Sunday, May 05, 2019

Blind Item #4

As I told you a few weeks ago, the media covering the Palace have now confirmed that the alliterate one and her royal companion are indeed looking for a house in Los Angeles. 

74 comments:

  1. Meghan and Harry
    Not a blind

    ReplyDelete
  2. looking doesn't mean they have the $ to buy. Or that she isn't going to prison.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I read the Daily Mail this morning as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The blind sounded unlikely, so when I saw it in the DM this am, it confirmed my faith in Enty.
    On the other hand The Daily Mail might just be writing stories based on blind items, which makes this one big circle jerk.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Her Mother lives in LA....This is not a surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Best title ever from DM: Meghan and Harry are 'looking for a second home in California' away from the spotlight


    Because Los Angeles is so out of the media glare.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It sounds like manipulation to get out of being sent to Africa. "Mean royals separating new mom from her mother to help her with raising the child"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Of course they need a second home, they just had a pillow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bravo. Best post of the day. You win the Internet today. 😂👏 Thanks for the laugh. 👍

      Delete
  9. I thought it was supposed to be Africa???. I didn't really see that happening tho lol

    ReplyDelete
  10. I bet it’s for her mother

    ReplyDelete
  11. It would make more sense for the royal couple to move Mom to England than for them to relocate to L.A. In the UK they are the biggest stars; in Hollywood, their light won't shine as brightly.
    I'd agree that if they're shopping for a house in California, it's for Megan's mom to live in and maybe MM and the Prince will crash there when visiting.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I said the first time it makes sense they are upgrading Doria’s bungalow to something more private and secure for when they visit her

    ReplyDelete
  13. The DM nailed it MeGAIN thinks she’ll be a Queen in LA. She’s setting herself up with a big house in LA using the palaces money so she can keep it when they split.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Lauren +1
    Who insists that their mother be bought a new home after getting married? A gold digger that's who.

    ReplyDelete
  15. So the DM publishes some rumors based on an Enty blind and Enty thinks this validates him. Sure.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Stop trying to force the hand, Meghan, you couldn't even get Dorito an Christmas invite with this tactic.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Is this the same mother who did not even show up (was not even invited) to her only child's and only grand baby's baby shower?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Krab And your evidence that the DM got this from here? You have none at all. Go salivate over Markle’s fat, smelly backside elsewhere, will you?

    ReplyDelete
  19. LA needs more cuckolds.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Also, congrats to all the British chumps paying for this mess.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "A duchess in England, a queen in LA...." really DM??

    ReplyDelete
  22. She's so desperate

    ReplyDelete
  23. PHG/Prince Hot Ginge - I see you fellow dlisted peeps!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Urgh Dlisted.... where a few handfuls of cerebrally below-average, masturbate over cat gifs and anti Trump rhetoric.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now now unknown, Michael K is the shit when it comes to blogging & those commenters do not abide any racist sexist or illogical trollhards. We could use some Dlisted stank around here.

      Delete
  25. Could someone post a link to the DM article?

    ReplyDelete
  26. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6994293/Meghan-Harry-looking-second-home-California-away-spotlight.html

    ReplyDelete
  27. They are talking about the move to distract from the missing baby. Unless Meghan was much earlier in pregnancy than believed,the baby is born. I mean the surrogate was earlier. Maybe that's why she announced early,if her own pregnancy, she wouldn't have done that. Free the pillow!

    ReplyDelete
  28. If they do relocate to LA it won't be long before her 'retirement' will be over and she will start getting 'projects'. The best of both worlds.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous1:28 PM

    My two cents. This is garbage PR put out by MM's staff. There is no baby. There is no move to LA. MM will be going to prison. Congrats Brits she won't be sucking down taxpayer dollars much longer.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Come on, Enty. The Sun is reporting this. They probably got it from you.

    ReplyDelete
  31. GF thanks for the link.

    Ann, I missed something about MM going to prison?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous1:39 PM

    @Sunnykm according to a couple of Twitter accounts that have had insider info for months MM will be arrested for treason (interfering with the line of succession) once she announces the birth. The marriage has been nothing but a farce. MM blackmailed Harry into the marriage. No baby and nothing but a prison cell in her future. Just waiting for the show to start.

    ReplyDelete
  33. You were right, Enty, mea culpa. Nutmeg got an advance on selling the spongebaby photos. So she has some cash to splash. Her escape plan is well under way.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I just feel terribly for that little boy that so courageously followed his Mum’s coffin through London. Prince Phillip wasn’t supposed to join the procession but he did to lend support to his grandsons and their hardest public duty.

    I can’t stand Meg, she truly is a narcissist and flat out evil.

    But my affection for the little one who lost his Mum so tragically is such that I hope none of this is true.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I wish the DM would put all the MM stuff under News->Royal Family. I miss half the stories because they aren't all put under the same heading.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Unless you believe the other Twitter accounts that say she is currently in jail lol. So according to three twitter accounts, she is in jail, about to go to jail, or has already been released from jail. For treason, and trying to take down the monarchy that these three twitter accounts think they are saving, lol... the tin foil hat club...

    ReplyDelete
  37. Oh yeah, they also believe Harry broke up with Meghan in 2016 and they don’t live together, and that they wedding was a sham for some reason I can’t remember. 😂😂😂😂😂

    ReplyDelete
  38. Sunnykm, you haven’t ready about any of this because it is all BS.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Guesser-- free the pillow, lol!

    Would Brit taxpayers really pay for a home in overpriced LA area? Especially for an in-law or vacation home? If people are tsk-tsking about a dress price, the millions it would take to get her something celeb-worthy would surely cause more kerfuffle.

    If any/all of this is true...just, wow! She could never just make the best of any one situation long enough to earn favor. She got her vegan, scented nursery in Frogmore, and she apparently hasnt even had the child in there one day before talk of exile to africa or vacation home in LA


    ReplyDelete
  40. Will the Queen even allow this? I thought the royals have To live in the UK?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats what I was thinking. This kid would be in line to the british throne, I would s/he would have to live in Britain.

      Delete

  41. Correct me if I am wrong, but I am pretty sure a marriage can be anulled if it can be proven that there was fraud - for example, someonew claiming to be pregnant but found to be unable?

    ReplyDelete
  42. No, Oz, it’s some kind of conspiracy where the DoS has to go through the farce of a delivery and then she can be arrested. Somehow, the RF can’t go around this narrative 😂😂😂😂😂🤔🤔🤔

    ReplyDelete
  43. She is also in custody, but since she gave her sugars her internet passwords, she is also still posting on SM😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    ReplyDelete
  44. if there's fraud harry is part of it and would be liable and I don't see him doing that to his family...he's whipped but that whipped? I don't think it's a pillow.

    if they do buy a home and move to part of the year to LA, I don't see how they could remain part of the firm and retain all the perks and benefits that the paid family receive. i'd imagine the taxpayers would object to the round the clock security, travel expenses, etc if Sexcesses weren't doing their jobs in the UK/commonwealth.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Ladyconstance, thanks for the breath of fresh air. I'm as snarky about this as anyone, but I too remember that video.

    ReplyDelete
  46. So, if she announces and is arrested, what happens to Harry? Is he in trouble to because there's no way he can not know that there isn't a baby. Do you guys think she just flat out lied or there was a surrogate but something happened? This is all so crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  47. If true, it is hopeful that the palace cuts off their money because they will no longer be working for the British public, and the BRF. God knows that Sparkles has done mostly nothing. She's a really lazy loafer.

    ReplyDelete
  48. The whole story about Meghan being close to her mother is BS. She gave 100% custody to Meghan’s father when Meghan was 11. She was only invited to the wedding because of her race. Meghan used her just like she uses everyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Aquagirl...what's your theory on baby and what will transpire this week?

    ReplyDelete
  50. @ tatty using rows upon rows of laughing emojis doesn't make you look mentally imbalanced at all.... except if you're over 13 year old

    @urban rosebud dlisted is the last gossip refuge of pathetic and lonely mental midgets, patting each other other on their backs for their pedestrian low-rent wit; yet it figures, as you have never come across as particularly elevated in your comments

    I liked it myself once upon a time, back when it was relevant, you know, when posts gathered more than a couple of hundred comments, and people were allowed to have differing opinions. Now it's just a sad collection of fascist parrots, echoing one another.

    ReplyDelete
  51. MM is in labour. It will be interesting to see how this pans out, finally.

    ReplyDelete
  52. actually this may be the decision for them, go to LA with "celebrities" and leave the real royal alone... Alla Duke/Dutchess Windsor...

    ReplyDelete
  53. And it's a boy. The future Duke of Sussex, and the fresh prince of Bel Air.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I don't GAF where these two freeloaders go, I'll pay for the one way ticket..Ryan air.

    ReplyDelete
  55. The easel has ZERO signatures... that is definitely shady AF.

    ReplyDelete
  56. The D used to be a good site but there are too many nuts on there now. I had some psycho chasing me down because I did not like the new version of Wonder Woman. Sick.

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Ann how do I find the Twitter accounts that talk about the arrest?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Hmmm, you know what strikes me as odd as well is HM didn’t designate the babe a HRH as she did all of Wills kiddos.

    She doesn’t have to designate but the odd thing is once Charles becomes King the babe will automatically become HRH Prince of the UK
    as a grandchild of a reigning Monarch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Viscount Wessex and Lady Louise are not HRH...HRH has to be granted, it isn't automatic.

      Delete
  59. Lisa they are @torontopaper1 and @Dripdro74842947

    Just go to Twitter.com and type those names in the search bar

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anonymous1:37 PM

    @Lisa Torontopaper1 https://twitter.com/torontopaper1

    Drip Drop https://twitter.com/Dripdro74842947/with_replies

    ReplyDelete
  61. LadyConstance, a lot of hearts were broken at the sight of Harry walking behind Diana's coffin. Seems like he never got the comfort and help that he needed, grief counseling or anything and it's playing out now. But his behavior over the last year has worn people's patience thin. That wife of his! And the announcement by BP makes absolutely no mention of Harry at all. Again, heart breaks for him when MM & the baby are tossed and Harry loses a child he thought was his & he bonded with. He looked so happy in the photos.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous2:30 PM

    I'm curious how they will live in the US because she likely had to give up her US Citizenship to become a British Citizen. If they want to become American citizens, then they have to relinquish their titles by law. The fact that she accepted her new title (Duchess of Sussex) and most likely became a British Citizen could mean that she might have had to denounce her US Citizenship. I doubt that happened, truly, but I am curious if she still has a US passport after marrying Harry.

    But it will be very interesting to see what happens after all this.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Anonymous2:42 PM

    @Unknown she doesn't have British citizenship yet. I just read that her Canadian visa has been revoked recently. She still has her US citizenship.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anonymous3:01 PM

    I'd believe that. Canada isn't going to war with the RF on this one. I find it interesting that they aren't looking at options in the former Commonwealth but strictly the US, which is odd considering all the legal loopholes and such for Harry to become a citizen and what that would mean for his standing in the line of succession. I'm not 100% but I believe you have to live in the UK or Commonwealth to be considered for succession and removing him from that equation seems odd, but who knows. I don't know all the rules and this whole thing is a mess.

    Why the hell would you isolate your child from the rest of the RF and away from their cousins, aunts, uncles, grandparents, etc? Harry and William don't strike me as the type who would want their children to grow up apart from each other, especially since all of them (including Eugenie and Beatrice) were raised relatively close to one another. We already know MeAgain doesn't keep in touch with her family and there's really no reason why they need to live in the US when her mother could easily come to the UK (or one of the Commonwealth) to live if being next to her mother was that important (it's not; let's not pretend otherwise).

    Personally, something else is pushing the agenda to move out of the UK. Whether Megan is pushing it or the RF is pushing it, it doesn't seem like something that Harry is advocating for on his own volition. Harry does not strike me as the kind of person who would say "F this noise" and move to the US just because. If he was, he would have done that a long time ago and moved to Africa on his own accord.

    ReplyDelete
  65. BP gave PH and MM a choice: Move to Botswana, and retain your yearly stipend.
    Move to LA, and PH only gets what his mother, Princess Diana, left him in trust.

    There's no way they can afford a $10million house on $300,000/year.

    PH was not in LA house shopping.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anonymous4:47 PM

    If Torontopaper and Dripdrop are correct the child is not Harry's. That's the reason for the treason charge. MM is passing off a child that does not have royal blood. Currently the infant is seventh in line of succession and shouldn't be eligible. A child born of a surrogate is also not eligible even if it biologically belongs to Harry and Meghan. UK law is archaic and hereditary titles can not be passed along if a surrogate was used. Harry's interview and enthusiasm certainly gave me cause to doubt the whole treason story. Nothing like having a front row seat to a world class debacle.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Harry definitely witnessed the birth, doesn't mean it was Meghan on the table.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days