Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Nicole Kidman Talks About Her Kids - The Ones She Does Not See


For some reason, Nicole Kidman gave an interview to Hello Magazine. In the interview she talked about Isabella and Connor and how she does not ever get to see them. Although I feel for her and she is probably under some type of gag order, I would rather her just not talk about it at all if she is not going to tell the truth. If Nicole Kidman came out in an interview either in a tabloid or on Barbara Walters and said the reason she is not allowed to see her kids is because of Scientology and its tenets, then I think that would do a world of good. Instead we get pithy quotes like "They live with Tom, which was their choice. I'd love them to live with us, but what can you do?"

Well considering she probably does not even get to talk to them, then not a whole lot. She also told the magazine that the pain is lessened by having Sunday Rose. Tom can't hurt you Nicole. It's ok. Spill.

37 comments:

  1. Ugh, that quote is horrible! "What can you do?" I'll tell you what you can do, you can go visit them! You can pick them up and take them out! No matter what the custody agreement is, I'm sure she could spend a heck of a lot more time with them if she wanted to. I just hope they had a great nanny who loves them, 'cause they don't have real parents.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ummm... Tom might not be able to hurt her, however rest assured that the Co$ probably can and undoubtedly would.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Merlin you took the words right outta my mouth

    ReplyDelete
  4. Moosh & Marlin FTW

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think we're all in agreement on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I cannot say enough...it is NOT Nicole's choice. The children belong to Tom, and were to be raised Scientologists. No one is allowed to be around them that is NOT Sci freaks, including their OWN MOTHER!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I find that really sad.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not to mention that the children were brainwashed (allegedly) by the $cientolocult to believe that she is SP, an outcast "Suppressive Person".

    ReplyDelete
  9. What Jamie's Girl said. Hopefully Katie gets a better deal.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I vaguely remember an article written by a former scientology member that spoke of an auditing session where members have to divulge all of their deepest darkest secrets and when u divorce the parent who is still scientologist keeps the kids and restricts access. Kim will probably afraid that the secrets she revealed in those session would be used against her. Yes she could file for visitations but whats to stop "leaks" from coming out. Plus for all we know the kids who still scientologist dont want to see her. I mean they call her "Nicole" which I am sure hurts deeply.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Isabella's side-eye is killing me here.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That is a vile group (COS) and I hope we see the day it is no-more.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think everyone is missing Ent's point here. She threw her kids under the bus as if this is their fault. If they are trapped in the COS, it is because of their dad. It is better to keep your mouth shut then make your own children look bad to the world. Don't forget - she has joint custody. If Nic did speak out, told the truth about Tom & the COS, and she showed up dead soon after, I think even Beverly Hills PD could solve that case. Nic is too high profile for the COS to touch the hair on her head.

    ReplyDelete
  14. COS will always exist. They can control people and people fear them. People give COS money. The government likes that. They learn from COS.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I remember Isabella visiting Nicole in Australia a few years back and some Sci complaining to the press that she was too permissive and didn't follow COS guidelines so the visits came to an end. The last time I saw her out and about was with Katie and Suri and she had gained a lot of weight and walked a few steps behind them.

    ReplyDelete
  16. They have something on her. They have to.

    ReplyDelete
  17. ^^^I remember that trip. I think that was the end to any unsupervised visits.

    I don't get the feeling NK is throwing her kids under the bus, but maybe she's hurt they don't want to see her.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I don't get the impression that Nicole Kidman is exactly the kind of person who would stand up for her kids if their hearts at stake versus her own hide. Scientology may have a lot of dirt on her, plus they really are dangerous people. Perhaps she really doesn't have the love for them that she does for her own child...they being adopted, after all - or perhaps she's afraid of CoSc. Or perhaps she's been thwarted so many times she's just waiting for them to grow up and figure it out on their own. Probably something between the two.

    You can go online and read some stories of parents who lost their kids to Scientology, or kids who grew up in the cult and came out. It will chill you to the bone.

    ReplyDelete
  19. hunter, what are the URLs for those sites? I'd love to read them.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Valerie.. here is the best ones

    http://exscientologykids.com/
    http://www.xenu.net/
    http://www.whyweprotest.net/en/

    ReplyDelete
  21. i think she could be hurt plenty by COS if she spills. that's why she doesn't. and maybe this was her way of saying publicly how much she misses them---hoping they'll see it and contact HER. they're adults now, right?

    ReplyDelete
  22. "The pain is lessened by having Sunday Rose." That's the part that kills me. A new child doesn't replace your older ones. Man up, fight for the right to see your kids and take whatever Scientology dishes out. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Here is the part that I would like for her, or Tom, or someone in the medical field to explain to me: When they were married, they supposedly could not have children so they adopted. Then they got divorced, married other people, and now they each have a biological child? Is tgere such a thing as not being able to get pregnant because your eggs/ sperm are not compatible, although nothing wrong with them per se?

    ReplyDelete
  24. And yeah, I realise that the theory is that Sunday Rose and Suri are not biological children of Nicole or Tom....that't why I want them to explain it...*L*

    ReplyDelete
  25. well, here's MY question. right around the time she and dickwad split, she had a miscarriage. i believe she's acknowledged that. so what was THAT all about?

    ReplyDelete
  26. @ parissucksliterally - The COS has something on all of their members. That's how they roll.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @nancer --

    That child wasn't Tommy's - it was an open marriage due to his "preferences" but she may have taken it too far, hence the divorce.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Nancer

    Allegedly she was pregnant by Ewan McGreggor when they did Moulin Rouge.

    ReplyDelete
  29. hadn't heard the mcgreggor thing. thanks for the scoop.

    ReplyDelete
  30. She's cold as ice. Even when she was with Tom she used to talk about how she wanted to one day have a child "of my own". in other words, one who is not adopted. What a mean thing to say when you already have adopted children.

    While I agree the COS are scary, I think her shruggy oh-well-whatcha-gonna-do? attitude about her older kids is gross.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I've spent way too much time on that Xenu site. Those people are so whack. How can something so weird, scary, and stupid be so powerful?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I read somewhere that Isabella wanted to go live with her because she hates Katie.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I never got the feeling she even cared about the first two kids. She acts like Sunday Roast is her only child. I thought the first two kids were Tommy Girl's idea.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Unless there is something really bad in her past/background, a mother can almost always get at least joint custody. This arrangement has to have been part of an agreement/contract or financial settlement. Granted, Tom is rich beyond belief but Nicole also has plenty of money and could easily take him to court. The fact that she has never made a legal move to get them back or at least to see them regularly, says she has agreed to it for some reason. I think there must be something potentially embarrassing she doesn't want made public or she got a large pay-off

    ReplyDelete
  37. I'm just not a fan of this woman and it's hard for me to wrap my head around the idea of giving up my children under ANY circumstances. Growing up my own mother instilled in me the mama bear code of conduct - no one f*cks with her children and if they do, prepare to do battle. I believe that Nicole threw herself under the bus in exchange for her fame. Now she seems to be living with the consequences of that choice.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days