Monday, August 19, 2019

Blind Item #6

Apparently this royal has no idea there are the recordings of him sexually assaulting another underage girl. The reason why he is not welcome in this country. He thinks the ban is because of the more publicly known sexual assault of that other underage teen. 


31 comments:

  1. Randy Andy
    I thought he was going to “retire”?

    ReplyDelete
  2. @ troy dyer
    RETIRE? From what? Public life? f-ing underage girls? Being a douchebag assaulter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ideally all of the above, but I thought that there were rumblings that Prince Andrew is being pressured to retire from public appearances.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous8:15 AM

    Holy chit now that's a scoop. I think Charles plans to retire Andrew in his "streamlining the monarchy" plan. We know Andrew was upset his girls were not going to be allowed to receive public funding and do royal family engagements.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was a parody account on Social Media that was operating on the premise that there is such thing as a "career in public life" as if they have their own union, or something .

    They were assuming there were people out there dumb enough to believe it---obviously from the responses here, many of you fell for it...

    ReplyDelete
  5. The UK royals actual problem, not whatever MM is doing. Ol' crazy bat queen will keep stanning for him though, and hopefully bring the whole monarchy shitshow down.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought the "streamline" the nobility had more to do with cutting Beatrice and Eugenie off from stipend because of whorey behavior from....well, the whole fam. Andrew, Ferg and the girls all of them....but mainly as a control mechanism for Andrew..from Philip.
    Since Phil is obviously too old to even drive, they have taken the checkbook away and Charles is temporarily in charge. I expect him to do a Wallis Simpson thing and abdicate - leaving Wills in charge, which means he HAS to get control of Sparkles.
    I think Andrew will be encouraged to take a well-deserved hospital rest at a back country estate, but I look for MeAgain and the ginger to succumb to a fiery plane crash unless they stay out of public.
    RF has a lot of irons in the fire.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How could it NOT be known?
    Seriously. People in high up places are fools if they don't think they're being recorded in nefarious acts

    ReplyDelete
  8. get rid of the porky prince. ban him from Southeast Asia too.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When are they going to round up him and the rest of the accomplices?

    ReplyDelete
  10. And to think that Andrew once seemed like the only normal one of that inbred lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really! When was that? He was always a boorish crass entitled snob of the highest order. His daughters take after him.

      Delete
  11. Cool how Brits pay for this guy's lifestyle... and halfprince Harry's.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Perhaps the Windsors could lock Andrew up in one of their castles like the Monster of Glamis...

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://www.foxnews.com/world/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-appalled-footage-manhattan-mansion

    Fuck him

    ReplyDelete
  14. When are the British people going to get fed up with supporting the sleaze bags in the Royal Family?

    ReplyDelete
  15. If I were a Brit, I'd be fed up with supporting this family of arrogant inbreds.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oh please, of course he knew, those recordings are probably among the things SMegwhore Markle used to blackmail Harry

    ReplyDelete
  17. OK, so he thinks it's because of sexual assault A, not sexual assault B? Preposterous.
    I'm doing some proactive grieving over the end of the British monarchy. Not only because of Andy.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'm a Brit, and trust me, plenty of us are sick of these people.

    I do find it very interesting that the most Epstein/Royals coverage currently happening in the UK press is coming from the Mail, which has usually been a very pro-Royal paper. If the family aren't able to keep the kind of person who reads the Mail onside then who knows what'll happen?

    When the crown passes to Charles, I'd say things are going to be very different.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Who'd replace the royals?

    Some group more innocent and less well paid?

    No. Same tune, different title.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "People in high up places are fools if they don't think they're being recorded in nefarious acts"

    + 1 Rosie.

    Going all the way back to when 'a tabloid' hid a video camera in the living room of a hotel suite when some woman got together with Frank Gifford. Remember that (anyone)?

    Celebs, maybe even civilians, should assume there are hidden cameras/ audio when in hotels or traveling. There used to be devices you could buy, and use to sweep for that. Not sure about now, with everything being digital. I dunno. But I speculate the 'businessmen' who own hotel chains probably trade celeb hidden camera pron like baseball cards.



    ReplyDelete

  21. So what Country is Prince rapey banned from? I lost track of which is which.
    Also, question about things I truly have no clue about:
    when Brexit happens, does anything change with the Royals, officially? I have no clue how that stuff works.


    @Samantha the 1st
    I remember!

    ReplyDelete
  22. "@Samantha the 1st
    I remember!"

    Wasn't that something (at the time?)

    Imagine some of yesterday's scandals if social media existed then.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous10:23 AM

    @Marisa Prince Andrew is banned from America. Has been for many years.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm gonna call what I bet they are gonna do with Andrew. He's gonna "suicide" himself so they can put him in witness protection and retire him somewhere beautiful.

    ReplyDelete