Thursday, May 17, 2018

Blind Item #3

Three out of the four invited of this former A list group have slept with the groom. Two of the four have slept with the groom's brother.


55 comments:

  1. The Spice Girls/ Prince Harry and Willian

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Spice Girls.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you wanna be my lover you gotta get with my friends

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wait, arent there 5 members of the spice girls?


    ReplyDelete
  5. But I thought all 5 spice girls were invited...?

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/celebrity-news/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-have-only-invited-three-spice-girls-to-the-royal-wedding-a3841736.html%3famp

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was thinking the Saturdays. The Spice Girls are pretty old for H&W.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Saturdays. One is a former Miss England (or a contestant) and one is married to a PL footballer (and she was super wild pre-marriage).

      Delete
  8. Anonymous7:15 AM

    Oh well, its just adds to the list of dysfunction that is Harry and Meghan. The Queen must be clutching her pearls right about now. This Royal wedding is one big hot mess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haven't the Royal Family and others of its Ilk always been full of dysfunction?

      Delete
  9. This wedding is the epitome of why Brits think we are all trash in the U.S. I mean her half sister can't STFU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who the Fuck cares what a few entitled, inbred, pasty white looking asshats with fucked up teeth that live on some tiny little island care about a country or people that have, can, and will beat their puny ass back to the stone age anytime/anywhere.

      Fuck the British and their uppity attitude !!!!

      Delete
    2. Can ANYONE name one thing that this dysfunctional inbred brood of a family has ever contributed to the human race? Granted, they and the Kentucky derby keep the hat industry alive... but is that any real reason to grovel on your knees at their feet?

      Delete
    3. I'm British and if you Americans still view us all as the cast of 'Four Weddings and a Funeral' you are very much mistaken....as for our teeth well that again is a very old fashioned view. Just saying....

      Delete
    4. Ok... what about the inbreeding? Any thoughts on that?

      Delete
    5. The Royals are inbred. It has been going on for generations so I won't argue with that. Most of us couldn't really care less about the wedding over here. We are force fed it but all in all to us everyday folks it's no big deal....

      Delete
  10. And to think, Daily Mail readers thought Kate was a step down for the Royals. I may sit on that site all day Saturday, just reading their exclamations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:58 AM

      90% of DM readers are miserable lives

      Delete
    2. And the other 10% of us are content lapping up the spilt tea to prepare for enty’s blinds.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous1:03 PM

      At least we do something. Brainstorming hahaha

      Delete
  11. The half sister's clearly crazy, it's not M+Hs fault

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I would assume Victoria Beckham is the exception. She's been producing offspring with David since the late 1990s, when William was still under 18 and Harry was under 16. Baby, GInger, and Sporty have all been single for a few years in the 2000s.

    It seems Scary Spice was the only one not invited. Where are our RACISM!!!!! trolls now?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Not according to Page Six - which also says Sporty was left off the list.

    What I find more interesting is that a lot of Royals were not invited. That's going to be a fun conversation at future family gatherings.

    Interesting article in the Telegraph today about how American brides have always had difficulty being accepted by the British toffs.

    "How the aristocracy shunned the transatlantic 'dollar princesses' who came before Meghan"

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wasn't there a rumour that pink hooked up with one of the brothers back in the day?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Now we know what Zig-ah-Zig-ah means.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The daily mail is trying to stir up trouble about minor members of the royal family not being invited to their wedding, it's not a state occasion like Williams wedding so he's not inviting those he's not close to.
    They are his grandmother's cousins children and grandchildren hardly close family especially when Charles has tried streamlining the royal for year's.
    I don't get some of the celebrities though Cordon the Clooney's Beckham's and Spice girls, but it's their wedding and can invite who they want no matter what anyone else thinks.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Leanne Norman, some of the people he has not invited grew up with him at Kensington Palace. They may not be his besties, but they're hardly strangers.

    What I think is odder is that very few people in Royal circles seem to have met Meghan. Some of the long-serving palace courtiers said they'd yet to be introduced to her, which is awkward with the wedding in two days.

    That's Harry's fault, not hers.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Groom's half-brother.

    ReplyDelete
  20. IMO some of those not invited despite not growing up with them, etc are Instagram models, etc and likely to turn their private corner of the big day int "all about them" as well as posting pictures of themselves with other famous people who do not court publicity in their lives.
    I have to say that if it was my wedding (and I was a big cheese of some sort LOL) I probably wouldn't want them either, because chances are that they would be profiting off of it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Weren't the Spice Girls way, way older than Harry and William when they were at their peak and H & W were little kids idolizing them? That would be very odd.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm extremely offended that Andrew Dice Clay and/or Morton Downey Jr. wasn't invited to give a toast!! Oh well, to each their own I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  23. well, Morton's been dead for years, so he has an excuse.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Are those little mix girls invited to he wedding?

    ReplyDelete
  25. @ J F

    Who grovels?

    As long as Queen Liz continues, I see the point of the monarchy. She drove ambulances and worked in truck factories during WW2. The family stayed in London through all the bombings. She paid for her wedding dress with ration tickets. As a symbol, she is like none other.

    After she goes (bless her), I think the British royals are going to normalize into being more like an average family, like the royals of Sweden, Denmark, Spain. It's already starting to turn that way and they will all probably breathe a sigh of relief when it's completely accomplished.

    Imagine Buckingham Palace as a museum. That's probably going to happen in the not too distant future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool, cool, cool ... so she did what millions of average people do throughout the world every single day. That IS impressive!! I'll give her credit as a good person and a strong matriarch of her dysfunctional family... but she's no Mother Teresa either.

      I say we need a pay per view special of the royal family and the Kartrashians in a cage fight to the death after she is gone.

      Except for Prince Andrew... he still has a debt to pay for his paedophilia in the salt mines of remote Africa

      Delete
    2. Sorry but Spain is not an average royal family. They still have state power.

      Delete
  26. Thats doin it for the monarchy!;)

    ReplyDelete
  27. @plot

    I don't think the British press will allow the British royals to "normalize."

    It's a very big business, and because English is now an international language, it's an international business.

    Both the Daily Mail and the Guardian are now read all over the English-speaking world, and the former in particular generates a lot of traffic from royal scandals.

    Not as much demand for Danish-language coverage about the Danish royal scandals - and they have had just as many. (Former princess Alexandra, the first Asian to marry into a European Royal Family, has been dumped and is hella bitter.)

    ReplyDelete
  28. "so she did what millions of average people do throughout the world every single day"

    Millions of people every day choose to stay in war zones?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ya are you really that ignorant beyond your own front yard?

      Lemme see... hmm
      Congo
      Yemen
      Afganistan
      Syria
      Lebanon
      Iraq
      Pakistan
      Chechnya
      Ukraine
      Etc, etc, etc....

      That's just a start... I got bored at thinking on this so stopped there.

      @plot "You can't cure Stupid" is REAL!!

      Delete
  29. Thinking the author of this BS BI thinks its the Spice Girls but it's a much younger group.

    ReplyDelete
  30. As long as Queen Liz continues, I see the point of the monarchy. She drove ambulances and worked in truck factories during WW2. The family stayed in London through all the bombings. She paid for her wedding dress with ration tickets. As a symbol, she is like none other.


    Elizabeth and Margaret stayed at Windsor Castle during the war. King George and Queen Elizabeth (later the queen mother) stayed behind in London. QE might have paid for her wedding gown with ration tickets, but while the country was using ration books to get their fair share of eggs, meat, sugar, etc.) the royal family was eating and drinking sumptuously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point... while everybody else was using ration for survival she was buying wedding dresses with it...

      Proves my point of their entitled elitist attitude.

      Put all the royal crap in a museum, but the immediate 1st generation relatives of the queen in a decent house with a decent pension and maybe a driver and security detail and the others can join the rest of the 21st century where people have to work for a living!!!

      Delete
    2. Ohh... and a free dental plan

      Delete
  31. @J F

    Millions of people are subjected to war zones. How many choose to stay inside it? Refugee camps all over the world say not that many.

    ReplyDelete
  32. @J F The Royals have their own private residences that they own -
    Sandringham, Balmoral Castle, Craigowan Lodge, Delnadamph Lodge, Birkhall to name a few. The Royal family handed back properties such as Buckingham Castle, Windsor Castle, Kensington Palace and Clarence House to the Government a couple of centuries ago and the Government maintains the properties through revenue from taxes, paid visitors etc. The Queen through the Duchy of Lancaster and the Prince of Wales through the Duchy of Cornwall estates pay for their own expenses for their families such as wages, maintenance of private properties, clothing, food, health, *dental* etc. Their personal wealth through investments, art, jewellery is probably not really measurable as some of the pieces are many centuries old. The revenue the Royals bring in for their official engagements in terms of stimulating the English economy in such things as the car and fashion industry would be difficult to estimate. Personally I would tell the public and the Government to f*** off, live in the private residences living off the investments of the estates and personal wealth they own. The Royals can never make the public and media happy. When both Princes William and Harry were working full time, they were publicly shamed for not doing enough public engagements. When they quit their jobs to become full time Royals, they are publicly shamed for not working. Maybe when the Queen passes, then they may refuse to continue to be a public Monarchy and live their lives as they wish - I hope so for their sakes.

    ReplyDelete
  33. JF Queen Elizabeth according to this poll is the 6th most admired person in the world, President Trump is only the 30th most admired person.

    Plenty of nations have successful constitutional monarchies, including Japan, Sweden, the Netherlands and Spain and of course New Zealand, Canada and Australia share a monarch with the British royal family
    https://yougov.co.uk/news/2018/04/11/worlds-most-admired-2018/

    ReplyDelete