Monday, September 16, 2019

Blind Items Revealed #5

September 5, 2019

This alliterate permanent A list singer who is not even the biggest in her family has always said she hated this permanent A++ list celebrity, so I'm not sure why she would agree to work with her. That seems really odd.

Janet Jackson/Oprah


39 comments:

  1. For money and attention.

    I think a new record for most obvious answer to a blind has been established.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why does she hate Oprah? Did Oprah side with Michael's accusers?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The heat is on Oprah like never before and rightly so.

    Perhaps Ms. Jackson is throwing a bone based upon a negotiated deal?

    Could you blame her if so? No one else is going to stop her.

    Or maybe Oprah has something on her and is forcing her to provide shade?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why would Janet need money? She made a lot and divorced a very rich husband. Maybe Oprah has some dirt on Janet? Hmmmm we all do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bet she had to walk away from any money in order to keep the kid.

      Delete
  5. +@Me. @Do Tell where you been?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Janet Jackson may need a lot of things but MONEY is not one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. black community has turned on Oprah for aligning herself with Geffen. she has been making some real poor choices since her talk show ended

    ReplyDelete
  8. Guesser, I don't really pay attention to Janet or Oprah blinds. Much like Dancing Boy blinds, You Tube blinds, boy band blinds, blinds about sports, most hip hop/rap or extremely long items.

    It does make for a much more expedient CDAN experience.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sd Auntie

    One must pay penance to the New World Order (NWO) to obtain the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN) cable broadcasting channel via the FCC.

    "Oprah" is not the face she projects via "Harpo" Productions.

    Watch Janet and Michael's "Scream" video. She's sticking up for her brother.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes you are spot on About Oprah. She is not the person she wants us to think she is.

      Delete
  10. shocking she would do anything with Oprah considering how shes basically attacked Michael after his death.. my guess is this is the Jacksons family attempt to stop any more bleeding and blows to his estate and they are accepting her terms to do it... they dont really have a choice... another finding neverland or something like that and the estate could be severely tarnished

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oprah is a spawn of Satan.
    #NoConspiracy
    (that's no homo for the conspiracy crowd)

    ReplyDelete
  12. DJSNOLA

    Do not forget Michael Jackson owns the Beatles music catalog. He outbid Paul McCartney for the rights. Paul McCartney pals with Oprah on Geffen's yacht and Geffen is a music industry mogul.

    MJ owns many other very famous musician's music catalogues. Paired with his own, the Estate of Michael Jackson is worth BILLIONS over time.

    There will soon come a time where Oprah and her pals will have to dig themselves out of the hole they made for themselves. Until that day arrives, Janet Jackson should do whatever is necessary to keep that music from being stolen via blasphemy.

    There was recently a press conference held by the Michael Jackson Estate's attorney. You can find it on YouTube. It was no later than the month of August.

    ReplyDelete
  13. DSNOLA

    Once Michael Jackson is slandered... there may be a contractual clause enabling the original owners of the music MJ currently owns to revert back to the original owner.

    Oprah paid a very high price for that network.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no clause like that. The publishing rights are property. If I buy an iphone and then kill someone, it doesnt revert back to apple.

      If being sleazy lost you the rights to music, those 50s blacks wouldnt have had to sue Hesch to get sofa change.

      Delete
  14. There's nothing funnier than Michael Jackson cultists. They're in complete denial about their freak messiah.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hamid

    First... I guarantee you Michael Jackson was abused.

    Second... He is no longer on earth, i.e., dead.

    Third... If anyone was abused by Jackson, they should have ratted him out immediately while they had a chance.

    If you woke up the morning after being abused would you want to wake up to the same face as an adult?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're obviously one of those Jacko stans who knows nothing about the real world outside of Jacko. If you knew anything about abuse victims, they can go decades without telling anyone. It's also very common that victims experience a form of Stockholm Syndrome and form a bond with their abusers.

      But in Jacko stan world, everyone is a liar except the freak who said he only ever had two plastic surgeries.

      Delete
  16. @Me, Yeah child victims aren't always the iron-willed paladins of truth and justice that some people seem to expect them to be. Often they're just scared, hurt and confused children who don't think the world will believe them, especially when the abuser is the beloved king of pop.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @DoTell,the Oprah blinds connect the dots on a lot of other blinds. She basically gave the documentary the Oprah seal of approval.

    ReplyDelete
  18. We're looking at the exposure and subsequent destruction of Satanist pedo Hollywood.
    It's ALL HANDS ON DECK. No one has much of a choice. Won't save them, but they all do what they're ordered to do.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hamid

    I don't know who rubbed your lamp the wrong way this morning Hadji... but dead men tell no tales.

    It is easy to blaspheme them. Look at you. A varitable Barney Bad Ass.

    Now... Do you remember when MJackson hung one his infant children over the balcony of hotel? That was MJackson sending a signal to the world.

    Have you heard the phone calls of MJackson claiming he would be murdered for what he knew?

    How about other musicians who have paid the price for speaking out like Dave Navarro and Chester Bennington?

    Look... I get bashing MJ is easy due to his looks, ranch, etc.

    The dude was robbed of his innocence.

    Don't brag about being a surface dweller that is all knowing yet impotent. Be the omnipotent spelunker you claim to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm atheist, so calling me hadji doesn't work.

      The signal Jacko sent the world when he dangled Blankie was that he was a fucking moron.

      The rest of your screed is standard internet conspiratard drivel.

      Delete
  20. Hamid

    Good God up in heaven I loathe Hadji bots lurking on conspiracy theorist gossip sites.

    You are entitled to your opinion as am I Hadji Dodgi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could you say that again in English?

      Delete
  21. Is there any truth to the rumors that MJ never molested kids, but Bubbles was known to get high on Jesus Juice and take liberties with their keisters while MJ watched?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Like the Beatles were choirboys supposedly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are they alleged to have plied 9 year olds with drugs and alcohol and then raped them in front of a Peter Pan cutout stand?

      Delete
  23. @me That interview with Thomas Mesereau was a joke. It was very poorly done. I mistook the seasoned interviewer for a high school project style amateur.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oprah gave LaToya a mercifully short lived reality show on her OWN network. The laughable "premise" was LaToya trying to find a multi millionaire to keep her in the style she wanted to live in. The only problem was/ she was ALREADY married, to her "manager" in the train wreck reality show. So Oprah has worked with the dysfunctional Jacko family before.

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Me, MJ, his estate do not own the Beatles music catalogue.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Whatever happened to that blind about a Jackson family member giving birth to Janet's kid with the scuzzy M Eastern dude?

    ReplyDelete
  27. I don't believe MJ was a full-on rapist. He had this strange a-sexuallity about him and he was a wimp. A wet piece of kitchen paper. Adults scared him, and so did girls. But he was a perv, for sure. I can't picture him holding down a screaming or passed out boy, and doing unspeakable things. But I can definitely picture him getting off seeing a pre-pubescent willie, giving each other stiffies, and then masturbating together.
    Sexuality of a 10-year old.

    ReplyDelete
  28. +NAL
    Exactly right. Exactly.

    ReplyDelete