Saturday, January 06, 2018

Blind Items Revealed #3

September 4, 2017

This B+ list mostly television actress on a very long running cable show is in danger of losing that A++ list boyfriend. Apparently one time she yachted for a best friend of the A++ lister. The man who paid her for the yachting had no idea she is the girlfriend of the A++ lister and thought the A++ lister wanted to hire the actress for yachting purposes. Awkward.

Meghan Markle/Prince Harry


74 comments:

  1. Guess she didn’t lose him!

    ReplyDelete
  2. We will know this is true if she ends up dead. If it is there will be proof and the Monarchy won't allow that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this saying that Meghan yachted WHILE she was dating Harry?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sure she needed the additional income a yachting excursion provided her. Entern has always said she just an opportunist looking out for herself.

    ReplyDelete
  5. She must be a firecracker in the sack. Harry does not care and probably used escorts his whole frickin life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So was she with Harry when she was yachting?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With him as in relationship wise

      Delete
  7. Is yachting like prostitution? What is yachting?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:39 PM

      Really rich people own yachts. Yacht girls are hookers that charge prices only rich guys can afford. Hence the term yacht girl. Go spend a weekend in the yacht...

      Delete
  8. Sounds like it was before...then XX introduced her to Harry thinking in terms of Harry hiring Me-Again and either she spun it into a "blind date" (as reported for their meeting), or he didn't understand the setup and assumed it was a blind date. Question is, who's the fixer? Guy Pelly or Markus Anderson? And has HRH twigged yet? If not, who's going to tell him?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I can't see Harry marrying a yacht girl. Reformed yachter possibly, but not one who was doing it while they were dating. He may be a ginger, but he's a Power Ginger.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think they're truly smitten, and that longevity will only be tested by time....

    But Harry is no saint, and if he judges her on her past, he's scumA++.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree. It seems fitting he find a party girl that understands his past and won't treat him like crap for it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If you go by this blind. Megan was a yacht girl and Harry was one to use the services of yacht girls (why else would the friend make the assumption?)

    If they both participated in yacht activities, then neither is morally superior. Harry would have no standing to criticize her - not that he has or would.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's not 100% up to Harry. If the Palace finds out that she was doing this, he will face a lot of pressure to dump her or renounce it all to marry her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OH BS!! Trust! The Queen knows everything..,and apparently, it’s either NOT TRUE or Queen realizes times, they are a-changing and DGAFF!

      Delete
  14. When I hear the story about how PH and MM met, I immediately thought of Bani and the Celebrity Sex Broker blinds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Observant - when I watched the engagement video of them tellling the story I immediately thought of this blind. She is a terrible actress and it was so rehearsed: she touches his arm - reminds him to seem off the cufff...

      Delete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw "Diana: In Her Own Words" on NatGeo channel. It was originally first aired during a lunar eclipse (well, that was my memory of it).

      She said she used to hear voices. Like Prince Charles proposed to her and said something along the lines of, "you realise that means you might become queen someday?" And the voice said, "you won't Ben queen but you'll have an important role." And it came true... 🌙

      Delete
  16. It´s a LARP. Enty is a cuckservative 4chan larper and is angry because Obama did an interview with Harry and now is visiting William. While the dumb Trump is hated by everyone. lol

    ReplyDelete
  17. Not a fan of the royals but I can't believe that the palace hasn't thoroughly investigated Markle, so she must have passed muster. The palace staff are more class conscious and snooty than the royals.

    I googled, "who introduced Harry and Meghan" and the name "designer Misha Nonoo" kept coming up. I'd never heard of her so I looked up her website and her designs are meager, repetitive and forgettable, however Nonoo is a tall attractive blonde, so I totally believe that she could be a yacht girl who does the part time work to finance her design house.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Who is Harry's friend that she was yachting with? We all know she has a history but I doubt that Harry cares much because his whole life has been about hookers and weed.

    ReplyDelete
  19. WTF is a LARP? Live Action Role Play? @Rafael, your comment makes absolutely no sense at all. Too much DemocraticUnderground before the morning coffee?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1 That made me spit out my drink.

      Delete
  20. Nonoo was married to a friend of the royals. That's how she comes to Harry.

    The other person who may be the matchmaker is Violet von Westenholz.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Just Paige - That's exactly what I was watching. I agree with your assessment of her behavior during that video.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think this blind implies she yachted before Harry and that is when one of Harry's buddies used her. Later when he saw them together he just assumed that Harry was using her services also. Doesn't necessarily mean she was yachting when dating Harry.

    Ash X - just google yacht girls. The term started when beautiful girls hung out at Cannes Film festival and then just with rich guys on their yachts in the med. It has evolved into just high high priced escorts to rich guys and not necessarily on yachts and generally referring to celeb or semi celeb women doing it. It is apparently a real thing. A lot of blinds here about actresses you would never guess that have been 'yacht' girls or still do $$$$ escorting.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lol at “power ginger” thank-you @Don... you’re on fire today 🤓

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ⚡️GO GO POWER GINGER! ⚡️

      (He'd be the Orange Ranger)

      Delete
  24. Unpopular opinion, but the Queen saw her sister, who was also the "spare", destroyed by being unable to marry the man she wanted. Harry is 6th in line to the throne, or will be by the time he marries, so I don't think the vetting is as extreme for Meghan as it would have been for anyone William dated.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Factor this into the equation. Meghan Markle is paid to perform. (In all kinds of situations). She has now lucked into the gig of a lifetime, playing the role of Prince Harry's loving wife. The Princess role- with the being American,divorced,multi-cultural thrown in for distraction and media-adoration bonus points.
    The reason for this performance is simple, Prince Harry is a closeted Gay Man, who wishes to pursue his lifestyle behind closed doors. Ignore the manufactured P.R. around his bachelor lifestyle, and examine his past "romances".
    Think "straight" about this, no man in his position, or a Joe on the Street would ever consider marring Meghan Markle , with the slightest knowledge of her past.
    This is just a "Hollywood type" arranged marriage to give the Stars cover.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Agree, Nutty_Flavor; it's a lot lower standard for Harry than Billy, as Harry will never inherit. And the standards for Billy are lower than they were for Chuck. Still, I'm sure that Betty and Phil Battenberg think that Uncle Eddie's spouse was enough yachting for the family. The question is: do they care enough at their ages to push back?

    Certainly there is no cattier bunch than the palace staff, and if there's a rumour, they either know about it or they started it. Perhaps Meggie has a unique ability to charm them. Stranger things, what? Meanwhile, Sarah and Andy grind their teeth....

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Daily Union: well, that would explain a lot, now, wouldn't it? Uncle Eddie is said to have been fond of playing the whistle, with Wally cheering him on. Perhaps grandma Betty should create him Duke of Windsor.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Clearly Me-again (good one) got herself knocked up. It’s the only way the Windsor’s would agree to this ridiculous marriage. A black prostitute marrying a royal. Only in Hollywood. What a dumb skank.

    ReplyDelete
  29. She's the usual actress, a user and social climber, who believes her own hype. I sometimes watched Suits and didn't know her real name until she got with Harry, B grade is being generous.

    ReplyDelete
  30. SdAuntie A LOT of rich men end up marrying their favorite escort. The upper east side is filled with 'em

    ReplyDelete
  31. She must be good

    ReplyDelete
  32. Remember: Long ago, a blind here revealed that Grace Kelly was a yacht girl.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Grace Kelly had a healthy sexual appetite. I’m not sure she would have required payment for a weekend on a yacht.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I assume yachting means more than yachting.

    ReplyDelete
  35. But don’t you think - to use the water metaphor - that that ship has sailed. I think it’s too late to back out even if he or his family are having doubts.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @ Nutty_Flavor - excellent point about the queen seeing her beloved sister destroyed by not being about to marry her divorced lover. Maybe the Q has accepted that her heirs will marry who they want? Her (alleged) favorite son married and survived Fergie, so maybe Markle will be a walk in the park. (Or a flash in the pan??)


    @ Observant one - When H and M were doing their interview, the thing that caught my attention/bugged me was their talk about roasting a chicken. "Look! We were cooking our simple dinner! Just like you regular folk!"

    ReplyDelete
  37. Grace was supposedly sexually abused by her dad growing up, and used the casting couch in HW for acting roles and yachting in Europe for the income.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I'm pretty sure that Harry had to ask the Queen's permission before he could get engaged to M.M., I don't think he's far enough down the list to be able to avoid that. I'm also pretty sure that the gossipy Buck palace people made sure her majesty heard about all the info about her, not to mention any information their version of secret service dug up. My guess is that it's a combo of Harry being down the list of succession and the example of all four of her children being divorced were enough for her to decide it wasn't that important....as long as she doesn't continue on like Fergie did.

    @ Don, 'Power Ginger': Love it!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Grace wasn't abused, no sexually anyway, her father pretty much ignored her, the boys were everything to him, not to mention that stories abound that he believed she was not actually his daughter. She spent her whole life trying to win his praise and affection which resulted in a father figure complex,and affairs with much older men (Bing, Gary Cooper, Gary Grant) as a dark spin off from this. She was no angel and actually very catty to other women, Ava Gardner called her out in public on her hypocrisy, Liz Taylor and Joan Collins were in the room at the time.

    As for this blind, I take it with a pinch of salt , MI6 would have everything on this woman and the Queen would be told as she seems quite taken with Meg, it probably came from one of Harry's friends who isn't happy about him marrying Meg so is sticking the knife in. Enty is safe from litigation because the royals never sue about gossip , too many other things might come out in court.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was interesting to me that the last (and only other) blind by Enty that 'revealed' Markle as a yacht girl disappeared from this site overnight. It said like more and more people were coming forward about it and named other women from MMs Deal or No Deal days that did the same to supplement their income. They commanded higher rates because of being on a tv show.

      Delete
  40. She is the new Koo Stark. I guess time will tell if things play out the way they did with Andrew and Koo.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I see ZERO chemistry between Harry and MM.
    Is this like a George Clooney/Amal Beard situation?

    Also, I've seen some reports that Harry is not Charles son.
    Some have reported he looks like one of Diana's lovers.
    Any truth to this?

    If there is any truth to the former,
    why should the Queen care who Harry marries
    if he's not related to the Queen anyway?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know someone who moved in Royal circles who says it's openly acknowledged within the fam that Harry is James Hewitt's son. But personally I can see Prince Charles in his looks.

      Delete
    2. He looks so much like a young Prince Philip it’s ridiculous. How can people ignore such a strong resemblance to his father and paternal grandfather? It makes no sense. Yes, Diana had affairs. No, she did not father Harry with one of them.

      Delete
  42. @Mango - The roasting a chicken bit made me wonder if it was a code phrase....they said it multiple times. I know I'm cynical as hell, and maybe I have read too many of Enty's blinds over the years, but I thought it was way too contrived. I am trying to figure out why she ALWAYS has her hand on his arm, or his back. So far, my reasoning has led me to think she knows he misses his mother desperately, so she has determined that he needs constant touching and reassurance. I don't like being catty, and I am certainly not racist, but this relationship seems too contrived, like the roast chicken.

    ReplyDelete
  43. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Or, maybe they were just roasting a damn chicken and he proposed. I certainly have no means of comparison, but I’d imagine cooking your own dinner is quite a lark when you have to make an appointment to see your own Grandmother. She’s definitely grabby, but Americans tend to be more like that. Perhaps they’re actually in love. I’ll choose to think they are.

    ReplyDelete
  45. 346NYC, apparently Diana did have an affair with a ginger. However, Google Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Baroness Fellowes. Those are Diana's older sisters, they are both gingers, and Harry strongly resembles them. I've also noticed that as Harry gets older, he begins to look more and more like a Windsor male in all but coloring. (though the height comes from his mother's side) All in all, I believe he's a genetic Windsor.

    ReplyDelete
  46. No one ever says what the past allegations are about Markle. Just this yacht story.
    Harry has definitely changed his demeanor/appearance since the engagement announcement.
    A couple of psychics have said it won't last more than five years.
    Markle was supposedly up for the next Bond movie as a Bond girl. That would have sent her career into the stratosphere. Hmmmm.

    ReplyDelete
  47. She is pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Only Markle says she was supposed to be a Bond girl. Nobody else - certainly not the Bond film people.

    ReplyDelete
  49. What I find interesting is the theory that Diana's biological father is James Goldsmith. She looked so much more like Jemima Kahn then the Spencer sisters. If true, it would make Harry's children with Meghan 1/4 Jewish and 1/4 Black.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Meggie a Bond girl? Not the lead, certainly. She's not that hot. As for Harry being one of mom's lovers' sons? The timing is wrong for that. Also, there's a pic of grandpa Phil at about Harry's current age, with beard. They look like brothers. He's got the Battenberg Y chromos.

    The word among those who served with Harry is that he's a good chap. Passing on the family tradition of the holiday hunt because Meggie doesn't like it--plus his body language around her--well, that doesn't bode so well for the future. But his gonads are surplus to requirements now, thus he can just be gossip fodder. It's a shame, as he was thought to be the one to bring back some rascally masculinity in house Battenberg.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Longtime reader here, first comment -

    Had to ask if anyone remembers that Jimmy Saville, underage rapist and sex purveyer extrodanaire was also intimately connected with Prince Charles and considered his "mentor", and was allowed to come and go in Buckingham Palace as he pleased.

    The Queen knows how to handle little Miss Markle, and it will be to appear to be kind and accepting but make no mistake, Markle will be lucky to last through the next five years, and the tabloid thrashing that is going to hound both her and Harry will "teach" him to fall in line next time around, no doubt about it.

    ReplyDelete
  52. My take: Meghan is approved because with all her diversity (American, actress, biracial, divorced) and the distraction it has created, she makes Camilla look less awful, and a bit less controversial. It's pretty clear that the Queen plans on Charles taking the reins, and whatever Camilla will be (Consort? Surely not Queen, one hopes!), she will be in a position that has not occurred in the British Royal family in centuries, as a divorced publicly acknowledged adultress & cuckolder (or is it cuckoldress hahah?). Royal PR are very savvy & trying to spin Chas. & Camilla as less unsavoury than they have been viewed in the past. BTW, has anyone seen Tracy Ullman's take-off on Csmilla? Very spots on Youtubr: it's a scream.

    ReplyDelete
  53. So PH has a Pretty Woman fetish I guess?

    ReplyDelete
  54. I agree with the commenters saying that Harry has hit a new low.
    Everything about those 2 seems too fake and contrived - at least on her side. She's really a mediocre C list actress, with mediocre looks. A trip to Top Shop on Oxford Circus, and one can spot 100 Markles, much better looking than this one. He could do so much better, but prefers to settle for average, in every way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A new low? I tend to think his low was the Nazi costume. So you think he only consorted with pedigreed virgins before?

      Curious what bothers you most about MM, her sexual history or her race.

      Delete
  55. I heard it was the other way round. Awkward when a mutual acquaintance turned out to be a girl from Harry's past.

    At 1st, Meghan Markle repeatedly turned down Harry's invitations because she had a boyfriend.

    I remember reading about that back in 2015 when Harry 1st spotted her as an exercise guru on Canadian TV.

    Finally she agreed to go on a date with him and it was arranged through a friend.

    Could it be that not every human with a vagina is a whore for fame, money and power?

    Could it be that those at the British tabloids are just bitter? They hated Frank Sinatra too. That's why they called them rats.

    Could it be they buried the truth about Harry trolling for chicks on TV programs because it's unseemly?

    ReplyDelete
  56. @Media Viewer, not sure where you got the idea that the British tabloids were "bitter" about Markle. Both the Daily Mail and the Sun have been outdoing themselves to sell her to the British public.

    The last 3 Markle headlines in The Sun: "Get that Markle Sparkle: Meghan Markle's Skincare guru on the perfect prep for your big day." "One is Amused: Meghan Markle's Xmas gift to the Queen caused Her Maj to burst out laughing." "Royal Knees Up: Pubs to open until 1am for 2 nights to celebrate Harry and Meghan's wedding."

    The tabloids are there to get clicks - and have a healthy side business being paid for placement, which is why you see so many articles about Emily Ratajkowski in them. Whether the positive Meghan articles are paid-for-placement or just a way to stay in good graces with the Firm is unknown. The fact is, though, that the British tabloids are not tearing Meghan down at this point in time.

    ReplyDelete
  57. It can't be anything worse than what Prince Andrew got up to with his friend Epstein. Then there's Charlie's friendship with serial abuser Savile. The Royals can cover up scandal no problem, as they have the security services doing it for them.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I hope one of Markle's tricks had his cabin wired for video and sound, and the tape finds its way to a foreign file locker or tube site.

    ReplyDelete
  59. None - you must be one of those ppl who judges ppl by the colour of their skin, and not the content of their character.
    To you, MM, who is average in every way, is special, because of her race, while I don't give a shit about her race, and I dislike her purely for what sort of person she appears to be.
    Reverse racism it's called.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Fairylights - only three of Queen Elizabeth's children are divorced, not four. Prince Edward is still married to Sophie Rhys-Jones.

    ReplyDelete
  61. as much as I dislike him, remember, Charles too knows what its like to be forbidden to marry who he loved- and look at the lengths he ultimately went ot and the disaster that ensued.

    Maybe Harry really loves her- given his past, I have to believe he knows all about her.

    I bet the castle/crown staff just keeps all of Meghan's indiscretions/past secreted from the very old Queen, whose husband is failing... can't be too hard.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Does anyone have info on Joe Guiliano Meghan Markle first husband? Joseph J. Goldman-Guiliano, Northwestern grad, criminal defense attorney in MA?

    ReplyDelete