October 14, 2010
This former A list reality star and now just a celebrity with some kids has been complaining publicly about paps. What she has not said is how the other day she hid from the paps and would not let them take her photo until she did her makeup, changed clothes and then and only then just "happened" to show up right where the paps were.
Nicole Richie
I have to say, I would definitely want to hide and get my face on before anyone takes my picture...
ReplyDeleteIf she has issues with the paps taking pics of her kids, then that is a separate issue from this one.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with farmgirl. Who wants to get their picture taken when you look like hell?
ReplyDeleteWasn't she complaining about paps showing up at her daughter's daycare and hanging around when she (Nicole) wasn't even there? Honestly, I agree with her- celebs can work the paps all they want. It's part of the business now, and an easy way for people to stay relevant- but their kids should be off limits (especially when their parents aren't around).
ReplyDeleteI agree that it's different when they stalk the children. Nicole can choose her fame and the BS and/or stalking that goes along with it; her kids cannot.
ReplyDeleteDespite some hints that she's off the wagon, I think Nicole has been a good mom.
I honestly wish it was a law that children's pictures could not be published without parents written consent. That way we would know who is really whoring out their kids photos vs. being pap attacked.
ReplyDeleteI agree--the issue with the kids has everything to do with the paps being super creepy. It is the one thing I applaud Nicole on.
ReplyDeleteAs one who takes the worst photo's I get it....
ReplyDeleteI agree with all of you. When it comes to kids, they should be off limits, maybe she was complaining about that.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you guys...it's one thing to get yourself papped...but stalking the kids' school?
ReplyDeleteI get it also if you go somewhere that is pap heavy.....I also don't blame her for waiting till she was presentable. How many of us have made sure we AT LEAST threw on mascara or gloss or something just to run to the store (even if it's in a less than desirable outfit). I know I do!
Funny how much she complains about how her kids shouldn't be photgraphed, and yet she has posed with them on the cover of "People" magazine THREE TIMES.
ReplyDeleteI guess her kids' privacy isn't quite so important to her when she's being paid.
@ Krissie.
ReplyDeleteI agree.
Nicole is a waste of time & space. She's a hypocrite and publicity whore despite her protestations about protecting her kids.
@Krissie - I'd agree, but a photoshoot at the house or at a studio is totally different from creepy paps hanging around a school. One's on her terms, the other isn't.
ReplyDelete@Whitney-My problem with the photo shoots is that Nicole's entire issue seems to be that her kids deserve privacy and should not be in the public eye. So I do not see the difference between a photo shoot or a pap shot. Whether Nicole okayed it or not, the end result is the same-that her kids' pictures will be shown for all the world to see.
ReplyDeleteThe only difference is that Nicole pockets money one way, and does not pocket it the other way. Hmm....
I hate this stupid bitch.
ReplyDeleteDidn't she claim in an interview that she didn't own any makeup?
ReplyDeleteNever could stand this troll looking hypocrite.
ReplyDelete