Thursday, May 07, 2009

Michael Jackson Sued For $44M


The publicist who worked for Michael Jackson during his child molestation trial is suing Michael for $44M because Michael hasn't paid her any money. Honestly, since everyone still thinks he is a child molester, I wouldn't pay her either. A publicist who charges as much as she appears to charge better make everything go away. For that kind of money she should have had Michael Jackson being honored by The Boy Scouts Of America as their hero.

On the other hand, she probably knows some really interesting things about Michael and so I can't believe he would want to go to trial with this. She even alluded to this in her lawsuit when she says that it would no doubt produce theories, accusations and rumors. Oh yeah. You have to love the rumors. With Michael scheduled to make a gajillion dollars this summer in London, you would hate to see something leak out about other things he may have done or people he may have done.


16 comments:

  1. LAWDDDDD
    Michael hasn't even recieved his first check from those concerts and the whole world is coming out to sue him.

    Hmmmm could all these lawsuits be publicity stunts?!!?!?

    ReplyDelete
  2. enty, publicists aren't miracle workers. there's only so much you can spin.

    hmmmm...but i'm wondering also what she's got on him. guess we'll have to wait till she writes the inevitable tell-all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i remember this woman. she was out there every single day during his trial and before and after. i think she worked pretty hard for her money.

    i bet she knows where all the bodies are buried. if he had any money, he'd probably pay her off but since he doesn't.....anyone smell a book coming?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ya, I remember this lady too. Why did she stick with him for so long if she wasn't being paid? Gathering info?

    ReplyDelete
  5. How do you spell hush money?

    It's obvious the publicist spells it $44M.

    ReplyDelete
  6. He's been sued tons of times in the past few years and he never has to pay out. He always restructures his finances or receives a "gift" from some wealthy billionaire type. Who got the money from his selling Neverland and all of his crazy junk?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would so buy her book. Or at least check it out from the library. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is bullshit again. She says she was in charge of everything, including paying his bills. So, she didn't pay herself? MJ sells out 750,000 tickets in world record time, and now people want to cash in on it.
    The world is ugly. . .

    ReplyDelete
  9. Enty, your comment "something leak out about other things he may have done or people he may have done." really vicious.

    He was found not guilty, remember? 11 counts, I believe.

    ReplyDelete
  10. yeah, and some jurors afterwards said they thought he was guilty. they just didn't have enough evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Don't know if anyone reads paper mags anymore but the latest issue of People has a pic of Stevie Nicks and Jacko at Clinton's inaugaration. He wanted to borrow foundation from Stevie for the stage show but the stuff she had on hand wasn't light enough.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ya and OJ is still looking for the killer....but thanks for reminding us he was charged not once,not twice but ELEVEN counts.

    ReplyDelete
  13. anyone who doesn't think this freak ever touched a little boy-----send YOUR kid over to spend the night with him. come on.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. siwillia - "Not guilty" doesn't mean innocent. How many rapists, abusers and murderers are deemed ‘not guilty’, only to re-offend and be caught (or appallingly never brought to justice)?

    If you truly believe he never touched a child's no-no place (or vice versa), than you are too naive to function in today's society.

    Also, 11 COUNTS?! I don't remember it being that many! Does that include all those times he bought the kiddies/parents off?

    ReplyDelete
  16. So... if she 'knows' things, things that perhaps pertain to covering up the fact that Jacko molested children, can she be charged with aiding and abetting?

    ReplyDelete