Blind Item #1
Apparently Bel Air was not considered "young enough" for the alliterate former actress turned A list celebrity which is why has focused her search on Malibu.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
September 29, 2024 The hasn't happened yet A list rapper is in really bad shape. He had to be awakened just to make it on to a recent re...
-
The mother of a barely there celebrity was overheard musing about how much the sperm donor is worth way more dead than alive, at least to th...
-
The alliterate one had lunch with a woman who runs a surrogate agency. Is this the way she plans on getting people on her side? Or, was it j...
-
Is it grooming when you put a child front and center and have them interviewed by national magazines just so you can try and keep the realit...
-
An offspring of a former A++ lister is hooking up with an A+/A list singer. Their first hookup was a messy drunken spectacle in front of sev...
-
October 15, 2024 Apparently, the growing rift between the alliterate one and her husband began shortly after the big funeral. The alliterate...
-
For old times sake, these two bad actors/former co-stars/former couple hooked up. They will blame it on being drunk.
-
The Sean Combs of Hollywood documentary coming is going to send the alliterate one and her husband running like cockroaches.
-
October 16, 2024 I guess things are getting more serious considering the permanent A list "singer" has Narcan ready to go througho...
-
October 9, 2024 The Sean Combs of Hollywood documentary coming is going to send the alliterate one and her husband running like cockroaches....
Sparkles is just getting more and more vile!
ReplyDeleteMM
ReplyDeleteLol @ moron fifty-percent and his hippo wife.
ReplyDeleteLol @ she's skinnier than every female here at CDAN.
Delete#facts
Speak for yourself,dude
Delete👙 all day long!
DeleteOk so... No offense Trisha but...
DeleteWe've seen many pictures of you,from many angles (thanku for that) and I'm going to stand firm in my original statement lol
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIt's so confusing
DeleteWhat’s confusing is someone here so long still doesn’t spell my name correctly... it’s not like it’s part of my screenname🤔
DeleteHoliday weekend, end-of-Summer sales at the liquor store, you know.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHas only 1 kid*(as opposed to 2 toddlers)
DeleteWould it make you feel better about yourself to post a full length?
DeleteTo prove to us that Meghan is a big ole fatso?
That's what the point is here... non?
No. I couldn’t give a toss about her... never have. You stayed an incorrect assumption (happens a lot). I fixed it for ya
DeleteI never said 1 thing about her weight body -and I don’t and have never use words like fatso or body shamed anyone -~you attempted to So it to female readers here -which-you are “one of” right🙄
DeleteI just remember the post slamming the other royal girl as fugly. Didn't seem very nice to me. I guess people can choose what's allowed and not alliwed when they are boss of everything.
DeletePlease keep going...you're showing your true colors-
DeletePlease.....continue...
J what ya mean?
DeleteBut don't you applaud when they call her fat?
DeleteIt's hilarious then isn't it?
So when I point out that J is literally calling 95% of the women here "fat" you literally didn't catch thatz but instead jumped in to say how skinny you are? And that I wouldn't know what it's like because I've never given birth?
Amazing.
No. You verbatim said she is “skinnier”(another word I don’t use ) than any female here. I simply said “speak for yourself”.
DeleteIts☝️Right there. I can copy/paste for ya if it helps.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIn the thread about Andrew's daughter's wedding a day or two ago. Until the post is deleted you can read hiw that girl's not pretty enough for our feminist authority. But it'll be deleted quick, that's the MO.
Delete
DeleteRosie riveter9:16 AM
Oh this poor girl. I bet everyone calls her "the ugly royal" and it's notta lie.
Yes, I'm looks-shaming.
This one?
Yeah. So weird... I call one person fat, another poster calls all the wimen here fatter than that person, then says I called everyone here fat, which I never did, not remotely. Very strange.
DeleteI think strange sums that person up pretty well...
DeleteMy goodness! Gotta love Tricia and J 👍🏻😆😍
DeleteGood job, y’all!
Who is supposedly paying for this house and how can PH live in CA & still be part of the BRF?
ReplyDeleteWhat's great is, thanks to Elton John's miraculous technology, they can shuttle around the world without harming the environment.
ReplyDeleteLol!
DeleteLol👍
DeleteWhy would they even allow her to buy a house in the US? Plus, I thought she was like, 45. Boca Raton, FL is more for her I would think
ReplyDelete@Marissa 👏 👏 👏
ReplyDeleteI don’t blame Meghan. Who wants to live among a bunch retirees and has beens..
ReplyDeleteShe’s a never was until she yachted and conned Harry. No one knew who she was until she started doing her best work on her knees and back. Now, she’s only famous by association, who is she to be so picky and uppity?
DeleteExactly! Finally someone speaks the truth!!
DeleteShe's a princess, you petty & jealous peasant
DeleteNo, Rosie dear, she isn't. She is a duchess.
DeleteBrits, are you aware your government is in deep crisis? I would worry less about this broad if I were y’all
ReplyDeleteWhat crisis? Trying to enact the outcome of a democratic vote?
DeleteThe EU are known to ignore democracy or keep running votes till they get the answer they want....Denmark, Ireland..
@Randaleese: But she is a has-been. Or actually, a never-was.
ReplyDeletei will be amazed if this purchase and move takes with without repercussions from the RF/ HMTQ.
ReplyDelete@Lauren: We posted at the same time.
ReplyDeleteJust what CA needs--another immigrant. I assume he will be here through the legal channels...
ReplyDeleteWho is going to pay for it? The RF isn’t going to, and Hairy’s money is tied up in trusts. Maybe they can move in with Doria.
ReplyDeleteWhy, the British taxpayers will ultimately pay, with a big smile because their dirigible duchess is so delightful.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the house is part of the exit package
ReplyDeletethis makes her look like a fool. why marry royalty and then abdicate to live in filthy LA. Malibu has fires, homeless, pollution, gang activity and road rage on PCH! every year, there is a massive fire. I'd live in south of France or somewhere in the countryside with horses and nice scenery. PH likes to party so he may even want ro hang with coke mom.
ReplyDeleteAre the BRF (at tax payer's expense) allowed to have vacation homes in countries not apart of Britain Monarchy?
ReplyDeleteAnd, Harry is going to regret this so hard in about 5-10 years....if he hasn't already. Don't worry about her though! She will probably have stupid reality show after an Oprah special and book tour when the divorce settles and she will never go away...just like the Kardashians....and herpes.
Supposedly there will be no exit package. She was offered an exit package to cancel the wedding. At first she accepted, then she changed her mind. She was told that there wouldn’t be another offer in the future. I don’t think they’re even legally married.
ReplyDeleteIf MM was smart she would buy in Vancouver BC. Nobody would question it as inappropriate and she would have a house for when Harry divorces her and she is back working on a cable series. Most of them film up there.
ReplyDeleteJesus. As though British royalty isn't the OG Old Money.
ReplyDeleteGirl has been merching and scamming fees so hard since the wedding that I am sure she has built up a steady income for a mansion in LA to isolate Harry further from his family. Then, she can do tell-alls galore from her US perch. They have made themselves unwelcome in the UK so it is that or Africa, and Markles won't want to be away from glamour for more than 5 minutes so that is a non-starter.
ReplyDeletePeople in oceanside Malibu are saying "but we already have whale watching."
ReplyDeleteTry Larchmont, very hip youngish family type of area, Meggles.
ReplyDeleteOr try Santa Monica. Parts of it are oceanfront, and it too has a more family vibe. You will get a lot of storm damage in Malibu. Any bad weather, it tends to flood.
Harry might like Topanga better. More private, bit of a hippie vibe.
Or try the Hills, then you don't have to fight traffic all the time, you're more centralized.
Nope, a top of hill ocean view is probably what is on the menu.
Malibu is kind of trashy now. She'll fit right in.
ReplyDeleteBleu - YES and old money does not spend. She is acting like the cliche new money.
ReplyDeleteAquagirl my guess is it's mainly for her and she can be a dual citizen. Some Brits use the USA as a tax dodge, or live in the USA part time. Lot of British expats in L. A., especially in its ocean adjacent cities.
ReplyDeleteThey should just buy a fairly modest-priced beach house and use it for a vacation.
I think PH and PW get money from Charles' holdings, but I'm not sure.
Lol young enough? Meghan, you’re three years shy of 40...you left ‘young’ a while ago
ReplyDelete"I don’t think they’re even legally married."
ReplyDeleteHow so?
Although, I think if PC and Camilla had to have 'only' a state ceremony and a C of E "blessing," then PH and MM should've done the same. MM had been married, what, twice before PH? I think the first was annulled -- did the C of E quietly "annul" the second, too?
Fine with me, then her dumb ass's presence won't snarl up traffic closer to where I live and work. Go up to Malibu. I suggest Trancas area.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I love the statement that she wants to move to Malibu because she's "homesick."
ReplyDeleteDarling, you grew up in Crenshaw and moved to Hancock Park with Husband #1 or #2, depending on how who's counting.
Taking repeated trips through Malibu on the TMZ Celebrity Tour bus does not mean it was your "home."
Nutty, thanks for posting a new article to your blog! I check it every day, love it!
DeleteI think they literally mean Bel Air is all retirees which BH is. Lots of older families. Malibu young is say rich 20/30/40s.
ReplyDelete@Samantha: I didn’t watch the wedding...just saw snippets of it. When it comes time to sign the registry, she signs, and then when it’s his turn, he holds the book in a certain way so that you can’t really see what he’s doing. I don’t think he ever signed it.
ReplyDeleteFirst marriage was annulled, I don’t think second one was. But this marriage (if they are married) could possibly be annulled due to coercion.
Harry gets about $300,000/year from his inheritance from Diana, and Charles gives them (PH & PC) $ from the Duchy, but idk how much. After the supposed renovations of Frogmore and her more than million dollar expenditure on clothes in one year, I think they’re being shut down or at least limited. The LAST thing they should do right now, given public opinion, is buy another house. Charles offered them a place (I think in Wales) but they turned it down.
@Nutty: TMZ celebrity tour bus! Love it!
ReplyDeleteI saw a report somewhere, that the mainstream media never picked up on, that Doria listed $9,000,000 in income for 2018 on her taxes. She runs yoga classes. That's a lot of stretching people, unless she's laundering Meghan's merching money to keep it out of sight from the RF. Considering Disney gave their "for profit" Foundation $3,000,000, I woudl say they are int eh ballpark for buying a small house in Malibu with those funds alone. Who knows what Meghan has brought in for 2019. Her merching is most likely paying for this house. She can always purchase the home under the name of the Foundation as well, and use any finds in that account. Meghan is one crafty grifter.
ReplyDeleteMeghan’s bigger concern should be the IRS. She’s had issues with them in the past and I’m sure they’d love to go after her. It’s not just the merching, it’s the ‘gifts’ like the flight that Elton paid for, whatever she was given at the baby shower in NY, free clothes, etc. Plus I think
ReplyDeleteshe still had outstanding tax issues from the Tig. That’s why she closed it down.
I had heard that Doria had a few million in her account, but I didn’t realize it was $9,000,000. How does a yoga teacher not get audited if she declares that much income? I wish that Doria would refuse to give the $ to Meghan. Both grifters. They deserve each other. The house that Doria lives in was actually left to her and a younger brother (I think 1/2 brother?) She stole it right from under him, so she’s definitely capable of screwing over a family member.
She's too stupid (too busy climbing) to realize Malibu is not "young" There are just as many old people and it is a hellava lot quieter. At lease with Bel-Air you have West LA/West Hollywood/Bentwood/Santa Monica all there nearby. With Malibu, Santa Monica is close but still a schlep. Anyone with money and good taste would move to Newport Beach or even Manhattan Beach if you insist on LA county
ReplyDeleteThe UK is on the brink of riots over Trump clone and right wing puppet Boris Johnson's fascist move to ram through Brexit. These royal grifters buying a house in Malibu will not go down well. They deserve all the blow back they are going to get. It's centuries past time to abolish the Royal scammers anyway.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete@Aquagirl,where does the $9 million dollar figure come from? I know Doris seems to live above what would be her means, but she couldn't have gotten that much without setting alarms off tax wise.
ReplyDeletedid you all see the clip on twitter where Harry is telling the head of Disney at the Lion King premiere that Meghan is available for voice overs and film parts? search for FawnOverMeGain
ReplyDelete@Crystal96867741
Hahahahaha are you effing kidding me!?
DeleteThat is SO EMBARRASSING. I cringed so hard my ass almost swallowed the chair
Delete@Mischi, after the way she brushed past Iger to get to Beyoncé I doubt he does her any favors. She’s not attractive enough to casting couch either. How much you wanna bet she put Harry up to that?
ReplyDelete@Guesser: See SwishyFishy’s post above.
ReplyDeleteShe'll be closer to her (rumored) ex-trick Mnuchin's wife, who seems--on so many levels--to be MM's role model.
ReplyDeletetookiesmum, I think you're right. I read on Twitter that Harry said that he had some good contacts in the movie industry and that he could get her parts. She's holding him to that now.
ReplyDeleteMeghan can hang out with that other teen, Barbra Streisand. :/
ReplyDeleteRosie, she's certainly not slimmer than I.
ReplyDeleteYou're saying she's dashing Harry's dreams of being a fresh prince?
ReplyDelete😂😂 that was good
Deleteyes, malibu has gang activity.. yikes the delusion runs deep
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThought you said *you* are female, Rosie?
ReplyDeleteWomen don't usually use the word "female" in the pejorative sense, and doing it while body shaming is a double-whammy. (It's J that usually is calling MM fat btw, the women here don't.)
Rosie wrote -
"Lol @ she's skinnier than every female here at CDAN.
#facts"
*sigh*
DeleteI can see that your brain searches for black and white- and literal words and phrases, Samantha.
And I really do wish you the best here, as you navigate CDAN
But (and I mean this as NICELY as I can say it)
please stop asking me absurd questions
Sunkist: traffic to and from Malibu is hellacious. It's meant more for the huge money folks who don't really have to go to and from 'work' outside home very often. The once a year movie types. The CEO types maybe.
ReplyDeleteHas she ever sat in traffic trying to get into L.A. from the beach?!
Or to and from the airport? I guess if they intend to use a private plane, there's Santa Monica airport. What am I thinking. They are not about to queue up at LAX.
Listen up, Americans!
ReplyDeleteShe's a princess.
So it's not fatso, it's princess fatso.
Got it?
Aquagirl - thanks! Very interesting info. I agree the last thing they need to do now is spend. (When does their tour begin btw?)
ReplyDeleteI never noticed that he didn't sign it. Wouldn't that be something.
"But this marriage (if they are married) could possibly be annulled due to coercion."
Hmm...! The mind boggles.
I always wondered: Since Henry VIII took all the trouble to demolish abbeys, tear down edifices, execute clergymen, and chop the heads off his wives, all so he could be the head of his own religion -- why didn't he change the one thing that pertained most to his situation? The one thing that prompted it all to begin with?
Why didn't he create such a thing as the no-fault divorce? Nope! He did all that, and still kept all the strict rules regarding marriage and divorce in the newly minted C of E. I vote late stage syphilis warped VIII's brain. That would explain a lot.
Murky Meg just gave CDAN a shout-out.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXfNwpPnwU8
Yeah, that's one boggled mind.
ReplyDeleteThis is all so stupid. The DM version of this story is based on a story from ONE person. If they were looking for a home here for them to stay when they're visiting that'd be one thing but this is a bit far fetched. (PS--I'm in Santa Monica and many of the Malibu "facts" above are flat out wrong--just sayin'...)
ReplyDelete"Women don't usually use the word "female" in the pejorative sense..." what a load of garbage. So there's a guidebook on how women should speak about themselves? You're sounding like a Real Housewife of Beverly Hills with that - incorrect - observation.
ReplyDelete^ Words of wisdom from someone literally called "anna nonymous." ^
ReplyDelete*eyeroll*
"Calling a woman fat -- particularly when she isn't -- is textbook misogyny. It's a gendered double standard employed by weak men (and women) to silence women."
ReplyDeleteAll of this.
Kay, thanks for weighing in. She's not just a woman, she's a style icon. She edits Vogue magazine and is voluntarily on the covers of magazines. If she wants anonymity, if she wants to avoid my accurate comments on her geometrically-expanding mass, I would be the first to encourage her, to beg her, to live a private life.
ReplyDeleteNow you'd like to control what I say but I won't let you. Please don't waste your time.
Meghan gets to skim that $3M from the Disney donation for a house down payment.
ReplyDeleteAnd, yes, she's porked up quite a lot. From a size 4 to a size 12/14 and going up, up, up.
@J I'm sure you like to imagine people such as myself truly caring about what you say 24/7 on a gossip site. You aren't that important, trust. And bravo to you for making the distinction between a public vs. private individual. But my assessment stands.
ReplyDeleteI don't expect you to care or change. You're a misogynist. Period. I've sized you up.
You care enough to clutch your pearls and comment clucking disapproval, Kay.
ReplyDeleteNow that you've taken my measure, and I know what your judgment is, you won't have to waste time repeating it to me over and over. I completely acknowledge your moral superiority.
@J No worries. I'll comment how I always do -- whenever I want, however I want -- but thanks for mansplaining the comment system.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting that you immediately recognized yourself in my comment. Lots of people jumped on the "Meghan is fat" train. But apparently my words found a home at your door.
Wonder why.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI can infer well, Kay. Comment as you will, but please don't @ me too much. Derek and another commenter here seem hell-bent on getting comments moderated, and I know a free-thought, free-speech zealot like you wouldn't work toward their goal.
ReplyDelete@J
DeleteThanks for the compliment.
As you were.
Oh noes J! It’s MUHH SOHHH JUHH NEEEEE!
DeleteAnything but that! 😱
Ok. How about "ass kissing loser", Astra? Is that an improvement?
DeleteWhy the hostility, Kay? Please calm down.
DeleteOh shit. Am I becoming hysterical, J?
DeleteYou're being very unpleasant. I'll share a secret: there are people in the world who think differently than I do too. I let them, and focus on the clarity and fairness if my own thinking. But you have your system, I have mine.
DeleteSo you replying to me -- accusing me of being...what? Oh, yeah, a pearl clutching, free-speech limiting, free-thought destroying, disapproval-clucking so-and-so -- was just you, acknowledging that my opinion differs from yours?
DeleteThat's convenient.
Describing, Kay, not accusing.
DeleteOf course maybe it's all a big misunderstanding and you didn't have me in mind when you chose to judge acceptable and unacceptable rhetoric here. Further, when you characterized persons unknown as "being useless or a failure or someone who sits online all day making disparaging comments about women would be far worse" that wasn't a shrill and unsubstantiated flail in my general direction.
Let me know, because it does seem like there was a bit of intemperate ad hominem there...
Ah, so because you saw yourself in my comment, you thought you'd counter with, in your opinion, an equally shrill and unsubstantiated "description"?
DeleteMy comment was not directed at you. Did you see the @J? Have I shown a fear of confrontation, J?
Are you often called a misogynist? Does that explain your sensitivity to the word? Do you feel your time on the internet is impeding your real human interactions? Does that explain your sensitivity to my comment?
So many questions. But I know you have the time.
Oh, a misunderstanding then. You weren't attacking me or judging my comments.
DeleteGoodness, how unfortunate. I do have lots of free time, among the many blessings I count. Still, not so much free time that I don't lament the portion wasted today unnecessarily interacting with you, since you didn't have me in mind at all when you came along pronouncing what was and wasn't righteous.
However, always an optimist, I'll celebrate the new clarity and jump out of bed in the morning, eager to spend the day, the week, and hopefully a lifetime not in conversation with you.
So that's a well-practiced, copied and pasted, "yes, I'm often called a misogynist, but my life is so full offline to justify a response" response.
DeleteUnlike you, I look forward to reading it again in another 6 months.
Fucking amusing.
No, just drafted it real time. English Lit degree and a lot of reading.
DeleteAnyway, please let's not talk any more. I recommend you chat with Samantha. She started up a fascinating alternative history of the English Reformation up this thread a bit... I'm sure you'd find her a worthy and appropriately-insightful interlocutor. Bye, please.
I don't think I complimented you on your writing ability. I remain unimpressed. Big brains aren't usually found hammering out "how fat is she?" jokes on gossip sites.
DeleteRun with the morons, J, and be mistaken for one. No offense to the other morons (and non-morons) commenting here.
Last word? Up to you.
Stick with Samantha. Be at parity.
DeleteStick with Tricia. Be at parity.
DeleteI remember when @Rosie riveter was fun. What happened? @Tricia13,I do remember a picture of you and your "taut tummy", it was the day my furnace went out a while back! Meghan has put on a noticeable amount of weight, and looks bigger than when " pregnant ". Not shaming just a fact. Good night,stop fighting,# no moderation.
ReplyDelete@tookiesmum.....Harry’s money left both trust funds when he turned 30. Diana’s and The Queen Mothers. Around £20-25million in all , no doubt Megs is handling it all.
ReplyDelete@Lulu Filona.....Meghan would have had to sign the Official Secrets Act before she was allowed to marry into the RF. Way more binding than an NDA. She’s still not taken out British Citizenship as far as I can see which I find Verrrry odd.
That would avoid the normal treason charge but they could still ask for extradition on a national security warrant or perhaps arrange for something else if she starts blabbing, leaving the way free for Harry and Archie to return home, no strings attached. Everyone and their dog has to sign the OSA if they work for, or are in constant contact with the RF (even the gardeners), word is even Philip had to sign one , so Megs is not going to get out of it, especially as Harry is probably a blabber mouth.
@Samantha the 1st......yes Harry and William are funded by Charles from his Duchy of Cornwall funds, The Queen pays for the rest of the family. Their funding is purely at Charles discretion so he could cease funding them in a nanosecond, that day is fast approaching if they keep on with their Prima Donna antics. Especially as reports are coming out about them having rejected Charles generous offer of buying them a country estate. Meghan may have fooled them for a short time but she is over playing her hand , much as Diana did and it will all end in tears.
To all, especially Rosie & Kay:
ReplyDeleteUnless you are blind, it’s clearly evident that Meghan has blown up like a balloon since her so-called pregnancy. There’s no denying it & I don’t feel bad saying it because it’s true. I would never say this about a woman who lives her life privately, but Me-Again, the fame whore, consistently draws attention to herself, so all bets are off.
And to Rosie, who seems to want to compare MM to CDAN readers: I am 5’8” and 125 lbs. So you can add that to your CDAN chart. (Unlike MM who claims to be approximately 5’6” and is really around 5’3” which is especially evident when she’s in her 4’ stilettos, surrounded by taller people such as Kate, William and Harry, I am truly 5’8”.)
Congrats. You are worthy.
DeleteAnd I bet you'd like to think you'd still be worthy even if you gained 25 pounds.
Thanks @Nutty, @EmeraldCity, and @Aquagirl for your comments and the laughs too.
ReplyDeleteMy thoughts on the Crown's strategy with dealing with Harry and Meg is the observation that at some point a lot of money is getting drained away from Harry by the couples' own actions. His per annum is pretty low compared to Meg's spending, the vacations, and a house in LA. Perhaps that is the passive tool they will use to handle him. Enty said that they were looking at homes at the $10M mark. So will it be a mortgage or some of Harry's capital? If so, how much capital will get eroded before the inevitable divorce, and how will that change the spousal support? Just thoughts.
Sparkles is fatter now than she was at 9 month 'pregnant'. And fyi, I'm 10 years older than her, and weigh 25 pounds less.
ReplyDeleteAnywho, these two are grifters and con artists. I think they are doing a Clinton Foundation: stealing charity money to finance their lifestyle. I think the Queen is done with them and rightly so. Everyone else is...
What makes me sigh are the Americans. Are you people really hard-up for respectable celebrities that you throw money at James fucking Corden and ex-hooker suitcase girl Sparkles? She's gonna be a star once they're in Hollyweird, mark my words. They'll be the toast of the town. At least in the Uk they got exactly what they deserved, but in th US it'll be all Oprah, Ellen, and whatnot.
Le sigh.
Kay: abso-fucking-lutely. I married for love, I respect my parents, I don't steal, I'm not self absorbed, I don't need to pay people to say nice things about me, and I run my own company, which has employed more or less the same people for 8 years. Even my cleaning lady has been with me for over a decade.
ReplyDeleteAll of this might not be a lot, but it surely is a hell of a lot more than the suitcase girl can say for herself.
The only thing she truly managed to do is hook the retard prince. William wouldn't have looked rather twice.
I'm 5'11" and 136lbs...not fat! And I'm older than Fartkles.
ReplyDeleteWell this party picked up overnight! Lol
ReplyDeleteRo - I didn't ask you anything. It was rhetorical.
Like "et tu?" was rhetorical, although I guess scholars debate how historical.
The only other thing I recall 'asking' was why you pop in to every Markle blind evn though you claim to hate them, only to insult the people who comment in the Markle blinds. Tht too was rhetorical.
I on't mind i you reply to the 'questions' but it's not obligatory.
Could you have been more patronizing btw? < -- also rhetorical
As for my 'brain searching or literal patterns' or whatever, I'm not literal minded. But your attempted insult seems to describe someone on the spectrum, in which case it's an ableist insult as well. I'm not on the spectrum and your comment makes no sense. There was nothing subtle about your earlier comment.
Then you doubled down on it later, attacking Tricia's appearance in specific. All in reply to a MALE who regularly attacks Meg's weight on CDAN. So yeah, I'm mystified at your intent but not at your meaning.
_________________
Ro typed -
"Ok so... No offense Trisha but...
We've seen many pictures of you,from many angles (thanku for that) and I'm going to stand firm in my original statement lol
6:48 PM
Blogger Rosie riveter said...
*sigh*
I can see that your brain searches for black and white- and literal words and phrases, Samantha.
And I really do wish you the best here, as you navigate CDAN
But (and I mean this as NICELY as I can say it)
please stop asking me absurd questions"
"She's not just a woman, she's a style icon"
ReplyDeleteMeg is NOT a style icon, but since when are you into fashion, J?
"Sparkles is fatter now than she was at 9 month 'pregnant'."
I remarked on her sudden weight gain not long after I got here. It wasn't being talked about at the time. By now everyone's wondering why she remained so thin throughout the 'pregnancy' but then became very puffy with a large stomach after the supposed birth. (That sounds horrible but I don't know how else to phrase it.)
However I wouldn't call her "fat" (and I haven't, it's J who does so on the hour, it seems, with the most unoriginal wording even middle schoolers would find corny), she's average sized now, and the dress at the baby reveal did not do her figure any favors.
It seems like she has been doing yoga to me; her face and limbs seem slimmer than soon after Archie was born. But she still has a bump, and it is very noticeable, imo. I think she is pregnant -- for real this time. I think they used a surrogate the first time.
And as I've said before, for the stans' sakes will say again -- there's nothing wrong in using a surrogate, but, if she wants to truly help others, there are many who can't get pregnant without medical intervention. If Meg would be open about this, she could help destigmatize the issue. Well, maybe not any more. The dislike for her seems to be exponentially growing by the day.
Her father has spoken to the press again. The man is 70 and hasn't met his grandson. That alone is horrible. I think she could pick up a phone or send the man a photo at the very least.
" I recommend you chat with Samantha. She started up a fascinating alternative history of the English Reformation up this thread a bit... I'm sure you'd find her a worthy and appropriately-insightful interlocutor."
I didn't present any theories. I pointed out that his actions made no sense. Some argue that he had syphilis, and others think he was just a jackhole who was cranky because of the giant oozing sore on his leg that wouldn't heal.
But his "reformation" actions while leaving out the main reason for it, made about as much logical sense as his blaming his wives if they had daughters. Maybe he was just not very smart. Or scrupled. Look what his ancestors did to Richard III (and probably to the boys in the tower, too.)
Tricia typed -
ReplyDelete"I never said 1 thing about her weight body -and I don’t and have never use words like fatso or body shamed anyone -~you attempted to So it to female readers here -which-you are “one of” right"
That's what I don't understand either. A self-proclaimed feminist, and woman, and regular commenter. I could maybe understand if the women here actually did use those words about MM but they don't. It's not something I'd expect a woman or a feminist to do, or to word it the way it was worded, either. And we didn't mistake the meaning, as she later aimed it directly at you.
But when someone consistently stans and gets nastier when it doesn't work, I begin to wonder if they're paid to comment here -- as Rosie said she is, not long ago, btw. That could also explain hanging around while disapproving of the site: watching for blinds on other 'clients.' Astroturfing firms? scrubbing bubbles...scrub, scrub...
Who knows, but it was weird.
Who cares what any of us look like anyway btw. I don't.
This was really interesting, emeraldcity. Thank you for the info and confirmation.
".yes Harry and William are funded by Charles from his Duchy of Cornwall funds, The Queen pays for the rest of the family. Their funding is purely at Charles discretion so he could cease funding them in a nanosecond, that day is fast approaching if they keep on with their Prima Donna antics. Especially as reports are coming out about them having rejected Charles generous offer of buying them a country estate. Meghan may have fooled them for a short time but she is over playing her hand , much as Diana did and it will all end in tears."
And, about the blind itself Lol, $10 mil won't buy much in Malibu. A beach shack maybe? A very ordinary, once starter-home in decidedly unfashionable areas of L. A. could easily run $ 1 mil.
ReplyDeleteBut I don't really care tbh. They'll probably never live in it either! What I wonder are things like, where is Archie, why haven't they been out together in a while, and how are they hoping to pull off this tour in the middle of this shambolic mess?
Also did anyone go to visit Diana's grave, on the anniversary? And if so, who?
"not a libtard" we don't want either of them...
ReplyDeleteCorden, or Sparkles. How about Canada??
"What makes me sigh are the Americans. Are you people really hard-up for respectable celebrities that you throw money at James fucking Corden and ex-hooker suitcase girl Sparkles? "
Sorry for the posts-in-a-row guys but I am catching up. Hopefully there will be other people's posts between.
The Sparkles and Southern Charm blinds are my jam. Easy way for those who don't "like" "me" to avoid me btw. But isn't it strange how people hang around topics they claim not to like?!
I still can't figure out why she put on weight after she supposedly whelped, in spite of the fact that she may or may not be fatter than the females here on this site. It's a mystery indeed.
ReplyDeleteTuritella wins for brevity.
ReplyDeleteEXACTLY, Turitella, exactly.
Marble isn't going to be a star in Hollywood. She can't get a magazine cover, or even a mention in a corner of a magazine cover. Nobody cares about her, nobody is willing to spend $ on a magazine to read about her. And she won't be getting voice overs. She can't act. She can't even hold that dummy convincingly.
ReplyDeleteAnd, yeah, she's a porker.
Yo, for people who claim that they don’t care what people think on here, these spats between some of you are long winded and boring. You don’t need to one up each other all the time
ReplyDeleteMe thinks Rosie is Markle or 1 of her delusional rabid fans and let’s call it like it is she’s freakin huge now considering she was skinny looking when “pregnant” and before the supposed pregnancy I think Dorito is holding the money that Murky stole off the charities and her husband she’s no style icon everything she wears looks like shit on her sponge bob body type
ReplyDelete@tricia you’re gorgeous don’t listen to them
@j I think your comments are hilarious and great