Blind Item #6
Posted by ent lawyer at 8:00 AM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
16 comments:
Paul Haggis
Haggis?
Scientology
https://pagesix.com/2019/11/21/paul-haggis-wants-his-rape-accusers-sexual-history/
blame the victim...just like the dems
Maybe the text messages right after, but what does the sexual history matter? That's a tactic you usually see guilty dirtbags use.
In case anyone is really interested in California rape shield laws.
A defendant (Haggis) is allowed to bring up past consensual activity between him and his accuser, but, cannot use 3rd party / reputation accounts of the accuser's past sexual encounters with other people...UNLESS...the accuser brings it up first and then the defendant (Haggis) can rebut/ cross examine the accuser's past sexual acts but limited in the scope to what the accuser brought up in their testimony .
So, yes, Haggis can bring up prior consensual acts with the accuser.
It is possible Haggis could both be an abuser and Scientology is behind it. I don't know what to believe. SO yes, "sticky" situation is right.
How do you brandish somebody? Wave them around onna stick?
@Low Key.
In West Hollywood there are probably clubs for that.
So California is basically owned by CO$?
LowKey/FlashyVic--LOL!😂
@squirrel....more like demean the victim and then pay them off, just like the cheetah in charge.
CheetOh in charge. Darn spell check.
What's this "he's not allowed" bullshit? Paul, if you've got proof, even circumstantial, USE IT.
^this
Just saw this. Don't be so sure to assume all the women are connected to that sick cult of Scientology. I knew him personally and he made up a vile but innocuous lie about me that pretty much ended my career. I believe he did this to cover up his tracks. His own sister, now dead and yes, she was in Scientology, but she give specifics about his(now well known) theft of other people's writings. I don't know for a fact he raped all the women but we knew a woman that he stalked and had his way with. He was able to get her personal information and phone number. All this while he was married to Deborah. Personally, I feel he had a falling out with that sick Scientology because they were tired of covering up for him. Mean spirited bastard who knows how to play the game and now look like a victim. HE IS A LIAR! And NO, I am not a Scientologist, I think that whole cult is sick as F$#@
Post a Comment