Friday, October 05, 2012

Random Photos Part Two

Is it just me or has Jennifer Garner been looking amazing lately? She was at the premiere of
Ben Affleck's new movie.
Also there were John Goodman and
Bryan Cranston.
The very skinny January Jones.
The last cast photo of Jersey Shore until some reunion down the road or an AA meeting.
Kirstie Alley after DWTS rehearsal.
This photo of Katie Holmes was snapped the other day, but she is so rarely photographed not wearing jeans that I thought I would post it.



39 comments:

  1. I'm one degree from the Argo premier. A friend of mine went because his partner (now deceased) is portrayed in the film as a 10 year old. Ben Affleck plays his dad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Years of smoking have taken such a toll on Kirstie's face. Thank God I quit last month!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Am I nuts or was there a period of time where John Goodman couldn't get insured for movies/TV because of health issues? Could've sworn I read this somewhere...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Katie just does not have nice legs, I'm sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kristie Alley looks like a zombie....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jen looks post baby-glowy, not in love. Blech. Maybe she's the blind reveal for the stubborn wife? Katie looks amazeballs. I want that whole outfit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Definitely thinking Jen is the "Stubborn Wife" blind from today. Ben has been known to be a skeezball.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Could January Jones be the one doing coke holding the baby?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Katie looks pretty good here, usually her legs are all funny looking but not here. Love the leather skirt - I would so rock that!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought the stubborn wife blind says the husband is B list but no one knows who he is. EVERYONE knows who Ben Affleck is. It's not them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. ^I'm loving the leather skirt on Katie too. Katie can be quite hot when she tries.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I want to see that movie! It looks great.

    Katie should stick to wearing jeans.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @lanasyogamama: Agreed. Those thighs are way sturdy.

    Now I feel awful for having said that, but she could have looked so much better styled in a pleated skirt that fell below just below knee level.

    She's slim, has a small waist and hips, and the pleats would have worked and showed her fine-looking calves in this outfit.

    And she's the one designing a fashion line? Fail... Bad outfit/styling. We all have body parts that we need to hide or flaunt.

    ReplyDelete
  14. if amazing means ill fitting dress.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jamie2, I think her calves/cankles are what ruin Katie's legs.

    To each their own, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No part of Katie's legs look good.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous1:47 PM

    @hunter- that's the vibe I'm getting....

    ReplyDelete
  18. you SEEEE how absolutely pretty garner can be w/ a wee bit of foundation and lipstick?! now let's work on a properly tailored dress. #babysteps

    last season of jersey whore? (typo but it stays). #thankyoujesus

    oooh, that mustard is a lovely shade on katie.


    ReplyDelete
  19. Jv looks weird in her face. How come u never, never see goodman with his wife? Dish me up some dirt please!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't think it's Garner for the blind. I don't recall her ever being described as "tiny". Athletic, yes.

    ReplyDelete
  21. January Jones as the coke momma?
    Also, wtf did Dina do to her face? It looks much better

    ReplyDelete
  22. Kirstie needs to get rid of those raggedy ass hair extensions.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Kirstie looks proper weight challenged .

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think just seeing Jennifer Garner not wearing frumpy house clothes shocks people into falsely believing she looks amazing. Her face looks good but the dress is terribly fit!

    ReplyDelete
  25. It could be the angle, or the tights, but Katie's legs looks huge. She has worn dresses showing her legs, and I'd say she has a great pair. Just an unflattering picture. Also, I love Jennifer Garner. I think she is gorgeous, and seems to adore her children, which makes me love her more.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Ingrid...yes, you're right about Goodman. It was after he had some major heart issues. Although he's still a big guy, he's slimmed down and is taking better care of himself. I just love John Goodman. :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Look, not looks ^^^

    ReplyDelete
  28. I see nothing wrong with Katie's legs... I think she looks fantastic. Granted, not the best outfit, but her legs look great!

    ReplyDelete
  29. I guess I'm not getting the horrible legs on Katie thing. I think many women with legitimate cankles would adore having Katie's "cankles".

    Dress fitting aside, Jennifer looks great.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Christ, do you all hyper-evaluate, then trash, the bodies of actors they way you do actresses??!
    "Oh my god! Matt Damon's calves look sooooo fat!! He should be ashamed of himself for ever going out in public!"
    Get a grip, people. I'm pretty sure of any of you stood next to Katie Holmes, she'd make you look hideous by comparison. .
    I just cannot stand listening to women hammer away at other women like this. It really is true that girls and women are the worst bullies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! Camera caught Katie mid stride. FFS.

      Delete
  31. Wow...I don't get the heckling on Katie's legs either...I think she looks lovely. And I'm not really a big fan of hers...

    ReplyDelete
  32. mid stride, my ass. There are many pics of Katie's legs looking BAD. She and Mischa Barton have BAD LEGS. I'd gladly put mine up against Katie's any day, and no way would she make me look heinous. I think Katie is a very pretty lady, but I am in no way going to look ugly next to her.

    so there. And if you don't like people ragging on celebs, then I suggest you visit Jezebel.com .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's wonderful you think so highly of yourself. You are the pinnacle of class and modesty.

      Delete
  33. Interesting that out of all the cast on the Roseanne show, John Goodman is the one who still has a career 15 years later. I would not have predicted it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yeah, really not seeing the problem with Katie's legs. Are they the slenderist legs I've ever seen? No. Does that mean she should hide them in pants for the rest of her life? Absolutely not.

    Also, those are not cankles. (I really hate that term.) I'm pretty sure a cankle is when there's no clear difference between your calves and ankles - it's just straight up and down.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Solus, Jennifer uses the services of famed celebrity stylist Rachel Zoe. When she is looking just like you & me, it is a fashion statement, carefully crafted. Think my next post should be about the strange marriage of Jennifer & Ben, as in Bennifer Part 2, since the first engagement to a Jennifer was to Jennifer Lopez. As always ; M
    http://formercriminalprosecutor.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  36. Must agree on Katie's legs- I'd cover those up with pants most of the time too. No - they aren't huge, but compared to the rest of her , they're disproportionately large.

    ReplyDelete
  37. "Interesting that out of all the cast on the Roseanne show, John Goodman is the one who still has a career 15 years later. I would not have predicted it."

    Huh?!

    Johnny Galecki? Sara Gilbert? Sarah Chalke? Laurie Metcalf? All still have name recognition and great careers. ???

    ReplyDelete