Monday, March 25, 2019

Blind Item #3

There are no work commitments that would have kept the thirsty foreign born A- list actress away from the celebration of a life event for the former alliterate actress. Not a chance. She wasn't invited. 

75 comments:

  1. Meghan Markle and Priyanka Chopra

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was pretty far down in Saturday's mega-thread, but Priyanka, Serena Williams, and Jessica Mulroney are all investors in/public faces of the online app Bumble.

    Kind of strange that all three of those women, who are otherwise very different, would both be involved with Meghan Markle and one particular dating app.

    No conclusions, just think that's something worth thinking about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like the idea of Bumble and how only women get to send messages first on it.

      But it doesn’t eliminate the possibility of being catfished again.

      Delete
  3. Don't think she expected to be. Chopra told Wendy Williams last year that she and Markle were not close friends.

    ReplyDelete
  4. But she's spent all week yapping to the press that they are, which leads me to think that the Ducharse and Chopra are up to something. Ghosted and then un-ghosted. What does the Ducharse want from her? It's obvious what Chopra wants. But Meghan? Gotta be more than positive PR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well at least her alibi for not being at the wedding/whatever isn’t something that might self-serve to strengthen someone’s PR image like claiming, “I was at a feminist rally.”

      God I miss Princess Diana.

      I’m no royalist/monarchist but she was the only royal I ever gave a fuck about because my mother said she dreamt about Princess Diana before finding out she was pregnant with me (she even nearly named me after her).

      Princess Diana used to literally hug HIV+ patients IN THE 1980’S during the epidemic when it was still considered a death sentence. People used to think you could get it by kissing/holding hands back than.

      Now SJW assholes just retweet and reblog everything on the #vegan and #woke tags on Tumblr (complete with feigned and/or misguided outrage) without even knowing what it means.

      End of rant. Happy Tuesday.

      Delete
  5. Snatch, have you been following all this crazy stuff Meghan's new PR people planted in the tabloids over the weekend?

    Text: Kate fell out with a lady named Rose who is married to an aristocrat.
    Subtext: there was something between William and Rose that Kate put a stop to.

    Kensington Palace must have been furious, because a glorified retraction with a Richard Kay byline was the headline story in the DM during the European morning hours today.

    I wonder if this is the work of the ex-Hilary Clinton PR lady recently hired by Meghan.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Law of physics, when Thirst meets Thirst...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 💥 BOOM! 💥

      And then everybody gets wet. 🌊

      Delete
  7. @Nutty The DM has gone off on William and Kate and this Rose lady. In the comments section on the story, and especially the editorial by Kay, the pro and anti MM fans are very pointed. Especially any mentioning that MM is behind this. Rose and Kate are probably busy with play dates, not scheming mean girls stuff.
    You're probably right about the PR lady, the Clintons fight bare knuckled.
    With all that's going on in the UK, and they're writing about garden parties for Aristo's?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I still love how that amazing mother (Theresa) of Sparkles didn't even go to her only child's baby shower! But the father who raised her is the piece of shit allegedly.

    Kate's farts have more class than all of Sparkles from head to toe and inside out. She will never be able to make shit she flung, stick on Kate. It'll always boomerang right back at her.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Depeche Model, there are pap shots out this weekend of Doria going to a laundromat with a big pile of quilts.

    Sooooo, Meg, you can get yourself a $100,000 dress, but you can't buy mama a heavy-duty washing machine?

    Even better, mama must have called the paps to get precisely that shot - I doubt that they hang out at coin laundries. Doria WANTS everyone to know that her darling daughter isn't buying her a washing machine.

    Fun family.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There's some spin in the Telegraph today, about Saint Diarrhea, obviously an MM PR puff piece attempting to fill in some gaps about questionable timelines. The rumours of where Diarrhea was for most of MM's young life have now been explained as her becoming an air hostess. That's a new one on me!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes @Nutty, I've been following the Rose stories, and I can only think that Latham is behind it, like the rabid fighting dog that she is, but the Sussexes offices have not yet moved to BP. So the approvals by HM's staff have not yet been established. If that's the case, the next week or to will be pretty disgusting. Possibly MM is refusing to move offices till after the birth?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Worse than Diana. Unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Nutty: I thought that all 3 articles were strange. Kate falling out with Rose (when MM has a reputation for dropping her friends), Eugenie having a ‘4th wedding party’ which is actually a display of articles from her wedding which will bring money into Windsor. She had a preview party as a thank you to those (designers, hair, make-up, etc.) who worked on her wedding which she paid for herself (lots of negative press about MM’s $500,000 baby shower and her potential second one, plus her overall ridiculous spending). And finally two articles on Beatrice potentially getting engaged, even though she’s only been dating the guy since October (everyone thought MM & Harry’s engagement & wedding were rushed.) Looks like she’s flinging mud at everyone, falsely accusing them of the same behavior that makes her so disliked. Very transparent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beatrice the highest of high class yachters trying to get hitched before grandmummy passes from leukemia

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  14. snatch & nutty - but....but......that's so WAAAAYCIST!

    We're supposed to like people purely based on skin colour now, didn't you get the memo? It's very very racist to hate somebody for their skin colour, but liking them for their skin colour, is definitely not.

    Judging on character content? Foggeddabboudid. MLK didn't know what the fuck he was saying.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8:41 AM

    Also following the Rose/Kate story. If there's any truth to it then there's a man in the middle. That's the only thing that can come between two long term female friends. Agree that Prince William may not be the most faithful husband but at least he's been discreet up to this point.

    There are literally thousands of comments on DM about this nasty campaign originating from MM's new PR staff. People are not happy and are directing that anger back at MM. Maybe at some point Prince Harry will find his balls and shut down his wife's social media presence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree that only a man comes between two longtime female friends. Women have hurt feelings all the time and often there are power struggles over who will be the alpha. Female friendships are extremely complicated.

      Delete
    2. Truth, JL. Female friendships are usually awful. The saying “friends are enemies that want something from you”, was made for female friendships. It isn’t worth the trouble.

      Delete
    3. @JL @Astra

      My female friends here in Indonesia aren’t fine (not ALL women make good friends, but women are just like all humans—some are assholes, some are not).

      My female friends here in Jakarta may not be the most politically-correct (and I disagree with their views often, so as long as I don’t YSL about the heavy stuff we can hang around Starbucks talking shit just fine 😂🤣😂😂).

      But you know, I’ve made peace with the fact that not all my friends are necessarILY PC.

      What matters to me is, they’re “bridesmaid material”.

      The reason why I dislike outspoken “feminists” so much is because I never see a “bridesmaid” in them, if that makes sense?

      By “bridesmaids vibes” I mean: I can talk my secrets to them, they give a shit about me as a human being, they enjoy my company and vice versa.

      Sometimes I see those outspoken “feminists” types of twitter and I feel like if I ever came to them for help as a domestic violence victim, instead of giving me a hug, they would just turn my plight into a tweet.

      Delete
    4. *My female friends ARE fine

      Dammit autocorrect a girl has no time for this

      Delete
  16. Were Kate and Rose really long-term friends, though?

    It's hard to tell. The Cambridges keep their relationships pretty low-key, unlike the Sussexes and their fake celebrity friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems as though they went to some charity events together, (in one pic both W&K are giving Rose the side-eye), but long-term friends? Who
      knows.

      Delete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Interesting that you mention Jennifer Meyer.

    Didn't Meghan get a Jennifer Meyer "mommy" necklace at her half-million-dollar shower in NYC?

    Curiouser and curiouser.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Ann: Don’t know if you’ve ever looked at her WriteLifePR account. I looked at some recent entries last night, and it was actually scary. This woman is such a narcissistic sociopath. Constantly refers to herself as beautiful and brilliant. She’s got a recent post of a little African American girl and a little Caucasian boy & says that Harry chose her long ago. Everything she writes is so self-serving & over-the-top. I wouldn’t want to be in the same room as her.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Aquagirl, how do I get a look at her WriteLifePR account entries please?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Never mind, got it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How? I googled it but nothing came up.

      Delete
  22. Nutty, etc real. Even if you have a heavy duty washing machine, if you have more than one big thing, it’s so much faster to go to the laundromat.

    ReplyDelete
  23. tatty, I'm fairly well-off, however I'm not married to a prince (thank God!). Both my mother and mother in law have housekeepers my hubby and I pay for, if they need a duvet laundered the housekeeper does it, they do not.
    If they need their curtains washed, the housekeeper arranges for a laundry service to pick them up, service them, and deliver them back. Being photographed on your way to the laundromat is not particularly high-brow, although obviously there's nothing to be ashamed of, better to be poor and clean than wealthy and dirty. But - big fat BUT - there are ways of not making your mother's (who might get photographed!) life easier and a little bit more luxurious, if you give a shit. And it costs very little. Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  24. So maybe she doesn’t want a commercial washer and dryer for the two times a year she washes multiple large items.

    I’m rich, have a housekeeper, etc. In my experience, it’s not the washing that is the issue, it’s the drying. If I take two things to the laundromat, they can both be washed and dried at the same time and it’s all done within 2 hours at the most. Maybe Doria likes to be efficient and knock things out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tatty, a clothesline is what I find to be best for drying pretty much everything. And it’s free! But, it’s usually very hot here and sunny so if you live in a cold rainy place it may not work. I’d definitely always use a clothesline in Southern California though.

      Laundromats aren’t clean. There was an article about the massive amount of fecal bacteria in laundromat washing machines and dryers. And I hate to sit and wait at a laundromat.

      Delete
  25. Anonymous10:32 AM

    She goes to laundromat.
    What a shallow conversation.
    Her laundry... her business.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous10:38 AM

    Sorry had an errand to run. @Aquagirl I was reading her Twitter account last week. There's serious mental illness behind some of those posts. She's such a narcissist that she just can't help herself when she added that tidbit about "you know me" in the header. The best thing Harry (or Sir Christopher) could do is to force an end to her social media presence. I truly believe it feeds her mental illness. She's scary dangerous, and she's backed herself into a corner with all the lies. I worry about Harry. I'm no longer a fan of his but his mental health has deteriorated significantly since his marriage. She's isolated him from friends and family for control purposes. It's sad to see how she has publicly emasculated the poor chap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Ann: Totally agree. I would be terrified to have her around if I were Kate & William. She belongs in a straight jacket. Harry definitely has mental health and possible addiction issues. Idk if you recall reading that when William met with Prince Philip a few weeks ago about separating the households, he asked him (PP) to promise to take care of Harry. Sadly, I just don’t see this ending well.

      Delete
  27. Very Meghan-sympathetic article in The Tatler today.

    It's well-written and thoughtful, although I don't agree with its conclusions. But it does show that not all Meg supporters are vulgar, sputtering fools.

    Just most of them.

    You can read the article here: https://www.tatler.com/article/meghan-markle-mania

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous11:40 AM

    MM is playing with fire. She may think she has the upper hand but then so did Diana. We all know how that ended. The Royals, whether British or otherwise, did not get to where they are being shrinking violets. The Firm are giving her enough robe to hang herself with (and I do not necessarily mean this metaphorically). She is safe whilst pregnant and through the first couple of years of the young royal offspring’s life. And then, like Diana, she will be given an ultimatum, shape up or ship out. MM is far less lovable than Diana and unlike the dead princess, Markle married the spare rather than the heir. If I were her I would zip the lip and enjoy the ride or she will end up out of the family or dead.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The pollen is so ridiculous right now, there is no point for a clothesline.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Oh yeah I guess pollen is an issue. It is full on spring here but I don’t have allergies so I guess I never notice it except when the car turns green. Didn’t think of that, sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Gotta love people diagnosing people's mental health who they don't know, based on stories they choose to believe or not based entirely on whether they support your existing beliefs.

    I honestly don't get your obsessive hatred of her, stalking every article and blog post, analysing every little thing she does or says. Making up conspiracies such as she's plotting to get rid of William, Kate and the kid's. Some of you seem to have the characteristics you project on to Meghan, so maybe people in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones.

    What outcome do you actually want? Divorce, public humiliation are the obvious but is that enough I know some here and elsewhere what her dead and think more of the people who supposedly killed Dianna than they do of Meghan, What will actually make you happy? We've had people in the royal family who've done things a million times worse than anything Meghan has been accused of, which so far seems to be a that she's a gold digging prostitute who uses people, is high maintenance and rude. yet your making her out to be the devil incarnate, Jack the ripper and Hitler all wrapped up in a dress you don't like.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you. If there was a tsunami that wiped out half of the UK, they'd blame that fucker on MM lol. Why not anger that there is a "royal" family to begin with, that taxes are being paid to support?

      Delete
  32. Omg ok! It isn’t that serious. That’s public life. Some hate you, some love you.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Calm down @LEANNE MORGAN. I mean that in all sincerity, by the way. @Nutty, what do you think of the rumours of a paid shoot of the baby, to be paid through Meghan's channels to a charity of her choice? ( Don't forget Audi Polo sponsorship, while you digest that) and the sudden poll on Twitter, by her friend Omid Scobie? Basically a poll on professional shoot, or Lindo steps? Interesting that he has extended the poll votes....they weren't swinging to her favour? Is he putting feelers out?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think LEANN NORMAN is too hyped up to warrant telling her to calm down.
      Now that I read it again, she's actually spot on with her entire comment.
      What *ARE* you all going on about?
      Really, and I mean that in all sincerity by the way,
      I'm truly curious as to the end game you seek?

      Delete
  34. Scobie’s an interesting case, isn’t he? Meghan’s unofficial mouthpiece, and the former boyfriend of Markus Anderson, who the DM almost openly called her pimp. He’s been remarkably loyal to her while others have either quit or been disposed of.

    Still don’t know what I think of the baby situation. There was a video just a couple of weeks ago with her prosthetic belly moving from side to side at a royal event. Is there a real baby under there? And if not, where are they going to get one within the next four weeks? If she was 12 weeks at Eugenie’s wedding, the due date would be around April 21, not coincidentally the Queen’s birthday.

    Anyway, not sure if they can pull off the London with a surrogate. Better to have a “home birth” and then a fancy photo shoot a few weeks later. Maybe those are the poll results Scobie wants.

    Re: the charity situation. Wasn’t that what Jolie did, ask that the money be paid directly to her so she could pay it to a charity? I believe Enty said he had not seen any evidence that it was actually paid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Harry’s “personal” trips to Africa are either rehab or that’s where the surrogate is. He could be checking in, bringing payment. That is not to say I buy the surrogate theory. Meghan’s face and even nose certainly have had baby bloat lately.

      Delete
  35. Pull off the Lindo, not London. Damn you autocorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Meghan is 100 % behind that story about Catherine. How convenient this came out just days after strong sextape rumors. She needs to learn to be more subtle. Even if it story is true it's clearly OLD gossip. Who even cares for this ? A royal source says Kate is pissed at the rumors and there is not truth to it. Rose and her partner even thought about taking legal action.
    Now dailymail has a story out how Meghan is seen as very difficult by the staff at KP. Her nickname 'ME-GAIN'. She really is playing with fire.

    ReplyDelete
  37. There is no strong sex tape rumor. Goodness, some of you live in an echo chamber

    ReplyDelete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is definitely recently-unblacklisted-in-Bollywood Priyanka because Enty can be quite funny on the podcast regarding her thirst. 😂🥤🤣💦

      In other podcast news, I’m glad people are beginning to see through Gabe Hoffman.

      He is unnecessarily explicit and gratuitously graphic that you wonder if he even cares about the victims, and he presents his “advocacy” material in a manner which might actually APPEAL to pedophiles. You can’t help but wonder if there’s some pedophile out there actually ENJOYING his podcasts.

      Gabe argues in one of his earlier podcasts (in which Enty sounds uncomfortable and awkwardly says something along the lines of, “wow, Gabe. That’s graphic.”) that it’s necessary to shock.

      My first job ever was research assistant for a guy who worked for Human Rights Watch’s Child Rights Division, And I learned a lot of advocacy techniques (naming and shaming, etc.) BUT NEVER ONCE did we include graphic details of sexual abuse against a minor in the report. Because you know, we actually have respect for the victims.

      Gabe rather reminds me of another “advocate” who is similarly graphic. This one even got into some legal trouble with the mother of his child because she just wanted to protect the child (smug as hell when he won in court too). I was still willing to give that other guy the benefit of the doubt because te mother of his child is also his ex-wife (and perhaps she was just being spiteful). And I GAVE him THE BENEDIT OF THE DOUBT. Until... he went on a brutish newspaper and something “edgy” and explicit about how he felt when he defecated. And the something clicked and I couldn’t stop thinking, “oh my goodness, the mother of his child probably knows something about his character that WE DONT KNOW!!!!” (Even his defence lawyers probably don’t know.) Major red flag.

      Anyway, I wanted to PUKE when Gabe said he bought Heather O’Rourke’s medical examiners’ report for 30 bucks. Because I DID NOT CARE FOR THE WAY HE READ IT ON THE PODCAST.

      I’m glad at least Enty sounded a little ticked in the first episode and cut it short by about 10 minutes.

      According to Enty, in the US if you get access to evidence of child abuse, you’re only allowed to look at a handful of stills and then you’re legally-obligated to destroy them, because it’s child porn. But you get to keep that medical report and talk about it on a podcast in a way that would’ve made Heather’s mother FAINT?

      It’s not right.

      Delete
    2. *and theN something clicked

      Apologies for the other typos but I’m assuming the other ones you can figure out what was meant.

      GTG, it’s a work day. A Tuesday morning in Indonesia.

      Delete
  39. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Enty's HILARIOUS tweet regarding Priyanka's level of thirst: https://twitter.com/entylawyer/status/1068218390056099840

    If you hadn't guessed by now, my #BasementBlast tomorrow night will be the whole Nick Jonas/Priyanka Chopra thing. Someone could have wandered through the desert for a month without water and they would still not be as thirsty as Priyanka. cc: @priyankachopra

    ReplyDelete
  41. I read somewhere that she helped plan it and pay for it. I kinda think that she wouldn't be anywhere where she is not the center of attention

    ReplyDelete
  42. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  43. IF diana was murdered by "them" then they already have a plan in place IF meghan is becoming a real problem,...some women die in childbirth...

    i think all this news is just the shake up in the royal lines, grandma is almost going, and william and kate will be the ones to suck up too, that's why they ( har and meg) want a seperate household, i get it....
    charles for now will be a buffer but i bet things will get even dirtier when grandma dies....
    i think there is an old skool and new version of the royals batteling it out...and everybody is trying to get in to the right place of power and all that for themselves.... the rose girl would be better friends with meghan then with kate...now that would be interesting caus some HAD to suck up to old skool, maybe they like the new breaze in the royal lines...

    it's all a wait and see how it unfoldes...

    ReplyDelete
  44. Hi Scandi Sanskrit! I get nostalgic when you talk about your home, Indonesia. It’s been some time, but I used to travel to Bali, and neighbouring islands, twice a year for an extended stay and dived all over there and towards Java. I made friends with people in Jakarta who puddle jumped to dive with me. I stayed once in Sanur, it was awful, there was techno aerobics every other hour at the pool. Eew. I was there during the second bombing, less than a mile away in the house I rented.

    Life hasn’t afforded me the opportunity to return lately. I miss Bali (which is a different animal from Indonesia in general, I know). I had such memorable and good experiences with everyone I met, all over the island.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m sorry the bombing happened while you were around, Lapin.

      Cute name by the way. My fake ex-boyfriend used to call me Wabbit/Piglet. 🐰🐰👩🏻‍🌾🐰🐰

      Delete
    2. Speaking of techno aerobics: https://youtu.be/QQSYo_pC-QA

      (Sorry.)

      Delete
  45. I haven't read what LEANNE NORMAN writes in years - I just scroll right by when I see her name on top of a giant block of single-spaced text - but I wanted to respond to Rosie.

    Why do people follow the Meghan story?

    Because it's like 8 different Shakespearean dramas going on at once.

    All the elements are there - lust, power, greed, deception. And nobody knows the ending.

    Watching this play out live vs watching a TV drama is like watching the World Cup or (a good) Super Bowl in real time, as compared to watching some faded film of the Super Bowl in 1972.

    Nobody seems to be telling sports fans to "stop making fun of poor Le’Veon Bell" or that they should be "nicer to Kevin Durant." They're both adults and they chose their game. So did Meghan Markle.

    ReplyDelete
  46. OMG Scandi that’s hilarious...and vaguely gross?! Thanks for the LOLZ!

    That was the only time I stayed in a “tourist trap” hotel, and it was only because it was shortly after the first bombing. Moved into a family owned B&B outside Seminyak the second half of that trip and boy, what a difference!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’re welcome! LMAO.

      Eh, the *whole island* is a tourist trap TBH.

      (Whispers: I prefer Lombok.)

      But the ashrams are nice in Bali and I’m not sure Lombok has any ashrams? (Like real ashrams, not a luxury resort with a “yoga and meditation” package.)

      Delete
  47. The laundromat is absolutely NOT efficient. The washers are not good, and it takes at least $20 to get something dry. Laundromats are designed to rip off the people using them. So, that means Doria was playing the sympathy card, not th efficiency card. Sitting in a launfdromat waiting for your clothes is one of the rings of Hell.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I certainly don’t wait at the laundry mat! I leave and come back

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous2:12 PM

    Anyone notice Write Life's Twitter account is now set on private? Don't know if Sir Christopher is on the job or if she's starting to get nervous. TorontoPaper1 is pushing the high treason issue.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days