Blind Item #18 - Golden Globes
This permanent A- list mostly movie actress who stole her way to the top was talking smack about several of her exes, including two A list mostly movie actors who she complained had no drive to succeed and were only interested in having sex and partying which is why she likes her current significant other because he has drive and is willing to have sex with others and not her.
GWenyth Paltrow/ Pitt and Affleck
ReplyDeleteGoopy just doesn't want to fuck much at all. Simple reason why she cant keep a man!
DeleteI did not like her dress.
ReplyDeletesince when is gwyn permanent a list?
ReplyDeleteThat's probably the right rating -- she's an Iscar winner for best actress and she's the Hollywood family equivalent of a sorority house legacy.
DeleteWonder if Harvey will ever release her video.
ReplyDeleteGOOP was trying to be sexay. She swung and missed.
ReplyDeleteWeinstein's trial started today.
ReplyDeleteShhhhh....his minion will come !
DeleteMore charges in LA?? Where is his loyal gal pal to defend him?
DeleteWinona with her shoplifting thing?
ReplyDeleteDepp and someone
It's GOOP, she basically stole the Shakespeare in Love part from her "friend" Winona.
ReplyDeleteGoop stole Shakespeare in Love out from under Winona Ryder. Doing God knows what with Harvey to get it. Side eye on her revised harassment story.
ReplyDeleteGoop doesn't even live with her husband. She just wants a male security blanket. Though I think most marriages would last longer living separate lives.
That dress was desperate.
ReplyDeletehttps://deadline.com/2020/01/harvey-weinstein-rape-trial-fireworks-rosanna-arquette-rose-mcgowan-1202822314/
ReplyDeleteI wonder if he used his walker again for sympathy *Eye Roll*
ReplyDelete@MyDogSmiles - I've already seen photos of Harvey and his walker today. LOL
ReplyDeleteNever liked her and I'm glad I wasn't wrong.
ReplyDeleteLegend has it that Gwyneth saw the SIL script at her good friend Winona's and stole the role out from under her. For those who weren't around in the 90s, these 2 were best buddies. They made Spice Girls lip sync videos together even! Winona's career never quite recovered.
ReplyDeleteGoop is the debil.
That is an affirmative MyDog, people are comparing it to Cosby's cane.
ReplyDelete@dummy, Well that is the clean version of the rumor.
ReplyDeleteShe's just insufferable. Entitled product of Hollywood nepotism.
ReplyDeleteThia and Brayson Unbelievable SMH
ReplyDeleteGoop's dress was hideous.
ReplyDeleteGwyneth Paltrow has never been sexy and has always had the posture and face of a frog.
ReplyDeleteHer hair looked nice.
GOOPY
ReplyDeleteGwyneth has never been 'sexy' - she's like a void.
ReplyDeleteI would love for winona to spill ALL of the beans someday. You know she's got the great stories! And, I also believe her version of the SIL story.
ReplyDeleteGwyneth's dress was horrible last night.
Haha sorority house legacy.... perfect description, Bleu. The “dress” last night was sheer desperation. My guess is she’s no more want her teenage daughter to borrow that for a night out any more than any of us wanted to see her flaunt her boring bits. She seems so starved for validation and needful of reminding everyone she only acts when begged. Pathetic and so tone deaf.
ReplyDeleteI loved Gwyneths mother, she seemed to have so much class. Gwyneth on the other hand talks about body functions so much, I'm starting to see her as a dirty toliet.
ReplyDeleteThat was one fugly dress. It looked like she smeared chocolate stains all over herself.
ReplyDeletePeople who talk about sex rarely have it. Nor do
ReplyDeletepeople who bring vibrators to Christmas parties
& constantly talk about steaming their va-jay-jay.
Brown granny panties
ReplyDeleteGoop
ReplyDelete& since Brad Fulchuck is GAY that’s probably why she’s ecstatic
Don't forget Winona had a little shoplifting problem...
ReplyDeletePaltrow made an unfortunate choice with her dress. It looked like a belly dance costume with the low cut and bare midriff, and the see through sleeves. Paltrow has never had a good fashion sense, it's just absent with her. She could do with a stylist, and not a yes person. Her husband is cute, and looks like he'd be easily overwhelmed by whatever.
Paltrow who stole that s ript from Winona Ryder she ended up getting an Oscar for. Missed her on the red carpet.
ReplyDeleteGwyneth's dress was the most hideous thing I've seen at any awards show at any time EVER and that's saying something. This even topped that sad braless goth thing she wore many years ago. A macrame bikini with a sheer diarrhea brown flouncy overlay. and the beautiful necklace she was wearing was UNDER the dress! That poor necklace deserved better. It's clear that she (along with many of the other stars in hideous get-ups) is not actually interested in looking glamourous, elegant or even presentable, She just wants the media attention and tongue-wagging. Desperate, desperate, desperate.
ReplyDeleteUgliest parade of gowns I've ever seen. I can think of only a handful that looked presentable:
-An actress I'd never heard of (I think possibly from Succession) wore a midnight blue sequined ballgown that really stood out because it was simple but not dull looking.
-The actress who plays Mrs. Maisel had an alright deep wine coloured dress.
-Helen Mirren looked good as usual - she's had more stunning gowns at other shows but she looked fine. I would kill for her figure even though she's in her 70's.
-Renee Zellwegger's pale blue number looked nice.
-Nicole Kidman's red dress was standard awards fare, but it looked pulled together and attractive.
-Betty Gilpin had an elegant black ballgown on.
Near misses:
Margot Robbie - looked like she was heading to a barbeque.
Jennifer Anniston - I'm convinced she has a wardrobe of identical featureless gowns in black, red, and taupe that she simply rotates for events. BO-RING. Just once I'd like to be shocked by something she wears.
Saorise Ronan - uninspired droopy chainmail dress.
That's it. That's all that comes to mind. The rest of that red-carpet looked like righteous vengeance by pissed off stylists.
They've done pretty well for a couple of guys with no drive. No Hollywood parents either.
ReplyDeleterednoir said...
ReplyDeleteThey've done pretty well for a couple of guys with no drive. No Hollywood parents either.
===========================================================
Thanks for saying this. It needs to be said. Why is it the ones who were born on third base (or home plate) claim others who are just stepping into the batters box or waiting on deck are lazy and have no drive?