Tuesday, October 02, 2012

Blind Item #2

What celebrity couple were hoping their recent cameos on a popular network show would increase the price for baby photos of their new baby. No matter what they did, they could not get any offers above $20,000. Instead of taking that money and giving it to charity, they just posted photos of their baby for free.


39 comments:

  1. Nick and Vanessa Lachey????

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I wondered about that when they released the first twitter photo yesterday. I don't remember seeing them via cameo, but I bet it would be on shows I do not watch (gonna guess Dancing with the Stars, supporting Drew?). Cute little son they have, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, just looked at pic of camden lachey. Cutest little thing!!!! What a doll!!!!!

      Delete
  3. Yup, agreed vanessa and nick lachey

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did Katherina Caballerina get paid for her baby pic last week?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just wait till Megan has her baby and they find out no one cares...because that means no money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! The way they keep covering the bump with an umbrela is so obnoxious! It's like yes you are having a baby just like millions of people do. Big whoop.

      Delete
  6. Did Jessica Simpson get paid for her baby? I noticed she twittered some pics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i think she was on people mags cover with her baby

      Delete
  7. Jay Cutler and Kristin Cavalari!

    http://www.terezowens.com/jay-cutlers-baby-mama-and-son-on-the-set-of-the-league/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TerezOwens+%28Terez+Owens%29

    ReplyDelete
  8. nick and vanessa

    they twittered the pictures of camden yesterday

    are they rich? i know he got 10 million from jessica simpson divorce--but--do they have anything else?
    they just purchased home in la for 4 million .....
    just wondering

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hv to say, they arent the most talented duo but they are hard workers.

      Delete
    2. Honestly, when Nick and Jessica were married he was the bigger star.
      Until the show aired and everyone saw how stupid Jessica was and then she became a big deal. Ew

      Delete
    3. Caitlin you are gorgeous!

      Delete
    4. Caitlin you are gorgeous!

      Delete
  9. That totally goes in line with CDAN's reveal of Kristin a couple weeks back, doesn't it? Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nick and Vanessa Lachey haven't appeared recently together on a network show as a cameo.

    I don't see it being them.

    They aren't the only celebrity couple that post their baby pictures online instead of selling pictures to cover of a tabloid magazine. I like it better when they share them as exciting parents.

    They have a beautiful son by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I hope it's not Nick and Vanessa. They seem pretty down to earth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really like nuck. There just usnt a market fir his skills right now.

      Delete
    2. Lol, nuck!! Meant nick! He just seems like a really nice human, and i like the bro love too.

      Delete
  12. They were in the audience last night supporting Drew on DWTS. I think it is Nick and Vnessa.I think she even made a big deal on howit was their first night away from baby.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cameo appearance and sitting in the audience supporting a relative who's competing isn't the same thing. They were there to support a family like members of the show General Hospital were supporting Kelly Monico. They weren't making a cameo appearance.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The idea of Nick Lachey being considered a "celebrity" is idiotic enough. That his wife should consider herself to be one is preposterous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:14 PM

      Vanessa is a celebrity in her own right. She is on the ABC show Wipeout

      Delete
  15. Kristin Cavilir never sold her pictures to a tabloid cover. She's been all over the place with the paparazzi taking pictures of her with her child. She posted pictures of her baby on her twitter account just like Vanessa Lachey. Different media outlets posted the pictures on their website. Including People magazine.

    The blind items stateed posted "photos" as more than one. Lachey only posted one picture not several.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Unless you are Brangelina, trying to get big money for baby pics is flogging a dead horse. Those days are over.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yeah, stop embarassing yourselves! And enty, no one is obligated to dinate money to charity. Its nice to do, but not a must. And doesnt it say something positive that they didnt showboat and do photos for publicity? And brag about their charity donation? I call it class.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Enty, I'm getting tired of you snarking when someone sells baby pictures and snarking when they don't. Pick a side and stay with it. It's nice when parents don't whore out their baby, for charity or otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This post is very similar to the one when David Beckham posted pictures of Harper on FB. Charity comment and all.

    ReplyDelete
  20. What about the Rancics?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nick and Vanessa....she just posted a picture of her son on twitter yesterday. News outlets didn't even pick THAT up!

    ReplyDelete
  22. They should cos he is a doll!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. It's a child, not a meal ticket. Didn't anyone learn from Octomom??????

    ReplyDelete
  24. that sux that they didn't get great offers, they really try

    ReplyDelete
  25. would nick ritchi and shane lamas be considered celeb's? And or their child still a new baby?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ugh, Kristen Calamari or whatever is going to ruin the League!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Please fix the ad situation. It takes pages forever to load, the ads run five yards deep and there are multiple hidden video ads auto-playing

    ReplyDelete
  28. If it is the Lacheys I must say he is a very beautiful baby! Saw the pic yesterday and awwed over his adorableness all afternoon.

    ReplyDelete