Sunday, July 29, 2018

Blind Item #4

How do you make a little extra money if you have no income and are not allowed to work to generate any income but definitely have some things you want to buy and others you need to pay off to keep things quiet? Well, if you are this former actress you get clothes from friends that were given to them for free that you will wear. You then have the person in charge of the checkbook buy those clothes at full market value. The friends then split the money with our former actress 50/50. She is actually making more money now from this little ruse than she ever did acting or yachting. She was never a really big earner yachting wise. 

81 comments:

  1. Lilo? I find it hard to believe she has friends.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Meghan Markle?
    Why bother when she has access to Prince Harry's father's $$?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it’s MM over Lilo. Good one. Thomas Markle won’t shut his trap again.

      Delete
  4. Yeah Markle. The Royal family are notorious for being tight asses with the cash, especially for members who aren't direct heirs to the Queen. She needs to get pregnant soon or folks are gonna start seriously looking at her past, just too juicy a story there for the press to leave alone forever. However once she's knocked up and pops out a cute quadroon she can rest easy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Markle is a fascinating study in PR. You can see her paid supporters comment on every online story about her, and I suspect she is working with her so-called crazy Dad and siblings to create sympathy for herself. I wonder what her endgame is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her end game is to land a billionaire. Harry is just another stepping stone for her.

      Delete
  6. Meghan Markle and Jessica Mulroney.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lena Dunham didn't haul it in yachting?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lena would never make it in yachting. She's a fat, sloppy, annoying bitch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly- who on Earth would pay $$ to see that exceedingly revolting, pear-shaped piece of hipster shit?

      Delete
  9. @Vessimede, you could be right. Based on her professional and personal history, she seems to be an experienced grifter. Reminds me a bit of the Annette Bening role in the movie "The Grifters", a good flick that seems to be forgotten.

    Ironically, I saw Markle today in a movie: I was on a long flight on a discount airline and one of the movie selections was the 2011 release "Horrible Bosses", in which she has a three or four line part as a FedEx delivery rep. It would be interesting to hear how she got that role, which could have gone to any pretty girl in Hollywood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was her Hollywood sugar daddy. https://talesofaconartist.com/2018/04/20/meghan-markle-on-sleeping-w-film-producers/

      Delete
    2. https://talesofaconartist.com/2018/04/20/meghan-markle-on-sleeping-w-film-producers

      Delete
  10. She can't act for shit either. She had to marry Harry because he's the only person she knew who could provide her the lifestyle she wanted but couldn't afford to keep up on her own. She had limited funds. She's going to make sure this marriage lasts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think it sucks that the Royal family won't let Meghan or her husband anywhere near their fathers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don’t think Meghan has any desire to her father and he knows it and is making money off that fact.

      Delete
    2. Has any desire to see her father***, that could definitely be read wrong

      Delete
  12. Oh yeah I'm sure she's working with with her father and siblings, I mean why wouldn't she want to have her name dragged through the mud by two people she hasn't seen in years and her own father who's selling his story a every opportunity.
    It's not getting much sympathy for her the majority of comments on Meghan articles are very anti her.
    They object to everything about her from her smile, her legs, her waist, her touching her hair. Heaven help her if there is actually any photos of her touching Harry they lose their minds.
    I find it funny that whenever people post comments that the majority don't agree with then they are accused of being a paid shill. Some people dislike way she is being treated my her family and the media.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Has to be Me-again. Every time I turn around, there’s a news story about what she’s wearing to some function. Wedding is over, and there’s no baby news, so who cares about this chick anymore? Can we stop trying to make her a “thing” now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Unknown 😂 at Me-again 😂

      Delete
  14. It sounds like Markle. Lindsay is allowed to work, people have chosen not to employ her. Except for new show coming, I guess. Which is one crapfest “reality” show I’m looking forward to! What a train wreck

    ReplyDelete
  15. Replies
    1. Not likely. He's 6th in line, behind Prince Charles, Prince William, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis.

      Delete
  16. Where's the video of the Arab billionaire pooping on her? That should put an end to all this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 😳😳What the ... for real??!

      Delete
  17. Can they just release the dossier of her being a ho so we can be done with her!

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is just sounding worse by the day. She’s a total grifter and the palace has obvs decided to sit back and watch this implode. Harry has been conned by a tart and it’s going to blow up in his face.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This is genious and also bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Palace isn't restricting her from seeing her father. Kate sees her parents as much as she wants to. If Meghan isn't seeing her dad, it's because she is making that choice.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Markle.
    But harry is a left wing simplton like markle. Harry likes sports and is celebrity and markle likes money and celebrity.
    They have enough in common to last a bit. Markle needs him more than he needs her.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Of course Kate sees her dad. Makes Harry jealous.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Markle can't help but make money off this deal. Her Yatching fees will be astronomical if they ever split up.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I don't think she wants to split for a while, having Arabs shit on you for a living can't be good for the psyche long term. This is her big chance and she's going to make the most of it. She's getting past her sell by date and if she doesn't pop one out in the next year or so she's likely never to. At a minimum she's looking to get her own reality show and a clothing/perfume line out of this. If she sticks with it she'll end up perm A-list and no more whoring for a few thousand a time.

    As for why the royals don't care that a whore has married one of their own, and don't seem to worry that the story will get out, well the answer is pretty obvious. Harry isn't Charle's son, so he isn't really a royal.

    ReplyDelete
  25. If an everyday woman, or the average YouTuber can buy a designer bag, or designer piece of clothing, then Meghan Markle is more than able to buy her own bag, dress and shoes, or use connections. Most designer brands are no longer considered "exclusive".

    Unless Meghan is buying a new Birkin bag every month (unlikely), then the outfits she's been wearing more than fit into the Royal budget. I really wish this site would get off Meghan Markle's arse, tbh.

    That said, it's been fascinating watching America try to get to grips with having a Royal. Yes, she is. Some very passionate American women (see: obsessed), seem to be under the impression that there are a whole lot of rules that Markle should be following and that she's failing miserably. These supposed "rules" are complete rubbish.

    The palace has not suddenly written up a new level of standards for Meghan Markle. Why do so many Americans think she needs to lift her standards, I wonder?! Hmmm, what might the root cause be here?!

    MM can't do a damn thing about her relatives. We all have them. Thankfully, she has a normal mother.

    Diana did her own thing (also spent a fortune and openly accepted donations from designers). Sarah was allowed to be free range (and ran up a lot of personal debt, as people didn't want to dress her). Kate's paved her own safe, predictable fashion path, but people forget that she was photographed topless AND bottomless outdoors in France (if you want to talk about new Royal faux pas - that one was a doozy).

    I know this is a gossip site, but what can't be denied about Markle is that she's had a strong social conscience since she was born. It's documented. On film and in childhood letters. You can't fake that. Imo, MM has ended up right where she deserves to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope. That is all PR bullshit. The childhood letter was a class project. There were no "letters" it was a one time effort. All of her "charity work" has been one time efforts and photo ops. Nothing long term at all. She even hired a woman to "raise her humanitarian profile". Real charitable people eouwo never do that.

      Delete
  26. @Xanadu, the point of the blind is not that she is shopping out of her price range, it's that she isn't earning her own money anymore and everything she buys has to be approved first.

    I'm wondering how much truth there is to that, given how dowdy a lot of Diana's clothes were in the first few years and how often Kate recycles a lot of her outfits.

    ReplyDelete
  27. As well as needing her own discretionary cash for payoffs.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Then Diana found outside parties willing to exchange nice things for personal attention.

    ReplyDelete
  29. They all have clothing allowances and the size of the allowance varies according to their rank in the line of succession. Catherine is married to the future King. Meghan is not. Catherine spends about 100k pounds a year on her clothing. Meghan has spent more than 1 million. Catherine and her family paid for her wedding dress, as is the tradition. Meghan did not. Catherine wears high street fashion from time to time and when she's not "on duty". Meghan wears custom made designer fashions all the time. There are rules to how they have to behave and dress-- no short sleeves, no strapless dresses during the day, no crossing your legs when you are sitting. The royal walks in front of, and greets people before their non royal spouse. Meghan doesn't follow any of these rules. Also, she doesn't look very royal in her demeanour and has that smug smile and people are beginning to hate her for it. She is also a grifter, older than she admits, infertile and married twice previously, yet laughingly, dressed in virginal white for her 3 rd wedding. She is scum. Pure and simple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You do realize that these blind items could be lies, right? Also, you don't know that she wasn't sent those clothes for free-especially since what she wears sells out. You only "know" about this supposed 3rd wedding because of a blind item. You like believing the worst of her. I won't guess why but you should really ask yourself.

      Delete
  30. Again, these "rules" you speak of are simply not true, but knock yourself out and wallow in bitterness and jealousy. I'm out...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh honey, yes they are very true you gullible sad fool. JeslJea?? Of a mattress actress?? Are you twelve?? How incredibly embarrassing for you!

      Delete
  31. Definitely Meghan Markle. Maybe this explains why her clothes don't fit--hey were intended for someone tall (Jessica Mulroney). That hideous blue and white dress that she wore to a wedding made her look like a small child dressed up in her mother's clothes. She's also wearing someone else's shoes. They always look 2 sizes too big.

    ReplyDelete
  32. This is obviously about Meghan. Harry is a dumbass.He truly has to be in love with her to ignore all the bad stuff about her. I heard so many stories about her going to yacht parties,trying to find herself a billionaire bf,she left her boyfriend at the time once it was obvious for her that Harry is interested in her. She's not close to anyone in her family,not even her black family,no even that close to her own mother,who showed up just 3 days before the wedding,has few friends who are attention seeking just like she is.Just mess all around. I'm just waiting for the media to research it more about her past because there are plenty secrets that woman has.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hilarious! MM? Is she building up a nest egg to pay people off without H knowledge? Is that not fraud ? the Duchy of Cornwall pays the bill for royal wives outfits, surely PC's people ask for receipts? Explains why its all crazy high end stuff like the £8k Givenchy bespoke weird thing she wore out with the Queen.This is so audacious i want it to be true, but MM not be caught - lol. Clever girl!!

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Xanadu, ignore them, they don't know what they're talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Only real question is, has she gotten a side piece yet?

    ReplyDelete
  36. @Mischi: great summary!
    @Xanadu: there are tons of rules, other than those mentioned here: never turn your back to the Queen, if you’re dining w. HM, once she’d done eating, so is everyone else, no PDA’s when representing the RF,
    the curtsying which everyone knows about, no dark nail polish, no showing your knees when wearing dresses, hair & make-up must be polished (MM I’d really failing on this one), no eating seafood or garlic,
    no wedges (the Queen prefers nude pumps), wear dresses (Queen doesn’t like women wearing pants), always pack a black outfit when traveling, in case someone dies. These all seem very easy to me to follow. The BIGGEST rule is that royals need to show impartiality, hence why they don’t vote) & can’t accept gifts (especially clothes from designers.) Kate seems to follow all of them.

    Also, Me-again has no conscience, and her mother is far from ‘normal’. She disappeared when Me-again was a child, hence why MM lived with her father for most of her life until she left for college. So please stop spouting bullshit,

    ReplyDelete
  37. @PurplePuffin: Yes, now we know why none of her clothes fit properly.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Aquagirl, that's such bullshit. Kate for example was famous for wearing wedges for years after her marriage. But I'm glad you know for a fact that Meghan "has no conscience" based on your own fantasies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, MM is the one with the fantasy. Thinking she could marry Harry & her past will never catch up with her. Me-Again uses and discards people: ex-husbands, live-in boyfriends, former friends, etc. The list goes on. She’s a sociopath & sociopaths have no conscience.

      Delete
  39. Royal family can't take freebies. I call bullshit on this.

    ReplyDelete
  40. LOL, all the hens cackling. It seems like Harry and Meghan will do just fine. And, until there are photos, all the whoring allegations are BS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The divorce is inevitable. It's fun to watch the train wreck in the meantime though! Thank goodness we have William and Catherine.

      Delete
  41. Love how the Americans here have made up all sorts of Royal Rules to fit their preconceptions.

    @Ali B

    I agree. They are a nice couple who are going to work it out, particularly after this initial shock of royal engagements. The sooner they can become like Edward and Sophie, living a quiet life, the better.

    So far, no photos and no witnesses to this yachting rumor the committed haters love so much.

    ReplyDelete
  42. "She even hired a woman to "raise her humanitarian profile". Real charitable people eouwo never do that."

    Yes they do, all the time. You betcha Bill Gates has a PR person for his charitable trust.

    ReplyDelete
  43. It IS lots of fun to watch. I am kind of shocked about the clothing scam, but something has been very wrong starting with the wedding dress that hung on her like a wonky ironing board cover. If she can't pop out a babby it's gonna be a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  44. i liked the wedding dress ok and thought it fit well. It wasnt so skin tight that it looked uncomfortable. The headress train on the otherhand i thought was ridicuolous at 50 feet long. It looked unbalanced with the short train onthe dress.

    But i thought her wimbledon ralph lauren outfit looked huge. Either this blind explains it....or RL is bringing bacck the 80’s oversized look.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Oh, @Xanadu. Almost everything you said there is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Although Harry is an idiot, he knows about Meghan Markle's yachting past. But I still don't understand how the Royals let him marry her. She's going to be a bigger PR disaster for the Royal Family than Harry's mother, Diana, no real lady either but not a full-blown ho like Meghan.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I think she’s smart, seeing she won the jackpot. Good luck to her lol

    ReplyDelete
  48. As the Markles have not shut up, then they haven't been paid out. Enty no offence but as you are American you have little knowledge of the Royal family and how they work. They won't pay the Markles off, because what else can the Markles do? They have trashed the Duchess of Sussex as cold, heartless, selfish, social climber etc. They have made fake profiles and spread gossip and sent messages to gossip sites that she was an escort and her mother was in jail for prostitution. They have said she was married to another man and had children and a lot of this was discounted as lies. A money grabbing vile father's further interviews won't shed new information on this supposed heartless Royal, so the Royal family won't pay him out. They know from the past if they give them a cent, they will want more as they don't understand that their daughter/half sister is not rich only the heirs of throne are and she married the second son, who inherits nothing. Why has not one famous person come forward to support the Mr Markle? He won 2 Emmy's, but nobody appears to support him or be a friend of his in Hollywood. Now that is bizarre and makes you wonder about his character.

    ReplyDelete
  49. And here come the Meghan defenders.

    Anyway, it will be interesting to see how her PR team fills the "slow month" of August when the Royal Family is at Balmoral.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Here comes the Meghan attack squad!
    Some of the people who attack her have such crazy amount of hatred for a woman they'd never heard of until she and Harry got together, the way in which they talk about her like she's done them some personal harm is honestly disturbing, it's like the ramblings of a stalker that feels personally involved with the celebrity.
    The worse you guy's can come up with is that she's a prostitute and a gold digger who uses people to get ahead. None of which is backed by any evidence. Even if some or all of it is true that's hardly something shocking in Hollywood and certainly not worthy of the pure hatred expressed for her.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @ LEANNE NORMAN
    Working in Hollywood and socializing with producers is proof enough.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Leanne enjoys defending Ms. Markle and suggesting that any dislike for her is racially motivated or the result of hatred, jealousy, or a diagnosable mental disturbance.

    Actually, having an affection or dislike for a specific celebrity is what celebrity culture is all about. Wrestling has built an entire industry out of good guys and bad guys. Most movies have a hero and a villain.

    The Royal Family's villains go in and out of fashion: Charles, Philip, Edward and now Andrew have all had their turns playing the bad guy. Kate and Fergie have also been through the ringer. I'm guessing William will get a turn at some point too, and probably George when he's old enough.

    Anyway, I think Markle is fascinating because she is so clearly ill-suited for the Royal family. What's going on there?



    ReplyDelete
  53. Im a Brit and bought up with almost reverence for the British monarchy, its in our DNA i think . My reservations about MM are suitability to join the highest social rank and be someone who represents the UK and Commonwealth, and so above me socially. the role of Harry's wife is so much more than just wife, who ever he chose, and he chose a woman he loves and best of luck to them personality. my reservation is about suitability to be within the inner sanctum of the monarchy, but she's in, so that is that. However the times i do feel for her is the utter misogynist attacks she gets. "Stripper" "gold Digger" "yacht girl". If she was the royal and Harry was the Hollywood starlet with a scratchy background would there have been such commentary? There is never a comment that would imply shame for him that H would partake in the service of escorts, or drug use in the past (all alleged of course) .

    ReplyDelete
  54. @Nutty I never mentioned the racial element to people's hatred for her, though it's undoubtedly there.
    The Royal family is hardly some saintly institution the whole of it's history is littered with murderers, rapists and thieves I hardly think Meghan's supposed sims are about to bring the Royals downn in disgrace.

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Cupofteaandsliceofcake

    If a female royal - say Beatrice - was about to marry a hot-looking foreign male celebrity with two ex-wives and a sketchy professional background - a Porfirio Rubirosa, Phillipe Junot, Gabriel Aubrey or Karl Cook type - I doubt the commentary would be positive either.

    Bea's background isn't squeaky-clean either, and I wouldn't expect that to be mentioned when she marries.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Kate and Meghan: both commoners. But they differ so much.
    Since we are talking about their fashions:

    Kate went from simple student, girl-next-door-in-love, to a charming, regal-looking, humble and genuine seeming woman.
    MM went from low-rent, desperate for fame, dime-a-dozen, shit actress/escort, to expensive-looking, high-rent, fake-as-fuck, much better actress.

    MM will never outclass Kate, because it's not in her nature. Kate would have been gracious and lovely, had she married a plumber, while it doesn't matter whom MM marries, she's kinda pedestrian.
    She will always be low-rent, no matter how many millions she drops on tags.

    ReplyDelete
  57. If this is MM then she could be doing this to buy drugs (another CDAN blind post). THAT would have to be "off the books."

    ReplyDelete
  58. Am I the only one who sees the racism in alleging that wealthy Arabs shitting on people is on par with taking a breath? Surely there are just as many if not more rich white men who like to shit and be shit on, golden showers (a grifting President comes to mind} as well as men of other ethnicities.
    The level of comfort people have making such absurd claims about an entire group of people is really quite sad. Otherwise, you're just too damn chic for me and run around with a fabulous crowd of wealthy Arab bon vivants.

    And Depeche Model, what makes the Duchess more low rent than say.....I don't know, you for instance since you seem so well-versed in these things.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Yes Kate and Meghan are both commoners: but so was Diana.

    For those who think because Diana had the courtesy title of "lady" as the daughter of an earl, look up peers and commoners.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I don't get all the hating on Meghan Markle. Her dad is an opportunistic ass who is running his mouth about his daughter on national tv. We Americans shouldn't come off so smug, after all; we have Melania Trump, as acting FLOTUS who yachted her way to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Fuck off Bubbles.
    This ain't a safe space for thumb-sucking millennial, or Starbucks.
    And take your SJW shit with you.

    ReplyDelete
  62. @ Do

    "Markle's ongoing demonstration of unsuitability and lack of honor in character and purpose"

    Not nearly so glaringly as anyone in the White Pride House these days.

    Markle has not said word one about her family, her situation , or the royals since before the wedding. Those qualify her far beyond most people. If we're talking publicity whores, maybe a reminder of how Princess Diana operated is in order?

    "The public is smart and sophisticated enough"

    ...to keep the nastiest people rich with reality shows.

    ...to keep stupid non-music in the top of the charts..

    ...to elect fraudsters like Trump, Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell to fill their pockets with our tax money.

    ...to fucking vote for Brexit against their own best interests just to feel some nationalistic pride.

    ...to think that a gun will protect them from anything, video game style.

    ...to ignore their children completely but talk online all day about how homeschooling them is saving their education.

    So sophisticated.

    ReplyDelete
  63. @Bubbles

    +!!

    I wonder which of these posters has personal experience of all Arab sheiks shitting on them?

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days