Friday, May 07, 2010

Read Rachel Uchitel's Statement Carefully


Today I have read several sites which say that Rachel Uchitel has denied having an affair with David Boreanaz and they point to her statement released by Gloria Allred as the proof. I think they need to read the statement a little closer. She doesn't deny having an affair with David and I think it is pretty obvious from the texts between her and Tiger that they did have an affair. She is just saying she wasn't the one shaking him down. Earlier this week it was made pretty clear that it wasn't Rachel shaking him down, but people don't take the time to read. Here is the statement from Rachel.

"David Boreanaz is not part of my life, nor will he be. I am not in communication with him and do not wish to be. I have made no claims against him and do not plan to assert any. Any statements to the contrary are false and I hope that this statement will finally end any speculation about this issue. I am looking forward to a life that is not filled with scandal, rumor, innuendo or false statements about me. I will not have any further comment regarding David Boreanaz."

It doesn't say the he was not part of her life, it just talks about the present and apparently she is a fortune teller because she says no for the future too. If she didn't have an affair with him this is where she would have said it. She didn't.

20 comments:

  1. I noticed that, too. Despite Uchitel's statement, she is a fameWHORE who probably does not look forward to a life filled without scandal, rumor and innuendo. I'll be she be linked with some other a$$ down the road. She's probably kick herself for not meeting Jesse James.

    This guy's a first-class jerk.

    ReplyDelete
  2. er, kicking herself. I should proof-read before submitting my comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I understood quite clearly that she was not denying it ever happened, just that she was not part of current events. This was one of my few moments of clarity recently,lol.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ok, who is this chick?? The girl with the Golden Tw*t?!?! I don't see why all these celebrity men flock to her.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "I am looking forward to a life that is not filled with scandal, rumor, innuendo or false statements about me."

    THEN QUIT SCREWING MARRIED MEN, YOU DUMB BITCH!!!!

    These broads make me sick!

    ReplyDelete
  6. end of the day, she's a ho, despite the well-written spin.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Seriously. She has some nerve. She absolutely slept with him when he was married, and to me, it could possibly be interpreted as she IS the one shaking him down right now. Sure, she may not have a formal "claim against him", but she's got a lawyer that makes calls to the married men that she's fucked to shake down later for cash. If it walks and talks like a duck...

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Montana - easy sex, kinky, and (until now) a reputation for not kissing and telling. That has to be a powerful combo to a celebrity who is always worried that his one-night stands will blab to the tabloids. Guys talk amongst themselves, and I bet there's a lot of talk amongst celebs about which women will put out and shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  9. funny you mention a duck, because that is exactly what she looks like to me.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The comments are killing me! You all are on FIRE today!!! I'm so proud ....

    ReplyDelete
  11. That is what PR people call a "Non-denial denial"

    ReplyDelete
  12. A comic talked about meeting her on the radio. He said that it isn't about her looks with men. Sh just has this naturally overwhelming sex appeal to men.

    Some just got it like that. I say good for the ho's who are turning the tables on these douchebags. If the men can't keep their pants zipped. Don't expect the women to keep their lips zipped.

    But she totally banged him.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh ya, she "boned" him all right.

    Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

    ReplyDelete
  14. LOL @califblondy, wish I thought of that one.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I do love Joy Behar for explaining on The View that "Uchitel she's a whore." Uchitel indeed, Joy. Badump-bump.

    There's an article in NY Mag about the culture that produces Uchitels by the drunken busload -- bottle service in expensive clubs. She's essentially a paid procurer, and ITA with those above who note that she's like other sex workers - paid to go away and for her discretion, until her tidy life plan was royally fucked with (badump-bump X2) by one Elin Woods.

    I don't have much emotion towards Uchitel but those false, wide-eyed, hand-on-chest, who-me?, why-can't-the-tabloids-just-let-me-be-great? - type protestations are what kills me.

    I don't know if I buy overwhelming sexual charisma, though. She looks like a bunch of cutouts from plastic surgery magazines taped to a paper bag. Lady looks like a dude.

    ReplyDelete
  16. You are looking forward to a life not filled with scandal? THEN WHY DID YOU FLY TO LA AND HIRE GLORIA ALLRED?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I read somewhere (don't think it was here?) that the reason the woman is suing Boreanaz is partly because he told her she was his only mistress. WTF? There is no such thing as a "faithful cheater" dumbass.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wait, isn't the real question whether David Boreanaz and Tiger ever slept together? ;)

    ReplyDelete
  19. LOL Mooshki!!! Inquiring minds want to know the answer to THAT question for sure!!! ; )

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days