Monday, May 05, 2014

Your Turn

Bigger night for fashion - Oscars or Met Gala?


30 comments:

  1. Anna hates the Oscars.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Met is where the celebs unclench their buttcheats, fashion wise.

    #voguebywigs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or literally! Don't forget about stinky Goop!!!

      Delete
  3. Who is hoarding the Dos Equis?

    ReplyDelete
  4. probably met.

    oscars is first and foremost for film. fashion industry goes with it, but basically just on the red carpet. once inside, it becomes about film.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Celebs suck up to Designers at the Met & wear what they are told to, which makes for some funny ensembles at the Met. It more costumy than the Oscars.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oscars! I'm too much of a philistine to even know what the Met Gala is, but if Enty puts up a post I will talk clothes and drink wine!

    ReplyDelete
  7. TTM where's your pic baby?

    Met gala...Seen some doozies of costumes there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ech Sherry, trying to decide if it's worth showing my face just to have some psycho get all hacky about my kids again. Peeps are weird, yo

      Delete
    2. I agree TTM, family comes first! Good choice!

      Delete
  8. Interesting question Enty. But unfortunately we have no way to know, since the Met Gala isn't broadcast on TV. Would be cool if it were!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think the next big one is Burning man :-) Coachella is such a photo op now, I can't wait for the burning man photos. Maybe Leo will dance again?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oscars are more about looking great while playing it safe. Met is where the fun fashion happens.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, the Met. Any place where Kim Kardashian appears dressed like a couch is the home of high fashion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seven, Anna Wintour cutting off everything but her hand on Vogue's Best Dressed made up for it a bit.

      Delete
    2. Oh, BURN. I love the crop job, wiglet.

      Delete
  12. Oscars has an international audience of one billion (I believe). I give them the advantage.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think the Mat Gala trumps them all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. As if this needs an answer (Met Gala). That's when it gets interesting. I wonder of that's why Kimye got married in advance: they were either invited and want to debut it on the carpet, or they didn't recover an invite, and they're saving face.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It depends on if you mean in terms of recognition or greatness. The dresses worn at the Oscars are more recognizable and more people see them and at The Met people are dressed for fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Apples and oranges. Bigger laughs at the Met!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Meth gala would be best.
    I don't know what the f word that Met gala is.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Different objectives - Oscars is about being classy in front of a billion people. Met Gala more cutting edge fashion, so some wilder outfits that most would consider too out-there for the Oscars. Or just ugly like the sofa slipcover KimK got duped into wearing last year. OMG - I just googled that monstrosity - the dress, the gloves, the shoes - ALL MATCHING in that hideous floral fabric. Kim - I have a bridge to sell you! Ricardo - passive agressive much?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oscars, more important to a larger audience, Met Gala, High Fashion full of more Misses than Hits..love to see the pictures to get an idea what designers are doing, that's more cutting edge. I don't care, I love it..lol

    ReplyDelete
  20. I like the outfits for the Met ball better & there's a theme every year.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I love a good theme. Gives the guests a goal, helps them sing for their supper.

    ReplyDelete
  22. could someone tell me what the hell is a buttcheat? Would that be Kim Kardashian since her ass is fake?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Except for a few women, the dresses were hideous and made the women look ugly

    ReplyDelete