Saturday, September 27, 2014

Can The Hackers Ruin Jennifer Lawrence's Career?

Another round of celebrity photos were released by hackers today. In each of the three big releases, Jennifer Lawrence has played a huge part. She has appeared in all three photo hacks and today an additional 55 naked photos of her were released which brings her total to nearly 300. That is a very large number of photos and apparently there are hundreds more of her still to be released along with movies. Most of the celebrities involved have suffered a day or two of outrage and embarrassment but have moved on and honestly, I think most of it will be forgotten. Jennifer Lawrence is different though. She had an image she tried to maintain that saw her get cast in big box office films and Academy Award type films that led to her reputation as a serious actress who has trouble not falling on big nights. She has generally been scandal free. None of this is her fault. The hackers broke a lot of laws and managed to access all of her photos. The problem she faces is that there are just so many of them and they just keep coming in wave after wave for just about a month. With more to come and now with her high profile coupling with Chris Martin, I wonder if she will get offered the same parts and roles. Does a producer or studio want to work with her knowing there could be other photos or something else leaked? A sex tape right when she is promoting some $200M movie. A lot of studios might decide to take a pass next time they hear her name.

100 comments:

  1. oh well...
    she annoys me. and how many pictures does one need to take? self obsessed much?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She prob took & deleted 10 for every photo she actually sent to her boyfriend, but the cloud kept them all.

      Delete
  2. Somewhere Joan Rivers is smiling.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think it'll be a game-changer at all- nude pics,no matter how much real/fake cum on face involved is not a "clutch your pearls" situation anymore...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love her and she will prevail. Not her fault and don't blame her. She's young and beautiful. Won't hurt her career.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't think it will hurt her at all.
    Now if it were pics of Taylor Swift, well yeah I can see that impacting a career.
    Jennifer is a box office draw, she's not going to lose parts. If anything this is getting her name out all over the place. She should probably raise her rates.

    ReplyDelete
  6. E ghads. I thought all publicity is good publicity.

    It could ruin her if producer / directors don't like to know they're getting sloppy seconds, or in her case - thirds, fourths, fifths,etc.... If it's important for them to think they have the magical straw that's going to get the actress on her back, then she's going to be shunned until tbe stench wares off.
    OR, they may all be lined up cuz she's easy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree a few photos wouldn't hurt.. but hundreds? Looks downright odd.

    In his recent memoir, William Friedkin wrote that Lawrence desperately wanted the role of Dottie in Killer Joe. Then her agent signed her to X Men instead. If you've seen Killer Joe, it's a brilliant blue-black comedy, but the role of Dottie is for a nymphette who gets seduced (in a very graphic sex scene) by a psychopathic hitman played by McConaughey. Judging by her raunchy photos, Killer Joe was more up her alley (no pun intended) than X Men.

    ReplyDelete
  8. even Lilo said Jennifer fucked her way up to the top--but nobody too her seriously because well she is Lilo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The difference being that Jennifer is a talented actress and used those connections to prove it and now no longer has to fuck for parts. Whereas Lilo is still proving she was overrated after Mean Girls with every second shot she gets.

      Delete
  9. No one shld be looking at thise photos anyway. Goofing around acting silly and taking pictures shldnt own u for rest of life. These girls shld get advice from vanessa williams.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now I am beginning to think Ms Paltrow hired herself a teenager hacker. If Ryan Phillipe can be responsible for candle fires Goopy can be the head of a hacker ring trying to bring down her husband's girlfriend.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Bacon R., "This is getting her 'EVERRRRYTHING' out all over the place" heheh

    ReplyDelete
  12. @audrey, I would NOT be surprised at all-actually you could very well be onto something-remember her campaign against 'Vanity Fair'& the article they were working on about her??

    ReplyDelete
  13. She'll be just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 'Killer Joe' was a tad disturbing-yes I know,it's supposed to be but I thought it got a bit tedious-on the other hand,my sis loved it..beauty of film right there.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Am I the only one thinking she made herself a serious enemy out in H'wood? That many pix of her, and not all that many of the others, makes me think it's somebody she knew that did it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. She'll be fine. I mean, IT'S NOT LIKE SHE'S GAY! HAHAHA

    Seriously, as long as Hunger Games makes a billion dollars they won't care. It's about making money.

    ReplyDelete
  17. She doesnt have that many. Half of those pictures are fake pics.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Unless you are a perv - who's bothering to look?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha In that case, Im a Perv of the highest rank. Yes please, can I have another?

      Delete
    2. I think its more curiosity than perviness that is making people go look at the pics. Its interesting to see what people are like behind closed doors, especially if their persona is the polar opposite of what they portray in real life.

      And who can blame jennifer for taking all those pics, she is drop dead gorgeous with a killer body and she obviously likes to fuck alot. Go girl!

      Delete
    3. B26, its reslly pretty simple ethics. Were these pictures intended for everyone to see? No. Do you want to support criminal activity by looking at them? No. Would you want someone looking at your or your daughters nude photos that were never intended for u to see? No. Case closed.

      Delete
    4. @Eros - I would say it has more to do with the hypocrisy of her public image. Mind you, had these photos never been revealed, the public would not have known - until of course her true personality contrasted her persona.

      Delete
  19. It'll make no difference because she is a genuinely talented actor. Surprisingly so for her age. She's appeared essentially nude in films already so it's not as if anything new was revealed, other than how she trims her bush.

    And besides, except for a couple of skeevy ones she looks fantastic in the pics.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I doubt it will hurt her much. Other than the Hunger Games movies, her movies are squarely aimed at adult audiences. I don't think anyone really cares about nude pics. She's not drowning puppies.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Jennifer Lawrence isn't just some starlet trying to make her way up the food chain. She is and was an A-List Oscar winner with multiple nominations before this happened. I think she'll be fine.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Even if it'ss not her fault ,even if the pics are private,even if you do what you want with your body,it's many many naked pics at this point.She looks as narcissist and crazy of her body as Kim K .

    ReplyDelete
  23. This is all a publicity stunt for the changing of Jennifer's image. She's now dating a grown up, Hunger Games will be over soon, she wants to be seen as a sex bomb. Everybody complained how she looked out of place in films like AH and SLP(and she did), these pics are to help people see her as the "hot" bitch. It reminds me of the stunt with K Stew and the director toward the end of the Twilight franchise. I'm not saying that Jennifer herself leaked these pics, just that it's all concerted.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Why does anyone need that many naked photos? Geez...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Unless they have pics of her doing ass to ass I think she'll be fine. Now if she has a seriously raunchy video of her that might hurt her career. The pics that have been released are no big deal. Everyone knows actresses are narcissistic. It's not really a shocker that she has so many. A lot of girls her age have tons of naked pics of themselves on their phones.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Reality check. Who here hasnt seen naked women? What is the big deal? So what. So fucking what. This is being made into a much bigger deal than is necessary. If anything it will probably help her career.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I can't imagine this ruining her career Bc if anything most people have rallied behind her. Who cares if she took so many pics of herself, it's not like she meant to share them unlike a Kardashian...

    ReplyDelete
  28. Marilyn Monroe f**ked her way to the top and she's an icon. Lucille Ball got to the middle on her back - had to stop when she met Desi - and she's an icon. I don't think anyone really cares about Jennifer Lawrence had to do to get in front of a camera, just that she looks good and performs well when she's there. I mean, Tara Reid has f**ked plenty of people, but you don't see her with an Oscar.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I agree she'll be fine but I'm with Derek....how many pics you need of yourself naked girl? That "amount" is the only part that makes me give her a little side-eye. A little. Again not the "naked" part...the "huuuundreeeeds" part. Strangely, I've never done it even once (only because it wasn't so easy or "normal" to do that when I was a teen in the 80's and I'm mid-40's and no one wants to see my ass now) but I can confidently say if I did there wouldn't be but a handful to speak of.

    ReplyDelete
  30. If a movie looks good, I'm going to enjoy it! Being outraged and boycotting things the news decides to report on would make me a hypocrite unless I investigate the creator of every single object in my house. Besides, it's more fun to enjoy the good people have to offer than to focus on the "bad" and alienate them because I don't agree with something they like.

    ReplyDelete
  31. this has the fangs and talons of paltrow written all over it.
    that'll teach that lil bitch! LOL

    ReplyDelete
  32. I don't think it's a big deal, and I'm surprised that a so-called "entertainment lawyer" would think so either. (I know, it's all entbots writing at this point.) Nudity is no big deal. And the implication that her dating Chris Martin is a negative...? Why would it be?

    ReplyDelete
  33. I still don't get why anyone would want to keep naked pics of themselves anyway. Naked pics of other people (knowingly/willingly given) maybe fine. Naked pics of myself? Hell no. Nor would I be willing to send any to anyone for them to keep.

    Clearly I don't have the narcissism/self-confidence needed for this thing.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I like Jennifer and think she's a good actress. But, the public was getting a little tired of her and I think the pictures are going to hurt her career in the long run. I saw the first set and they screamed casting couch to me. I know I am not the only one to think that either. I have seen a lot of comments elsewhere that say they think she made it to the top so fast because she slept her way to the top. People will be thinking that for the rest of her career.

    It seems like someone is out to get her. Who did she piss off? I also don't get why she's dating Chris Martin. Weird.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I like Jennifer and think she's a good actress. But, the public was getting a little tired of her and I think the pictures are going to hurt her career in the long run. I saw the first set and they screamed casting couch to me. I know I am not the only one to think that either. I have seen a lot of comments elsewhere that say they think she made it to the top so fast because she slept her way to the top. People will be thinking that for the rest of her career.

    It seems like someone is out to get her. Who did she piss off? I also don't get why she's dating Chris Martin. Weird.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I haven't seen ive of these raunchy things yet! (Looks to see if anyone paying attention). This shouldn't hurt her one bit unless a porn tape pops up in the hacking file.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Since when were sex tapes considered a bad PR move unless you are doing a Disney film.

    ReplyDelete
  38. It is amazing how social media has brought out the narcissism of sooooo many people. I mean how many pictures of yourself let alone your naked self do you need?

    ReplyDelete
  39. If this was pre Silver Linings Playbook, it might have hurt her career. But I think she has already established herself as talented and multifaceted. This is just another side of her. I think she will be fine.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Alexa Rose

    She's dating Chris Martin because they are trying to change her image. Jennifer is A list indeed but she is not yet in the leagues of an Angelina Jolie. She's still considered goofy and childlike. The Hunger Games franchise has been carrying her so far. I don't know anybody who considers Jennifer sexy or an "adult" for that matter....these pics and now dating GOOP's husband are to change people's minds.

    ReplyDelete
  41. No …it won't affect her…she takes a break, has a baby…new woman

    ReplyDelete
  42. The studios would be dumb to avoid casting her even after all this: she has top star quality and can act most of her peers off the screen. The casting couch rumours are obviously bullshit - she's been an obvious choice for most of her roles - and the charge of narcissism won't make any sense to the iPhone generation of under-25s who love her.

    ReplyDelete
  43. It's not like she's a Disney actress. Her career may even get a push. Aside from Hunger Games (and I predict a bunch of non-literary male adolescents will now go see the remaining films in the franchise due to their number one spank bank star) she tends to opt for grittier films anyway

    ReplyDelete
  44. I think she'll be okay. People seem to actually feel sympathetic towards her and the others because of this extremely purposeful and gross invasion of personal privacy. And whether she feels it or not, she has the charm to publicly laugh it off and make a joke about herself.

    ReplyDelete
  45. No. Jennifer was 1) a victim of cyber crimes and 2) said crimes resulted in naked pictures. Only way it hurts her is if this was some deliberate attack against HER as speculated above, but then she'd be done regardless of the nudies. OR- if some of the pictures involve her pegging Charles Manson while pouring sugar down Obama's gas tank.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha!@LadyH. Maybe she tortured bunnies?

      Delete
  46. See, this is the problem when you mix long-distance relationships with digital media. Jen and Nick were a couple for years, and during most of those years she was almost always on location. So I'm sure they filled the void with a bunch of what a lot of couples do, and that's pictures and videos. I refuse to look at any of these leaked pics because the invasion of privacy is so, so gross, but unless the pics feature her with farm animals or minors or a series of men/women who subsequently helped her get where she is today, there's no harm and no shame, and I doubt there will be any lasting repercussions with regard to her career. She's a grown woman and these were never meant for public consumption.

    About the only thing I can say is that anyone who takes pictures of themselves in compromising positions can virtually guarantee that those pictures will one day end up in the wrong hands, particularly if they're famous. If you want to keep it private, put a lens cap on it and use the camera in your head.

    ReplyDelete
  47. We are talking about Hollywood, right? Since when has being naked on film ever--EVER--hurt a woman's career in that field?

    ReplyDelete
  48. My hubby and I erase all our sexy pics. Like the time (true story) we were watching Star Wars (all 6) and I asked if he wanted me to dress sexy. He said he'd live for me to dress like Chewy, but I'd need to stop shaving.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some of these peoples pics had been deleted YEARS ago. Nothing is ever truly deleted.

      Delete
  49. She's really into "self-portraits" huh. I bet that's ancient history now. I doubt it will impact her career. She's already proved herself a serious actress. I think it's fortunate the leak happened after she did though.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Bee Haven, just be mindful that it's difficult to completely erase something permanently. Many of these Fappening photos were thought to be erased by the owners, and photos Jodi Arias's deleted survived even after being subjected to a wash machine cycle.

    ReplyDelete
  51. By the way, when enty says 300 pictures are already out there, I suspect he's double or triple-counting from what I've seen, or else he's been counting every pic, not just the revealing ones - and the general media coverage of the second and third waves has been fairly minimal. The Chris Martin thing may actually cause her more trouble in the long run, if some studios decide casting her would be a distraction - but given her talent, appeal and profile, can they afford to be so picky?

    ReplyDelete
  52. Jennifer doesn't care. She was papped smoking a joint, she flipped off the press at the Oscars, drooled over Jack Nicholson. No one thinks she's a goody two shoes, not even the parents of tweens and teens flocking to the Hunger Games movies.

    If you get a chance, watch her in Winter's Bone. Girlfriend owned that role, and it's not an easy one.

    ReplyDelete
  53. She was great in Winter's Bone!

    The pictures weren't hanging around in her photo album on her phone. They were sent to her boyfriend. Many were probably deleted, but were still lurking in "the cloud". She wasn't doing anything scandalous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the bf was hacked, not jLaw. He would save them all. There are stories of him showing others the pics. I think she erased hers, same as anyone. He is the one who was hacked.

      Delete
  54. I hate when people (Lena Dunham) say blaming the victim is like saying someone was wearing a short skirt so she's asking to be raped..
    Comparing RAPE to girls who willingly take their own nudie pics disgusts me.
    Yes of course it's wrong that they were stolen, and they have every right to take naughty pics, but don't compare it to rape and speaking of Lena lets hope she doesn't have any clam shots in the cloud.

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Seven... W'sBone...totally.... that was where we first saw her (while hubby and I were vacationing in Mexico '11...never heard of it and picked it up at "a dvd cafe" they call 'em down there...illegal dvd places...you get the idea) and had no clue who she was or anything about the film, just thought it had an interesting title and I remember saying to hubby..."dayamn this girl is goooood. I bet this won't be the last time we see her" (clothed...kidding).

    ReplyDelete
  56. I don't see it hurting her career considering she already has a Best Actress Oscar AND she's mad talented.

    Maybe if this had happened in the 1950's but now? Please.

    But I think Derek Harvey said "self-obsessed much?" and I have to agree. If anything, the sheer volume of nude photos she took is laughable.

    The only aspect of her career this might hurt is a potential future Playboy centerfold, because she's been overexposed in that area - yuck yuck.

    ReplyDelete
  57. This won't ruin her career. She's the victim here. It wasn't her fault. Also, she has already proven herself both as a serious actress and as a box office draw.

    But now that everyone knows there's a new side to her, people will see her differently. I'm already noticing a divide (on the internet in general) between the defenders and the people calling her every sexist name in the book. The general public definitely won't stop loving her or anything. She has actually become even more popular. She's just not "untouchable" anymore. She has "dirt" now. It's unfortunate because it wasn't even her fault.

    ReplyDelete
  58. The pics will have no effect on JLaw's career. She has the awards and the block busters, and she is only 24. She is teflon.

    I went looking when I saw this post. Anna Kendrick is the first one I can see the pics having a negative impact on. She doesn't have any nudes, but there is a pic of her w/ her face on a mirrored counter, and in the other mirror, you can see a rolled up bill and coke residue.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Kendrick and Drugs:
    too lazy to clicky


    http://m2.thefappening.sexy/albums/picture.php?/2493/category/168


    http://m2.thefappening.sexy/albums/picture.php?/2488/category/168

    ReplyDelete
  60. First, this latest leak is, according to others, is just a repost of her previous leaked pics, so.....

    To the question, unless it's PROVEN she used "The Couch," or a really explicit tape comes out, NO it won't hurt her career. Her, you know, LIFE, OTOH...

    ReplyDelete
  61. I'm astonished that she has so freakin many photos. What the hell? Was she planning on putting out a damn book? That sounds more like something Kimye would have logged (okay she would have a gazillion). I don't think this is going to detour directors at all. The way Hollywood runs these days, shit that's the kind of thing that turns you into a "star" in our fucked up society. I hope they nail the asshole(s) that did this to the wall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How is this So Many Pics? Think of how many times she had long distance phone sex. That's 20 pics each time? It's not that many when you get it in context.

      Delete
  62. Wait, you guys that are questioning why she had so many pics of herself, weren't some of the pics deleted and the hacker got them from the magic cloud? And was it only Kate Uptons boyfriends phone that was hacked or could it also have been Jen L's bf's phone? So.... Maybe she isn't a narcissist who loves looking at herself or maybe she's like me with 900+ pics of my cats that I'm just too lazy to delete but rarely look at.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I totally understand her having lots of pics. She has been on locations filming constantly for how many years straight? That is a lot of time for her dick to be away from her puss, so sexting galore going down.

    I agree w/ Kevin, I haven't seen any new JLaw pics. Kendrick non nudes and 3-4 bims I never heard of not doing anything interesting. Oh, and the site I follow has 121 JLaw pix, and 4 videos. I don't know where Fugazi Enty is pulling the # 245 from.

    ReplyDelete
  64. The only pic I saw was (hopefully) a selfie of Nicholas Hoult. Le swoon.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I doubt that this will impact her career at all. She is the most bankable star of her age. If Julia Roberts can leave a man at the altar and hide out in Ireland with the next man and survive that, JLaw will be just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  66. I agree, I think Paltrow has it out for her

    Just like Jen had Blake's naked selfies sent to the paps

    Goop is sneaky like that

    ReplyDelete
  67. Nancy while I don't like Julia Roberts that's an unfair dig. She left him at the altar because he was hooking up with strippers. Or something like that.

    ReplyDelete
  68. this is a much different discussion from 3 weeks ago and sbgate

    ReplyDelete
  69. They were pics to her boyfriend & she prob viewed several & deleted them. She's talented & looking at her career I don't see whete she ever needed the casting couch.

    ReplyDelete
  70. But now that everyone knows there's a new side to her, people will see her differently. I'm already noticing a divide (on the internet in general) between the defenders and the people calling her every sexist name in the book. The general public definitely won't stop loving her or anything. She has actually become even more popular. She's just not "untouchable" anymore. She has "dirt" now. It's unfortunate because it wasn't even her fault.

    12:11 PM

    Drink that Kool Aid!

    ReplyDelete
  71. Yeah I gotta take back my knee jerk reaction to the number of pix they "say" are out there. I can see taking some personal photos to send your boyfriend periodically, sending them every now and then and then thinking they've been deleted. The way they've been released is very misleading and like a dope I fell for this bullshit like a rookie. Eh this isn't going to hurt her career anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Well, it's not the 90's anymore. All the pearl clutchers are in nursing homes and their kids don't give a crap.

    She's fine.

    ReplyDelete
  73. IMO, this will hurt her - maybe not professionally (porno's will always have followers), but personally - hell yes... Chris Martin "relationship" is total crap... Really?? No unwed "men" are out there that they could link her? She needs to settle the hell down or get a new publicist. Liz apparently can't keep her craziness under wraps anymore and a lot of people are done with her. She is no role model - however the Hunger Games made her even more famous - what is the age level of those who have bought into the franchise??? Tweeners.

    ReplyDelete
  74. There's a difference between cynically making a sex tape and then leaking it and pretending to be outraged, while hoping it will help your career, and this situation in which JLaw and others are truly victims of intrusive hacking of photographs they thought were private.

    Why on earth would this hurt her personally OR professionally?

    This is a lesson to all of us that to store anything in the cloud is to put it within the reach of a hacker's grasp.

    And by the way if you are contemplating committing a crime? Don't do any searches on your home computer. Your IP address, even if dynamically assigned and changed every time you log on, can be traced back to you. And if you do your searches from a public library instead? They have video of who used their computers, when.

    And by the way don't do those searches on your cell phone, tablet or notepaid either.

    The cloud is forever people. I would love to be truly portable and keep everything in the cloud, my friends who work at Google swear by it and extol its advantages all the time, but I just cannot bring myself to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Why in the world are there so many naked pictures of her? Exactly how much do you love yourself Jennifer?

    ReplyDelete
  76. especially when she told shaliene woodley.. don't take nude photos or make a sex tape, and don't do drugs.. roll eyes now..3.2.1.

    ReplyDelete
  77. It MIGHT, marginally, hurt THG box office #'s w/ conservative parents keeping their tweens home. But that'll be fringe.

    Beyond that, in a way, it moves her beyond YA stuff. Helpful, in a way.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Lawrence in "Winter's Bone" was awesome. In "Silver Lining's Playbook" not so much. I kept waiting for her to do something while watching that movie.

    I can't comment on the how and why these photos were taken and sent since that would be speculation on my part and I don't know anyone involved personally.

    Because of the sheer number of pictures she's in I don't think it's a stretch to say that she was the target of the release. Was it Paltrow? She's well connected in Hollywood thanks to her parents and I'm sure she "knows people" who could do such a thing.

    Then again the existence of these pictures could've been well known in certain circles and someone decided to release them for who knows what reason.

    It's interesting that all the posters saying this won't affect her are singing the same song so to speak - saying the same thing over and over just rearranging the words.

    I don't see how this won't hurt her.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Since when does a naked photo or sex tape ruin careers? Not since the mid 2000's. Now it either makes a career or boosts it. No wonder all these people are filming themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Doesn't change how I feel about her, I think she is awesome. Nothing wrong with nude photos whoever she took them for, it's her business.

    ReplyDelete
  81. it didn't work for montana fisburne.. lawrence fishburne's daughter.. she wanted to use a sex tape / porn career w/ vivid to launch her career and it buried hers b4 it began. no one seriously in hw wants to touch her.. so to speak..

    ReplyDelete
  82. There's no issue of hypocrisy here - Lawrence has never pretended to be a puritan or to hide the fact that she has a wild side. That I think makes a huge difference in this type of situation. Anyway, as others have said, the photos all look as if they were snaps for the long-distance bf: she mentions that once in an interview, and the whole thing blows over.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Did you ever wonder why Jennifer Lawrence got an Oscar? Did you ever wonder how she got that big $15 million Dior campaign contract? She has just extended her contract this year with the high-profile fashion house, committing for an estimated three more years to the tune of approximately $15 million in compensation! Jennifer Lawrence does ANYTHING for success! as you can see from her dirty photos. Marc Jacobs supports Jennifer and she took those pictures for him. http://styleangelique.blogspot.hu/2014/09/who-leaked-all-those-naked-celebrity.html

    ReplyDelete
  84. Yeah, that Marc Jacobs site is as credible as the Emma Watson hate site.

    I don't know what planet you people live on, but hot young chicks take and send nude pics all the time now. God Bless Smartphones.

    The fact that some think these pics show a hidden side to JLaw is as delusional as people saying the Ray Rice video showed something we didn't know beforehand. What is the big revelation, that her chastity belt was unlocked? You really think that hot, young rich chicks don't fuck?

    Y'all H8RZ should really be thankful for the pics. Now in addition to hating JLaw because she's young, pretty, rich, and has both box office and critical success, you can hate her for having nicer tits, nicer clam and an active, fun sex life.

    ReplyDelete
  85. She was so pretty with the long hair. Hate her hollywood makeover.

    ReplyDelete
  86. I think the only way it would hurt an actresses career was if the pictures were bad. I'm not going to hate her body is amazing.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days