Saturday, November 03, 2012

Blind Item #1

This married A+ list movie actress let it be known at an event yesterday that she is open to a new relationship because she is bored with her celebrity husband. Our actress turned on every bit of acting knowledge she has ever showed and flirted non-stop with a man approaching billionaire status. When she was asked about her kid(s) she said that is what boarding schools are for and he would never have to worry about seeing them.


63 comments:

  1. JULIA ROBERTS!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Julia's husband is not a celebrity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. He has an imdb page, that's good enough for me!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @seaward lol so does a girl I went to highschool with who did an episode of law and Order

      Delete
    2. katsm0711 BOOM celebrity

      Delete
    3. My husband has an IMDB too, from doing the music for a minor indie movie in Aust. Clearly we'll have to make some lifestyle changes commensurate with his celebrity status. He'll have to get himself some (new) perversions, and I'll have to start coming onto billionaires. Excellent.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous9:20 AM

    A list movie actress with a celebrity husband..... Kidman seems to fit for sure... Roberts wouldn't becuz her guy is a cameraman.... Kidman makes the most sense to me so far.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Kidman's kids are too young for boarding school...but I dont really have a better guess :(

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'll go with Kidman too. I can see Keith being boring when he's not drugged and liquored up. Though she's not the life of the party either, so she needs to stop if it's her. Would explain why she never seemed too broken up about not being able to see her other kids.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So... what event happened last night?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Helena Bonham Carter.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Catherine Zeta?? I can picture her saying that. Maybe her acting is so good that it's hard to tell what kind of person she is.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Maybe it was the hurricane Sandy benefit?

    ReplyDelete
  11. "The event" perhaps CMA related? Her kids are coming up on school age, which should require lots if parental involvement. :(

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kidman would be stupid to leave Keith Urban. I think he is just precious.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't think it's Kidman. I can't see her wanting to leave her hubby because of the PR backlash. Same deal with Gwinnie.

    I like the CZJ guess, but not entirely sold on her either.

    ReplyDelete
  14. kidman was at a horse race in Australia on Friday.ALONE
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2227203/George-Calombaris-Celebrity-chef-rushes-Nicole-Kidmans-aid-suffers-shoe-malfunction.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I went to the store a few hours ago. Without my husband. Stop the presses!

      Delete
  15. Good detective work, FrenchGirl!

    What about Angie? Her kids are approaching boarding-school age.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Nutty...
    Angie isn't married

    ReplyDelete
  17. @ seaward : I have the most awkward IMDB page ever and I m surely not famous :-)

    ReplyDelete
  18. @kats...good call w/ thw Sandy benefit

    @master of the house...I love love love the "find X" image! I pulled it from an email many years ago and have used it as my computer log-in image ever since because it makes me laugh every time I see it. I figure that is the best way to start the work day! It's the little things.... :-)

    ReplyDelete
  19. If you're talking about the NBC benefit - there were no A+ movie actresses - the only women that I recall were Christina Aguliara (sp?) and Whoopie Goldberg. Oh yeah, Mary Blige. that's all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SusanB That was one of the worst hours ...

      Delete
  20. I like your guess, Jane3113. but GP must have been very tipsy to slip up and speak that way... I'm going with the GOOPSTER!

    ReplyDelete
  21. CZJ. She may be off her meds, but I can see her saying this. She hasn't been getting any attention lately and would do anything to get some.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Doesn't A+ mean they could open a movie based on their name? It seems to point to Nic Kidman, but I think she's smart enough to know that her marriage to Keith is what people like best about her at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Kate Beckinsale? Kate Winslet? Jennifer Connelly? I don't know but maybe throwing out some different names will help steer someone else's brain to the right answer.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Kidman is a good guess. Remember, she was cynical enough to be Tom Cruise's beard for almost 10 years.

    I'd say Paltrow is a good guess, too - everything she does is for show, she was quite the player in her younger days, and I can see her being so sufficiently dissatisfied with her marriage and her kids that she'd chuck them all, albeit secretly, in favor of some billionaire. She ain't getting any younger, either.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The only thing against Kidman is her kids are too young. Otherwise this would be her. Remember that blind about the actress who smiled and smiled in front of the cameras and as soon as the lights were off she handed them to the nanny saying get them away from me. Everyone speculated that was Kidman.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Agent*it - I don't know, I liked part of it - "Under the Boardwalk" - I watched mainly to see Billy Joel. Thought Sting and Steven Tyler (!) were good too. Didn't seem to be as in-your-face asking for money. But yeah, I didn't care for some of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susan B, Oh, I couldn't bear it. Maybe the too often site Of Matt L's face ruined it for me But geez, they looked like they were ready to croak !

      Delete
  27. Salma Hayek? The billionaire thing convinces me.
    No idea how old her kid is, so could be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'd like to think that with her struggle to have children and how miserable she was with TC for all those years, it's not NK.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I just dont see kidman flirty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It says celebrity husband. Not actor or singer. I seriously doubt it's NK.

      Delete
  30. Who is either shitty enough to say, "that's what boarding schools are for" -- OR, has adolescent kids, when boarding them is more common and accepted?

    I think CZJ sounds like a yes in both categories.


    ReplyDelete
  31. Michael Douglas is an actor not a celeb.

    Salma has already hooked a billionaire and her husband is a businessman and not truly a celeb.

    That's if Enty is using correct titles.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Reese Witherspoon?

    @FrenchGirl, the horse race Nicole is at isn't just a horse race. We have a huge racing carnival leading up to the Melbourne Cup. It is called "the race that stops a nation". I am having Tuesday off work to attend a Melbourne Cup luncheon - hotels, pubs, clubs, private homes all have gatherings. It is a wonderful chance to get dressed up. When I was at TAFE classes stopped so we could watch the race. I've never been to the race in person, but one day maybe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @feraltart lol horse race. Oh let @FrenchGirl off. The rest of the world let alone people in France definitely aren't as besotted in our affairs as we are with theirs. Unfortunately, I have no luncheon to attend but our office will definitely have a sweepstake and have the radio on at 3pm. Good luck if you have a bet on!

      Delete
  33. If you move this back a bit in time, I would say Kate Winslet fits the bill.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Gwyneth Paltrow and the "approaching billionaire status" guy is Jay Z! Lol, she's been trying to convince us she's "real" for a minute. BFFs with Beyonce, rapping on tv, talking about how she listens to Rick Ross and French Montana in the car.
    Gwennie is ready to tap that urban market.

    ReplyDelete
  35. if you are A+, don't you have a few million? seems like after a certain amount of money; what's the difference??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @me:
      The difference is owning a private jet or a yacht or a 50 room mansion instead of renting them or being invited to them. The 1% covers a VERY wide array of wealth.

      Delete
    2. @me:
      The difference is owning a private jet or a yacht or a 50 room mansion instead of renting them or being invited to them. The 1% covers a VERY wide array of wealth.

      Delete
    3. It does indeed. I am the one percent according to the Democrats but I am working two jobs because we still need that to make ends meet between mortgage, tuition, Childcare, etc. We buy our clothes on eBay and drive used paid-for cars. It's not what you'd think.

      Delete
  36. Anonymous1:35 PM

    Again. This is sad. I went to a posh private school and some of the girls were there all year long! I heard they stopped the practice. Holidays. Stuck in the school. Boarding schools! Yuck.

    ReplyDelete
  37. @Agent**It, totally agree about Lauer. I thought it was going to be Brian Williams and Jon Stewart and when I saw him it was just UGH. Insincerity just oozes out of him.

    Most of the rest of it was okay. I had already donated to the Red Cross, but if I hadn't already I would have been tempted to call and ask how much to get Matt Lauer off my screen.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I still like Kidman and believe she was truly in love with Tom and he used her or maybe he changed after he got in deep with COS so I don't think this is her.

    I'm going with Goopy, Chris Martin is a celebrity but certainly not a billionaire and to keep up with the Carter's (Jay z and Beyowolf) she needs a billionaire! I mean how is she going to own her own basketball team and stadium with what Chris earns? The poor girl!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Kidman checked out boarding schools in Nashville before Sunday was even 2 yrs old. Just saying. The kids are a prop to her. She could take them or leave them. They were just to make her look like the every woman and not the Ice Queen she is. As well as to deflect questions of her fertility after Suri was born.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Kidman was at Derby Day yesterday

    ReplyDelete
  41. I don't get all the love for Kidman. Must be her PRs infiltrating the site. There has been much speculation about her even carrying Sunday Roast. The kids are definitely just props to her.

    I can see this being her.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Penelope Cruz? Maybe she's bored of Javier's cheating and wants to catch a billionaire, just like her friend Salma.

    ReplyDelete
  43. As snobby and clueless as Goopy is, I really think she loves and adores her kids. I don't think this would be her at all. I don't think it's Nicole either, but then again, I got nothing on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I'm going with Julia Roberts on this. Her husband became a celebrity through marrying her, along with the scandalous reporting on how they came to be a couple. Let's not forget that she's cheated atleast once with Javier Bardem. She's known to be a cold fish to deal with unless you're a power-player, then she poors on the America's Sweetheart schtick.

    ReplyDelete
  45. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I have a strong suspicion this was joking banter after an introduction at an event to lighten the mood, and no one took the comments seriously, but it's been turned into Blind Item fodder.

    "That's what boarding schools are for," was likely a punchline.

    Which actresses with kids have witty off-the-cuff comments like Emma Stone or Jennifer Lawrence?

    ReplyDelete
  47. "That's what boarding schools are for" is the line Victoria Beckham (at the time Posh Spice) says in that Spiceworld movie.

    ReplyDelete
  48. KATE WINSLET

    BOARDING SCHOOL IN ENGLAND

    ReplyDelete
  49. i dont know why but dangnabbit i just love nicole kidman *ducks behind couch* and i refuse to believe anything bad about her *covers ears* la la la la la la

    ReplyDelete