Friday, October 04, 2013

Blind Item #8

About two years ago this actor was right there at A list. The his first solo film came out and bombed and he has steadily dropped to a B-. No franchise to keep him artificially boosted. His latest movie was supposed to be his return to A list but his acting is so bad that the script had to be revised and he is being edited out of as much of it as possible while still using his name to sell it.


39 comments:

  1. Sam worthington?

    ReplyDelete
  2. But Clash of the Titan's was a franchise to keep him boosted. Who was that guy in that super bomb a about 2 years ago? Something to do with a book or tale or something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The John Carter movie? Is that the one?

      Delete
  3. Someone from the Twilight franchise? Maybe Kellan Lutz?

    Sam still has franchise movies coming out and B Coop is still going strong

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's it! Thanks guys!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Re: Taylor and John Carter that is.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Taylor Lautner, abducted

    ReplyDelete
  7. Robert Pattinson or Liam Hemsworth.
    Mostly because I don't like either of them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Robert Pattison. Looks of a model. Talent of a rock.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I first thought Riggins with John Carter but the franchise comment makes me agree with Lautner. He's not a good actor.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm with Robert Pattinson guess

    ReplyDelete
  11. idk-I think Taylor was never right there at A list.

    but Shia may have been and there are no Transformer movies coming out to keep him boosted

    ReplyDelete
  12. Taylor Lautner Abduction Sucked!

    ReplyDelete
  13. No, they're filming Transformers 4 this week in Chicago. They move to the studio next week for all the CGI work.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Totally Taylor Lautner. They were billing him as the next Tom Cruise (like that's a compliment -- career-wise, maybe).

    Now..."Tracers" is in post-production. Wonder how much he'll actually be in it? Terrible actor. Laughably.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You gotta look at who has movies in post-production.

    Taylor Kitsch - no
    Asston Kutcher - no
    Shia - yes "Nymphomaniacs"
    Pattinson - yes, x2
    Taylor - yes, "Tracers"
    Sam Worthington - yes, x2

    Still going with Taylor Lautner, who SUCKS harder than any of the above.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This sounds like Taylor Lunter. The film Abduction was going to launch him into the A-list and the next Tom Cruise but it bombed badly. He's a bad actor. The franchise is Twilight. A franchise can make an actor famous but it doesn't always translate to box office draw, even Chris Hemsworth Rush hasn't done that well at the box office. Look at Robert Pattinson.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Taylor Kitsch is a good actor, so I don't think this blind is about him, despite the crash and burn of John Carter.

    ReplyDelete
  18. taylor or robert p

    ReplyDelete
  19. what about zach efron, high school musical franchise, all other movies after bombed and isn't he in Parkland and well he's a mess

    ReplyDelete
  20. I still dont understand why they are trying to make Taylor Kitsch happening. Meh, he sucks

    ReplyDelete
  21. taylor lautner, definitely.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Why would they want to use his name to sell a movie if his movies bomb and nobody sees them?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Taylor Lautner, he's hot but his acting isn't so great.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Agree it's Lautner. Kitsch was always really good on Friday Night Lights.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I'm hoping this is Taylor Lautner and not Daniel Radcliffe. Radcliffe isn't the best actor, but he seems to be improving, and he just seems like such an interesting person. Either way, I'm sure either Lautner or Radcliffe have enough money from their hit movies to not need much of a career.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous6:45 AM

    Agree with you all about Lautner. It should've been titled Abortion, not Abduction.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Lautner. He's gonna be gone soon.

    ReplyDelete