Today's Blind Items - The Designer
This designer is American and A list and known by all of you and has celebrity offspring. He has cornered one section of the globe in a certain market while the husband of this foreign born A/A- list mostly movie actress all of you know has cornered the remaining part. The problem both are having is finding enough hospitals and doctors to provide what they need from very tiny babies. The foreskin. They have offered cash incentives to have doctors and hospitals pressure parents to get the procedure done and are spending millions in research to try and duplicate the same quality in a lab. So far, they have been unsuccessful. Apparently there is a noticeable difference. What they are both doing is to charge high prices to the unsuspecting for lab created while pretending it is the same quality. The actual cream used with actual foreskin is the most expensive product on earth right now and the margins are through the roof. Even with payoffs, what cost the designers pennies is being sold for $1000 per gram. This of course has led to unsavory types to also want to get involved and their methods are not very subtle. Third world mothers are having their babies taken from them to get the foreskin. All because rich people want their skin to look younger. That foreign born A list dual threat actress who had a former family member reveal some news this week is a big fan. The permanent A list mostly movie actress who is an Academy Award winner is also a huge fan.
Ralph Lauren?
ReplyDeleteTommy Hilfiger?
ReplyDeleteI think you got it. I remember that really show starring his daughter when she was a teen and she told her friends back then that he used a special cream on his face that was made from foreskin.
DeletePerm A MM Actress-Angie or Nicole K?
ReplyDeleteBlanchett and Beckindale are fans
ReplyDeleteJust use Preparation fucking H you dumb rich bitches!
ReplyDeleteIt shrinks Nobby Stiles' so imagine what it can do to your haggard food avoiding fucking fizzogs.
Leave the cocks alone.
Anyway You'd think there's be plenty of hoods available in those primitive areas of the world where the ignorant populace practice this sort of mutilation as a matter of course. You know, the Middle East and the US.
prep h formula has bern changed in the states due to misuse of product. wish it was the same @flashy vic
DeleteI have no clue but I'd love to see this research. My guess is that it is similar to the killing of animals for their horns/tusks. Very sad.
ReplyDeleteI dunno probably guessed but Halle Berry for the Perm A(or Angie)?
ReplyDeleteFB dual threat actress Priyanka?
google revealed Oprah, Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett being fans of foreskin beauty cream
ReplyDeleteGetting circumcised is culturally mandatory in a lot of countries. They don't need to snatch babies from their moms. Just go to any doctor that does the procedure and collect the foreskin!!
ReplyDeleteYou have to pay for it now in America. They used to just do it as part of the birth but now its $500+out of pocket..to have it removed.
DeleteSalma Hayek and her husband
ReplyDeleteKate Beckinsale for the the first big fan! (Ex-husband revealed he's having a baby)
ReplyDeleteSandra Bullock, Cate Blanchete and Kate Beckensale promote the "penis facials",they are reproduced like with stem cells in the lab. This was used for many years to regenerate skin for burn victims,but the value went up because of this. The trend is moving away from circumcision,but in many poorer countries it is possible they may be doing it against parents wishes. It's been popular to use the foreskin from South Korea. I wonder if this is hurting medical use by making it more expensive?
ReplyDeleteWhat the fuck is wrong with people???
ReplyDeleteCle de peau?
ReplyDeleteI guess jizz doesn't hold it's properties once it hits the air. Gross.
ReplyDeleteAnd if these HW broads would give up cigs, drugs, and booze they wouldn't need this, just a mild facelift every 5 years or so
Sounds like it may be profitable to be a moyle these days.
ReplyDelete😂😂
DeleteHave they tried Planned Parenthood? I'm sure those ghouls would be all to eager to procure the product for them.
ReplyDeleteThey probably already do this. They never miss a chance to make money on dismembered infants.
DeleteOh. My. Lord.
ReplyDeleteWe need a catchy name for this story. The Circumcision Scheme? The Foreskin Fix?
ReplyDeleteI know somebody out there can top those.
"Oprah Loves Foreskin on Her Face"
ReplyDeleteJanuary 25th, 2013
Jezebel
Oprah likes to rub human foreskin all over her face—because it's an ingredient of her favorite anti-aging skin cream SkinMedica, which she calls a "magic fountain of youth and miracle wrinkle solution." Apparently, this is offensive enough to earn the ire of the Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project who protested the media mogul's sold-out appearance in Vancouver yesterday.
...
Additionally, human foreskin has a lot of uses, other than being a penis turtleneck. It's an organic resource that can create skin grafts for burn victims or take the place of animals in cosmetic testing. As far as anti-wrinkle creams go, one foreskin can be used for decades to grow fibroblasts that lab techs use to cook up some collagen.
https://jezebel.com/oprah-loves-foreskin-on-her-face-5978961
No wonder that publication is called Jezebel
DeleteThe perm alist oscar winner is def sandra bullock
ReplyDeletesalma and hubby for foreign born designer and wife
Oh gross.
ReplyDeleteThis horsesh!t just keeps getting worse.
ReplyDeleteI know a lot of things about a lot of things that I'd rather not know.
At first (actually for a long time) I didn't believe it....but CRAP
WTF is wrong with these people.
As far as "cultural norm" - not really so much anywhere except US is it a "cultural" norm. It may be religious requirement some places - but the rest of the Western world doesn't do this BS.
and I say that as a mother who had both of my boys done...for gender identity with father.
Still it's BS and the more I know - the worse it gets.
Oprah and most of those other women that love this stuff don't look that great without makeup ( lines and puffs are still there), they are wasting time and money.
ReplyDeleteForeskin is just dead human cell with slightly less proteins and hormones than baby blood.
ReplyDeleteThis is just grooming for young blood and the real money maker, Adrenochrome.
An organic material that hold's the key to extended life for only one bite of the poisoned apple.
Adrenochrome, which is a pigment obtained by the oxidation of adrenaline (epinephrine) within the Pineal gland.
The ultimate "apple" formula (and insane profits) requires barbaric means to extract from a tortured and disposable breeder. One will beat the poor baby maker for weeks so the brain juices of a full term baby turn on GOD_MODE. Weird science happens during gestation that labs can't reproduce. Narrowed down to the fine line between emotion and healing.
Hint, they have to laugh between the beatings, no shit. Possible with chemicals and emotional triggers.
First documented by both the Germans and Japanese in the forties. It has become perfected since.
Ha! Off with their little heads. When we run out, we're going after the grown men's foreskins.
ReplyDelete"If I could turn back time" in more ways than one! Too bad someone wasn't on to this scheme about 30 years ago when removing the foreskin in the US was de rigueur. They were probably throwing out the foreskin into a roll off dumpster behind the hospital back then, too. You could make yourself look younger with all the cast off foreskin you wanted back then.
ReplyDeleteI'm curious to know what is the science behind using foreskin for this? It sounds a lot like foreskin is used because it is a chunk of human skin that is hacked off of some babies, rather than foreskin being some sort of special properties. After all, all of your skin cells have a regenerative property in the sense that your skin heals itself, so why couldn't they just cut off pieces of regular skin? Oh right. Because it would disfigure you! And if it has to do with stem cells, those are readily available via a blood draw. Therefore, it follows that you'd probably just be able to pay would-be donors and harvest these cells in a clinical environment. This blind is obviously a Frankenstein's monster of a few bits of information patched together.
@Violet617 For sure! Sorry to say, but if you're an old bag in the first place, a skin cream is only going to help to a certain, small degree. Makeup's what's making them look younger.
ReplyDeleteDisgusting. Shut it down. Baby penis titans and their insane clients need to find something else to fix their ugly.
ReplyDeleteThe debate about whether or not circumcision is a "cultural norm" is misplaced in this thread. We are talking about the sum total of medical waste in the US here (that's a lot of fucking foreskins and if you are thinking that they are doing anything with foreskins other than throwing them out in the trash, you've got another think coming because they aren't interring them), and whether or not there is a movement to not circumcise your newborns is a red herring. Those of you arguing about whether or not it is a common practice in the West, here's the deal: insofar as we are talking about newborns and their precious foreskins, the US is "West". Check birthrates in Europe vs. the US if my argument isn't making sense and you'll be soundly disabused of that notion.
ReplyDeleteIf there is a secret "fountain of youth" somewhere, the elite hasn't found it yet. The 1% still get diseases, age poorly and they drop dead ( some earlier than others) too.
ReplyDeleteARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME WITH THIS SHIT? Is it really SkinMedica??? Please say it isn't. I bought some under eye cream and was apalled that I paid $95 for a tiny little teeny jar of it. Probably .10 of an ounce. I had no idea there was baby wiener in it.
ReplyDeleteThese people should be put in prison. Just do facial oil cleansing and you won't need to put any extra crap on your face. OMG. I'm sickened.
Omg this just made me lol
DeleteHaha
LOL I always laugh this discussion because I went to Prep school and if you were not circumsized you were weird and so was your family and as a female in high school, we use to talk about it. There was literally a list of the few uncircumcised boys in the high school I went to of 80. I swear I am not trying to be mean...but, high school girls talk.
ReplyDeleteBut...seriously....foreskin cream?
I bet if this was true (and worked) the totalitarian governments (China, n. Korea) would already have started propaganda campaigns encouraging circumcising infants for increased health and vitality, longer wangs, whatever, and it would be flooding the marketplace here and there. So I call BS.
ReplyDeleteGood point EponymousAnonymoud. There are plenty of babies being born and there would be an easy breezy extra money for the parents way to harvest foreskins if this were real. I agree if anything the foreskins are the excuse or cover to get at something else much more sinister.
ReplyDeleteMrs Libnish you can switch to K beauty products. They are cheaper and better than a lot of label american dermocosmetics.
ReplyDeleteThis blind reminds me of a joke in one of my brothers’ joke books: What do rabbits do with their foreskins after circumcisions? Sell them to gays for chewing gum. It was the choice of rabbits as the sellers that always cracked me up. For guesses- Calvin and Marcy Klein, just as backup options. And Jane Fonda as the permanent A list fan.
ReplyDeleteAnd, like, where can one purchase this stuff? Asking for a friend...
ReplyDelete@JoeBlow
ReplyDeletethe US has about 4 mil births per year with 80% circumcision rate
Europe - about 5 mil - 20% or lower circumcision
Can - 400K - 30% circumcision
Mexico 2 mil - 20%
S. America rates drop to about 10%
now what were you saying about the US being the "western world" for practical purposes?
The US is the ONLY place where circumcision is an "opt out"
as far as your medical waste thing....0.8x4mil foreskins at 1 gram each...
is 3,200,000 grams or 3,200 kg or about 7,000 pounds - roughly the size of two cars...
not that much "waste" to pile up.
So many thoughts running through my brain about this post that I'm left almost speechless. But really... WTactualF?!
ReplyDeleteFlashy I'M glad you're back. Where ya been dude?
I think we are misunderstanding each other because your statistics confirm my point. The US--with the practical purpose in this discussion expressly being the country with most foreskins readily available--is the Western world. We are talking about a single, Western nation's physical output of foreskins. Twenty percent of 5 million is one million, and that is for the "country" of Europe. The US is cranking out 50% (because we only circumcise males in the US) of 80% of 4 million. Your stats confirm my point, so thanks for providing them. You can add up the rest of the Western world's discarded foreskins and the US outpaces them all, but we don't need to add up the rest of the Western world because the rest of the Western world isn't one country, and a country is the only thing worth talking about in this argument because restrictions upon what is done with medical waste are only worth considering in terms of one country versus another because if you are a company wishing to harvest foreskins from hospitals, you're going to be dealing with federal regulations.
ReplyDeleteAnd the medical waste thing: my argument doesn't have to do with the overall tonnage of foreskins. It has to do with the fact that every medical procedure creates medical waste, which is in turn disposed of singularly. Hospitals don't retain their waste for an entire year. They throw out the trash like the rest of us, daily or weekly.
@TeeHee@U it would be the opposite in all the countries I have lived except the US. It’s rare except for religious reasons. Muslim/Jewish and the lower social economic groups in China are the only ones I know who still actively practice it. We would assume the boy was from those religions/cultures if he was circumcised. It’s considered an unnecessary and painful procedure on someone too young to give consent, bordering on male genital mutilation by many people. Very rare to see it in men under 50. Some older men had it done, but not a large percentage had it done. One man told me his father fought in the desert in WWII and was unable to wash, so had his sons circumcised as babies. There are fewer doctors who are prepared to do it here. I’ve seen some botched circumcisions as an A&E doctor and would never recommend it. I don’t get the “to look like his father” reasoning either. Would you dye and infant’s hair or give him matching tattoos as his dad? Spend time with your kids, have fun, listen to them, be kind and fair, teach good values and integrity by example, that’s far more important than having matching genitals.
ReplyDelete@MrsLibnish I feel your anger. I guess they don’t advertise it as “Painfully harvested from the foreskins from babies”. It’s appalling.
ReplyDeleteBack on MTv, Ali Hilfiger used to have a show called Rich Girls. And on one episode she used this cream that she said her dad (Tommy) was a fan of and it was made from the foreskin of a baby's penis.
ReplyDelete@Erm and 'im and @TeeHee@U The religious vs. social reasons argument can be easily resolved by the fact of Teehee@U's qualifier of having gone to "Prep schools". In the US, Prep schools are nearly entirely tuition-based. Sure, they toss a few admissions out based on little things like scholarship, but they are primarily attended by those whose families have the means to send their kids there. Therefore, it sort of makes sense that the kids at those schools are, at least in part, members of the proverbial white, Anglo-Saxon, protestant section of society. At least, moreso than the kids at an average public school. Therefore, she probably had run-ins with a lot more of those kids than of the "average" type and the dongs she and her friends kept close score on were influenced by the combination of class and religion that permeates much of the East coast preparatory school scene.
ReplyDelete+ Preparation H, folks! When I was a young teen using those tanning lights I got 2/3rd degree burns on my face. Guess what was used?.....Prep H
ReplyDeleteAlways remember: EVERYThING has more than just one use!!!
So the designers are Tommy Hilfiger and Salma's husband.
ReplyDelete@SnarkyAngel.
ReplyDeleteI tend not to be on at weekends anyway and this last weekend was a long holiday one where I live. In short: mostly drunk.
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
ReplyDeleteAnd is this "La Mer?"
Why do people need this stuff? Shades of Countess Bathory.
ReplyDeleteIt's trapping the water between your moisturizer and your face that gives extra benefit. You do not need human body parts, or cow or other placenta. You do NOT.
That blue gel by Estee Lauder always worked wonders for me if my face was looking a bit icky.
I can believe this blind, although I have no idea if it's true. There are so many dis-empowered people on earth that could be victimized by these vampires.
@Em and I'm.
ReplyDelete"I don’t get the “to look like his father” reasoning either. Would you dye and infant’s hair or give him matching tattoos as his dad?"
If you ever get to the point of conversation where, "Ooh, doesn't he look like his dad?!" is based on comparing genitals then I suggest backing out of the room quietly before hollering for the Peelers, because that's some Epstein/Savile levels of noncery right there.
Foreskin Fix.....Penis Turtlenecks.......We got writers...now for the plot.
ReplyDelete@JosephBlow. I grew up going to what we call public school, including boarding schools (US equivalent to private schools), so I think it must be very different in the UK. I'm also Anglo Saxon White. I've just done a quick straw poll amongst fellow medics here (a change from bloody Love Island, Boris and Brexit), and apart from the two Muslim surgeons, none of the other males or the husbands/boyfriends/partners and sons are circumcised and the Muslim hasn't had her sons done. Anyone who tells you the baby doesn't feel pain and gets over it quickly are lying. We are a mixed bunch tonight - British of various origins, Irish Australian, NZ, Scandanavian and German. I also learned that the UK is trying to get the target for circumcisions performed here under 2%, it's about 3.5% at present. I know most of the circumcised males in the UK and Europe have been done before moving here. My NZ colleague says there in the late 1940s over 90% of male babies were circumcised, but now there are fewer than 1% actually performed in NZ. it is widespread in the Polynesian nations like Fiji and Samoa so migration from those countries brings the numbers up. I also learned that it's practically unheard of in Japan. Our hilarious nurse from Dublin told great detail about all the wonky cocks and other weird stuff she's seen. Black humour keeps us going. Best shift break this year!
ReplyDeleteI think it's important for a little boy to resemble his father in that way otherwise the child will feel like he's lacking, or not normal. Kids really internalize things.
ReplyDeleteJoseph P your comment about skin cream not really helping old bags brought back a memory. I was an Avon lady for a short time. The same truck driver would deliver to the house and one day he told my husband, "I have been delivering to the same women for 15 years now, and they're still ugly!"
Collateral Justice traumatized me with his (or her) post. Jaysus!
@Flashy Vic 100% correct. As alway, you can express it more succinctly and funnier than anyone else. I always look for your pearls of wisdom.
ReplyDeleteIn countries with free or heavily subsidised universal healthcare we don't waste money on unnecessary, painful and permanent procedures on babies. If we want let our sons look like their dads we'll put them in matching jumpers. Where medical care is often a profit making enterprise, like the US, circumcision rates are much higher.
Technique and sweet talking by blokes aside, an uncut penis always gives a man a little edge with the ladies. That's the kind of high school girl talk we had at good old CLC, and after doing my due diligence as an adult, I'd agree.
Enjoy. Powdered baby skin pills
ReplyDeletehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2140702/South-Korea-customs-officials-thousands-pills-filled-powdered-human-baby-flesh.html
Best comment goes to @MrsLibnish.
ReplyDeleteSoylent Green is PEOPLE!
SkinMedica is BABY WIENER!
I think it depends on which generation you are talking about re circumcision at birth being common. (Outside of religious practices.)
ReplyDeleteThis talk about how much the baby feels and how it is not necessary for hygiene was not a thing in the past.
Once that talk began the circumcision rates began to drop. I don't know to what extent.
Back in the day, uncircumsized Goyim in the USA were fairly rare. I think it was more common in Europe, where it was seen as a Jewish religious rite. Remember that film where they would tell which teens/men were Jews trying to pass as Goy, by checking their foreskin?
So just to that subtopic here of how common it is...it used to be a very common thing in the U. S. for male babies to be circumsized. It was standard. It was done by doctors not long after the baby was born. The exception might be more rural, home births.
One of the Wayans brothers had his sons circumsized when they were about 8 or 9? He talked about it. I think it was part of a standup. I can't recall where I saw that. I can't recall which Wayans. His sons had to go to the hospital and I think stay overnight. He might've had the same operation at the same time. I might be getting details mixed up. Does anyone know more?
ReplyDeleteIf you want to have nice skin, drink 8 glasses of water every day, get 8 hours of sleep every night (unless you’re having great sex because that’s good for your skin as well), never, ever go to sleep with make-up on, and use a very gentle facial cleanser (I use Purpose, which you can buy at a drugstore.) Also wash your face in the sink because the water temperature that you use in the shower is normally too hot & will damage your skin. Wear sunglasses & sunscreen
ReplyDeleteevery day, don’t smoke cigarettes, and if you’re going to the beach, bring an umbrella. Other than that, it’s best to use products with as few chemicals as possible. And leave the poor baby boys alone.
@Huckleberry: Foreskin Follies
ReplyDeleteI'm guessing this is a blind now (aside from being one 10 years ago) because of the demand and they apparently way it's being sourced?
ReplyDeleteTissue Nutrient Solution (TNS) is the patent name I think SkinMedica use.
It's all about the fibroblasts which old gentlemen that were willingly donating just don't have enough of "the goods".
Also, the foreskin comes in... flakes. Have fun with that thought!
This was a few years ago I heard this, but there were trials about trying to get melanin from foreskin to, again, use as a semi-perm/permanent solution.
Sandra Bullock confessed to using it on the Ellen show
ReplyDeleteI also should mention that even a newborn that is a few months old has already lost chromosomes- which is what I was referring to in my last comment as "the goods".
ReplyDeleteThere IS a good SCIENTIFIC reason to collect foreskins, especially from babies with abnormalities as these are used to help with muscular, skeletal and other things at the chromosome level, as these samples can be looked at and go to helping people (mostly mothers and fetuses) in the future.
But a demand from rich people who can already afford anything and it isn't going towards helping others? Another story.
What would foreskin have in it that would be good for your skin? It's just flesh. It would be akin to grinding up any type of mammal skin and rubbing it on your face.
ReplyDeleteDo they mistakenly believe it has similar properties to stem cells (which I also highly doubt would be beneficial in any way if you rubbed them on your skin).
no cream is gonna make u look 20 again. just get a facelift or get the wrinkles lasered off. would like to know what countries have the most customers..must be the same aficionados of The endangered Rhinos right?
ReplyDelete1. Salma Hayek's husbands is not a fucking designer - he's the CEO of a huge fashion & luxury goods conglomerate, he designs fuck-all
ReplyDelete2. this is sick
3. also slightly less sick is the prolonged down-low hissyfit from the anti-circumcision commenter. Uncircumcised dicks are absolutely revoltingly disgusting, there is a reason this practise has been around for thousands of years, it's done keeping in mind dozens of very real and painful issues that could arise later in a man's life (when I was in high school a 13-year old needed to have it done for medical reasons, which never would have arisen had his parents taken care of it at birth), the pain-factor is the stupidest argument I have ever heard from anyone, especially since for example teething apparently is the most painful feeling for babies, and nobody fucking remembers that, so stop it with your faux outrage of thinking about the poor children - they don't fucking know you moron!
If you want to really be all outraged why don't you talk about the real barbarism behind FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION, a practise with the sole purpose of inflicting pain and suffering on women for the rest other sexual active life?
Leave circumcised dicks the fuck alone, you premature ejaculator!
I am still sitting with my mouth open and no words,... WTF did i just read????
ReplyDeleteAnd why is it that not more people react like that, a face cream with MF foreskin in it?? REALLY!!!??? Stealing it?? WTF??? I just can't process this...
"not a libtard" said - "If you want to really be all outraged why don't you talk about the real barbarism behind FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION, a practise with the sole purpose of inflicting pain and suffering on women for the rest other sexual active life?"
ReplyDeleteThis, although I wasn't gonna bring it up, I can't help grabbing at this bait.
Not only do many little girls DIE as a result of this barbaric "procedure," it's often done with a dirty dull knife, and it can range from having some outer parts removed to having so much flesh excised that a gaping gap remains. Either way the remainder is sewn up with a cactus thorn and some type of 'thread' only leaving an opening the size of a matchstick tip.
Then, for the rest of her life, she will have trouble passing anything...urine, blood, anything.
On the "wedding night" (and the bride is often barely past childhood), the "husband" (forced marital partner) is given a ritual knife to cut her back open again.
Women who have been mutilated this way as children (it cannot really be called "circumcision" when there's nothing "extra" there to begin with, and yeah guys, I hear your complaints saying the same thing. I take no position on that issue) usually have complications with pregnancy and childbirth. I'm not a Dr. I don't know why. But I know they do. I've read and watched too much on this over the years.
Those are KNOWN complications and yet it goes on.
Oh and the kicker? The girls are NOT infant when it happens (which would be equally bad) but, are 5-12 years of age. And this is all done WITHOUT pain killers or anesthesia.
As for male babies...if it is going to be done, at least give the infant pain relief, not to do so is barbaric. I do not care if they won't remember it later. We don't know how it could affect their psyche. Not all emotional pain is conscious pain. And in the religious ritual, stop using the mouth! Babies have been given herpes when the moyel has a 'cold sore.' Use a little compassion and common sense there. The mouth does not have to be used at all.
I tried not to be graphic...
As for this face cream...knock it off, ya ghouls.
Just Scrolling through - the comments on this thread are excellent
ReplyDeleteThere are a few commenters asking why the technical discussion - why not simple disgust?
Disgust was expressed by most serial commenters at beginning. This is nasty, mean and sick.
Why is no one more upset about FGM? We are but this was about foreskins...being used in COSMETICS
Now that that is done, as far as the science....
the foreskin of infants has "fibroblasts" which are kind of like stem cells for collagen
so theoretically, these cells can re-"teach" your old worn out skin cells how to make collagen again
does it work? Probably...the same way that putting stem cells near degenerated nerve tissue works.
Placenta tissue may do the same (ish) thing. still nasty.
The reason infant foreskins are used in particular is
a. the foreskins of adult males do not have the same level of fibroblasts as those of an infant. same reason "umbilical cord blood" is saved and used for stem cells - you can't get the same effect by boring out an adult belly button.
but
b. adult foreskins are not readily available
Like I said earlier...I had my boys done for gender identification with father so their peens would look the same.
I have read that it produces pain response in infant boys that is a primal trauma...and can explain a bunch of emotional repression, blah blah blah...now they use pain reliever but babies still scream so it still hurts.
Years later - I would NOT have it done...and have since found that my husband actually has a repressed anger that his was done. Seriously...he makes jokes about wanting it back now.
I found a crunchy momma blog that confirms it is TNS (Tissue Nutrient Solution) or "human fibroblast"....it will not be listed as foreskin.
Some companies use the foreskins to grow more fibroblasts...so not all cosmetics have actual foreskins.
@Sd - Too bad about preparation H - it had shark liver oil which is a tissue shrinker - learned that in pharmacy school many, many years ago
The MAIN problem is that, particularly in the US - people have an unnatural relationship with aging and death
AND
Celebrities are allowed and encouraged to do disgusting, unnatural things which may violate the life force of many people...ala Epstein.
As far as that goes...
I have no effing idea who the designer or other person is and I have searched company history for every high end cosmetics company I can find....
SkinMedica is now an Allergan company - big pharma so the history of the company will be long buried.
thanks for the info @m bee! im shuddering that i once used shark oil on my puffy eyes in the 80s! feel sad..
Deleteone more
ReplyDelete@not a libtard
I used to agree about the non-circumcised penis
the reason jews and muslims insisted on circumcision...is they lived in the effing desert where there was no water.
It was an edict from God - to make the peoples more successful at survival.
but modern day washing of the junk makes the disease argument moot
This is proven by medical research
wash the junk = lack of infection
MB - I've heard that some adult males complain that the foreskin can become abraded or even tear during sexual activity. I do not know how prevalent an issue that is, or if, from a male perspective, that and having to take a bit of extra care with hygiene would outweigh the circumcision "controversy" or would underscore its necessity.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is, can't ask an infant what it wants.
MB please don't be insulted but, why are your comments formatted so strangely? (The random paragraphs/line breaks/indentations.) It make it harder to read them. Maybe just me.
ReplyDeleteWhen Female Gential Mutaliation was a cause of the day, people are/were rightly fully horrified. But somehow when it's done to male infants every has a mass delusion that it's medically necessity, but somehow only in America and magically not Europe. If people can't get together to condemn infant genital mutilation, how strong the propaganda in America is.
ReplyDeleteIf people want to do it to themselves as adults, that's their right.
Related OT: There was a story where a bunch of men in a country in Africa that someone managed to convinced that circumcision prevents cancer. So when a "non-profit" offered "free procedures" "to help fight cancer" many thousands of men jumped at the chance to sign-up. Those NGO's are a nasty nasty bunch.
'I give you 50,000 foreskins and all you made was a wallet?!'
ReplyDelete'But when you rub it, it turns into a suitcase!'
Can't believe no one told this joke before I did...
Thot Crimes - removing the prepuce does not impact future fertility, health, or sexual ability, or sexual pleasure. (In fact many argue the opposite, as far as health and sexual pleasure. Many say the foreskin dulls sensation. Some also say friction with an 'uncut' member can be painful.)
ReplyDeleteComparing it to FGM is an insult. Another way to minimize what girls and women have gone through for centuries.
Whether it's right or wrong to perform on an infant is another matter. It's a matter of religious belief in many cases. I know some believe that doesn't matter.
But please do not compare it to FGM, for reasons explained in my prior comment. It really is NOT the same thing.
Some claim the lack of hygiene and what builds up behind the prepuce can increase disease in their female partner. I do not know if that's accurate but doctors believed that and that was a reason given. It was practiced with regularity for that reason among others, until fairly recently, when the men's rights movement piggybacked onto the FGM movement - imo to again minimize what women go through and derail the anti-FGM movement.
ReplyDeleteI'm getting off topic though and I think I've covered that subtopic enough.
I have no foreskin, but my jizz cures both pimples and crazy in women, if used in ample amounts. The dual remedies gives many a tough decision to make.
ReplyDeleteSince nobody has mentioned it yet, I'll just offer this out as a consideration: the procedure undoubtedly reduces the sensitivity in men. Who knows what sort of weird problems we are inviting with the rise of pornography and the circumcised, baseball mitt dicks that we create for ourselves by jacking off all the time.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a doctor, but seriously, having the most sensitive part of one's body rubbing against the rough texture of cotton underwear, all day, every day, probably isn't the way nature intended it.
@Samantha - formatting is weird I guess because...I have old lady vision so have to peer at computer screen and when typing in small edit box - I have to use spaces to review my own writing.
ReplyDeleteOn image boards you get harassed for using "reddit spacing" so I have modified my typing to avoid being called out on that. Kind of funny because on the "chans" no one knows how old you are and finding they are chatting with "gran" would probably freak them out.
I'll try to keep in mind that it looks weird on this site.
Joseph - I'm not only not a doctor but i do not have the equipment being discussed in parts o this subtopic, but, doesn't the thingy point downward? So the underside/sensitive part is against the body, not against the cotton? Don't some men opt for loose boxers? *shrug* Guess I might as well ask.
ReplyDelete"I'm not a doctor, but seriously, having the most sensitive part of one's body rubbing against the rough texture of cotton underwear, all day, every day, probably isn't the way nature intended it."
__
MB - I have similar probs...I need new specs badly. I just made a booboo in one comment where I quoted the wrong thing and didn't notice. My hardware (mouse/keyboard) is about kaput too, so it doesn't always copy correctly.
"I have old lady vision so have to peer at computer screen and when typing in small edit box - I have to use spaces to review my own writing."
__
"I'll try to keep in mind that it looks weird on this site."
Ignore what I said. I am too fussy sometimes.
@ Huckleberry Snip-It Serum
ReplyDelete@Samantha I suppose technically I wouldn't know either, but as a circumcised male (I know, TMI, but it seems pertinent here) it stands to reason that there is going to be some de-sensitization that happens due to friction. Even if it is pointing downward (not all men "address" this way--also personal experience) there's still going to be contact on at least one side because it doesn't tuck between the legs. And yes, some men do opt for roomier underwear, but it's only going to be as roomy as the clothes you are wearing on top of it. I think that loose fitting clothing looks sloppy, so it would a bit of a bummer to think that men choose to go through life dressing that way in order to protect their junk from properly-sized and tailored clothing.
ReplyDeleteWhat weighs more: That humankind managed to procreate during billions of years of evolution while having their foreskins intact, or a 3000 year-old religious practice? All kinds of mental illnesses are associated with extreme childhood trauma.knows what kinds of problems "the quest for younger skin" has caused.
ReplyDeleteAnd what fucker thought, "you know.., what we should do with all those leftover foreskins is make luxury facial creams."
https://i.imgur.com/e27ouko.jpg
ReplyDeletehttps://i.imgur.com/sMA6HRv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ei6h1dq.jpg
Has to be someone with access to labs.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Salma and her husband.
TNS is Skin Medica which is made by Allergan Labs (the botox company).
Foreskin contains fibroblasts-which dr's tell their patients it contains "growth factors"--so they don't get disgusted and not buy it. The dr's get a financial incentive to sell the entire Skin Medica line.
Sell botox+TNS+Juvederm Fillers+Kybella=great residual income for dr's.
Look up TNS Serum on eBay $350 for 1 oz.
Early april fools or somethin. Yikes.
ReplyDeleteJoseph - I dunno that I can subscribe to your assertion that clothing renders people numb. Or clothing renders people incapable of sexual sensaation. People have been wearing clothes since recorded history. Men have been circumsized for about 2000 years that I can think of. (At least, some men.) They wore clothes.
ReplyDeleteWhichever way a man "carries" or "presents" or whatever euphemisms tailors use, I haven't yet heard of a callous caused by boxers or briefs.
A soap diva swears by her beauty regimen; bathing her face daily with her own urine. Sounds a lot cheaper than black market foreskins. I'll just stick with my Lubriderm.
ReplyDelete