Friday, September 19, 2008

Nicole Kidman Had Morning Sickness - Still No Baby



Nicole Kidman is still talking about her pregnancy like it will make us all believe she really was pregnant. I'm still not buying it 100%. Are you buying it? She just never seemed, heavy. Her breasts never grew an inch, and she never really ballooned past anything more than a really heavy Thanksgiving meal.

In an interview with the Sun she says that she had incredible morning sickness. Life changing morning sickness. Of course all of this happened on the set of the film she just is by coincidence promoting now. Even though she was pregnant and sick, and pregnant, she struggled through 14 and 15 hour days because the film was so important. She had to finish the film, and baby be damned she was going to.

Yeah, ok. Look, here's what you do. Sure, it's invasive, and violates your privacy and shows we don't trust you farther than Tom Cruise can see over you, but I think you need to give us a DNA sample. That would be good. That would be a really nice start. A birth certificate would be good too. You know, something that shows you are the mother and it wasn't some surrogate or something like that. Then when you do that, I will sit at your feet and listen with awe and rapture as you take me through the first trimester and how difficult it was for you.

Until then, I really don't want to hear about pregnancy or any of your make believe stories about how you love Keith Urban, because I don't think you really do.


29 comments:

  1. Uh-oh, you'd better duck Enty, the Nicole supporters will not be amused. :)

    This reminds me of when Days of Our Lives hadn't yet cast a baby to play Claire so they used a crying doll. It was laugh-tastic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How about an actual baby --- all I've seen is a bundle of clothes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, even if it was a surrogate, it could still be Nicole's egg and Keith's sperm, so DNA wouldn't necessarily clear it up. Also, even with a surrogate Nicole and Keith's names would be on the birth certificate. Furthermore, who the f&ck cares?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I go on and off of "Days...". Clearly I missed out on little jewel of a casting decision!!! Or lack there of!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just don't understand why, if she really wasn't preggers, she would keep saying she was. What is the big deal? So that we really believe Tommy boy got her pregnant at one time? WTF? Will people look down on her if she had a surrogate? Seriously?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Adrian, there was one shot with a hand poking out of the white bundle. Maybe it's a mutant?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really think that she and Keith did in fact conceive a baby, but I don't for one second believe she carried the baby. Like ENT says, she did not exhibit any of the typical symptoms - bloating, breast enlargement, etc. I really believe a surrogate carried their baby, and if this is the case, why not publicize it? What is so bad about that, and why not embrace it and show that it can be a positive experience? So bizarre.

    ReplyDelete
  8. i'm not a nicole supporter but not everyone balloons up during pregnancy and it's her business to show the baby when she wants, not when other people demand she should.

    someone seems obsessed, enty.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I do think that she carried that low birthweight baby herself, otherwise it would've been a bigger baby from a more normal weight mother. She exercised even more while pregnant so as not to gain an ounce. I also think she delivered weeks early on purpose to make sure she was ready to return to work when she did. She had to get those reshoots done for "Australia" before jetting off to London to start on "Nine" - she was under the gun time wise.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't now whether she had the baby, but.....recently I saw a photo of her carrying the baby in a sling. the interesting thing is the sling was really low, down by her pelvis and not higher up her chest-----Where most mothers carry their babies.

    I have had 4 children and three I carried in Maya Wraps and it was uncomfortable, awkward, and not cuddly to carry the baby too low.

    that photo really made me wonder...it didn't seem natural for her to carry her own child....just saying....banning bottles maybe.......

    ReplyDelete
  11. She's still trying to compete with Tom. He had a baby girl so she had to have a baby girl. Or at least try to convince the world that she had one. She's not a good enough actress to pull it off though. She never acted or looked really pregnant and she sure as hell isn't acting like a new "Mother".

    ReplyDelete
  12. Maybe she wants to be the one to tell Sunday she was born surrogate instead of the world telling her.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I know 2 people in Nashville that take yoga at Sanctuary Yoga where she goes. They both told me that she absolutely WAS pregnant and they were in class with her, up close and personal only 2 feet away. I asked them repeatedly, "Is it a pillow? She faking it, isn't she?". They swore up and down that the bitch was preggers. Can we please move on now? I'm so bored with her.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Oh this is absurd. I beleive she had a baby.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I didn't see the hand--maybe it was a chicken bone.

    ReplyDelete
  16. hey Ent - why do you think you have some right to see Nicole Kidman's baby? It's her baby, and her right to let little Sunday (god help us) be photographed when she's ready to let it happen. If Nicole were showing it off to the world, you'd probably be right there accusing her of pimping out little Sunday to advance her career.

    Nicole gets to keep the baby private for as long as she wants to. Possibly she's going to these lengths to protect her own, and the baby's, privacy since everyone is so anxious to snap her. Even though Nicole's a public figure, her kids aren't, and she can do whatever she wants to do, on her timetable. Not yours, or anyone else's. To accuse her of not really having a baby is sort of childish and designed to bully her into showing the baby just to shut up her accusers. I'm surprised at you.

    ReplyDelete
  17. nothing about her "image" is true. nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous1:19 PM

    When Nicole and Gay Cruise were married they tried having a baby. I believe if I remember the story both got tested and Gay Cruise was spitting out blanks. That's the reason they ended up adopting.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Adrian, DListed had the pic with the hand.

    I do think she really was pregnant, but I still find it funny to gossip about it being a fake baby.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Mooshki--it looks like an anemone-- I still don't buy that she gave birth.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I, personally, think it's an alien baby and she can't show it until they finish the human-looking latex head they use for walking around among regular people.

    Didn't anyone else notice how that baby photo had extra long, spindly fingers?

    ReplyDelete
  22. that hand looks like a baby's hand. i swear some of you are on crack...lmao.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I don't believe she was pregnant apart from a succession of false bellies.

    And y'all can whine about not caring and can we move on all you like, but you're still coming here reading it and having YOUR opinion on it. You just don't want to hear some people think it was fake.

    Well tough. I'm with Ent on this one. Fake, fake, fake, fake and fake.

    ReplyDelete
  24. crack is the only thing that keeps me going when I realize that our entire world is controlled by aliens. or at least that's what the implanted chip in my head keeps telling me.

    ReplyDelete
  25. LOL Ms. Snarky!!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. ms snarky...lmao!!!! pass the tinfoil hat honey, you're too fun to pass up!

    ReplyDelete
  27. I agree with notachance. I think she did carry that baby & her excessive workouts kept the baby's weight low. She told a guest at a 4th of July party that her due date was July 21st but yet the baby was born July 7th. How lucky for Nicole that her mother & sister just happened to arrive that weekend & were able to be at the delivery considering she delivered 2 weeks early. I think she was induced so she could be ready to go back to Sydney to do the reshoots for Australia & then she left immediately for London. No matter how hard she tries to convince people, her work will always come first.

    Just for the record, these aren't new quotes. The Sun, who happens to be owned by her friend Rupert Murdoch, just copied older quotes to make it look like a new story.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Oohh lipstick feminist! Get out of my head! I saw the same thing! Seeing Nic carrying her baby so low in that sling was uncomfortable. Awkward. Odd. At the same time, it's seems as if as an actress you would research the role of new mother you were playing, right? But before I demand DNA and a birth certificate from Nic, I need one from Sarah Palin first.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Spot on ENT!
    I so totally agree with you-sick of reading about her pregnancy and sickness...yeah...whatever...

    ReplyDelete