Tuesday, March 31, 2020

Today's Blind Items - No More Backing

Over the past few months after she claims there were attempts on her life and forced to yacht more than she has in decades, I asked myself what brought all this on for the foreign born permanent A list model. Oh sure, there is the stigma of the pedophile, but that wasn't enough. That had been in her hip pocket for decades along with her role in all of it. For many years this family with the long and storied history considered the model much like they would an art gallery or museum. They were patrons. It didn't hurt that many young men and women in the family had their first sexual experience with the model. One female member was especially close to the model because they had each been with underage teens with the pedophile, and apparently at least once had been together with an underage girl.

Could it have something to do with recent royal marriages? I looked at the biggest recent one and everything seemed in order until I realized it wasn't. This is where it gets a little more complicated but essentially the next one in line who will actually get to spend a long long time at the top married his first cousin. The last name of the wife was always front and center so you didn't look too far back. Honestly, you only need to go back one. That wouldn't be a problem at all until you you look back at the real grandfather of the one in the line of succession. Yeah, the one who had the affair with the grandmother of the one in line. Now all of a sudden, husband and wife are related. Back in the annals of the history of the family, this kind of thing happened and was encouraged. That long running family I mentioned earlier, often volunteered a tribute to the gene pooling.

I suspect that through the royal who is trying to save his name and who has spent lots and lots of money over the years bedding our model and her "friends," that he spilled the beans. Those pregnancies were, indeed fake. Oh, sure the babies are real, but no way did they want to take a chance and get some crazy genes going. So, you get an egg donor or sperm donor and then a surrogate. The model probably found out and started talking, as she does. The long storied family with money got wind and cut her off financially, forcing her into her current life.


101 comments:

  1. The Rothschild's for the family?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Naomi and the Guggenheim’s? Or Rothschild

    ReplyDelete
  3. Naomi....rest is too much to read!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Will and Kate are cousins?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And their kids are from donors? They each look like one parent! Jeez

      Delete
    2. @MD Anderson

      It’s not a secret Wills & Kate are cousins. The scandal (if the blind is about them) is they are really first cousins & not distant cousins.

      Delete
    3. Still kind of gross MD. Although some of my pals from foreign country did the same. Their kids will not be doing the same though.

      Delete
    4. I thought she was a genuine commoner. Didn't they have to create a coat of arms for her family before they got married?

      Delete
    5. I wondered how she was just chosen to live in the same house with William at college. Now I know.

      Delete
  5. So did Elizabeth the second have an affair with Middleton's grandfather or the late queen mum had an affair? So confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. MD and Montana - that was my take as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Diana grandmother was rumored to be the mistress of queen Elizabeth father. I’m so confused

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7689949/Kate-Middletons-grandfather-pilot-Prince-Philips-1962-South-America-tour.html

    "Decades before Prince William and Kate Middleton were born, they shared a connection through their grandfathers who crossed paths when Captain Peter Middleton was a co-pilot who flew alongside Prince Philip.

    In 1962, the Duchess of Cambridge's paternal grandfather accompanied the Duke of Edinburgh during his royal flying tour of South America."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Naomi obviously ... Will and Kate for related and she was cut off by the royal family

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. no way. The royals don't have much liking for African women of any nationality. They prefer their own kind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You got Andrew who is trying to save his name, that is how Naomi found out. That’s my take anyway.

      Delete
    2. Wrong!
      Google Prince Charles and Sheila Ferguson from The Three Degrees.

      Delete
  13. So the point is William and Kate are cousins,and all the kids are by surrogate. I think I it's Andrew who is the affair kid. The heir would have been very deliberate. And why would you need both sperm and egg donor,one would be ok. Charles and Diana are cousins. This is pretty common in royal families.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Guesser

      They would use sperm to ensure the heir to the throne has Charles (or William’s) dna & in hopes the child looks like him/his side of the family.

      They would use egg to ensure at least one of the children looked like Diana (or Kate).

      If conspiracy theories are to be believed Kate is not a biological female so they would need a donor egg from someone.

      Whomever is donating needs to be a distant relative like a fifth cousin or someone who bears strong resemblance to the parent of record.

      Delete
    2. "If conspiracy theories are to be believed Kate is not a biological female"

      Lol, wut.

      Delete
    3. Insane in the membrane
      Insane in the brain.

      Delete
    4. They are all reptilian. Kate laid eggs then stuffer her dresses with a pillow. Old bag Liz has another 100yrs to live.

      Delete
  14. Who would believe anything Naomi says?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't understand why someone like Naomi who was one of the highest paid models in the world in her heyday would sign up for this. It couldn't just be for the momey, she had plenty of that. Is she just a thrillseeker or is there some kind of mental illness or personality disorder?

    ReplyDelete
  16. This takes fan fiction to a whole new level

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right? The quarantine is making people loopy.

      Delete
    2. @galouise

      I asked a British friend about this. I was told the royals are all inbred. So in the end it doesn’t matter if they are first, second, or third cousins because they are all of the aforementioned. Twisted.

      I read in several articles that Meghan Markle is a “distant” relative of the royals. That could be one reason the Queen allowed the marriage to take place.

      I’m waiting on that tell-all book Meghan is going to publish.

      Delete
  17. Naomi, British “royals” & the Rothschilds

    As for who married their first cousin, I’m going with Charles & Camilla. Her grandmother had an affair with one of his relatives. Also it’s not a secret Charles & Diana were related. Not a secret William & Kate are related.

    As for the fake pregnancies I personally never believed Duchess Kate was ever pregnant. There was a blind this year that said the same.

    Having said that, just because I believe this doesn’t make it true. But I’m not convinced I’m wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous10:58 AM

    Haven't there been quiet rumors that Harry is actually Phillip's son? That this is one of the juicy news that MM has in her arsenal that will be made public in a divorce if the BRF doesn't pay up? Diana planned to go public but was waiting for her children to get older. The surrogate rumor for Will and Kate isn't new either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Anne

      I’ve heard those rumors too. I notice Prince William is looking more like Prince Phillip as time goes on.

      Delete
    2. @T.W. Would that have been consensual or rape?

      Delete
  19. Lynn Forester de Rothschild For the female member that joined Naomi Campbell.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I know the Rothschilds are bankers & such but I still don’t understand how they own and control 99% of the world’s wealth & resources. I appreciate it if CDAN community can break it down for me.


    At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, all these elites are related & they have a breeding program.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This is really interesting bc there is a tarot reader, Janine, on YouTube who has been seeing that Meghan has some blackmail material regarding parentage of the royals. One would guess that it's Harry's parentage, but that doesn't make sense & Janine gets that it is not him; she even suggests issues with the youngest ones. This information fits with her info. If Andrew has been blabbing this makes even more sense. It would be easy for Meghan to hear this.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Did Frances Shand Kydd have an affair with Peter Middleton? Diana was born in 1961. Apparently her parents marriage was not a happy one and she did a runner in 1964 with an Australian wallpaper heir. They would have mixed in the same social circles.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Charles and Camilla....She used to comment on her grandmother's affair with his grandfather. She seemed very proud of that, like they were destined to be together.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a kind of hookup line when they first met. My grandma was your grandpa's mistress or sth like that

      Delete
  28. TW: The Bush family was not born into it, they weaseled their way in (and faked their English pedigree), and are basically considered gofers for the Rothschilds and other "elite."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Gator

      In other words the Bush Family are pawns who are led to believe they are one of THEM.

      Delete
  29. Peter Middleton was not in the same social circles as Francis Shand Kydd.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Totally confusing but I'll take a stab at the Royals part: Andrew and Fergie are first cousins so Beatrice and Eugenie are not really royal. Not believing this because they look just like their Mom unless she received IVF and a sperm donor.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Oh Wait! I just re-read that and it sounds more like William and Kate as the first cousins. Not buying this one at all.

    ReplyDelete
  32. So modern day Game of Thrones. Got it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. So modern day Game of Thrones. Got it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Enty, don't you realize yet that Adderall makes Meg manic?


    ReplyDelete
  35. Wait, what? Kate is not a biological female?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Pottymouth

      It’s up to you if you believe that theory.

      Some conspiracies are true, some are lies based on truth, some are ramblings of crazy people, & some are intentionally put out to discredit the Truther Community.

      David Icke is insane but his book The Biggest Secret is an eye opener.

      Delete
  36. I read it as wills and kate are first cousins and their kids may have donors.
    I don’t buy it, sounds like it’s more negative rumor-mongering originating from crazy jealous MM

    ReplyDelete
  37. So Pippa’s grandmother banged Prince Philip, who was a friend of Pippas grandfather. Both Kate and Will have the same grandfather, so their kids are from donated eggs and a surrogate. Naomi blabbed and she’s paranoid the royal family, who used her as a sex toy will kill her:

    ReplyDelete
  38. They did give Michael Middleton a coat of arms but they did rub elbows with royalty going back to 1926 and were considered aristocrats.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I remember reading in Kitty Kelly's "The Royals" that King George had fertility issues, and they literally used a turkey baster to get QE and Margaret? I wonder if that could be it. She and Philip were closely related too.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Is this Chuck’s real dad?? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlYgVe3W4AIFqYd?format=jpg&name=medium

    ReplyDelete
  41. Naomi, Charles and Camilla for cousins

    ReplyDelete
  42. It is time for the House of Stuart to take over and drive the Montbattens back to Gotha or wherever where they came from.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @lady it wasn't that George had fertility issues he was gay and could not get it up with the Queen mom. That's why she was always so bitter she got stuck with the gay brother when she had wanted the womanizing Edward.

    ReplyDelete
  44. People of a certain religious persuasion, why is it always so?

    ReplyDelete
  45. So did Markle phone this one in? After all she’s in LA now.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Utter BS, it's amazing what you guys will believe & think you know all about our Royal family - just because American politics etc is full of conspiracy theories doesn't make it so for Great Britain. Methinks you're all going stir crazy in your isolation, seek help. 🤦‍♀️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahaha calm down Scottie, you still believe Charles and Co are truly different from the rest of us. Keep bowing and scraping we’ll keep laughing.

      Delete
  47. Why would a surrogate not talk? You would have to offer a lot of money a lot of money for people not to talk. Or they just used the same person all 3 times.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Complete and utter bullshit blind.

    Also, Naomi was involved with Adam Clayton of U2 for awhile. Were they engaged? I wonder if she was batshit crazy when she was with him?

    ReplyDelete
  49. The only person who definitely used a surrogate is Meghan Markle, she of the movable pregnancy bump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. I don’t know why but I believe the only reason Meghan “got pregnant “ was because when Harry was in the US Vegas specifically something happened and he got a girl pregnant who now lives in NC. I think that is Archie. They made Meghan get “pregnant “ so no one would find out about the illegitimate baby.

      Delete
  50. Everyone is barking up the wrong tree!
    Its been long rumored that Sir James Goldsmith is in fact Princess Diana's biological father. Her mother is known to have had an affair with him. Kate's family are related to him. So in fact, Will and Kate are related to eachother through Diana! Not the Windsors

    ReplyDelete
  51. Naomi Campbell and House of Grimaldi.
    Camilla's original come-on to Charles in their youth? His grandfather and her grandmother were lovers and doesn't that give you ideas? They are biological cousins, as are Kate and William.
    George, Charlotte and Louis are all "special babies".
    Andy blabbed to Naomi and Meghan knows too.
    My guess at least, lol.

    ReplyDelete
  52. @STN: Yes. And I believe that MM called this blind in. It’s just too ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I believe that Kate was pregnant. It was visible from her changes in figure, swelling of the cheeks, which is characteristic of a woman who is in this position.But Markle had a pillow in all the photographs

    ReplyDelete
  54. Let me get this straight... Naomi Campbell thinks she has such gossip on the royal family, so much so attempts have been made on her life, yet Meghan Markle is dragging said family through the mud with reckless abandon, while expecting them to arrange and pay for her safe keeping? As if the Cambridge children aren’t bio Kate and Wills... Archie is the only surrogate birth I’d believe. Besides, first in line is Charles, so it points to Charles and then references pregnancies, which doesn’t make sense for Camilla. Also, the blind says the one in line for both the husband and wife. Can’t be both, neither Camilla or Kate or Mm or Bea’s husband are in line. And the last of the recent marriages was Beatrice, who hasn’t been pregnant. Maybe this is supposed to be the Grimaldis. Albert was also a big fan of Naomi and models, the youngest sister dated everyone and had babies with her body guard, while the older sister became a windowed and then married German royalty? Dunno...

    ReplyDelete
  55. April fools Day lol!

    ReplyDelete
  56. More jealous, vindictive Markle rantings....

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Scottish Wildcat

    David Icke is British. He's the one who wrote about the claim Diana saw the Queen shape shift. He wrote other things about the royals too.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Unknown

    corticosteroids can make those changes too. I'm not saying Kate was or was not pregnant. While I know better than to believe all the conspiracy theories I do know that when there is smoke there is fire.

    ReplyDelete
  59. April Fool's Day has been cancelled.

    2020 has been cancelled.

    Time to throw a party and serve Corona brand beer for drinks...

    ReplyDelete
  60. The plot thickens!

    According to BG, Prince Harry is infertile. Prince Andrew donated sperm that was used to fertilize Meghan's egg(s). BG claims Meghan was pregnant. I doubt that.

    BG also says Meghan is pregnant again with one of Prince Andrew's babies.

    IF this is true than Prince Harry is raising his cousin(s). Then again, that family is so inbred everyone is his cousin/aunt/uncle/brother/sister...


    https://blindgossip.com/the-second-baby/

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Gnarfcat April Fools? Oh, no! You are right. I feel like I just got Rick rolled. Point to Enty, fair and square.

    ReplyDelete
  62. confused. So not only was there a surrogate supposedly but Will/Kate's kids are supposedly not even their own since there were eggs and sperm donors... and whywould the royals we worried about gene pool 'in breeding' now if they've practiced some form of it forever? None of this makes sense. And WHY would Charles let Harry take Andrew's sperm? Okay all so convoluted and weird I can't even follow the conspiracy parts.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I dont think the kids look much like the parents except maybe Charlotte and Kate. I like this kind of blind the best!

    ReplyDelete
  64. Kate’s mother is Carol Middleton, daughter of Ronald Goldsmith ....

    Telling you....Sir James Goldsmith is the father of Diana and somehow connected to Carol Goldsmith Middleton

    ReplyDelete
  65. It is strange that their son George has brown eyes when both of his parents and his grandparents on both sides all have blue eyes!
    Based on that I would believe that their was a donor involved!

    ReplyDelete
  66. April Fools all of you and Blind Gossip always puts up a preposterous April Fools bind that every one falls for as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Emerald City

      I thought the same but BG revealed that blind & they did not say it was the annual April Fools blind.

      Delete
  67. From Google, Ronald Goldsmith and Sir James Goldsmith are not related, two separate families. Even if they were related it would not make Will & Kate first cousins. There would be "once removed" in there...I think or something?? Anyway, I suppose the connection could be from some other side. IMO, Will doesn't looked anything like Prince Charles, more like Juan Carlos of Spain, just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  68. @MissDirect Bingo!
    Sir James Goldsmith is the GFather, actual father of Diana, had an affair with Frances Shand Kydd. Carole Middleton (nee Goldsmith) is Kate's mother. Not sure it's the same bloodline, she had a fairly modest background financially.

    That would make Zak Goldsmith MP her 1/2 bro. Fam resemblance much?
    http://chrisspivey.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/GoldsmithdiZac.jpg

    The Goldsmiths are a branch of the Rothschilds. Zak, Ben, and Jemima are the three siblings from this family, Naomi's 10 years older than the youngest, 3 years older than Zac. Hmmm...

    Wills looks so much like Di that it must have been her egg, if there was a sperm donor the hint in the blind seems to be that it is Rothschild. This would mean a handover is taking place from House Hanover to House Rothschild while the rest of the nobility are being sold that Wills is Stuart/Hanover. Mindbender.

    I still believe Harry is Di and James Hewitt's son, which makes him Rothschild/Hewitt.

    What's interesting about this is that the next King of England might be Jewish.
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-jewish-king-and-queen-o_b_876455

    Oh and yes, Charles and Camilla are also cousins.
    I wonder who has been attempting on Naomi? Any guesses?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. someone explain what they want to tell us? Did Naomi know something about Kate's surrogate? how ? is she blackmailing they?

      Delete
  69. Camilla great grandmother (Alice Keppel) was the mistress of King Edward VII (Charles great grandfather)

    ReplyDelete
  70. Happy April Fools' Day! Not buying this twisted tale.

    ReplyDelete
  71. @MissDirect Kate does not have blue eyes. They are hazel-green. It is entirely possible for little George to have brown eyes from that combination (studied genetics in college).

    ReplyDelete
  72. They're saying because Carole Middleton was a Goldsmith and Diana's father was secretly supposed to be James Goldsmith, that William and Kate are cousins. Except Carole's Goldsmiths and James Goldsmith aren't related at all. I'm probably more closely related to William than Kate is. And by the way, the Queen and her husband are third cousins.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Anonymous8:44 PM

    I'm surprised Naomi Campbell would need Financial Backing from The Royal Family.

    Because you would think She would be Rich Enough that She wouldn't have to worry about Money.

    But then again I guess it depends on Your Lifestyle.

    I mean if your making Half a Million to a Million a Month but Lifestyle Every Month Cost a 100,000 to Maintain.

    Then yeah obviously your going to run into Financial Problems after a while.

    Also The Girl has had a lot of Lawsuits Over The Years so I'm sure that no doubt has put a dent into Her Bank Account.

    Still I really think it's sad that She has to Start Yachting now.

    Especially considering She is a Month away from Turning 50 for crying out loud.

    ReplyDelete
  74. That's very interesting -- Kate and William are cousins via Diana's mother? Wouldn't be surprised. Don't know, but 100% believe Kate had a surrogate. Explains the hyperemesis that supposedly kept her out of action during her "pregnancies," as well as the appearance in full hair and makeup and no baby weight just hours after the birth of Louis.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Duchess Catherine has hazel eyes, not blue.

    ReplyDelete