Friday, October 26, 2012

Nick Loeb's Phone

The NY Post is reporting that Sofia Vergara's people are trying to halt the possible sale of some personal photos of her that were found on the stolen phone of Nick Loeb. Sofia's people say they are not fully nude shots, but are personal. So what if they are released then? That doesn't make sense. You know what does make sense? That they are of her naked or they are her doing something that she does not want the world to see. Think about what she dresses in or wears when she has shoots. You don't think she could handle some underwear shots being seen in public? Please. Remember, Nick loves orgies, strippers and drugs. What about his other photos on the phone? You think there is any of that on there and Sofia's story is a cover? This is a former US Senate candidate. Maybe it is Sofia, fully clothed, but watching said activity. Her official story does not make any sense.


32 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:04 AM

    Why does everything need to b documented? ESPECIALLY on a cellphone! IDK,,weird.......

    ReplyDelete
  2. Too lazy to look, but there was a blind about an actress being some kind of drug kingpin.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It would be awesome if there was a picture of Sofia naked atop a giant mound of blow wearing a crown and holding a scepter. (Because she was the fav for that blind about the actress bigtime drug dealer. Not because I'm making a Colombian joke.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First time poster...always enjoy your posts but this made me LOL I had to comment!!!

      Delete
  4. why the hell do they take pics of these clandestine events when they know a 10 year old can hack a phone nowadays

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:14 AM

    Tehehehehehe

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lol @amber, too funny, i am reading the caption now"in honour of entys blind"

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Amber, I will picture her like that everytime now LOL!!!! :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:18 AM

    Amber, crossing my fingers that you're right.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Amber, I can definitely 'see' that picture!In fact,many in SoFla kind of- sort of- witnessed "something" like that - "live" . That would be such a great pix.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Haha are any of you a photoshop wiz? We need this picture STAT. It could be the ambassador for the site!

    @Agent - who witnessed? Do you have some spilling to do? ;P

    ReplyDelete
  11. Augh, please don't make me dislike Sofia. I love her character on Modern Family (although this year her pregnant character has been pretty lame) and for some reason want to like her.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous8:37 AM

    @Agent, spill it, pretty please!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nothing new in South FLA

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yeah, the drug thing would really damage her in the family-friendly circles she now runs in, at least on TV. Underwear photos, not so much.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Research terms for SoFla are : Chris Paciello and Sofia Vergara.Drug, mafia, and Colombian cocaine cartel connections. She did get her internet fairies (well paid PI's that go on the internet and remove data for clients) to remove a lot of articles, but there are many out there still that confirm her "witnessed" behavior on the party scenes here.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Because she wears provocative clothing she should be cool with nude pics ? How very 1950's of you Enty!

    ReplyDelete
  18. And, she was dating Tim Allen when he was busted for cocaine.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tim Allen was busted for cocaine in '78. Sofia would have been 6 at the time. I'm thinking they weren't dating at that time, Audrey.

    And I know he was busted in '99 but that was a DUI (no reference to drugs) and still married to his first wife (not that that means anything.)

    ReplyDelete
  20. I stand corrected!

    ReplyDelete
  21. IT WAS THE FOCKING DIAZ BROTHERS THOSE GODDAMN COCKAROACHES!

    ReplyDelete
  22. INGRID, your killing me LOL!!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why oh why do people put ANYTHING on their cellphones (or any electronics) thinking that it is, and will remain, private?

    ReplyDelete
  24. I have to agree with Lola, why put private stuff on cell phones...it's crazy but nothing is private anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  25. See, I'm such a naive nelly. I was thinking that maybe the pics will show her without her "face" on or maybe in her skivvies. Would sex and drugs really ruin her image? I feel like pics of her in her sweats looking like an average gal would harm her more, actually. What do I know? She doesn't look like a drug user to me. She appears really fit and healthy.

    I can't stand this day and age in which every single thing must be documented on a phone, on a Tweet or on a Facebook. I SO appreciate my privacy.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Susan
    That makes sense, but I've seen pics of her in candid photos in sweats and minimal make-up.

    ReplyDelete
  27. A 10 year might know how to hack a phone but I could sooner fly a space ship than know how to do something like that! Impressive! I need to up my hacking skilz!

    ReplyDelete
  28. How she dresses has no bearing on her desire to not want her personal photos made public. It doesn't matter what's in the photos, they are private and she has every right to not want them released.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Bet it's a pic of her snorting coke.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The only thing I can think about is that beautiful dress...love the color.

    ReplyDelete