucked up sexual deviancy...

ohhh, wait.

https://youtu.be/skAlSsxFaYA?t=3m26s
https://youtu.be/oSK0JFVTUc0

Sd Auntie said...

Right Max! Real child abuse is rampant and I prefer the same gossip as what you stated. Our jobs affect us in every way and to see rich people exploit, traffic and abuse kids makes my heart hurt.

LEANNE NORMAN said...

I swear half the authors of these blinds are failed script writer's, sending in rejected idea's to get revenge on Hollywood.

Sd Auntie said...

Cant stand Benza and his political agenda. Sorry

rosie riveter said...

Krab, what are you going to do when Geffen is outed for the creepy pedo he is?
And also: why are you here? Is there someone on your end holding a gun to your head each and every day, 24/7 telling you to "Read and Comment on CDAN or else! "
Just curious.

rosie riveter said...

What does you being a Jew have to do with it?
I, as a lesbian, would like to know.

Krab said...

@Malignment, that CLEARLY wasn't a joke, you fucking moron.

@rosie, One, I've been here for more than ten years and I have zero plans to leave. Fuck off, newbie. Two, I am hoping that Enty goes back to actual believable blinds instead of InfoWars fan fiction. Until then, I'm just enjoying myself mocking you credulous idiots.

And I don't know if Geffen is a pedo. Neither do you. He's a scary dude and I certainly believe he had that journalist killed. But a pedo--nope, I don't try and convict people based on sketchy blinds.

GoogleSleuth said...

This is the kind of blind that makes me question Enty’s sources and what kind of axe they have to grind with the person in question. Sigh.

Alfalfa and Darla said...

Yup, Jolie.

Sierra said...

Looks like somebody's publicists are on double-time weekend working trying to stop the rot

Alfalfa and Darla said...

Jolie's has perfected her public PR persona to perfection. The world over thinks she's an angel sent from God himself. She's nuttier than I am. Each of her children have their own nannie from their own country of origin, except her own biological ones. Brad knows how evil and mentally unstable she is, therefore, if he were to blow the whistle on her he knows she would either have him have an accident or ruin his career. Unfortunately, when they first met as most men do he thought with the wrong head. Jolie's own mother had mental health issues that were never addressed and passed those onto her children, throw Hollywood, Jon Voigt into it and you have another sewer out there. Borderline Personality Disorder she acknowledged being diagnosed with along with a few others. FWIW
Those a my useless 2 cents worth.
Carry on.

pwal said...

How would he know? Dude is probably staying as far away from her property as possible, given what happened on the private plane.

Now if the younger kids drop the dime to him and he doesn't intervene, then yeah, she's got some dirt on him.

Maz Misandrist said...

"As a jewish lesbian" I feel the need to explain. It was a clumsy shorthand for the personal interest I had in holocaust denial. Nothing more, it was about 3 in the morning when I wrote it. Blame insomnia

MichiganMama59 said...

Don't base everything on one movie or book. I don't care if you are Jewish, gay, straight, Polish, Italian, short or tall.

Itttt said...

Definitely, positively 100% the poster child of Clowns in America’s Operation Mockingbird - Angelina Jolie.

plot said...

+gazillion Krab and Maz

@rosie

"what are you going to do when Geffen is outed for the creepy pedo he is? "

And you imagine this site will have something do to with that? What if he is charged with being a boring old sexual abuser? Will you be disappointed you can't throw that pedo ax around to hit all your favorite targets?

Angela said...

It's actually becoming obvious that the site has some kind of commercial and political agenda.

The public reveals about people like Weinstein, Singer or Spacey followed years of innuendos posted not just here but on many places. There was even a TV show that made fun of Spacey's presumed antics every week. Everybody inside the industry has heard someone who knows someone who had witnessed something. And in the end, it wasn't this blog that threw Weinstein under a bus. It was a series of comprehensive articles put together by the New York Times, and the New Yorker, publications that some of you believe to be implied in cover up stories for political conspiracies, and it took some real journalistic work where both publications put their credibility at stake.

Of course, the problem is that, when your most reliable sources for blind items get publicly outed, you want to keep the traffic, the attention and maybe the number of ad views the site is bringing. So, you have to keep the blind items churning. In Hollywood, when you produce a sequel, you're supposed to increase the stakes. So, here comes the new Weinstein, David Geffen. This time, he's gay and full on pedophile. Or meet the new Courtney Love (nobody was giving a fuck anymore about the regular one), Chris Cornell's widow.
By the way, how come you all assumed the stories about Courtney Love murdering her husband were true? Cobain was a heroin addict, who also suffered from terrible back pains, and attempted suicide while on tour (without Love being near him). It was obvious he was on a self-destructive spiral. And yet, you all jump on the Chris Cornell bandwagon, even if the guy hadn't done anything of interest since Audioslave or the Casino Royale song, more than a decade ago.

Basically, I'd say that 20 or 25 percent of the BIs in the last few weeks are based on reality. Mostly the ones about post-awards parties, when there are multiple witnesses, and reporters who can't write about everything they saw but are happy to spill the beans off the record.
Then you have the "Yes, but we already know that" stories, that rehash previous blind items (giving them more credibility over time, as if it were a continuing story) or rewrite stories that are already public (the mayor of Nashville, Mark Hamill visiting a sick kid as Luke Skywalker, etc.). These are the stories that make little sense in themselves, but can be used to vouch for the overall credibility of the site. "I'm not sure about this story, but what the site wrote about so and so was or so and so ended up being confirmed, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt." Of course, because these "blind" items had been publicly corroborated before they were published.

Angela said...

But the most "interesting" trend lately has been political stories. First, you get allegations that basically very major player in Hollywood is a child molester who basically spends their entire day either raping little kids, finding ideas for projects that would allow them to work with little kids they will eventually rape, or making plans to get traces of their raping deleted. Sure, Hollywood is a cesspool, but if just half of the stories were true, the honest guys who work in the industry and know what actually happens would be crushed by guilt and shame, leave the place, kill themselves or tip the police (you know, there may be one or two proper cops who would be ready to make a difference and get rid of the rotten apples). Not posting gossip stories, with a lot of fluff and stuff about Mariah Carey, on a semi-commercial site. Anyway, the message is clear: you can't trust anything coming from Hollywood. Or the Democrats. Remember that Obama had a ton of male lovers in his youth, and Jesse Jackson Jr. was the one who got them "retired".

Then, there are the subtle hints that there are some new guys in town, prospective candidates, who are ready to change things. Like the good Republican guy you should vote for, because his wife was raped by Don Henley when she was underage.

I will give the writers for this site some credit. Despite a few Jeffrey Epstein cameos here and there, these are not the standard tinfoil hat theories about Pizzagate, the Clinton Foundation, or other stuff rehashed to death by Fox News or the National Enquirer that the MAGA morons crowd likes to hear. Not that they won't write about it in the comments, but there's more variety in the blind items posted here.
Also, the guys who try to break your illusion that this blog's major stories are as true as the gospel are automatically plants or liars who try to protect their masters. By the way, did you know that drinking sulfuric acid is bad for your health? If you don't believe me, try it for yourself. As I am liar paid by various people, you must be sure I'm lying on everything, mustn't you?

Krab said...

+1 @Angela

Lots of the blinds here make perfect sense. Beyonce made sure that Jay-Z's mistresses were seated away from her at the Grammys? Sure, makes sense. Mariah Carey is completely out of it? Not hard to swallow. Fantasia Barrino's husband wants to make a porno with her? Yeah, why not.

The political /everyone's a pedo stuff is just plain loonballs, though. Mark Salling was killed right before going to jail because he was about to give up names? THAT'S NOT HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS. Anyone with half a functioning brain cell and/or common sense knows that. "Sure, we'll give you a plea deal, Mark, and a light sentence. But you'll have to pinky swear to give us names of Hollywood pedos before you go to jail. Promise? Mmmkay, that's all we need from you now."

plot said...

"The public reveals about people like Weinstein, Singer or Spacey followed years of innuendos posted not just here but on many places."

These rumors are almost 20 years old at this point. Gossip boards had many stories, naming names, which is where I feel Enty steals most of his BIs from.

"It was a series of comprehensive articles put together by the New York Times, and the New Yorker, publications that some of you believe to be implied in cover up stories for political conspiracies"

NO SHIT! That is the most galling thing of all, that posters here cannot acknowledge the need for journalistic standards which will bear fruit, such as throwing Weinstein out of his rapey closet, not some weird little gossip site like this.

Not much Enty writes is new. He will appear to confirm conspiracy theories so he can build another 200+ comment board. The cynical new Enty is not much fun like the old one.

Sd Auntie said...

Ok ace. Thanks for the constructive criticism. Most of the stuff here is true and some are not. Nicely written though

Sadie Slays said...

Wow, this blind really triggered the shills today.

I'm not sure why any of the non-paid, genuine commentators find this blind so outrageous. From a strictly logistical standpoint, using vetted escorts that they have control over reduces the risk that kids will end up in tabloid headlines or in blackmail situations. I don't agree with the practice, but can understand why an actress who is very, very careful about protecting her image might take such extreme measures.

Terry Teratoma said...

I enjoy this site because it can be fun, but it gets WAAAAY out of hand sometimes, so it's good to know there are rational people on here.

AAnon said...

This is obviously Kim kardashian. "actress" is just a code so it's not too easy to guess. Justin timberlake & Obama are also in on it.

Watch the paid shills & Clinton worshippers deny it, that just proves it true!

Maz Misandrist said...

I wish I could take back saying as a jew. Maybe I will see if I can edit. I will stand by the book as a great read, illuminating how denialists create their stories and the brilliant research that was used to expose David Irving as a fraud. Whether the subject is of interest or not it is a handy resource for the layperson trying to parse truth from constant propaganda thrown at us from right and left. I think a healthy scepticism of what gets posted here is warranted.

Krab said...

Here's why I think it's bullshit. Pax, for example, is FOURTEEN years old. I wouldn't parent the way Angie parents--I would ensure the kids went to school and had a stable home life instead of traveling all over the place--but I do think she's probably a good mom who loves her kids. This impression gained solely from the media, don't know her, never met her.

I don't think a loving mother who wants what's best for her kids would hire young teenagers to sexually service her 14 year old son. Nor do I think Angelina, who seems actually to care about kids who aren't her own/refugees/etc, would sexually traffic foreign children.

That's all. It doesn't make sense to me. It sounds like made up bullshit to get clicks. Presumably the same to other people.

TwoDots said...

Not a fan of Jolie by any means and she needs to get those kids socialized and in full-time education pronto, but I don’t believe this blind for a sec. Sorry Enty.

DDonna Tarttty said...

Angela, Angela, Krab, Plot....Boom, Boom, Boom, right in a row. What a coincidence!

This blind OBVIOUSLY hit the bullseye today. The more I see those names, the more I know the site is on the right track.

Anybody who's followed intelligence asset Jolie's career knows how fucked up she is. All the satanists, as they rise, have to make their public pledge, usually treated like a joke, like the Rock did on SNL last season.

The increasing histrionics and pushback among the naysayers brings me pleasure. The more they protest, the truer I know the blind is. They are speaking to and among themselves in a sinister circlejerk, but that's all.

plot said...

"I'm not sure why any of the non-paid, genuine commentators find this blind so outrageous."

I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't demand real proof, rather than a stupid BI, when accusations are tossed about on things like child trafficking which is what it sounds like Enty is trying to do here with Jolie.

What is your limit? When do you think that gossip (in the lame form of a BI) has gone too far and crossed the line into libel and forming witch hunts with absolutely no concrete evidence? When do you need proof of a really horrible accusation or is it all about the delicious gossipy thrill for you?

" All the satanists"

Looky there! Someone is high on the drug of Revelations!

Krab said...

Well, I'm outed. Like Brad, I sold my soul to Satan and like Angie, I sacrifice children in Illuminati rituals. HAIL SATAN!

You people aren't joking? You're actually that stupid?

SteveD said...

This would be an insane level of exposure to create by shuttling underage girls in and out internationally with suspiciously high level passports. An overkill solution to the problem of having hormonal teenagers. Like I have an infestation of rats in my house, so I'm going to smuggle in chemical weapons from Hezbollah to take care of them.

SteveD said...

This site is sober and sane compared to Lipstick Alley. They believe every celebrity is mind-controlled and many of them are cloned. Also, every time any family member of a celebrity dies in any manner, it was a human sacrifice that is necessary to rise in the Illuminati ranks.

Maz Misandrist said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Maz Misandrist said...

I was just reading about the satanic panic of the eighties and this Donna tarttt person shows up. The only child abuse that happened in those cases was perpetrated by nut jobs who saw Satan behind every door.
Also where do I sign up to get paid? Should I look to see if Lipstick Alley is worse?

totaji said...

Was it George Clooney? Or was it Jimmy Page or Chuck Berry?

just sayin' said...

I'm amused that anyone could find this blind so hard to believe yet get lost chasing every mirage of a rabbit hole that Alex Jones creates. Angelina Jolie has created an insular world for herself and her kids, who she calls her best friends. Stories told that her kids beg her for outside friends, that her older sons are addicted to online porn. These are deeply emotionally neglected children. Angie's a control freak who is trying to control her kids into adulthood, and it's not going to go well. There will be "Mommy Dearest" style books. You can't hold your own child to an NDA. We know she hires foreign "nannies" or "au peres", this is barely even a blind.

Maz Misandrist said...

What public pledge? What Satanists?

Mary Ann said...

Jolie's own words, “One of my boyfriends lived with me at my mum’s house when I was just 14. It was the smartest thing my mother could have done because, this way, we weren’t hanging out in a park together,” she said. “We lived like a married couple for two years. By the time I was 16, I wanted my freedom and wanted to focus on work.”

and “If anybody ever tells me that I am a mother to them like my mum was to me, it will be a great compliment.”

Like mother, like daughter?

Miss Chloe said...

Folks don't want to believe the worst of anyone let alone all of humanity. No one wants to think the child abuse in Hollywood is that damn bad. It is. No one wants to believe that multiple actresses and actors have been sexually assaulted/raped/abused, yet how many came forward as a part of the #MeToo movement for reals? Given that I've been raped and most of my female friends have been raped, yes I would say that it is really that damn common. I have literally read a blind and seen it play out less than a few months later. Are there political agendas with blinds? Yes. But it seems pretty equal as I've seen blinds about both Clinton and Trump. Does Enty have his own biases against certain people? Yes. Are some blinds probably paid for by someone who wants to spread rumors and burn someone like the ones written about Grant Gustin? Yes. I can actually crack blinds by viewing regular pics from Google without CDAN or AGC simply based on body language analysis. If you don't like reading CDAN blinds, then stop.

amused bush said...

But a lot of those theories get moved to the Conspiracy Alley and there are many posters who take the Illuminati musings with a grain of salt. Yes, there are a ton of crazy threads, but categorized accordingly.

Plus, let’s not pretend like a certain site (i.e. this one) doesn’t get blinds from those threads.

just sayin' said...


That quote sums it up perfectly, Mary Ann. She thinks she's doing the right thing...it keeps her kids from making outside friends or looking for girls to date. And while I believe we're right that underage sex isn't healthy for emotional development and is of course illegal, Angie clearly doesn't hold that value to heart, quite the opposite. And while it is human trafficking to import girlfriends for her sons, you can bet there are teen girls in Vietnam and Cambodia who don't have to be kidnapped to come over here to "work" for Angelina Jolie for 6 months. Like Epstein's girls, friends refer friends, eager for the easy money and glamourous travel.

DDonna Tarttty said...

I customarily don't address the trolls, shills and probable bots, but since one of them upped the ante and mentioned the "satanic panic," and I've actually been studying it FOR YEARS, thought it worth mentioning that, for example, in the McMartin Preschool case, the jury agreed that THE CHILDREN HAD BEEN ABUSED. Let me say that again: A jury acknowledged the children had been sexually abused. Again: The McMartin preschool kids WERE ABUSED.

What they could not determine beyond reasonable doubt, is that the "teachers" were responsible. Many jurors thought so, but they could not reach unanimity on "beyond reasonable doubt."

I suggest everyone interested in learning more about this read David McGowan's excellent chapter from his essays about child rape across the USA and the world, the specific segment devoted to the McMartin case. I bet you learn a lot.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/pedophocracypart4mcmartinpreschoolaug01.shtml

Thank you so much for brining up the "satanic panic," Maz Misandrist! I've been waiting for that kind of opening salvo so I could respond and enlighten people better! You truly are a force for Good and Greater Awareness of the deep problem of child sexual abuse in the country, even if you're trying to do the opposite! Kudos!

Susan Smith said...

Idk why but this sounds like something melanie griffith would do. But her kids are older so prob not.

TwoDots said...

Not sure what posts are directed at me, if any but expressing cynicism doesn’t necessarily mean being a paid shill, nor does it mean I should stop reading here. I’m well aware of how commonplace rape is, but that doesn’t mean I have to buy every single one of th blind items posted here. I’ve read here for years, and that won’t change any time soon. I just dont happen to believe all posted blinds. Not sure why that’s such a big deal to some 🀷🏼‍♀️

To each their own ✌🏻

plot said...

Yeah but Lipstick Alley doesn't post articles hinting at mind-control, cloning and human sacrifice, do they? Enty's blinds, like this one, rev the engine of everyone playing Whack-a-Pedo, Satanist Search, Nawlin's VooDoo, Clinton Derangement and a feast of other conspiracy bunk. LIke Angela said above, some of it is intriguing because some of the theories are new angles on old conspiracies. Some of the posters uncover stuff that, though unrelated to their point, offers another perspective on what certain industries might doing under the radar. Still, the willing suspension of disbelief or rational function in so many posters is reaching a critical mass here over all.

plot said...

@just sayin'

"Angelina Jolie has created an insular world for herself and her kids"

I don't doubt that for a minute. Those kids have very little exposure to anything outside the world Angie creates for them through private tutoring and their own clanish group of approved visitors.

"while it is human trafficking to import girlfriends for her sons"

That's where this blind falls off the cliff for me. To bestow on Jolie the power to cycle young illegal girls through her family compound for her sons to abuse is absurd. I can't say those kids won't be affected by Angie's long time sexual pathologies, one way or another, since she has done nothing but justify and defend her weird sex life (like sleeping with her mother's boyfriend or the blood rituals with Billy Bob.) But we don't know if she is different as a mother than she was as a young screwed up girl. We don't know if one of the boys simply started sleeping with one of the family servants who happens to be from overseas. And no one should be accusing her of trafficking, no way, certainly here where that word is used too often to garner the attention of the readers. That's beyond the pale, I think.

plot said...

"I've actually been studying it FOR YEARS"

With an obvious confirmation bias...

"he jury agreed that THE CHILDREN HAD BEEN ABUSED"

Possibly by the very therapists who filled their minds with the abuse scenarios, who shook their heads until the children hit on the "right" narrative of abuse for trial and then lit up and nodded yes. Abuse is often psychological rather than physical.

plot said...

"No one wants to think the child abuse in Hollywood is that damn bad."

It's not about Belief. It's about demanding serious proof for serious accusations.

If someone makes a terrible accusation about YOU, do you not want them to bear the weight of proving it beyond a reasonable doubt? I do hope so.

Miss Chloe said...

Cynicism and skepticism have their place, but beyond a certain point, stop reading damn blinds if they bother you that much. That's my whole point. There are blinds I don't believe either. I also think some blinds are planted blinds and that others pay money to not be mentioned on this website. For instance, for everything the Kardashian Crapire has done, it never mentions Kim, Khloe, and Kylie's fake pregnancies in total, Kris Jenner's heavy drug use or that she trafficks Kendall. That's odd. A few blinds about Grant Gustin have been planted by those who work for Candice Patton, bolstering her acting ability over his (which is untrue bullshit as he is a much better actor) and talking about how he is such a "weak" man when all that stems from the fact he wouldn't sleep with her specifically. Meanwhile not one blind talks about Patton's patterns of sleeping with many of her co-stars including the newest cast member who plays Dibny or that she is trying to turn that hit series into her own personal star launch vehicle to the detriment of all. A number of blinds about Bradley Cooper and his exes seem like revenge. So I see through a number of blinds, but others are 100% Grade A on the money.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
T. W. said...

@ancoranonhocapito - This is funny for all the wrong reasons.

Angie is treating her kids the way her own mother treated her.

Dannette said...

Jolie. I feel sorry for those kids.

Hortensia said...

Someone here needs to be on meds. Or, up your dose big time.

rosie riveter said...

Ahhh, got it πŸ‘
Occasionally I post while drunk and it's rarely the best idea ever

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
rosie riveter said...

@plot

"And you imagine this site will have something to do with that? "

What site? What if we are in an alternate universe? This site? Proof please.

"What if he is charged with being a boring old sexual abuser? "

What if your aunt had balls? Would she be your uncle?

"Will you be disappointed you can't throw that pedo ax around to hit all your favorite targets? "

What ax? What favorite targets? Proof please.

If it weren't for trump I mean bush I mean Reagan uhh what
no I mean Obama rulz go dems

Armenika said...

Definitely Jolie. It's scary.

rosie riveter said...

Omg πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
You are seriously doubting AJ would have a controlled environment so that her kids don't go out and do it on their own anyway??
Newsflash: kids have sex by 14. Rich and famous kids especially.
I can't even.
πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
You're just all over the place, and it's so very entertaining. Except, when it's not. Mostly those irritating "quotes" and when you tumble off the political deep end.
But this naivety is cute and I did enjoy it. Thank you.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

@Maz Misansrist: Don't listen to him. He probably thinks "Doctor Strange" is a "primer to the dark arts", likes the attention.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

Miss Chloe, I'm sorry you've been raped. I was attacked/assaulted one night in the Netherlands, someone strangled me from behind and he was definitely not after my purse. I couldn't stop feeling angry for years after imagining what he could've done to me if I hadn't screamed and he panicked. I can't imagine what it must have been for you.

Anyway, if comments of people who won't believe a sexual abuse story trigger you, maybe take a break from reading the stories for a little while? Hugs.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

Thank you, plot. The irony is, I've long suspected Ddonna himself is a troll. Likes to act all "outraged" at pedophile posts, but for some reason when Enty posts about tweeners/barely-legal BI subjects, starts bullying them/gets snide. It's very strange.

rosie riveter said...

Ahh shucks, ya got me. I'm a newbie. Is it really that obvious?
Ten years huh? We all bow down. No one else has been here nearly as long. My goodness, you are surely alone in that remarkable feat.
Welp, guess we'll see ya here same time/same place tomorrow? πŸ‘

Eff Yiew said...

Hide yo children! Hide yo wife! Dey rapin' everrrryyybody out here!

So Angie is a batshit crazy whore. Wow - in other breaking news, water is wet.

Malignment said...

WOW look at all the 5000 word essays by concern trolls.

Enty is over all the targets. they’ve sent in the troll armies.

Lot of people in Pedowood and related pedostries sweating bullets. Hope the FVI raids all of you sooner, than later

Unknown said...

I'm not sure why the idea of trafficking seems so outlandish. The woman who AJ went through to adopt Maddox was sent to jail for falsifying names, birth dates and places of birth of the children she facilitated adoptions of, I believe. Given the stories that have come out regarding Zahara's mother being alive and how that particular adoption went down, it also seems highly likely that Z was trafficked by the adoption agency in Ethiopia.

Malignment said...

@krab the fucking idiot that wrote

“The political /everyone's a pedo stuff is just plain loonballs, though. Mark Salling was killed right before going to jail because he was about to give up names? THAT'S NOT HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS. Anyone with half a functioning brain cell and/or common sense knows that. "Sure, we'll give you a plea deal, Mark, and a light sentence. But you'll have to pinky swear to give us names of Hollywood pedos before you go to jail. Promise? Mmmkay, that's all we need from you now."

His sentencing wasn’t until March, you ignorant concern troll.

Krab, been getting paid minimum wage to read CDAN and cast shade for 10 years. ROFL

Malignment said...

@unknown Jolie is the only one that could pull this insane bizarre shit off - she has insinuated herself into the United Nations and set herself up as some sort of neo-ambassador to the third world.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

Okay, but I don't understand why she thinks each adopted child should have one nanny from their COUNTRY OF ORIGIN when they're adopted.

It's not like she's going to be sending them back to their home countries after a couple of years (unlike my mother who bought language books for me because I only spoke English until I was 10).

I know many diplomats from my passport country bring their own domestic staff/nannies, I've been to diplomats' homes where they have a local team of staff (probably have been working in that house for years regardless of who's ambassador that year). OTOH, sometimes I share a lift in my apartment building with foreign families with a local nanny, and CD-plated cars would be waiting just outside the lobby (so I images the local nanny was arranged by their embassy/office/local employers).

But if you've adopted the child, why bother finding someone from their "country of origin" to look after them? It makes no logical sense, I just do not understand the line of thinking. Why not let them fully-assimilate as Americans?

Sounds like a prΓͺtencious orientalist hipster-ish "local-wisdom fetishism" thing going on.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

*so I "imagine", FFS

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Maz Misandrist said...

Miss Chloe I am in agreement. I know the stats both personally and professionally. Given my job I am hyper aware of child abuse. It's everywhere but especially where there are vulnerable children. My concern with the site atm is that it is using real cases of rape and abuse and trying to attach them to some sort of global conspiracy. If you happen to simply believe David Geffen is probably a pedo rather than he murdered half the aging rock scene for "killary" you will get called a paid shill. I feel that too many blinds are now catering to this tinfoil hat infowars brigade. As someone who was raped by a predator operating in the music scene i have seen similar abuses of power as we see coming out in Hollywood now, I don't want abusers to be ignored due to not fitting into a conspiracy theory

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
plot said...

"Okay, but I don't understand why she thinks each adopted child should have one nanny from their COUNTRY OF ORIGIN when they're adopted."

Because the nanny speaks the language the child is used to? To provide some continuity for the child who might be very confused and upset?

totaji said...

Ok, everyone is wigging out at the possibility of this, but if you massage a few details of this, without changing the key facts, it could sound not as outlandish. Frankly she could bring in a new nanny, the kid bangs her, and she goes to get another in hopes the kid doesn’t use her... but he does. This goes on a few times and from an external perspective you have the blind.

DDonna Tarttty said...

Pedo-defenders fighting hard, falling big. Facts are facts.

The reporting speaks for itself. I hope everyone on the fence about whether I'm exaggerating or they're full of shit reads that heavily sourced link I provided above.

The shrinks had nothing to do with convincing the jury the McMartin kids were abused. It was the physical medical evidence that convinced the jury those kids were raped.

So then the question becomes: Do "people" like Plot and Scandi Sanskrit KNOW they are actively lying? Or just saying what they think? Because to make a claim that it was the shrinks that convinced the jury those kids were raped is a flat out lie.

It was the doctors testimony about the damage done to their genitals, the sexually transmitted diseases the children had, the bruises on their body, etc., that convinced the jury.

Again, don't take my word for it. Don't take plot or Scandi Sanskrit. Read the testimonies. Follow the link above. The truth, as they say, is out there. And it's the truth that is the biggest threat to the professional liars.

Maz Misandrist said...

You could just be a troll. Someone who thinks others political beliefs effect their ability to work in child protection can't work in the field. My Alex Jones worshipping Trump loving co worker agrees with me on this. We work well together and the kids we work with love it when we bicker over politics. But I digress the tragedy of McMartin Case and the many others like it is that due to the malfeasance of the Police, welfare officers and the media any evidence there is will be forever tainted. Its not unlikely abuse took place. Child abusers always seek work near children. The trouble is when people can only understand evil through the lens of the supernatural and place it over what is tragically a common occurance all over the world. It would be tempting to describe Peter Scully as demonic but he is not. Just the worst kind of human. When you study social work, they use cases of SRA to illustrate what not to do. Not just because what may come out may not be true but also due to the trauma leading questions can cause.
It amazes me that anyone took seriously children saying they were flushed down toilets into underground lairs to witness human sacrifice. But they did.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

Why do ppl find this so hard to believe? It's totally believable:

1. AJ is insane
2. it's not like she smuggles them in her suitcase or like in a hollywood movie, work visa are very easy to obtain especially for celebrities: she can claim they are language teachers, culturally appropriate and necessary for her adopted kids coming over for a months or so...then when the month expires, she gets them extended visas via an embassy, which takes an hour, and boom, they work for her for 6 months and then get sent back with a nice envelope
3. she's fucking insane

If there's anyone who'd do something like this ,it's totally her.

Zophie Enzo said...

Agreed, nancer. And posts are deleted sometimes that I make, I'm guessing because they don't go along with the right storyline.

Maz Misandrist said...

Yeah studying for years thing is daft. I have been reading about the New York mets on the internet for years. I have not yet become a baseball player or manager or qualified to work in the Front office. Even of one of the most mismanaged teams out there. Sometging tells me that this study was not done through an education facility or guided by experts (Police who specialise in child protection, social workers, child psychiatrists etc). I will look it up but 'the jury agreed' sounds like bs. A dissenting opinion does not mean guilt

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nelson Muntz69 said...

Weird as I have been watching old Law and order SVU episodes on and off lately. I just finished season 5 and there is an episode, just found it episode 14 which is based on these trafficking rings that buy children for domestic slavery, sex slavery etc.

Maz Misandrist said...

I read it and it doesn't hold up. It does not even reach the standard of a basic high school essay in referencing. The author lists a bunch of 'facts' with no indication of the sources beyond a short bibliography at the end. The books cited are mostly by other conspiracy writers which is always a red flag. If you are unwilling to include the arguments of those opposed then you probably can't refute them. Some of the statements are so easily found to be distortions its comical, its not hard to go back and see that the National media were reporting Satanic Ritual abuse as real at the time. You can't call it a cover up when there are TV specials breathlessly pushing the narrative. There was no physical evidence, there were no tunnels, one guy thought he may have found some but on further investigation...nothing nada. Yes there was a hung jury but those jurors did not have the benefit of a ton of evidence that was withheld from them. There is evidence of Satanists committing crimes (look up the band dissection) but you could say the same of any religion. To believe this shit you have to believe in magic powers. I will say it again there may have been abuse but the abuser COULD NOT FLY or any of the other bs supposed by credulous people. What a tragedy for the children involved. I guess there is some comfort in the fact that after the panic died down and good people were exonerated of terrible crimes the system got a whole lot better for children in court. I will think about that as I escort kids to court over the next few weeks. There are so many laws/practices that help now, no more coaching/ leading kids what to say, no more attacks from defence lawyers. Young people are safer today, terrible that others had to suffer for that safety.
So yeah read the article and make up your own mind. But make sure you take in a range of opinions, query those who cherry pick evidence. Remember that Satanists are usually just pasty metal fans with dubious personal hygiene that can't even keep a band together let alone run an international conspiracy. Make the effort to find out how child sex abuse is uncovered (there has been a royal commission on child sexual abuse in the Australian Catholic Church. That is a good place to start your research. But it is harrowing reading and a terrible indictment of those involved in covering it up - fair warning).
Just to finish as someone who suffered abuse and now works to help kids recover from Trauma in both my professional and personal life I find being called a 'pedo apologist' both maddening and offensive. Some of us simply want to speak against the herd mentality that appears to have taken over, disagreement with some of the more far out opinions is no indication of anyones belief of the widespread problem that is child abuse. Some of us are actually working in a real way to try and stop it. What are you doing Ddonn TTTartt other than researching youtube and posting on gossip boards? I had a personal day off today and it still was a challenge keeping up with yr reactionary blather. I have no issue with a bit of good natured ribbing with the "un p.c right trumpists" on here. I usually don't comment but a diversity of opinion is fine and frankly necessary for a blog like this. Its you and a couple of others who are dangerous wackos. It's Entys site and he/she can attract who they like but it is a shame when a fun place that led a good fight against hustlers, puritans, harrasers and criminals gets derailed by con artists. My fear is that when the next Kevin Spacey or Howard Wienstein is hitting the rumour mill the nutters will have muddied the water so much that articles like the New Yorker one will not get written. I don't want to be reading Bryan Singer blinds forever but if that article you posted is the standard of proof then we will be. Apologies for the rant and probable typos. Angry, tired, flu impaired typing on a tiny screen is not the best

Nat Aki said...

The United Nations...passports...Jolie's head up the ass of the UN. Come on...that sick fuck organization is the largest pedo ring on the planet. At least Jolie isn't bathng in the blood of 10 year olds.

austin said...

What's even harder for me to believe are the people who INSIST this must be true simply because they read it here. Apparently some have never read the disclaimer found at the bottom of the web version of every CDAN page. I'm not sure if it shows up for those using the mobile version, so here's a copy/paste in case it doesn't:

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content.

bianca said...

Maybe she simply wants them to have someone in their lives who can help provide "authentic" knowledge of their birth cultural identity and be a kind of surrogate birth parent. As a WoC, I can definitely see how having someone from her country and/or who looks like her would make certain life issues easier for Zahara (?). The hair issue alone can lead to self esteem issues in same-race families, let alone mixed race ones, when the caretaker has no idea what she or he is doing.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kno Won Uno said...

+2
It’s becoming the Weekly World News of gossip. Maybe Batboy writes the blinds.
I never go back to check comments, so mine might be deleted, too. BFD.

Kno Won Uno said...

And the conspiracy theorists will jump all over it. That’s where enty gets his traffic these days.

Kno Won Uno said...

Oh. I thought you meant Judgement at Nuremberg.

Sandy 2319 said...

I spent years on this site before I ever commented. I was working in Hollywood, had been there for years when I started noticing and hearing things that didn't seem right. That is in part what brought me here. While I was working in the industry I was reading the blinds and just sorta put it in the back of my mind. Eventually I came across some things that convinced me that there were things going on in the industry that i did not want my children around. So I quit and moved my family away I still read the site and after a few more years I finally posted rarely. So for all the people who think they have more right to be on here than others and feel they can refer to people as newbies I want to say, get the hell over yourself. You have no idea who you are talking to, how long they have been here, and regardless screw you and your pathetic sense of entitlement.

Kno Won Uno said...

Some of them are stupid inflammatory. Sometimes I wonder if he’s just trolling the crazies. They fall for it every time.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

@ austin: nah you got it exactly the wrong way around: people don't come here insisting it's the truth because they read it here, people believe it because it's so easy to believe.

It is people such as yourself who seem to have flocked here INSISTING this NOT to be true....which is weird.
Because, how do you know it isn't?

designace001 said...

@ Maz Misandrist you said.. " I know the stats both personally and professionally. Given my job I am hyper aware of child abuse."

"My concern with the site atm is that it is using real cases of rape and abuse and trying to attach them to some sort of global conspiracy."

seriously you do this for a living and have never once considered that this IS a global conspiracy? Unbelievable . Are you not aware that human trafficking is a multi billion dollar industry?

Have you not ever read anything about the Dutroux trial, any of the testimony? Or the Franklin trial or any of the others? This is a global conspiracy of the highest order and there is a wealth of factual documented evidence to back that statement up. Or are you meaning that the shiny, wealthy celebrities are not a part of this industry that provides a product specifically for their shiny, wealthy clientele? Really truly unbelievable. You're not coming off as very credible.

Educate yourself. Think of it as a professional challenge from me to you. Who do you think can afford to play or invest in this sick pool?

Dutroux Trial
http://gbppr.dyndns.org/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/marc_dutroux_supplement.htm

Franklin Coverup John DeCamp was a State Senator in office from 1971–1987

Human Sex Trafficking statistics
https://polarisproject.org/human-trafficking/facts

Kno Won Uno said...

Few have actually been here a decade.

Kno Won Uno said...

Or if enty’s just making up inflammatory blinds for clicks.
Child sex abuse increases traffic. Why wouldn’t he use it?

designace001 said...

btw Angela Jolie sits on the Council of Fucking Foreign Relations, she's hooked up like a tow truck (on the highest level). Diplomatic Immunity is not a stretch.

Kno Won Uno said...

Too bad no one on twitter understands this.

Kno Won Uno said...

Have you considered therapy?

designace001 said...

Franklin Coverup link
http://www.alamoministries.com/content/english/newsreleases/conspiracyofsilence.html

Kno Won Uno said...

You. I like you.
I’ve been around off & on for years. This relatively recent foray into feeding the conspiracy theorists for clicks is so utterly distasteful that I might do a flyover once a week or so.
The obvious obsession with “pedo rings” directs where the blinds go, in my opinion.
Imaginary pedo rings get lots & lots of clicks, therefore, there are lots & lots of pedo rings.
But stupid people are stupid and will continue their feverishly deranged theorizing and Enty will continue to profit.
When nothing he says comes to fruition, he’ll pivot to the next thing. Cloning’s having a moment.

Kno Won Uno said...

There’s often no point in commenting when the conspiracy theorists are typing at each other for validation. At least on twitter, it’s limited to 240 characters and there’s a mute button.

Eff Yiew said...

I actually saw AJ not too long ago...like two months ago I was working an event at Cipriani down on Wall Street where the UN was holding its yearly event and she was the guest of honor. She got some bullshit humanitarian award and all the bloated, useless UN people were just sitting at the tables all patting themselves on the back. She even had her brood with her - she walked to the stage to make a speech and her little brood followed her like her own little personal UN. I'd post pix I took of her with her brood at the event but it'd be too easy to reverse search them and find out who I am so I'll pass on that.

Kno Won Uno said...

OMG. This is what CDaN has come to.
Gross.

Kno Won Uno said...

I’m not a shill. Just sayin’
I’m not here every day because it’s gotten so batshitty.
Sandy can vouch for my not-shillness.

Btw, I understand your comment & don’t disagree with it.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kno Won Uno said...

I agree.
Saying “there really isn’t a pedo ring behind every trashcan” doesn’t mean I don’t believe they exist.
We never know who we’re talking to. Some people don’t share, as is their right.
No one here has any idea if i’ve ever been sexually assaulted and i’m not obligated to tell them to prove my worthiness to comment. It’s absurd!
I wish people were more careful with painting a differing opinion as whatever = nonsense to them. We have know way of knowing what’s behind that opinion.

boredatwork boredatwork said...

@Effi: I believe every word.

If there is any celebrity in the entire world, who I believe has a God and Mother Theresa complex and who'd import impressionable young women into her home, telling them they are there to teach her children a language, while telling her teenage boys 'try and see where it takes you my son, Mama understand, nobody loves you more than your Mama' it's her. She's a psycho bitch with a heroin addiction.
I'm finding it curious how suddenly all these nay-sayers have appeared from out of nowhere ("I never posted before, but..."), it's almost as if they are all here for a reason, that has nothing to do with reading gossip...

Court b said...

Is it quality gossip, or quantity. Apparently it's becoming quantity. This blind is ridiculous. So many bullshit ones lately. I get there have to be false ones, but this one is attacking the family, and the kids on a particularly tough year for them. This is disqusting behavior, even for this site. New lows.

austin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
austin said...

@ boredatwork, everyone has an opinion so I don't challenge or debate them. You're entitled to yours, but it's intellectually dishonest put words in my mouth in an effort to delegitimize me. I didn't insist on anything. I expressed agreement (+1) with two commenters and that is all. Have a great day!

El Naro said...

Not sure if it is AJ, but many comments like just sayin' and unknown are spot on:
"I'm not sure why the idea of trafficking seems so outlandish. The woman who AJ went through to adopt Maddox was sent to jail for falsifying names, birth dates and places of birth of the children she facilitated adoptions of, I believe."
AJ cannot be a child advocate and use a shady adoption agency; this shows her lack of understanding and that she doesn't learn about the subject, but is simply a spokesperson/persona of the UN.

just sayin is right that there are teens that could be easily trafficked from those parts of the world, unfortunately. If the children went to school, they would be able to have relationship partners that were normal.

@Bianca - that is not how intercountry adoptions are handled. You do not traffic relationship partners in for the adoptees as cultural ambassadors. Yes, the children need contact with people of their culture, but not as hired employees where Ms. Jolie hands off her responsibility in that dept. The relationships need to be authentic or it is harmful for the adoptee who already struggles with relationships and lack of truth, especially when Jolie used shady adoption agencies.

pwal said...

IDK... that disclaimer is a great way to protect Enty if someone comes for him. If it's a work of fiction, why am I getting letters from a team of attorneys? Wouldn't a letter from an attorney be a confirmation that maybe there is some truth to what was said a la Melissa Etheridge?

I have my doubts about this blind, just as I had doubts about the actress who directs who was made to sleep with her mom's boyfriend.

But with this blind, you can't deny that there are some optics that could give some people pause. For example, Shiloh's birthday, when the the child actress from FTKMF, among others, were flown in and stayed for extended periods of time. Sorry, that seems fishy. Of course, there is the casting controversy that Jolie was allowed to wiggle out of because the NYT let 'a mischaracterization' stand as her explanation.

It's just interesting that she's using similar tactics as Weinstein, in terms of the press.

Squizgig said...

Just a side note, Ethiopia has banned foreign adoption of kids, citing the possibility of abuse to adoptees

Lisa Hunt said...

@maz @kno I hear you and agree with all you say. This site has really gone by the wayside in the last 6+ months or so. Enty lost a ton of readership when he moved to the platform before this (which as you know is the original platform). He still never got this many comments on blinds in the past. I read an article that Enty hired a firm that "drives" the conversation in comments. I also read that pedophile rings, abuse etc attracts the most readers. I can't blame Enty, he needs to make money and attempt to stay current, however the comments are almost surreal lately. And not a bit of fun at all. Another major fail on Enty's part.

ETA: if one more person praises the phony that is Himmmm (which is probably happening as I type this) and his heartfelt, emotional missives, I'll puke. And hey, I can prove it's not who everyone thinks it is because I went to elementary school with him. Let's see... what was our 6th grade teacher's name? What road was our school on? Oh, you "went out" (as only a 6th grader can do) with my best friend/your neighbor. Remember her name? How about the band that had a house on your street they used as a recording studio?

just sayin' said...

Kno Won: Not sure if you were directing a comment to me or just using the phrase "just sayin'", but let me be clear I've never thought of you as anything but one of the best commenters, and I don't call names, like "shill" at any rate. I know you've been here forever and I couldn't agree more with your above comments about the current state of cdan. Just sayin'.

clean4life said...

+1000

clean4life said...

I suspect St Angie has done some shady shit and want to see her go down as much as the next CDANer - but considering she's in a high-profile divorce case right now, I'm having a hard time believing this blind. There's just no way that Brad and the lawyers wouldn't be waiting for her to slip up so they can expose her.

If it is true, then I hope Brad's lawyers are reading πŸ˜€

plot said...

Wow, Maz, thanks for that!

plot said...

@ designace

"seriously you do this for a living and have never once considered that this IS a global conspiracy? Unbelievable"

Seriously, you don't know that 99% of children are abused by someone they know and trust?

Thanks for using children who are hurt and assaulted to feed your addiction to Danger! International Thrills! Ethically challenged aren't you?

Unbelievable.

plot said...

"btw Angela Jolie sits on the Council of Fucking Foreign Relations, she's hooked up like a tow truck (on the highest level). Diplomatic Immunity is not a stretch."

Yes, actually, it is.

And what sort of things do you think diplomats can do? What do you IMAGINE diplomats do all day?

Angie ain't one by a long shot.

plot said...

"just sayin is right that there are teens that could be easily trafficked from those parts of the world, unfortunately"

Easily? How easily? What does it entail?

And what constitutes trafficking, precisely, so we can know if this is exactly what Angie is doing?

Cail Corishev said...

I've known ordinary, non-rich, non-famous people who would say if their teenage kids are going to have sex (and many people today think that's inevitable), they'd rather it happened in their own home where they're safe (from what, I'm not sure). So the idea that a parent would approve of that going on isn't surprising. Add a controlling parent with the wealth and connections to be able to bring in kids from overseas to avoid other complications like complaints from other parents, and I don't see what's so outlandish about this blind. I don't know if it's true, but it's not hard to believe at all.

It's funny, before reading this blind, I didn't really know Jolie's politics. I know she's not conservative because I've never heard her bashed as one, so I assumed she was liberal. But she could have been anywhere on the spectrum from apolitical to hard-core leftist, and I didn't care. Now I know, from the over-the-top reactions here. Still don't care. She was hot in Hackers, but I'm not sure why she's such a big deal.

plot said...

"there were things going on in the industry that i did not want my children around"

That's too bad. LA is full of other thriving industries. It's one of the country's biggest metropolitan areas, after all. If you use the imprimatur of Hollywood to rule your family, that's unfortunate for that overwhelming majority of LA has absolutely nothing to do with Hollywood.

"I know she's not conservative"

She is libertarian of the Ayn Rand stripe, you know, one of those people who thinks reading Atlas Shrugged gives them a PhD in economics, international politics, taxes, charity and sociology. Her politics are kinda fuckt up, actually.

Maz Misandrist said...

Woah dude this may surprise you but I have never even met anyone in the field who believes in Satanic Ritual abuse let alone a global conspiracy. The closest I can think of is the abuse hidden within institutions, I mentioned the Australian Royal commision earlier. Awful stuff.
I am very aware of human trafficking 99% of which goes on away from the glitz and glamour of the worlds A list. Instead its some poor kid at your local motel servicing people who you walk past everyday. I think the 1% prefer not to stand in line for 15 min on a grubby mattress. Thats why we have yachting. I don't doubt there are shady exploitation rings in all sectors of society, bad people are everywhere. Its the "global conspiracy" shit that makes me laugh. Somehow these people have murdered more in a year than the Catholic Church did over 50 plus years of covering up child abuse. I am eager to see this evidence as along with the big meeting with the elders of the protocols of zion or whatever its called I missed this module. I hope its better evidence than I have been given so far because I think I am still to sick to go to work today and so have time to rip a huge college debt sized hole in any shoddily researched click bait that gets sent my way. Marc Dutroux is on my radar as an exceptionally evil bastard with possible high level connections in Belgium and Franklin I haven't heard of. I am guessing this won't be pleasurable reading

HH314 said...

Good to see I am not the only one grossed out by the current blinds and the direction this site is going. Some days it feels like the readership has lost its collective mind.
I want to mention something though, and specifically address Lisa Hunt: while I agree with you and understand that the owners of the site are simply trying to drive their viewership up, I think it is unethical, misleading, libelous and hopefully, some day, prosecutable. I have been around this site for years, close to a decade now, and I still remember the debacle when the owner Enty (not sure which incarnation) was asking his readers for money. I was beyond appalled, especially since I remember him posting that he does this for his own pleasure and not money. Obviously he was lying then and he finally figured a way to monetize this website by pandering to conspiracy theorists and promoting obvious lies. While most people can discern between embellished rumor and some harmless gossip, some cannot and believe it because it fits their preconceived ideas (or even mental illness).
I keep reminding this, but not long ago an agitated man barged into the DC pizzeria with a gun to release the children that were supposedly being trafficked from the basement. Of course there was no basement and he did not kill or injure anyone once he saw for himself that no porn rings were operated from a non-existent basement, but he could've killed someone. I just hope some deluded soul is not going to try something similar after reading this website.

HH314 said...

Oh, and the blind is meant to be about Jolie. As much as I dislike her, I don't believe she traffics sex slaves for her children. I believe 100% if any of them brought a boyfriend/girlfriend home she would be totally OK with them living together, but trafficking - no.

plot said...

+1 HH314

I'm not so nauseous as it makes me angry when merely for the increase in traffic, Enty (or Enty 4.0) throws around accusations for the Infowars and 4chan crowd with their Super Sekret knowledge that only makes sense to themselves.

It's so cynical to use child abuse and predation for page hits that it makes me livid. This creates a backlash that the old mundane stories of abuse just aren't exciting enough, so why bother? If it ain't connected to their approved list of Ebil Doers, it's ignored.

just sayin' said...

I would bet that this story is exaggerated -- more likely one or both of her older boys got involved sexually with an au pere and she allowed it -- much better than having them invite American girls into the home who would run to the tabloids the next day.

If this blind is remotely true, I'm sure that Angie's bringing girls in as nannies or au pairs and some of them end up doing double duty. Is it so hard to imagine an au pere getting a crush on one of Brangelina's sons? Imagining that she might be the future Mrs. Pax? Hence Angie rotating them out frequently to avoid inconvenient attachments.

She probably does the same thing rich parents have been doing for years -- going to an agency locally that works with agencies in other countries. I raised my kids in NYC in the 80's, and everyone hired live in nannies, some who came in legally with work visas, others who did not -- they had visitor visas and overstayed. Most employers didn't worry too much about their status as long as they were good with kids. The expensive ones were papered and white, from Europe, for less money you got women from the Caribbean. Their goal was to work here and earn a green card at some point.

You hear horror stories of women in ultra-rich Manhattan homes kept as literal unpaid housemaid/slaves. This is 100% human trafficking, though not part of the sex industry.

katsm0711 said...

Just ‘one’?

BlissBoo said...

I'm going to leave this right here. Read it if you haven't. If you're going to get your little panties in a twist over a BI, then please kindly get the fuck out. Enough of the whiny posts clogging up the comment area. THAT'S more exasperating than the original blind.


CRAZY DAYS AND NIGHTS IS A GOSSIP SITE.THE SITE PUBLISHES RUMORS, CONJECTURE, AND FICTION. IN ADDITION TO ACCURATELY REPORTED INFORMATION, CERTAIN SITUATIONS, CHARACTERS AND EVENTS PORTRAYED IN THE BLOG ARE EITHER PRODUCTS OF THE AUTHOR’S IMAGINATION OR ARE USED FICTITIOUSLY. INFORMATION ON THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN ERRORS OR INACCURACIES; THE BLOG’S PROPRIETOR DOES NOT MAKE WARRANTY AS TO THE CORRECTNESS OR RELIABILITY OF THE SITE'S CONTENT. LINKS TO CONTENT ON AND QUOTATION OF MATERIAL FROM OTHER SITES ARE NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CRAZY DAYS AND NIGHTS.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

The only people really clogging up the comments are the whiny fake outrage minions who only seem to appear when their deluded reality is shattered by a possible human trafficking/pedo BI. I'm not saying this one is 100% true or false but I enjoy when they all collectively meltdown, call Enty every name in the book, but still visit the website. I'll bet most of them don't even give two shits about slander. They just want to give the impression they care.

TwoDots said...

So this post certainly blew up then πŸ‘€

Unknown said...

@Two Dots of course. Whenever a topic like this is brought up all the anonymous internet fake justice brigade comes out of the woodwork to let us know how words hurt their feelings. There's about a dozen or so commenters on here who feel self important. But their BS shows every time they return to comment.

plot said...

+1 just sayin'

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Urthor said...

Wait what, this is Jolie? Aren't the kids super young though? Like Jolie is crazy but not crazy enough to do this with sub 15 y/os

Poppymann said...

First.

When using couple, it's "couple of countries." And unless you're referring to two countries, use "few."

Second:
What is Angie's "usual identifier?" Permanent A+ lister who kisses her brother, wears blood necklace and adopts lots of Third World Kids while trying to accomplish stuff for the UN?

People just throw out guesses based on the person they hate most that day.

Unknown said...

I live in Vietnam. It's not uncommon here for the poor families to send their underaged daughters to work as hookers in the city to "support the family". It happens here all the time. There's a french guy (in his 40's I believe) sitting in jail here because he went to the embassy/consulate to get a visa for his girlfriend to visit Europe. The consulate people asked how long they'd been together, he said 6 years. The girlfriend was 15 and they'd been together since she was 9. And he didn't think he was doing anything wrong, because he had the permission of her parents right from the start. Wrap your mind around that.

Her family is trying to get the guy out of jail because they've lost their meal ticket.

mary lamb said...

just sayin' said:

Is it so hard to imagine an au pere getting a crush on one of Brangelina's sons? Imagining that she might be the future Mrs. Pax?

This is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read and you're one of the more normal posters!
Maddox is 16 and Pax is 14. They're both underage of consent.
None of this is true.

I do have to say that this was the most hilarious thread I've read here in ages.
You do realize that whoever wrote this sat back and laughed their asses off, don't you?
Lots of hits because there is no end to the ire some crazy-azzed, jealous bitches hold for Angelina.
Some of them will take it to the grave. Sad, really, but these comments were well worth it. :D


just sayin' said...

Thanks for considering me on the normal end of the commenter spectrum, Mary Lamb, haha. I stand by my post. For one thing I qualified it by saying "if this blind is remotely true" and that I suspect that a grain of truth (that Angelina hires foreign au peres) is likely being exaggerated for this blind. Like. the source could be a neighbor telling Enty about seeing one of the boys making out with one of the never-ending stream of young Asian girls.

That being said though, we just heard from Unknown who says they live in Vietnam and are aware of parents eagerly sending way underage daughters to "work" or "marry". I would agree that American teen girls are not looking at young teens Maddox or Pax and seeing husband material, but if you put yourself in the shoes of a Cambodian or Vietnamese teen au pere brought here to work in Angelina's house for a few months, your heart might leap with the hope of getting to stay forever.

plot said...

I'm close to someone who lived in Vietnam for 2 years. She said that hiring young girls to clean and look after your kids is almost demanded by the Vietnamese of Western residents. So she did, but she didn't allow them to be live-in, which was unusual. She also didn't hire a cook like all the other families.

It's definitely part of life there. Also, her husband learned quickly, as a Western professional, not to just stop into any bar for a drink. The sales were aggressive in many places there, by sales meaning...yeah.

Count Jerkula said...

This blind just shows me once again that my parents didn't love me enough. Rotating cum receptacles would have freed up enough time and brain power in my youth where I c

Would have thrown myself into academic endeavors instead of porn and partying. Why go out chasing uppity, "what can you do for me" middle class suburban poon when 3rd world "happy for a hot meal and no beatings" clam & starfish are waiting for ya at home. "Don't buttfuck her if you don't get all A's." I coulda been valedictorian.

Ya think if one of these cum dumpsters gets knocked up AngieJo forces them to get an abortion, or just ships em home and the pregnancy aint the only thing terminated? Think she has boys given vasectomies prior to shipping them in to drench her daughters in ejaculate or forcing abortions on her own kids?

rosie riveter said...

Whoa there dude.
Too many metaphors; too much illustration-
I know those are big words-
"Yer trieing 2 hard" is what you may understand?

Count Jerkula said...

Fuck off, Rosie Pig. You are a serial date rapists, your opinions are shit. Well, not that you got dates with the chicks, you were only there to sell them drugs, but you stuck around until they were too high to consent or beg off of the sex.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days