Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Blind Item #7

Don't believe the hype. For their to be another installment of this former television show turned movie franchise, the lead actress, who is an A- lister would want to be aid more than any other actress in history by a wide margin. As much as the other stars would do it for $1M, our actress would want about $50M between salary and box office and that isn't going to happen.


21 comments:

  1. Tricia131:32 AM

    Pryanka Chopra/Baywatch?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tricia131:35 AM

    Didn't that crap bomb? Man she has cajones (if it's her)

    ReplyDelete
  3. casting girl1:38 AM

    SJP

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tricia131:42 AM

    That makes more sense -Enty seems really down on SJP-- I be never known/thought her to be like that

    ReplyDelete
  5. Patreeki2:18 AM

    Lol. Is there any demand for a film featuring 4 long over-the-hill broads pretending they're a third of their age?

    ReplyDelete
  6. mariaj2:21 AM

    SJP ...surprised that the movies had that sucess, frankly

    ReplyDelete
  7. sandybrook2:33 AM

    SJP doesn't have the chops to be paid that much for a movie that will bomb. And who wrote this BI? Kindergarten Enty maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "for their, from a JD?

    ReplyDelete
  9. hothotheat3:03 AM

    Baywatch movies not really a franchise yet.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought I posted on this blind.
    Oh, well.
    I'm guessing JLaw and her Mystique character.

    Maybe it was another blind item.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sexagenarians and the City!

    ReplyDelete
  12. just sayin\'5:17 AM

    sounds like baywatch/chopra to me.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Tricia136:42 AM

    Hopefully it won't be !

    ReplyDelete
  14. Farmgirl7:33 AM

    Hasn't there been some Charlie's Angels discussion lately?

    ReplyDelete
  15. SnarkIsFun8:04 AM

    I could be WAY off, but . . . Gal Gadot and Wonder Woman 2? (Although IMHO, she would deserve that kind of $$, especially as the 1st movie has passed $750,000,000 worldwide, hasn't it?)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Renshaw8:34 AM

    +1. Who knows if she is making bonus or back end money from he film. If not, $25M retroactively and $25M for the next considering it will be just as successful. I'm not buying his narrative she wants to be paid more than any woman. There is a public backlash that the male superheroes are making millions, why not her.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Cherry8:54 AM

    Jennifer Aniston

    ReplyDelete
  18. texasrose1:28 PM

    Might agree with you if not for the clue that 'the others would do it for $1million'. Clearly referencing the other 3 from Sex inthe City. This is SJP.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Camal192:51 AM

    When SJP offers completely dry up, because she's already in her 50's, that's when she'll want to do another sequel. She'll be begging them.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hot Cola11:54 AM

    Calling them over the hill is just m an. Tebr are many woman sucseesful at thiere 40's,50', 60's. Judges. Congresswoam. Hilery Clinton was a presidential candidate in her 70's. So shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  21. D. Albertson4:15 AM

    "For their to be another installment"

    You'll slam any spelling error on this site but everyone's going to just let that go?

    ReplyDelete