I guess this A list royal we all love had no say in the guest list for that recent big dinner. THat banished royal was there but without her wedding ring.
Kate Middleton and her ex friend (who supposedly had an affair with William) Rose something or other. This isn't a blind, it's all over every gossip site.
As was mentioned in yesterday's #13 blind, Harry was at lunch, but not the dinner. He didn't look very happy either. So if the rumours here are true, it reads like this; MM, thru her PR person places stories that PW had an affair with Rose. This causes a rift with Kate and William, and Rose is banished. This also causes a rift in Roses marriage, even if she's innocent. The story tracks back to MM, causing a rift between the royal brothers, further isolating Prince Harry from his family. What fresh hell has this woman wrath? They'll all be at each others throats by the time Charles is King.
@Meredith I didn't see them arrive, but they probably did arrive together. Then everyone separates for the procession to the dinner, accompanying whomever they are to be seated next to. For example, William arrived with Kate, but then accompanied Teresa May, as Kate accompanied Steve Mnuchin.
The other potential story is that William was testing for leaks, as he has often does in the past, and used a story about Kate and Rose not getting along in their local social circle.
He presumably leaked it to Harry or Meghan, and it ended up on the front page of the Daily Mail.
That relatively innocent gossip transmogrified into a cheating rumor in the hands of a big Meghan fan, a blogger from Utah who admits she has no real-life connections to the Royal Family.
I'm still not convinced that Kate didn't leak it herself. She would have to know that MM would be blamed for the information reaching the tabloids( if she really does dislike her why would she care), and what better way to make herself remain innocent while publicly embarrassing her husband. Never underestimate a woman scorned.
Rose was there without her ring on. She and her husband both attended, as he is Lord Chamberlain and expected at state dinners. She was seated as far away from Kate and Will as possible.
I absolutely believe MeGAIN leaked that story the only person who latched on to it on Twitter was a friend of hers, and then Lainey ran with it (shocker). I’m surprised MeGAIN can even sit with Lainey and her BS column so far up her ass.
I'm inclined to believe MM was maybe the leaker but HERE IS THE THING -
If it's NOT true, then why is Rose seated sooooo far from W&K and why is she not wearing her wedding ring? Yes I can imagine her presence would be expected due to her husband's station but for what reason would they engage in this petty theater if the rumors were not true?
There were, what, about 176 at the banquet? They have to scatter the royals through the seating plan. Apart from the top table, no-one is generally near anyone they specifically know. The DM reporter who Rose walked in the procession with is Sarah Vine, wife of Michael Gove, Secretary of State, and running for Teresa May's position.
Nothing much to add to the daily RF soap except that Princess Anne was seated next to Jared Kutchner , no doubt Vice Admiral Tim (still a Naval intelligence analyst) had preped her in strategic questioning.
So I guess CDAN doesn’t get that to be “royal” you have to be a member of the royal family? If this is about Rose Hanbury then she would be considered a “noble” not “royal.” Fergie is royal and banished. Did she turn up somewhere?
Kate Middleton and Williams ex?
ReplyDeleteKate Middleton and her ex friend (who supposedly had an affair with William) Rose something or other. This isn't a blind, it's all over every gossip site.
ReplyDeleteRose hanbury?
ReplyDeleteAaaaand We're off to a good start.
ReplyDeleteEnty sure knows his crowd
Sad - and I hope it is not true (about William/ Rose).
ReplyDeleteHer husband accompanied the Duchess of Gloucester and Rose was seated with Jeremy Fleming and Professor Ralph Speth.
ReplyDeletePrince Harry - Princess Michael of Kent.
ReplyDeletePrince Harry was there? I did not see any photos of him.
ReplyDeleteHello DMers!
ReplyDeletePrince Harry did not attend.
ReplyDeleteGuessing this is supposed to be Kate and Rose Hanbury, Marchioness of Cholmondeley.
ReplyDeleteDo we all love Kate though? Hmmm.
Rose Hanbury is not royal, she can be the banished royal. This is Meghan and Princess Michael of Kent.
ReplyDeleteAs was mentioned in yesterday's #13 blind, Harry was at lunch, but not the dinner. He didn't look very happy either.
ReplyDeleteSo if the rumours here are true, it reads like this; MM, thru her PR person places stories that PW had an affair with Rose. This causes a rift with Kate and William, and Rose is banished. This also causes a rift in Roses marriage, even if she's innocent. The story tracks back to MM, causing a rift between the royal brothers, further isolating Prince Harry from his family.
What fresh hell has this woman wrath? They'll all be at each others throats by the time Charles is King.
Is it Fergie?
ReplyDelete@Meredith I didn't see them arrive, but they probably did arrive together. Then everyone separates for the procession to the dinner, accompanying whomever they are to be seated next to. For example, William arrived with Kate, but then accompanied Teresa May, as Kate accompanied Steve Mnuchin.
ReplyDeleteMnuchin's wife was there, too, for anyone interested.
ReplyDeleteThe other potential story is that William was testing for leaks, as he has often does in the past, and used a story about Kate and Rose not getting along in their local social circle.
ReplyDeleteHe presumably leaked it to Harry or Meghan, and it ended up on the front page of the Daily Mail.
That relatively innocent gossip transmogrified into a cheating rumor in the hands of a big Meghan fan, a blogger from Utah who admits she has no real-life connections to the Royal Family.
I think Princess Michael should have been saddled with one of Trump's sons. Would have been like the Gatekeeper and the Keymaster.
ReplyDeleteI'm still not convinced that Kate didn't leak it herself. She would have to know that MM would be blamed for the information reaching the tabloids( if she really does dislike her why would she care), and what better way to make herself remain innocent while publicly embarrassing her husband. Never underestimate a woman scorned.
ReplyDeletePoor Kate having to eat dinner next to creepy-ass Steve Mnuchin. Yikes!!
ReplyDeleteThis not the princess michael of kent. She had her wedding ring on. Definitely Kate and Rose.
ReplyDeleteWilliam's gumar looked no better than the wife. All these British royal women look like dry, stringy beef jerky in stuffy WWII era fashions.
ReplyDeleteIs that you SMegma Markle?
DeleteThere is no beloved Royal enty. All off them nedd to meet a guillotine
ReplyDelete.
I guessed Princess Micheal because Rose has a title but i don't think is considered royal. Rose seems to be the correct answer.
ReplyDeleteRose was there without her ring on. She and her husband both attended, as he is Lord Chamberlain and expected at state dinners. She was seated as far away from Kate and Will as possible.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely believe MeGAIN leaked that story the only person who latched on to it on Twitter was a friend of hers, and then Lainey ran with it (shocker). I’m surprised MeGAIN can even sit with Lainey and her BS column so far up her ass.
I'm inclined to believe MM was maybe the leaker but HERE IS THE THING -
ReplyDeleteIf it's NOT true, then why is Rose seated sooooo far from W&K and why is she not wearing her wedding ring? Yes I can imagine her presence would be expected due to her husband's station but for what reason would they engage in this petty theater if the rumors were not true?
Nutty?
Wouldn't Rose be seated far away (at one of the unimportant people's tables) because she's only the wife of some palace worker?
ReplyDeleteThese are the people I would least want to imagine involved in sexual liaisons. Just no.
ReplyDeleteThere were, what, about 176 at the banquet? They have to scatter the royals through the seating plan. Apart from the top table, no-one is generally near anyone they specifically know. The DM reporter who Rose walked in the procession with is Sarah Vine, wife of Michael Gove, Secretary of State, and running for Teresa May's position.
ReplyDeleteRosie is not royal and she is not A list.
ReplyDeleteThe Queen's jewels almost blinded me.
ReplyDeleteSorry, what event is this? Trump's State dinner? Thanks.
ReplyDelete@Krab The A list Royal is Kate. Rose is the banished one.
ReplyDeleteNothing much to add to the daily RF soap except that Princess Anne was seated next to Jared Kutchner , no doubt Vice Admiral Tim (still a Naval intelligence analyst) had preped her in strategic questioning.
ReplyDelete@Krab.....probably just the American Cdan intern confusing an everyday aristocrat with Royalty.
ReplyDeleteGood lord, that Hanbury woman looks like a horse. Was William trying to be like his dad if he boffed this hag?
ReplyDeleteSo I guess CDAN doesn’t get that to be “royal” you have to be a member of the royal family? If this is about Rose Hanbury then she would be considered a “noble” not “royal.”
ReplyDeleteFergie is royal and banished. Did she turn up somewhere?