More Kristin Davis Photos
Sometimes I think they are real, and sometimes I can't tell. There is a new batch that has been released and they are not from the same source as the original photos released yesterday. It is becoming clear that there is no sex tape out there. If anything, this is a bunch of photos from a relationship she had with a guy about five years ago. The latest batch of photos have some with her face and some that don't. Obviously, they are all NSFW.
I don't think it's her. I think this girl slightly resembles her at some angles, but it's not K.D.
ReplyDeleteya EL avatars!
ReplyDeleteoh it's her in yesterdays ones.
sure looks like her to me...
ReplyDeletePeople say I look like Drew Barrymore....maybe I need to whip the camera out next time I have sexytime!
ReplyDeleteWhomever it is, she's got one big bush growing there.
ReplyDeleteMeh, this is all PR.
ReplyDeleteAnd sex tapes are so passe. Easily faked.
Did EL just give us a hint about Kristin's lack of relationships with men?
ReplyDeleteLadies, I cannot stress enough--
ReplyDeleteKEEP ALL X RATED PHOTOS/NEGATIVES/FILES. NEVER EVER EVER EVER LET YOUR BF HAVE THEM. EVER.
It doesn't matter who this woman is--the fact is, wherever she is, she's absolutely horrified at the moment, and well she should be. She didn't follow the above sage advice. Stupid stupid stupid stupid.
this women seems a little thin from waist down. kristin davis has always been larger in hips and legs
ReplyDeletesomehow i've made it to 48 without having any of those sorts of pictures taken of either me OR my conquests.
ReplyDeletethere are rumors of a couple of pictures taken in NOLA one year, but that was just boobies, and as far as i know, it was only posted in a cop's locker in virginia.
but he never proved it. :)
beyondseattle, I tend to agree. I couldn't figure out what was wrong but I kept thinking something was off about the top half of her. Now I realize it was the bottom half that was throwing me. If it was/is her... there is no point in denying it, especially in this day and age.
ReplyDeleteNo self respecting woman in Hollywood would be caught with that much hair down there!
ReplyDeleteYou guys are hilarious, and klown, your comment applies to women everywhere!
ReplyDeleteTMZ has the latest - apparently these pictures were taken in 1992(!) - that explains lots of things. Here's the link.
http://www.tmz.com/2008/03/18/kristin-davis-b-f-b-fs-friend-bad-three-way/
It's her, pre nose job I think. Ick area!
ReplyDeleteObviously her, but whoever is responsible for exposing these photos is a complete ass. Maybe she shouldn't have had the photos taken, but who among us hasn't wanted to experiment a little when we've been involved with someone? It's not like you think they're going to be all over the freakin' internet. The guy who is trying to make a buck off these needs a quick morality check. I have less respect for the person selling this crap than for the people exploited in them.
ReplyDeleteAgain - no interest in seeing KD humiliated. She's not a self-promoting celebutard and is mostly dignified and private.
ReplyDeleteI'd love to see the person floating these pix to the public humiliated. Let's expose that person.
I agree with Kat and AceT, whoever released those pictures is pretty darned low. The karmic turnaround is going to be brutal.
ReplyDeleteI wasn't sure it was her either, but she has such a unique hairline, it has to be her!
ReplyDeleteI'll admit that I don't really understand the purpose of taking these pictures. Making a sex video is one thing, you can watch it afterwards and get turned on.
But taking pictures of labias, your huge bush (the guy), and just strange positions that don't look very sexy is kind of pointless yeah? Like would a guy jack it to those pics?