July 10, 2019
It shouldn't take some celebrity to finally convince everyone that this A- list-ish mostly television actress/now host was a member of the cult. I mean, she and her much higher on the list husband opened a school to indoctrinate youth into the cult and it wasn't just for giggles.
Jada Pinkett Smith/Will Smith/Scientology
It shouldn't take some celebrity to finally convince everyone that this A- list-ish mostly television actress/now host was a member of the cult. I mean, she and her much higher on the list husband opened a school to indoctrinate youth into the cult and it wasn't just for giggles.
Jada Pinkett Smith/Will Smith/Scientology
Look at how these people raise their kids.
ReplyDeleteHollywood is so chock-full of creeps and morons, it's really something.
This wasn't fairly open knowledge that they are $cios?
ReplyDeleteI hate Jada. HATE HER!
ReplyDeleteI am so confused though. Sure I get the association so I guess not surprised but they live a lifestyle utterly OUTSIDE the Scietology teachings. Well, guess if they are closeted and married they are 'living the straight life' ala Tom Cruise similar and trying to re-program but all the stuff they and their kids do talking about gender fluidity, implying swinging and/or having an open marriage, etc etc are all very COUNTER church which is very straight and narrow in what it thinks you should live as a lifestyle. How do they fit in? Or do they just get away with what they want by being SECRETIVE and involvement so can do what they want so long as they pay into this science fiction cult?
ReplyDeletekiki, allegedly, CoS changed its rulings on being gay or straight. Now, no one cares.
ReplyDeleteOnly thing I know about Jada is she used to front a metal band and chick can fuckin sing!
ReplyDeleteGuess that's why the school failed and their kids raised themselves...
ReplyDeleteBad move on their parents
they're never considered scientologists on Tony Ortega's Underground Bunker for what it's worth
ReplyDelete@ Samantha I read Dianetics like 15 or 20 years ago and that was their take, that being homosexual is an 'imprint' of a negative experience with the opposite sex you need to "live down' and re-program. really? they changed this? Guess I am not up on current Sociopathic Scientology lol!
ReplyDeleteHow much of an "imprint" do you think a life-time of crazy old senile LRH, filled to the gills with little blue pills, wrecking Miscavige's asshole made?
ReplyDeletekiki - all I can tell you is I read (at least) a few years ago that that rule had been quietly abolished/changed.
ReplyDelete