Steven Seagal Is Not Your Ideal Employer
Way, way, way back in the blind items there is one about Steven Seagal. I need to dig it out. It was like from the first few months of the site. If I recall it was about the same type of thing that Steven is being sued for now by an ex employee. Kayden Nguyen is suing Seagal for sexual harassment, illegal trafficking of females for sex, failure to prevent sexual harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination and false representation about employment. All of this in just five days of employment. In her suit she also says that Seagal has two women who have the job of sexually servicing him 24 hours a day.
I am just shocked that she managed to stick around for work for four days. After seeing what she saw, you would think she would have left after five minutes, especially since she alleges that Seagal groped her pretty much right from the beginning of her employment.
When I first heard this, my first thought was, "I'm sure this was an Enty blind!"
ReplyDeleteUgh. One more reason to find Seagal disgusting!!!!!! :-p
Speaking of sex crimes, what do you think Ben Roetlisberger's pay-off to that girl in Georgia was? I'm guessing 2 million.
ReplyDelete@looserdude
ReplyDeleteI'm guessing nothing considering the D.A chose not to bring charges against him. My guess is there is no evidence.
And as far as this goes, this chick is probably related to Tila Tequila and went to the same school of attention-whoring. (I'm j/k, the joke writes itself)
Here's a question: who would be more repulsive to have to service 24 hours a day than Seagal? Is there anyone more repulsive? Poor poor women.
ReplyDelete@looserdude - I think there was a payoff, too, and in return she agreed dropped the charges.
ReplyDeleteNot much of a lawman are you, Seagal?
Seagal had better pay extremely well. Because ick, nast.
ReplyDeleteRe: Ben R's payoff...I'm sure it was pretty hefty. They said on the local news (Atlanta) that apparently the girl is no longer willing to press charges. So something convinced her to back off, Sue Ellen.
So, can he still be a lawman now? because I love that show! *LOL*
ReplyDeleteMy mom always found him appealing, I never understood why.
ReplyDeleteThose poor other guys on that "Lawman" show. You can just tell they're looking at each other like, "Yeesh."
ReplyDeleteslider1964 wrote "too bad she can't prove it"
ReplyDeleteWith such cheap and easy access to technology that can record this sort of behavior it's surprising to me that more people don't think to capture it on digital video or audio.
I've hated him since he hit Kelly LeBrock!
ReplyDelete@valerie
ReplyDeleteI heard on the news that the D.A wasn't going to press charges. I didn't hear anything about her dropping them, just the D.A part.
In Ben's case, the woman said she didn't want to go to trial because she could not handle the publicity. I can understand that. It's hard enough going to trial even when the world isn't watching the case. I really don't know if he's innocent or guilty. I'm inclined to think he's just a dumb jock.
ReplyDelete@Christine, how about Hasselhoff, Gosselin, Michael Lohan, or one of the Davis brothers (Greasy or Gummy Bear)? all ick nast IMO.
Jenny McCarthy is quoted about backing out of an audition for one his blowem up boat movies because of what what was 'required' during the audition.
ReplyDeleteGuess ya know what the gal who did get the part had to do...