Blind Item #7
Posted by ent lawyer at 10:30 AM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
30 comments:
Pam and Assange
+1
Was her husband in on the plan?
Based on some of the other rating on this site, I think Pamela Anderson should be "permanent".
The irony is that besides Assuang , whoever wins or loses over this situation it will be because of an anchor baby.
Assange (sic)
"gossip from the strangest places?" I don't want to out anyone, but I do wonder who the odd source was for this one.
Since the CIA is going to assasinate Assange, he should be careful bringing others into his orbit.
I hope he is saved.
Remember when Assange was repped by the niece of Paul Manafort’s business partner & huge Hillary Clinton supporter Amal Clooney? Good times.
Pamela Anderson for the former A+ list celebrity
Julian Assange for the putative father
Some unknown Ecuadorian married woman for the mom-to-be
Because, think about it, only an Ecuadorian citizen could give birth th an anchor baby for Assange. This woman probably works at the embassy, which is Ecuadorian ground according to international law, and the child was definitely conceived in the embassy, ergo, future citizen of Ecuador.
Remember when she aligned with Clooney and Clinton and dropped him as a client? Good times.
@best man , are you a disciple of Christ? I do not think Assange is based on his fruit, but hey , I've been off the reservation myself and regret it.
Annal.
So a man was dumped by his girlfriend, he started seeing someone else, and now his new girlfriend is pregnant. I don't see the objection, unless it's to sex outside of marriage, but who's old-fashioned enough to care about that anymore?
Read carefully. The woman is a married woman. She is having an affair with Assange.
Some leftist country. Maybe Canada & fits with Pamela Anderson, but isn't she too old to bear children?
Assange's impregnation-fetish strikes again, and this time lined up with his legal needs. Four acknowledged children, rumors of 6-12 more. Wonder how many were him stealthing?
HIs name always looked like an anagram for “sausage” to me (like if you turned the lowercase ‘n’ upside-down into a ‘u’ it would read ‘sausage’). IDK that’s just me. 🌭🤷🏻♀️
I like Pammy. I have a soft spot for her. Love her Instagram feed. 🖤
OT: Stormy Daniels is a pretty witty tweeter, if you look at her Twitter account (her replies are hilarious). 😂😂 I expected her to be a bimbo but you need a certain level of intelligence to be taht clever, adult humour of course is easiest but still.
I’m almost ashamed that I find her clever (not that wasn’t presumptuous enough to assume she’d be an airhead). Looks can be so deceiving.
*WAS presumptuous enough
OKAY so now apparently I’m the dumbass because injustice contradicted myself. Did I assume she’d be an airhead or no? Keep your story straight Scandi.🙎🏻♀️ I’ll shut up now. 🙊
So uh...how do we know the baby is said celebrity's and not the hubby's? Unless I'm not reading this correctly. Doesn't her marriage complicate his claim a bit? Obviously I don't know the laws of other lands but in Michigan if I got pregnant with another man's baby, they would force my husband's name on the birth certificate regardless. We'd have to get a divorce first and then fix it, blah blah.
@Btichy
That is not how it works. Assange wouldn't be given citizenship in Ecuador if he had a child with an Ecuadorean woman in London. He wouldn't even have a path to citizenship there. if the child were born in Ecuador with Assange inside the country, he might gain residency in Ecuador, though I'm not sure.
This birth would give Assange no rights in any other country but the UK. Since Jules is Australian, he had plenty of rights to stay in the UK already, more than most.
@plot, the birth doesn't give him any rights to stay in the UK. The UK is very strict about anchor babies- the baby doesn't even have rights if parents are not British. IF the mom is british that is only good for her, not assange. This has to be an Ecuadorian mom.
Also he is EU, would not need further cred through a baby in UK.
This is all so confusing. I thought he was granted Ecuadorian citizenship last year? If that even matters.
@jessica
Thanks for the info! Good to know.
Post a Comment