Blind Item #4
Apparently to see the full picture, one must see who is financing the suit against this former A+ list mostly movie actor. It is that group you never want to cross.
Apparently to see the full picture, one must see who is financing the suit against this former A+ list mostly movie actor. It is that group you never want to cross.
Posted by ent lawyer at 12:30 AM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
16 comments:
Travolta-Scio?
As a warning maybe? He has another pending suit I believe
Scientology and Jim Carrey
Jim Carrey being sued by ex-girlfriend's ex hubby.
Ex is a scientologist
Of course. So is Enty saying it's not true or that they are silencing him in general. I read the texts....really sad.
So now COS is going after NON-members' money?!
I can't wait until those horrible Clams are put out of business.
Jim Carry had some connections to Scientology, and apparently everyone seems to be taking the bait from them. Members of Scientology have a lot of suicides and "accidental "deaths with their members, and this poor woman may well have been driven to her death by them as much or more so than by Carrey. Of course, her so called Husband released texts of hers, only ones that make him look bad, not the ones that would show what was really going on. I doubt anyone would like some of their texts to be made public, why was he able to do this? I would have some sympathy if her family was suing, but this guy is only doing this as a money grab.
even though Carrey's Motion For Dismissal is probably already marked Ready on the Court's Calendar, 1/2 of the Ex-Husband's mission has already been accomplished:1)guilty by insinuation that Jim Carrey has at least 3 STDs & gave them to his exgirlfriend unknowingly; 2)that he is cruel,cold,arrogant etc. in his dismissive texts to her; 3) he knew or should've known all the drugs prescribed to him(in his fake name of Arthur King) were in her possession & he covered it up w/a text after the fact(supposedly not factually true), 4) all the other personal crap the ex outed about Jim in his 'tell-all' Lawsuit..........Only the second 1/2 of the ex's mission hasn't been accomplished: Getting Alotta Jim's Money!!!!
*** btw, I don't agree with anyone's 'take' on the DISCLOSED texts...I've no idea what went on in their relationship(NOR does anyone else,except the people actually & literally involved)...The only thing I DO know is that this is ONE SIDE of ONE PART of a story....and one that has a demand for Alot Of Money.
I meant I don't agree w/ 'take' on the'disclosed' texts or ANY OTHER PART of the accusations(stds,etc..) b/c I have no idea what's true or not nor is it my business.
If you watch "Going Clear" you can see that the attacking/smearing/harassing is what they do. Scary, scary people.
Those texts were heartbreaking.ifyou read them you'd be hardpressed to think he didn't know, and I hate thinking that but.....
I meant his girlfriend was unknowing...poorly structured sentence on my part...i notice that I tend to write 'stream of consciensce' style on this site alot & just hit send w/o rereading.
-but I did skim the texts the Ex's Attorney chose to put in his lawsuit the other day on DM.
It is interesting that no one in this scenario sought help. Like, whatever, just let her overdose. She dies and we'll move into the apartment.
ISIS?!?!
Jesus, Jim. Be careful, man.
Post a Comment