Friday, August 31, 2018

Blind Item #9

Word is that this foreign born A+ list celebrity is pregnant/using a surrogate again (whichever version to which you think she subscribes) because it gets her out of the boring things and allows her to pick and choose the fun things she wants to attend.


47 comments:

  1. More royal kids. Cocaine dealers fifteen years from now will be grateful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel like this goes back to the Eugenie wedding blind... there's apparently speculation about whether or not Kate will attend because she has a super long maternity leave and can cherry pick what she wants to attend during that period

    ReplyDelete
  3. Given that Kate had such extreme morning sickness with the first, and then POPPED TWO MORE OUT, a surrogate makes sense. If I'd been hospitalized and dehydrated from throwing up all day for months on end, my child would not have had a sibling. But if she shows up "pregnant" again, then surrogate it has got to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She had hypermesis gravidium with all of them. That's how we knew/found out she was pregnant.

      I have been pregnant 5 times and each time I have had HG too. Hospitalization each time. I only have 2 children now because of miscarriages but I wanted 2 children so I had 2 children.

      What you said is a bit silly.

      Labour really bloody hurts - why would any woman go and have another 6 kids?? She definitely carried those children because Queenie wouldn't have it any other way. Also, William could get the snip. He has 3 heirs.

      Delete
    2. @Katie, so sorry to hear about your struggles. Happy to know that you do have two children—whom I’m sure are absolutely loved—but very sorry for the pain that your losses must have caused.

      Delete
  4. Hey if you can afford it, why not use a surrogate? Do you think any man would willingly carry a child if he could pay someone else to do it? Dodging the hemorrhoids alone would make it worth it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kate had a very difficult time with pregnancy. She has a very rare condition which causes severe vomiting. An allergy to the hormone. If she wants to use a surrogate, I can understand why. I don't blame her. It's just sad that she has to keep it under wraps. Maybe it's because people would judge her...:::mirror:::

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ooh. Kate is beating Markle to pregnancy. I wonder if that will cause a riff or if the royal family is just happy that there's less chance of Harry & Meghan touching the throne if Kate has more boys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unless you're predicting tragedy of epic proportion, you do realize that MeMe and Mr Markle will never ascend the throne, right?

      Delete
    2. @Turtle The baby's gender doesn't matter anymore. Just birth order. New law.

      Delete
    3. MM was told years ago that she couldn’t get pregnant, even with IVF. Meanwhile, she is now older and much thinner (and lying about her age) and, whether or not she is doing drugs as reported, it’s very unlikely that she could conceive. I’ve always thought that if she does ‘get pregnant’ it would be through using Amal’s surrogate.

      Kate doesn’t give a fuck about MM possibly getting pregnant.

      Delete
  7. Kate has looked pregnant every time. Think again.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Brayson87 no way. Nothing tests enough for mental issues, history of addiction in a family, etc. Understandable if there is no other way.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This blind is idiotic. Kate has looked pregnant every time and the last one is just a few months old.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No stinking way would the Windsors allow one of those royal ankle biters to travel through the birth canal of a plebe.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Is the "surrogate" reference a nod to the pathetic losers who think that every thin female celebrity is a secret Tranny from childhood?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  12. @Unknown, pretty sure the vast majority of drug-addled mental case "winners" came through the "natural" way, I'd throw my money down on super science any day. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Princess Charlene, Monaco... much to the disdain of Princess Caroline

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ok so she's wants another kid and she can afford it ...problem ?

    ReplyDelete
  15. So is this part of the CDAN game--some blinds are real and some are fake?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Apparently the royal cousins do not care for Kate, so this is not surprising, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wouldn't Kate be A++ (and maybe 'all of you know' too?)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Amal that is a good guess.

    ReplyDelete
  19. absolutely nothing wrong with using a surrogate

    ReplyDelete
  20. Amal Clooney? Would she be A+ by association?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous2:53 PM

    Already? I guess what William wants, William gets... Regardless of Kate's health? smdh

    ReplyDelete
  22. Honestly, the more I hear about being a royal, the more I wouldn't blame her for doing this. It sounds boring and lonely. I still think Harry married Markle super fast because both his previous girlfriends ran once they got a taste of royal life.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous3:26 PM

    I like Kate. I think that she and William (and yes, their nannies) are doing a great job with
    their children. Louis is four months old!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Nobody thinks Kate Middleton has ever used a surrogate. You can't possibly fake how puffy she gets when she's pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The Rules were changed in the UK, and females can now ascend to the throne, not just males.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean like the current Queen, Elizabeth?

      Delete
  26. Oh for crying out loud MeMe, stop with the leaks. The way I see it, Kate needs to have quite a few more to neutralize the most recent (adult) royal addition.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I’m with the Amal guess. Kate no way.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Give me a break. Kate Middleton was pregnant. Honestly, who comes up with this "surrogacy" nonsense?

    ReplyDelete
  29. That HG stuff is no joke. I'd tie my tubes if i had that reaction.

    ReplyDelete
  30. No shame in using a surrogate.

    Just because someone looks pregnant does not mean they are. Some people gain weight. Some people use moonbumps and take steroids to make their facial features change the way a pregnant woman's would (broader nose).

    http://www.moonbump.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, but no. BeyoncĂ© was clearly not pregnant the first time, and there’s no way that Angelina was pregnant with twins. Wish I could post pics here, because it’s so obvious (i.e., Beyonce’s ‘Baby Bump’ falling out on live TV, but go ahead & believe what you want.

      Delete
  31. Every single member of the royal family could be abducted by aliens and Harry and his lovely wife WILL NEVER GAIN THE THRONE!!! Why do you think they let him marry her? He doesn't really count as a royal baby.

    ReplyDelete
  32. You can forget about Kate for this one, there is an official birth watcher.

    An old obscure law dating from the 16th century states unless a member of the privy council is present at the birth making sure that the wife of a direct male heir or direct line female heir to the throne actually pops the child out herself the child will be deemed ineligible for the throne and they have to sign off on it under oath. There are about 800plus privy councillors, scores of them are medical doctors.

    Sounds like an Entern made this one up unless Amal is the subject of this blind.

    ReplyDelete
  33. You'd have to be completely retarded to believe that Kate wasn't really pregnant all 3 times.
    This site is overrun by a bunch of looney tunes.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Duchess Catherine has said that she wanted 6 children but William had enough after 2 so I doubt she will be having any more.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Four kids sounds like a good compromise, and it conveniently matches Queen Elizabeth's output.

    Four is enough so there's always an excuse to leave someone at home when they travel. George is at boarding school, Louis has a sore throat, etc.

    In these days of suicidal pilots, acid attacks, and car bombers, that's only prudent.

    ReplyDelete