Word is that this foreign born A+ list celebrity is pregnant/using a surrogate again (whichever version to which you think she subscribes) because it gets her out of the boring things and allows her to pick and choose the fun things she wants to attend.
Kate Middleton
ReplyDeleteMore royal kids. Cocaine dealers fifteen years from now will be grateful.
ReplyDeleteBrilliant comment.
DeleteI feel like this goes back to the Eugenie wedding blind... there's apparently speculation about whether or not Kate will attend because she has a super long maternity leave and can cherry pick what she wants to attend during that period
ReplyDeleteGiven that Kate had such extreme morning sickness with the first, and then POPPED TWO MORE OUT, a surrogate makes sense. If I'd been hospitalized and dehydrated from throwing up all day for months on end, my child would not have had a sibling. But if she shows up "pregnant" again, then surrogate it has got to be.
ReplyDeleteShe had hypermesis gravidium with all of them. That's how we knew/found out she was pregnant.
DeleteI have been pregnant 5 times and each time I have had HG too. Hospitalization each time. I only have 2 children now because of miscarriages but I wanted 2 children so I had 2 children.
What you said is a bit silly.
Labour really bloody hurts - why would any woman go and have another 6 kids?? She definitely carried those children because Queenie wouldn't have it any other way. Also, William could get the snip. He has 3 heirs.
@Katie, so sorry to hear about your struggles. Happy to know that you do have two children—whom I’m sure are absolutely loved—but very sorry for the pain that your losses must have caused.
DeleteHey if you can afford it, why not use a surrogate? Do you think any man would willingly carry a child if he could pay someone else to do it? Dodging the hemorrhoids alone would make it worth it.
ReplyDeleteKate had a very difficult time with pregnancy. She has a very rare condition which causes severe vomiting. An allergy to the hormone. If she wants to use a surrogate, I can understand why. I don't blame her. It's just sad that she has to keep it under wraps. Maybe it's because people would judge her...:::mirror:::
ReplyDeleteOoh. Kate is beating Markle to pregnancy. I wonder if that will cause a riff or if the royal family is just happy that there's less chance of Harry & Meghan touching the throne if Kate has more boys.
ReplyDeleteUnless you're predicting tragedy of epic proportion, you do realize that MeMe and Mr Markle will never ascend the throne, right?
Delete@Turtle The baby's gender doesn't matter anymore. Just birth order. New law.
DeleteMM was told years ago that she couldn’t get pregnant, even with IVF. Meanwhile, she is now older and much thinner (and lying about her age) and, whether or not she is doing drugs as reported, it’s very unlikely that she could conceive. I’ve always thought that if she does ‘get pregnant’ it would be through using Amal’s surrogate.
DeleteKate doesn’t give a fuck about MM possibly getting pregnant.
Kate has looked pregnant every time. Think again.
ReplyDelete@Brayson87 no way. Nothing tests enough for mental issues, history of addiction in a family, etc. Understandable if there is no other way.
ReplyDeleteThis blind is idiotic. Kate has looked pregnant every time and the last one is just a few months old.
ReplyDeleteNo stinking way would the Windsors allow one of those royal ankle biters to travel through the birth canal of a plebe.
ReplyDeleteIs the "surrogate" reference a nod to the pathetic losers who think that every thin female celebrity is a secret Tranny from childhood?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete@Unknown, pretty sure the vast majority of drug-addled mental case "winners" came through the "natural" way, I'd throw my money down on super science any day. ;)
ReplyDeletePrincess Charlene, Monaco... much to the disdain of Princess Caroline
ReplyDeleteOk so she's wants another kid and she can afford it ...problem ?
ReplyDeleteAmal Clooney?
ReplyDeleteSo is this part of the CDAN game--some blinds are real and some are fake?
ReplyDeleteApparently the royal cousins do not care for Kate, so this is not surprising, I guess.
ReplyDeleteWouldn't Kate be A++ (and maybe 'all of you know' too?)
ReplyDeleteAmal that is a good guess.
ReplyDeleteabsolutely nothing wrong with using a surrogate
ReplyDeleteAmal Clooney? Would she be A+ by association?
ReplyDeleteAlready? I guess what William wants, William gets... Regardless of Kate's health? smdh
ReplyDeleteHonestly, the more I hear about being a royal, the more I wouldn't blame her for doing this. It sounds boring and lonely. I still think Harry married Markle super fast because both his previous girlfriends ran once they got a taste of royal life.
ReplyDeleteI like Kate. I think that she and William (and yes, their nannies) are doing a great job with
ReplyDeletetheir children. Louis is four months old!
Nobody thinks Kate Middleton has ever used a surrogate. You can't possibly fake how puffy she gets when she's pregnant.
ReplyDeleteThe Rules were changed in the UK, and females can now ascend to the throne, not just males.
ReplyDeleteYou mean like the current Queen, Elizabeth?
DeleteOh for crying out loud MeMe, stop with the leaks. The way I see it, Kate needs to have quite a few more to neutralize the most recent (adult) royal addition.
ReplyDeleteI’m with the Amal guess. Kate no way.
ReplyDeleteGive me a break. Kate Middleton was pregnant. Honestly, who comes up with this "surrogacy" nonsense?
ReplyDeleteEnty does!
ReplyDeleteThat HG stuff is no joke. I'd tie my tubes if i had that reaction.
ReplyDeleteNo shame in using a surrogate.
ReplyDeleteJust because someone looks pregnant does not mean they are. Some people gain weight. Some people use moonbumps and take steroids to make their facial features change the way a pregnant woman's would (broader nose).
http://www.moonbump.com/
Yeah, but no. BeyoncĂ© was clearly not pregnant the first time, and there’s no way that Angelina was pregnant with twins. Wish I could post pics here, because it’s so obvious (i.e., Beyonce’s ‘Baby Bump’ falling out on live TV, but go ahead & believe what you want.
DeleteEvery single member of the royal family could be abducted by aliens and Harry and his lovely wife WILL NEVER GAIN THE THRONE!!! Why do you think they let him marry her? He doesn't really count as a royal baby.
ReplyDeleteYou can forget about Kate for this one, there is an official birth watcher.
ReplyDeleteAn old obscure law dating from the 16th century states unless a member of the privy council is present at the birth making sure that the wife of a direct male heir or direct line female heir to the throne actually pops the child out herself the child will be deemed ineligible for the throne and they have to sign off on it under oath. There are about 800plus privy councillors, scores of them are medical doctors.
Sounds like an Entern made this one up unless Amal is the subject of this blind.
You'd have to be completely retarded to believe that Kate wasn't really pregnant all 3 times.
ReplyDeleteThis site is overrun by a bunch of looney tunes.
Duchess Catherine has said that she wanted 6 children but William had enough after 2 so I doubt she will be having any more.
ReplyDeleteFour kids sounds like a good compromise, and it conveniently matches Queen Elizabeth's output.
ReplyDeleteFour is enough so there's always an excuse to leave someone at home when they travel. George is at boarding school, Louis has a sore throat, etc.
In these days of suicidal pilots, acid attacks, and car bombers, that's only prudent.