Blind Item #8
This weekly magazine, never known for its objectivity was paid $1M for several features about why this disaster of a made for television reboot was so amazing even though it sucked.
This weekly magazine, never known for its objectivity was paid $1M for several features about why this disaster of a made for television reboot was so amazing even though it sucked.
Posted by ent lawyer at 1:45 AM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
12 comments:
Dirty Dancing
Awful!
And Kneepads/People
Except this morning afterwards People decided that Abigail and the guy who couldn't act had "no chemistry". But they all got paid ?
Had it on for 5 minutes out of abject curiosity and was ????It was sooo bad!Might put Coke Mom(I mean Debra Messing) over the edge--(she looked embarrassed to be in it rightly so)
What dreck...Patrick Swayze was a force of nature, beautiful to behold, and talented. Jennifer Grey was lightheated perfection.
Why would anyone mess with That?
Don't get me started on coke mom and that mummified character who played her husband, and why were They singing? At least Jerry Ohrbach Could have sung if asked. The Breslin character was too chubby, I guess that was an attempt to make her seem Real, it didn't work.
I couldn't bring myself to try. The movie was perfection, and Patrick Swayze's memory should not be sullied by any association with this .... barefaced money grab.
Dirty Dancing/People. We all know the truth-it was terrible and got destroyed on Twitter. Some movies need to not be remade. This was one of them.
Except Jerry Orbach is dead . . . although he STILL might have done a better job!
+100,000,000
Sadly, I know he's dead. But my point was that if the father was Supposed to sing in the original, Jerry could have pulled it off.
Is "Baywatch" any good? Just saw the trailer on TV the other day. That boy toy dude Nicole Kidman peed on is in it.
[…] May 24, 2017 […]
Post a Comment