Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Blind Item #7

Don't believe the hype. For their to be another installment of this former television show turned movie franchise, the lead actress, who is an A- lister would want to be aid more than any other actress in history by a wide margin. As much as the other stars would do it for $1M, our actress would want about $50M between salary and box office and that isn't going to happen.

21 comments:

  1. Tricia131:32 AM

    Pryanka Chopra/Baywatch?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tricia131:35 AM

    Didn't that crap bomb? Man she has cajones (if it's her)

    ReplyDelete
  3. casting girl1:38 AM

    SJP

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tricia131:42 AM

    That makes more sense -Enty seems really down on SJP-- I be never known/thought her to be like that

    ReplyDelete
  5. Patreeki2:18 AM

    Lol. Is there any demand for a film featuring 4 long over-the-hill broads pretending they're a third of their age?

    ReplyDelete
  6. mariaj2:21 AM

    SJP ...surprised that the movies had that sucess, frankly

    ReplyDelete
  7. sandybrook2:33 AM

    SJP doesn't have the chops to be paid that much for a movie that will bomb. And who wrote this BI? Kindergarten Enty maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "for their, from a JD?

    ReplyDelete
  9. hothotheat3:03 AM

    Baywatch movies not really a franchise yet.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought I posted on this blind.
    Oh, well.
    I'm guessing JLaw and her Mystique character.

    Maybe it was another blind item.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sexagenarians and the City!

    ReplyDelete
  12. just sayin\'5:17 AM

    sounds like baywatch/chopra to me.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Tricia136:42 AM

    Hopefully it won't be !

    ReplyDelete
  14. Farmgirl7:33 AM

    Hasn't there been some Charlie's Angels discussion lately?

    ReplyDelete
  15. SnarkIsFun8:04 AM

    I could be WAY off, but . . . Gal Gadot and Wonder Woman 2? (Although IMHO, she would deserve that kind of $$, especially as the 1st movie has passed $750,000,000 worldwide, hasn't it?)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Renshaw8:34 AM

    +1. Who knows if she is making bonus or back end money from he film. If not, $25M retroactively and $25M for the next considering it will be just as successful. I'm not buying his narrative she wants to be paid more than any woman. There is a public backlash that the male superheroes are making millions, why not her.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Cherry8:54 AM

    Jennifer Aniston

    ReplyDelete
  18. texasrose1:28 PM

    Might agree with you if not for the clue that 'the others would do it for $1million'. Clearly referencing the other 3 from Sex inthe City. This is SJP.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Camal192:51 AM

    When SJP offers completely dry up, because she's already in her 50's, that's when she'll want to do another sequel. She'll be begging them.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hot Cola11:54 AM

    Calling them over the hill is just m an. Tebr are many woman sucseesful at thiere 40's,50', 60's. Judges. Congresswoam. Hilery Clinton was a presidential candidate in her 70's. So shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  21. D. Albertson4:15 AM

    "For their to be another installment"

    You'll slam any spelling error on this site but everyone's going to just let that go?

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days