March 29, 2019
This foreign born permanent A list celebrity was hitting on men again yesterday. Not for sex, but for them to "invest" in her money pit of a fashion empire.
Victoria Beckham
This foreign born permanent A list celebrity was hitting on men again yesterday. Not for sex, but for them to "invest" in her money pit of a fashion empire.
Victoria Beckham
Yeah unfortunately you need fresh bait to catch whales.
ReplyDeleteI love this!
DeleteThis is pure discrimination against men! If you are a woman then people hit on you for sex but if you are a male homo sapien then people hit on you for money, wtf? This needs to stop asap!
ReplyDeleteSmells fishy.
ReplyDeleteShe should try "singing" for them, they'd pay her anything to shut up.
ReplyDeleteThe sex has to be better than her shit clothing line..
ReplyDeleteI thought Markle saved her brand, lol.
ReplyDeleteSo david has cut her off? Not as dimwitted as I thought he was.
ReplyDeleteThe Non-Smiler.
ReplyDeleteI have never seen a photo of her smiling.
She should have aimed to be a competitor with Kate Spade - something affordable enough for the professional woman, and she would have cleaned up.
ReplyDeleteVictoria Beckham should have gone for the Coach/Kate Spade price point and I think people would have snapped up her fashions, they certainly did for her Target collab.
Dumb move to make dresses starting at 700+. Women who are ALREADY RICH are not as likely to experiment with VB brand.
Michigan it's because she hates her dimples I guess. You also don't catch her wearing flats, I think because she thinks her legs look fat.
ReplyDelete@hunter I agree. If Jessica Simpson can get rich selling clothing there is no reason VB can't if she is willing to make some changes.
ReplyDeleteI just checked out her stuff. It looks incredibly basic. A huge plain white Hanes T shirt costs $880. Criminy. https://www.ssense.com/en-us/women/designers/victoria-beckham?gclid=CjwKCAjw-ZvlBRBbEiwANw9UWuOMyhSYqa8KD7QkDnJ5dEFXsDH54J3Q8OoGTI-FrQ-_s9V0eCIWsxoCri8QAvD_BwE
ReplyDeleteWhat Hunter said. That high-end: there are established designers enough. Should've gone for mid-price. She's not couture applealing.
ReplyDeleteRe her not smiling: she confessed she hates her smile. I tend to agree. Lol
She looks wierd smiling. Little teeth and does not want wrinkles. As far as flat shoes, she is too short. I have seen her with trainers. I hate flat shoes and avoid them.
ReplyDeleteHer dresses are brilliant, they're cut well and timeless. "She" can cut beautifully and she uses nice materials although unfortunately she's doing a lot of over-sized clothing lately. She definitely should have started with a lower price point: dresses at $300-$400 for instance and not $1,200. She wanted to start at the top without any education or training or paying her dues. That's a bit of hubris! Stella McCartney did very well out of the gate but she also apprenticed for many years and went to school for fashion.
ReplyDelete