Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Today's Blind Items - She Is Not Letting Go

She is foreign born. Probably B- list in her own country, she is relatively unknown here. She is probably the most calculating person you will ever meet though. She set her sights on this other foreign born B list actor on a hit network television show and she got him. The fact that she had to trash the other women our actor was seeing at the same time as her doesn't matter to her. She trashed their reputations, sold stories about them to the tabloids and made sure she was the one her boyfriend picked. There was no way she was making the same mistake she made earlier in her life when she last had a chance at a big star. he was an A list all movie actor at the time and she kept him strung out out on booze, drugs and keeping him away from everyone who would ever say anything bad about her. She hooked him, but later he got out of it on a technicality and she ended up with nothing except a miscarriage. Throughout the intervening years she has tried and tried but has not been able to snag anyone else as famous until now and she does not plan on letting go. I feel so sorry for that waitress who gave the actor an extra long stare and made small talk with him because she will probably get fired to keep her away from the actor.

1,688 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1401 – 1600 of 1688   Newer›   Newest»
BBB said...

Christine? Like The Christine?

"HOW DO YOU KILL SOMETHING THAT CAN’T POSSIBLY BE ALIVE?
She was born bad. Plain and simple.
Somewhere deep on a darkened assembly line.
Christine. A ’58 Plymouth Fury possessed by Hell.
She’s taken control of her teenage owner, Arnie.
Her previous owner is not alive to warn him.
And now she’s steering straight for
the one person in her way.
Arnie’s girlfriend, Leigh.
The other woman."

Run Jamie run!

p.s: No worries Christine, I copy&paste the lyrics while I was brushing my teeth last night.

AgonyAunt said...

Hey BaBBy!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. Another evil car meme! First there was Green Carmen Ghia (GCG). Now we get "Christine" (CRH). As in "Hell Hath No RED '58 FURY...". (There was another Christine who kicked up a fury recently...Hmmmmm.) Why-oh-why does the evil-satanic-coven-cunt-cabal wanna take me out with a classic car??? Is it a testosterone thing? Or a harlequin thing? Mebbe the ILLUMINATI simply likes the aesthetic of using a vintage automobile as a deadly weapon??? Cuz red-scarves and door-knobs are so passe...

If you aim to take me out with a classic car, please use a '69 GTO convertible (preferably green) or a '77 280Z (light blue, tan top). Manual. Double-clutch to downshift the Z. Heaven on earth.

TYSM

AgonyAunt said...

Hey Snoozle. See my post above? The one about Dornan in LA on 10/4. Interesting, non? What do YOU see Snooze. Cuz you SEE more than anyone...

AgonyAunt said...

Oh hush Assy-hole. The only sycophant on this thread is YOU. I reckon merciless bashing didn't work. So shameless ego stroking is the next tool in the shed. After that try to separate kindred-spirits. It's like a fucking paint-by-numbers approach to MK Ultra conditioning. Just goes to show the coven-cunts aren't using their BEST. It's really SO tedious. The symbols are TOO easy to spot. And the messaging is a blunt instrument. Where's the subtle jabs? The deft riposte? The butterfly wings fluttering in the sun to draw attention?

Why do the pesky flies ignore the honeypot?

Anonymous said...

Oh, sigh here we go again. Once again Dornan is saying that he wishes the 50 fans gone. Wow talking about biting the hand that fed him. I just don't get it. Dornan is a mediocre actor at best, unless y'all find that constipated look he has going on sexy. But he tried out for the role of Christian twice, he knew what the books were about, he knew what the script was, and he said yes. Why, because no matter how you spin it, he craved the fame and the fortune. Yet as soon as its over he tries to act like he was too good for it. Yes, I get he may be embarrassed, but he did not walk into that role blindly, nor did anyone who encouraged him to take the role. All parties involved wanted one thing....fame! And if it wasn't for Fifty, Jamie would still probably starring in BBC television shows, where he just has to look crazy, with very little talking. So he may want to act a little more humble. He is exactly starring in block busters afterwards. And the one he is going to be in rumor has it he has hardly any screen time. Where's Mz. Millie when you need her to tell him to shut the F up, because once the hoopla surrounding Dornan dies down, he is going to have to get work relying on his talent, and from what I've seen so far, Jamie has very little depth when it comes to acting. Someone has to pay for those pink couches and wrinkled clothes they wear. I feel like I'm watching the same version in ever part he plays, just with a different accent.

AgonyAunt said...

OH BRAVO Sandy-pants. I'd almost given-up on you. Nice comeback. An honest view of the current saga. Strap-on the lie-detector hon. Cuz we are sorely in need of TRUTH.

Yet again. One is saddened by the utter lack of subtleties in this entire script. In order for Dornan to "appear" as if he's distanced himself from Dakota Johnson. He bashes and undermines any connection to FSOG. Cuz a crack in THAT door. Leads to wide-open questions. About his co-star. And we ALL know where THAT goes. To alluring scents. And slender waistlines.

Mad-lad hasn't much range. Neither does she to be perfectly honest. Cuz she plays the quirky-sexy-but-strong-ingenue in every role. Or perhaps now the sexy-mysterious-femme-fatale. I reckon its an effective means to follow-the-money. It would be nice to see her in something more technically demanding. Something with REALLY great dialogue. A classic play. Inge perhaps. Or Tennessee Williams. Yes. She needs to do a play. Glass Menagerie. With her mother as Amanda. Williamstown Mass. Joanne Woodward and Karen Allen. Best production evah. And I saw it. So I know.

Perhaps he's ashamed of his choices. And that his sex scenes were real not reel. In retrospect. It would make anyone cringe. And not wanna face the music. His eyes look empty. As if all life has been drained. Bled-out. Maybe that's the REAL evidence of sacrifice. Trading Soul for shekels. And a wife he doesn't love. Sad.

SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sophie said...

Hey Aunty!

Yes, Jamie was in LA for a couple of days last week...
He filmed the Ellen show on 10/3, 10/4 was on a Ryan Seacrest radio show, attended the premiere of the “Dinner with Herve’”, plus more that I have missed...
Mama Millie was not with him. Also, no reports on the LA home closing.

This pregnancy is being handled differently from baby Elva. They never confirmed that Elva was coming and he did not reveal her name until this past year. I have wondered why and there are some possible explanations... was he concerned about crazy stalkers, did Fifty Shades PR advise to keep the new baby’s arrival quiet, did Millie slip this in to secure her marriage and send Dakota the message that he was still sleeping with her, was he quiet about it as not to hurt Dakota... please add more suggestions...
It was after Elva’s birth that Millie was accused of craving attention, having post partum depression and have zero personal hygiene (even with 2 nannies)... and he wasn’t very interested in Millie.

The Italian vacation this summer did reveal Millie cradling a bump that looked very much like a pregnancy. But, he was not protective of her on that trip, he barely looked at her. Only in the most recent appearances does he confirm the baby, and actually seems positive about it. ( I have a feeling that the new baby is a boy...and that makes Jamie happy)

Millie is quite active on Instagram with photos of fall leaves, etc. She may attend an award show within the next few days—-then we will be able to see the size of her bump.

With all of the press about Chris Martin, Dakota has sent a clear message that she has moved on. But, the feelings that she has for Jamie will be really hard to forget.

Rennie said...

It’s sad that Jamie disown his Fifty Shade Fans. I really believe he’s ashamed of his performance rather than the content of the films. He know that Dakota carried those films and he was the face and body. Not only did the critics crucify his performance but is English accent as well.

There was an article last week about the sale of the house. He made about a $400,000 profit. Someone commented that he bought it when he was hot and heavy with Dakota. Now, he’s gone back to his wife and got her pregnant. He’s going to be on the Graham Norton show. Let’s see if he will mention the new baby. We have yet to hear it come out his mouth. The news came from that Style magazine article. Then every newspaper and tv outlet ran with it.

AgonyAunt said...

Hey Snooze and Renny-penny. (I only do nic-names for my frens. Like a tribute. Of sorts.)

Yeah. I got "it's a boy" vibes wayyy before the blue-balloon release. Cuz I was feeling ECHOS of the past. Tho' it may NOT be the best omen for Millie. She may be more like Dornan's mum than she realizes. Which may also be a reason he doesn't divorce her. Cuz I get the "feels" this may be playing out like his father-mother. I have no way of knowing this. Other than gut.

Elva was different than Dulcie. She was the product of Millie's duplicity. And her existence almost destroyed him. Her naming was quite telling. I highly doubt his reps were the ones making those decisions to NOT reveal that pregnancy. THAT was Dornan. Cuz he couldn't face the TRUTH.

To me. This saga has always felt like a pendulum. Swinging to and fro. Often wildly and at cross-purposes. Dornan wants to "please" the women with whom he is in close contact or proximity. And so he see-saws from one to another. Trying to keep an equilibrium between two opposing counterweights. Both giving his life stability. But disappointing both camps. I don't know what to say about CM. He may well be a very nice guy. But I don't sense she loves him. Not in the way she loves mad-lad. And each time one thinks she's about to make a clean break. She doesn't. I don't need to tell you. Cuz you SEE the TW messaging. And likely MUCH more. Than I.

You prolly get tired of me saying this. I think Dornan has his wings clipped by those more powerful than Millie. In the meantime. He figures he'll please his Dad by replicating his OWN family. In the hopes his turns out better. Sadly. I don't think it's in his cards. The "sins of the fathers" and all that entails.

For what its worth. I don't think its "over". Regardless of what Sandy-pants and other Hollywood insiders may hope to achieve. We KNOW she won't let go. Neither will Millie. It is what it is.

Sophie said...

I just saw a post from Anthony ( he never posts about Dakota, but her comments were regarding Jamie)...
Dakota mentioned that she speaks to Jamie often and that he invited her to his premiere recently. It was her birthday and she did not end up attending because she doesn’t do premieres on her birthday.
She said that they were very close because of the movies that they did together.

Did anyone see he cute Instagram of Dakota taking a lie detector test in an interview ? There were questions about Justin Timberlake and Josh Hamm, but I noticed that There were no questions about Jamie.

Sophie said...

I found the interview — it’s worth a read:
WP Films
Yolanda Czaderska-Hayek conducts the interview

Anonymous said...

Aww Jamie's sister is lashing out at everyone on IG because of how mean they are to the Duchess of Sussex. Is that her way of ensuring Markus gets her an invite to the next party in the Cots? She is saying people are vile they way they make fun of the Duchess. And guess who liked it, Mz. Millie. What I find funny is I always said Meghan gives me Millie vibes. You know do anything to reach your end goals. And what is also quite telling is that if this blind is truly about the Mrs. then she is one of those vile people who trashed other woman to get her end goal....a man with ties to the entertainment industry. Ms. Millie and her friends are the original mean girls. Remember when that London Chatter went after Dakota??? Jess and Mz. Millie pretend they are all about empowering woman, but something tells me they are just as catty and mean. I'm sure that post was also written with Mz. Millie in mind also. I guess kissing up to the Royals is one sure way of mingling with them at the Soho Houses around the world.

AgonyAunt said...

Hey Sandy-pants,

Yes. But one BIG difference between #MYMM and the Duchess of SEX. The former isn't married to a gay male. Tho' they're ALL sponsored by Markus and his merry band of luciferian-satanist-freemasons. Also. Millstone actually carries her babies. Miz Megs will use her sister-in-laws rent-a-womb. Cuz her's is on the OLD side to be hatching royalty.

Jamies sisters are along for the ride. Can't exactly blame them. Tho' it tends to indicate a family tolerance for bullshit and sucking-up to fake-english royalty. Let's hope the Irish re-unite their country. And the Dornan klan can head to the Cots. Pink sofa's and udder cream for all.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

If y'all want a good laugh go on twitter. I swear "fans" of Mz. Millie are the most insecure people I ever met. They are basically crying thinking Jamie might have gone to Dakota's premier and not with his wife to Germany for some award show. They have the wife's biggest fan trying to talk them down from a ledge saying that The Dornan's are the strongest couple and Mz. Millie is an independent woman. I swear sometimes I just go on their accounts to get a good laugh. These women are probably the same ones who believe Jamie when he says they never fight and they have the perfect relationship.

Kiki said...

So Annabelle Wallis went to the premier of My Dinner with Herve and posed with Jamie...hmmmmm. She's another one that rumor has it likes to be seen with famous men. Sad part is he looked happier posing with her then he does when he is photographed with his brilliant wife who he tells he loves 10 times a day.

Sophie said...

Let me get this straight...

Millie is in Belgium preparing for an award show that will be sometime this week,
Jamie is in a London for a screening of “My Dinner with Herve”,
Dakota is in London for the premiere of Suspiria...

Interesting...

Sophie said...

Something that I noticed about Dakota’s interview for WP Films was that she had let her guard down when speaking about Jamie versus how she responded to similar questions at the premiere of FSF.

She admitted that they had seen each other recently, that he invited her to his premiere but she could not attend (Oct 4th), that they experienced personal intimate feelings while filming the series, that she spoke to him regularly and that she would love to work with him again.

A married man would not be expected to be so open, but Dakota spilled some Truth.

AgonyAunt said...

Isn't polygamy legal in South Africa? Hmmmmm. He WAS in South Africa. Was she there too? Not sure about Ireland. I doubt its legal. Tho' it's "practiced" by more than a few chad-lads. Men have always had "second" families. Hidden from view. The French do so frequently. Tho' its tough to hide these days. Makes one wonder if they're simply hiding the fact in plain view.

No skin off my nose if they want to live in a big-ole-Dornan-family-commune. But I wouldn't wish Millie-the-sister-wife or Markus-the-koven-kunt-king or Annette-the-evil-udder-cream-mudder on ANYONE. Especially not Dakota Johnson. Cuz Lord help me. I'm wayyy too fond of her. Sweet summer child.

She's not letting go.

Anonymous said...

@Suz Vic one thing I noticed about Jamie in interviews, whatever he's promoting that year, he just gives the same answers but in different ways and its usually sprinkled with his brilliant wife, his quiet boring life in the country, his crazy fans. He is going off a script. And yes he won't really talk about Dakota, because of fans who can't go between real life and reel life. He needs to keep up his loyal family man image---whether that is real or reel, we will never know. Dakota seems to fly by the seat of her pants in interviews and its refreshing not to hear the same stories time after time. I'm sure that little interview she gave about seeing Jamie and talking to him was not taken too well, I mean the fans of the wife were having a complete breakdown. They are a very insecure bunch. But when it comes down to it, Jamie and his wife are having another baby and Aunty is right --- she is not letting go! The vibes I get from Mz. Millie is she lets Jamie do whatever he wants, is willing to look the other way, as long as it doesn't get out. But when she feels very threatened she locks it down. Meh, I could be totally off and Jamie is the perfect husband. But one thing I do wish he would stop doing is talking about how he and his family are quiet people and don't like the attention and choose to live in the countryside away from the madness. That may be Jamie, but someone should tell his wife, m-I-l and sister, because those three may live far from the hustle and bustle, but they LOVEEEEEEEEEEEE attention. When the wife starts bringing in the children on IG, you know she's bringing out the big guns. If Mz. Millie didn't like fame and attention, she would have tried dating men out of the business, but she didn't. Just ask the DM or that troll pap in Vancouver.....someone is paying them to find the Dornans when they are out and about, and something tells me it had nothing to do with Jamie and his PR team!

Sophie said...

Yes, Sandy,

This is the way that it appears to me, as well.

Millie arrived in Belgium quite in advance, and if she wanted to shield Jamie from Dakota in London, she could have stayed there until the last minute. But, I think that it is more that she doesn’t really care what he does ( as long as she is not humiliated), versus that she trusts him implicitly to be faithful when they are apart. Or, she could have some very strong threats waiting to use in the event that she needs them.

Just announced that Late Late James Corden will host Dakota on Oct 22 and Jamie on Oct 23.

Those women attached to Jamie are too much. They would all be nobodies with him.

AgonyAunt said...

Sorry gals. I rather doubt Millie "doesn't care" what he does. Women ALWAYS care. If only for ego. And control. But I reckon she has a contract which defines terms of "marriage". And other "incentives". To keep him from leaving entirely. Whatever "evidence" she has (or Markus has) to hold him may involve the sister keeping tabs on him. Who knows. It's a mess. And I wouldn't trade places with ANY of them. Sad.

It begs the question what kind of families raised these people? Seriously. We know Millie's family is deeply fucked-up. Dakota's too. But Dornan was always positioned as coming from stable, upper-middle-class normies. The only seemingly anomaly was the mother's early demise. Maybe that's a larp. Maybe his family was-is as fucked-up as the rest of them. All dangerously damaged people. MK-ULTRA trained and trotted-out by (((satanic-elites))) and their (((media))) whores to worshipful NPC's to adore and envy. Dornan is a good-looking college drop-out who posed naked for money. And dated "starlets". He used it as a springboard to break into "acting". Using the range of one constipated blank expression. Her stated goal is to be more successful than her mother. Which is a pretty low-bar. Given the choices her mother made in her life and career. I reckon she REALLY means making MORE money than her parent. That's the kind of competition jews (or NPC's managed and brainwashed by jews) prefer. Cuz it totally ignores any value or worth not measured by money or fame.

Maybe its best they all live in a commune. Hiding their REAL selves from public view. Segregated from the rest of humanity. Where they only do harm to themselves. Sadly. They infect mankind with their emptiness. And blame others for the choices they make. It is what it is.

Kiki said...

Yikes, I see Mrs. D's style isn't any better whilst she's pregnant, if anything its worse. Who the hell is her stylist, that London Bitter chick. There are no words!

Rennie said...

Wait until Millie see that photo of Jamie with Anabelle Walli, she’s is going to have a fit. Boy, Dakota and Anabelle in London while she’s out of town. Jamie had his pick. Also, Dakota has a picture sitting on Edgar Wright lap. Is she trying to make Chris or Jamie jealous? I don’t see Chris getting jealous at all. Jamie is a whole different story. He has no right getting jealous but will. I think Dakota had a successful trip.

You are so right Kiki. Millie’s fashion sense is just as bad pregnant. She will be having the baby soon. She is huge.

Hannah J said...

So lets see if this plays out....Jamie will be in LA soon and apparently he will be filming a new movie there. His best mate is there with his wife. She always seems to go off private on IG a few weeks before we get a new picture from her of Jamie and sometimes his wife. So I'm sure we will be getting pictures of Jamie and his wife in LA (if he brings the whole family out) sometime this weekend or next week. Amelia's stalker will post some cryptic tweet about Amelia if she goes to LA and then she will post a picture of Millie in LA, saying she knew. Leading up to this she will go private on IG for awhile so she can stalk all of Jamie's friends to see who has the winning picture and then go un-private if she digs something up. There are so many same patterns, its funny.

AgonyAunt said...

Please PLEASE PUH-LEEZE tell me #MYWIFEMYMUSE camp-follows Jamie Dornan to LA and has anchor-babbie#3. O well done Millstone! They say third times the charm hon. Too bad he sold his mid-century Hollywood Hills pad. Pink sofas and blue-bassinets would look fab. Such a loss for decorating aesthetics.

Not to be a contrarian. I didn't think Dornan looked particularly cozy or fuckable standing with Annabelle. They seemed a wee awkward TBH. Not nearly as cozy and comfy as Dakota Johnson looked perched seductively on that nice-looking directors lap. I always think lap-sitting is a particularly personal act. One doesn't sit on another's lap without it being a message of sorts. It's both submissive and sexual. Teasing and provocative. Like an unspoken promise. Perhaps she'll work with him. Or something.

Jamie Dornan is never nearly as attractive unless he's standing within spitting distance of Dakota Johnson. On the other hand. Dakota Johnson is almost TOO perfect these days. Very feline and seductive. She hits every mark on the red carpet. And she plays the alluring femme fatale with photogs. Whilst she appears more physically lovely these days. She seems less soulful perhaps. Like Faustus. The more her outward beauty waxes. Her inner beauty wanes.

It is what it is...

AgonyAunt said...

Is Peanut Butter Falcon about to be released? Cuz Dakota Johnson is tweeting about "love and equality regardless of chromosomes". Kinda odd to be paying attention to this issue after so many months with nary a peep. Did Gucci hire a Down Syndrome model this season? Along with the LGBT cotillion? Cuz the message of these tweets feels scripted. And the timing is suspect. And craven. Self-serving. To suddenly pimp for Down Syndrome. When a movie she made about Down Syndrome is about to drop. Tsk-tsk. And they wonder why no one respects Hollywood.

Had she made a philanthropic focus of helping people with Down Syndrome after filming PBF -- and made REAL effort to help those living with DS -- people would cheer her using access and stardom to help DS kids and adults. She could have encouraged her pals at Gucci to hire Down Syndrome models. Instead of their YUUUUGE BRAVERY in hiring trannies. But Down Syndrome isn't as SEXY and EDGY as dilating a gaping wound. Cuz Down Syndrome isn't a CHOICE. Like sex-change mutilation.

It all comes tumbling down.

Sophie said...

Was the tweet recently? Because last night, she attended an event to support the Global Down Syndrome foundation in Colorado.
Shia LaBouef and the guy named Zac from Peanut Butter Falcon were there. They all presented speeches and Zac received an award.
And I believe that they all danced on stage with Zac.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Dakota doesn't have a twitter account, so not sure who's tweeting what. Dakota gave an award to her co-star with DS and it was a very sweet moment. Don't ruin it Aunty by making it something it is not!

BBB said...

Saw some pictures from some movie première in London, finally MyWife gets to have her triumph moment we were all waiting for (I guess she just waited until the pregnancy was more visible) and angry Jamie make an appearance too, both look tragically unconnected as expected...

And what's with the chronic belly rubbing? She's doing it in basically all the pics , sadly it doesn't feel like she's trying to connect with her unborn baby, it feels like she's using her pregnancy as a trophy, always sending messages, this is very sad and shows that she's a troubled woman, and unhappy women can't raise happy balanced children, an (almost) absent father doesn’t help much either...not even with a dozen nannies permanently living in the BSP.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could get a picture of My Wife rubbing her belly and Jamie grabbing his balls at the same time? Now that would be impressive, too bad MyWife didn't think about it, maybe next time for baby number 4? Wink wink?

Beware Jamie, soon you'll not only get the regular whipping you're already used too, but you'll succumb to castration...

Sophie said...

The London premiere was a big deal for Jamie- this role might garner him more respect as a serious actor.
I find it very tragic that his wife cannot pull herself together enough to wash her hair, put on some makeup and jewelry and find a dress that fits properly. She looked ridiculous. And yes, she rubs her stomach like Aladdin’s lamp - for attention.

AgonyAunt said...

Timing is everything. If Down Syndrome is a worthy cause. Then support it when it isn't convenient. When it doesn't help you sell a movie. And if you can't see the sense and wisdom in such advice. Then I reckon you live and work in Hollywood. But then. We already knew that...

Anonymous said...

Oh Aunty, stop your whining and moaning, not saying Dakota is perfect, but she does support a lot of things. She happened to work on a movie with someone with DS, presented him with an award and from behind the scenes of the movie and watching her at the award show she if very sweet and caring to this young man. He has said so himself. She's not doing it to promote the movie. End of it. She's not out tweeting about it, because she doesn't have a twitter account. Not sure where you're seeing all of this, maybe in your mind, maybe Astral is f'n with you!

As for the belly cupping, one Duchess is a cupper too....hmm. Wonder if they get together in the Cots and talk about what they did to land famous men. They just seem to have so much in common. Guess we'll be seeing more Dornan babies, since you know its up to Millie to decide how many, Jamie is just along for the "fun part". His words. Sigh, they'll be more Dornan children in the cots then sheep at this rate.

Sophie said...

Jamie once said that he never planned his career, it just developed on its own.

It sounds as if that is his philosophy on fathering children, since he just leaves it up to her. Okay, Dornan, get ready to have enough kids to field a football team, because that is what Millie does best.

He just seems to be more naive than I had imagined.

AgonyAunt said...

Whats wrong with BIG families? Who gives a shit how many Dornan brats are born? He can afford them. And Millie is a breeder. There are wayyy better things to criticize than his willingness to have lots of babies. He's made his choice. Now he'll live with it. Who wants to be the woman that breaks-up THAT marriage? With three kiddos 5 and under? Someone with a death-wish.

Oh piss-off Sandy. I SEE what I SEE. ZERO-FUCKS to you and your transparent PR shilling. Instead of handing out her "phone-number" to #metoo whingers. Or "saving" African babies for Hollywood pedos. She culda been working all along with dis-infranchised Down Syndrome kids and adults. A worthy endeavor. Instead. She CHOSE to glom-on to the same-ole same-ole Hollywood navel-gazing SJW bullshit. No one said she wasn't "sweet and caring with him". But it was also very convenient and timely. Period.

Hey Snooze. Nah. Not naive. Manipulative. And fucking lazy. Cuz he always takes the path of least resistant. And the quickest route to a bar. Or into bed with some hoe. It is what is is.

Anonymous said...

Oh Aunty you are wrong. There's nothing convenient. She made a movie, her co-star Zachary Gottsagen has DS. He won an award and Dakota and Shia, his co-stars in the movie, were asked to give him the award. That's all. All charities she is working with are worthy endeavors, no one is more important than the other. You're so wrong on so many levels and now you just are going to keep fighting because you saw her tweeting about DS, when whatever the hell you are seeing on twitter isn't from Dakota. SHE DOES NOT HAVE A TWITTER account. You're making drama where there is none! Stop being a little bitch!!!

Kiki said...

Jamie just gave an interview where he stated that he's never going to have to date again because he's married....so I guess all those waiting for a divorce will be waiting forever. Though he never said he wouldn't hook up with the young waitresses at his local pub. He also talks about IG and how so annoying it is because everyone just documents their entire life. Maybe he should talk to his wife about that. He seems to be very happily married and happy with his life. Just a part of me wonders is this the best acting he has done or is he truly just a down to earth guy who loves his brilliant wife and never strays.

AgonyAunt said...

Fuck off Sandy. My view is MINE. I OWN IT. And I don't wander all over social media dropping MY VIEW on Twitter or Daily Mail or IG or whatever outlets you and yours hover and defend. Be fucking grateful. Cuz I don't fanfag or shill or dump all over her (nor him) anywhere but here.

Holee shit you make me miss Astral.

Her charities are self-serving. Most rich and famous people use charities to serve their OWN interests. But at least be artful and consistent about it. Do something more substantive than handing out a trophy at an award ceremony. Right before your movie is released based on the same subject. Have you EVER looked at the stats of adult down syndrome abuse? Particularly in group homes? Where woman and men are raped, sexually abused, beaten and robbed by the people who are paid "care-givers"? Look it up sometime. But instead she chooses to "help" the #METOO'ers who are NOT impacted by chromosomes. It's all so fucking tiresome.

Don't you EVER get tired of the shilling? The constant ratta-tat-tat of manufactured "atta-girl"s for doing what any normal average decent human should do? Particularly with her money and access. Honestly. Why don't you just talk about the dress she wore. And how FABULOUS she looked whilst being "sweet and caring" on stage. Cuz really. Isn't THAT what its ALL about? Her next role? And her wildly successful career. That's the point. Right? Just give me the script Sandy. Cuz I don't wanna be OFF CUE with your ass-kissing and sycophancy!

For the record. ZERO-FUCKS given for Dornan. And his choices. Other than being a metaphor for HOW NOT TO CONDUCT ONES LIFE. He's deeply uninteresting. He's chosen to remain married. Bully for him. Such a courageous choice! And expand his young family. Again. Bully for him and his seed. Given these CHOICES it's ludicrous of her to claim Jamie Dornan as a "close friend for life". It doesn't happen that way. Attractive non-lesbian women and good-looking non-gay married men are not "CLOSE" unless they're banging one another. And for her to discuss their "close-friendship" at ALL is stupid and telling.

She has many good and compelling qualities. It's up to her whether she uses them. Or not. I'm just a poor humble observer. Not a cheerleader.

Anonymous said...

Yes Aunty apparently you do troll twitter because I quote:

"Is Peanut Butter Falcon about to be released? Cuz Dakota Johnson is tweeting about "love and equality regardless of chromosomes".

This is how you started this whole she's only doing this because I saw it on twitter thing. No one is promoting the movie because it hasn't even come out yet. But you want to call everyone out on the mistakes you think they make. Well you are mistaken. Someone might be tweeting about DS and love and equality, etc" but its not Dakota. So before you keep getting your panties in a twist know that there was a Be Beautiful Fashion Show in Colorado for Down Syndrome Researchers. It raised over $2.4 million dollars. An award was given to Zach. They reached out to his co-stars to see if they would present him with the award. The Peanut Butter Falcon was his first long film. So it makes sense they would see if his co-stars would be there. Jamie Foxx, Heather Graham, Jeremy Renner and Colin Farrell were also there. Are you calling them out too. I guess no one should have taken part in this special night because it doesn't fit your agenda. And yes I do know about DS, I have two people very close to me that have DS. Sooooooooooooooo its great to see Zac get recognition and its even more special to see his co-stars rallying around him. So stop making something special into something its not. Unfortunately there is abuse everywhere, but one person can't save the entire world. You can't help it, I know. You're an angry person and this is probably your only form of release.

Original Aunty said...

The mirror crack’d from side to side;
“The curse is come upon me,” cried
The Lady of Shalott...

SD said...

"The true paradises are the paradises we have lost"

It is perplexing. Disconcerting. Worrisome. Why do you remain in check? TBH, movement towards checkmate seems militaristic & crystalline. Yet who can visualize the entire, activated board? not moi that's for sure!

It might be worth considering that from time-to-time one has to sacrifice their queen and hope opponents' strategy sucks (it often does). Doesn't mean the game is over, just that it is time for originality and boldness.

p.s. Phantom emotions are pesky creatures, and so prevalent, particularly when one is void of a physical being-ness. Challenging to separate the grift from the gift...yet pleeze try to trust I am not out for ounces of flesh nor snippets of soul.

By the way. A bottom-line is relationships evolve and change baby. Clarity emerges, then may recede. No MK-ultra, or reprogramming goals, happening, at least on my end of the bridge.

And. Still Bearing Witness...

AgonyAunt said...

And just like that. Here you are. Think what you will. But my "conjuring" skills are better than most.

I'm busy spinning. And refuse to gaze on Camelot. Too bad others won't stick to their ART. Sometimes one just knows what's best. And what isn't. Not a matter of "trust". In my experience. Those who ask to be trusted. Are usually the least worthy of it. I never ask another to "trust me". It's more important to be trustworthy. And demonstrate it by deeds. And therefore I control it. Whereas I have no ability to control the actions of others. It's silly to trust something you can't control.

Perhaps evil is sometimes a persons highest sense of right. Until his understanding and grasp of good grows stronger. Then. Perhaps. He loses pleasure in wickedness. And iniquity becomes a torment. The only way to escape the misery of sin is to stop sinning. There is no other way. Cuz sin is its own punishment. There are those who seem to enjoy the pain. And wallow in it. Vanity, vanity. All is vanity.

I know you hate me quoting the Bible. But this came to me when I read your post: "...speak every man truth with his neighbor: for we are members one of another...Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you...And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you." "And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work..."

Now I raise your Proust with Mencken: "The whole aim of politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

Be careful. False flags and spooks can kill ya...

SD said...

Your skills (in general) are better than most. No argument there.

Kindness, tenderhearted intents, forgiving one another, does send forth ripples of grace and in the process doors and windows just may creak open too.

What? Am I a target for a false flag attack and/or lurking spooks? Alas, much more likely you are. 'Cause not all hobgoblins are imaginary. Some carry concealed weapons, dust anthrax onto mail and are frantically seeking a scapegoat. And, ironically, simultaneously, longing for unity and fraternity.

Many actions (seemingly everywhere) coming into alignment all at once. Peeps are scared/angry/knee-jerking their way to (potential) violence as a device to stop escalating fears and helplessness. Amidst it all an image of a mother orca whale (a species heading to extinction) pushing her dead calf for days-onto-days through a vast summer ocean comes to the surface.

Evil. Righteousness. Iniquity. Goodness. Penance. Revenging the sins done onto others. Forgiving self. Letting go of pain. Being brave enough to let in light and maybe even love. For sure, ego is the toughest hurdle of all to relinquish. But this is your moment toi. Make it count. For what it is worth, I believe in you.

BTW. I don't hate the bible, not at all, truly appreciate its'(and your) wisdom. What I dislike is when you use it as a shield, a barrier, a defense, a weapon. Or as justification to cast me into the wilderness as a jezebel or an infidel.

OK. Now I raise your Mencken with Hank Williams:
"...yet you're afraid each thing I do is just some evil scheme
A memory from your lonesome past keeps us far apart
Why can't I free your doubtful mind and melt your cold, cold heart..."



p.s. Can we pleeze get an (encrypted) private email account so as to communicate with each other? You can be whoever you want to be. And can "vett" moi as much as needed to appease fears of whatever.. try to believe that I have no intent, interest, or desire to arrive on any doorstep uninvited,that is not how I roll. But let's be brave and raise the bar just a smidgen. Why not?

AgonyAunt said...

Yet again. I don't know who you think I am. Rest assured. You'd be OH SO DISAPPOINTED. Let that sink in.

And no. I'm not predicting nor summoning your demise. Only to say in general that there is evil mischief afoot. And one should be "wiser than a serpent and harmless as a dove" in perilous times. Which is nothing more or less than what I've been clanging about here for eons.

I never prophesize death. Let the dead bury their dead. I ring the bell on behavior and choices which appear hazardous. And hope sounding the alarm may quicken the dead. It's not my job to force change. Rather. Its my hope people wake-up. And choose good. Sometimes it takes a mighty whack. And other times a gentle nudge. One uses the tools one is given. And righteous anger has its place. When motives are pure. If I were to manipulate for MY OWN "personal" benefit. I'd be a paid shill for WME. Like Sandy-pants. LOL.

I'm glad you don't hate the Bible. One is intellectually stymied without a decent familiarity. I'm frankly amazed by how few recognize bible metaphor -- often employed by the best writers -- when they see it. I blame Hollywood. And the weaponized-stupidity of zionist interests and moral degradation foisted on Americans by media, teachers unions and ADL approved University professors sipping latte at Yale. THE BIG CON. It's all backfiring as predicted. And some will die for their beliefs. Sadly. This isn't a new phenomenon. One only hopes the "right ones" are targeted. Not just the innocent schmucks who have no power and no influence over events.

I'm not fearful of private convos. I just don't SEE the point. This is my public outlet. And whilst some (yes Sandy -- this is directed at you sweatie) contend its my ONLY means of disseminating anger and snark. That isn't quite accurate. Whilst I LURK on Twitter. I don't use it publicly as a means for communication. And I don't lurk nearly as much as in the past. Cuz I'm too busy with OTHER things. And frankly. The repetition is wearisome. I hate being able to predict outcomes too easily. Cuz I like a challenge as much as the next person. This saga is boring me to sobs. Rinse. Wash. Repeat. So I conclude waiting for something courageous or inspiring or even surprising is a waste of energy. If she wants to spend her life and talents (such as she uses them) to prop-him-up and fellate (metaphorically speaking) Hollywood's agenda -- that's her business. Its not my job to encourage or fanfag it. And if I only share my insights with you. Then my ripple is limited to a very small puddle. This thread may hide an ocean. Who knows. But the water is fine. And so I float.

I like Hank Williams. And he knew his Bible.

AgonyAunt said...

P.S. You once accused me of being that cointel poster in other CDAN current threads. The one with a tiger as a logo. LOL. I don't know if he-she still posts in current threads. Cuz I haven't read CDAN (other than this thread) in months. It got very tiresome. All those horrific deeds that go unpunished. Just another mossad-glow-clown operation to destroy enemies and protect frens. And frankly. No fucks given on what Hollywood insiders do to one another. Cuz CDAN BI's prove the industry is engaged in escalating cannibalism. When a war between your enemies is "habbening". One steps out of the way. Waits for the dust to settle. Then arrests the survivors. Otherwise. There's too many evil-doers to stop them all. And tribal evil protects one another. Until the business losses are SO large. They fight amongst themselves for scraps. And turn on each other. Ever study the Holodomor? They ate rats and bugs and leather from shoes to survive. Red shoes are very tasty.

In the meantime American Patriots won't buy anything Hollywood sells. Starving the beast. Watching them fight over the carcass. I rang the bell ages ago. Get lots of popcorn. You'll need it.

SD said...

Rather. I wonder who YOU think I am? Rest assured. I am SO much more.

You, of course, are toi. No identity confusion. At all. Moi claims toi is a unique, irreplaceable energy. Every time I threaten to leave this joint she sulks--big time-- absolutely digs in her stubborn little heels. It seems she senses, and understands, "stuff" I often miss.

Moi et toi. Where did they come from? Seriously. One day they just appeared. Honest to gawd I did not consciously create them, like, say, you created aunty or 4H consulting. Nope. It seems almost as if they spontaneously combusted from flying veils...or maybe rose from childhood memories. Linked together in ways that don't hold up well to meat-and-potato rational analysis. Such is the magic and mystery of existence, in all planes.

How might moi be disappointed by toi? For NO expectations or undercover goals fester. And despite what some may imagine, no hidden evil agenda lurk either. By the way, to turn the crystal towards the light does not make one a sycophant. Take a deep breath and muster up some good 'ol fashion faith bro. In self first.

Now. The "point." It is often more difficult to write 100 words than 2000. And surely a different set of challenges, and rewards, in communicating to one person rather than speaking to 10,000. Keep in mind, this is not an either-or proposition: Private convo or public platform. One can have both. You can.

Nope. Not zipping up miss havisham's dress or demanding a mano a mano encounter on a Wellfleet beach (tho, actually, not such a bad thought). To be frank, moi is tired, and somewhat bored, being an anon in a gossip site. Wants to strive to be brave and "speak" to toi more "freely," without looking over my shoulder for spooks and what-ever. May be a good thing. Might not. Dunno. Risks involved? Sure. More for you than me, perhaps. I get that it is a rather crazy proposition. Yet...why not?

Not easy leaving the safety of the harbor for me either. But this is not an irreversible journey. And I can promise you this, moi is not a puddle. Unlimited actually. Who knows, just may provide a safe haven. Respite from the storm. What you say?


And for all tomorrows... I raise you, again. "Rightly to be great is not to stir without great argument, greatly to find quarrel in a straw when honor's at the stake."

SD said...

p.s. I was never conversant w/CDAN prior to landing (oddly unexpectedly) in the crib. And even then did not peruse other threads. Since CDAN crashed, interestingly coinciding with the Weinstein exposé scandal, the tone on many threads appears decidedly hostile, with overt "rightish" leanings. Rapid fire execution style outings: dope, sexual orientation, infidelity, proclivity for young teens dominate. The site appears to be under "new management," both tone and agenda altered.

Never thought toi and that (apparently) Muslim poster were one-and-the-same. Rather his (no doubt it was a he) energy had certain similarities w/toi. He was intentionally subversive and inflammatory, but in a smart-ass humorous and cute manner. Much (much) younger, less "jaded", than thou. Seems, alas, he has returned to the hallowed grounds of the chans.

No doubt. Hollywood IS crashing into the sea. The American Dream manufacturing apparatus breaking down. More and more peeps, inside and outside, are "woke" to the rue, the manipulation, the scam. Not just in HW but in other segments of society as well there are wildfires burning. Cannibalism and vested interests illuminated and glowing. Civil war.

THE challenge is what will replace all the burning rubble? Peeps, a society, long for, and need myths. A collective ideal that motivates and energizes. A faith,if you will. Endless negativity and destruction leads to yet more binary polarization. Not unification and fraternity.

I often ponder, what would Charles de G say and do? (btw, new 850 pg. bio by Julian Jackson might be worth a read)

SD said...

Final post script (at least for now): It seems at times that the strongest alliances shatter stereotypes and expectations. For example. Did you know that H. Arendt and M. Heidegger had a 50-year relationship, and in fact were lovers for years, beginning when HA was his 19-year-old student? Weird, huh? Weirder still, it was HA who championed (indeed saved) MH's reputation and work after the war when he was ostracized for his card-carrying Nazi affiliations. Given that she was a German Jew this may seem odd, even traitorous, at first blush. More, HA wanted to dedicated her 1958 book, "The Human Condition," to MH but felt relations between them were too "star-crossed" to do so. And told him so.

She, however, did not share with him a verse she wrote at that time:

Re Vita Activa

The dedication of this book is left out.
How could I dedicate it to you,
my trusted friend,
to whom I remained faithful
and unfaithful,
And both in love.

(I believe he may have read this verse at the end of his life.)

AgonyAunt said...

Perhaps I was too flippant. A weakness. Cuz I have perused Arendt. But its tiresome when she's offered up as the shining example of a virtuous (((writer))). She's maybe the ONLY tolerable (((one))) TBH. I do read Heidegger. He sacrificed much for his integrity and convictions. Why do jewish females prefer goyim men? Is it the combination of intellect and decency and honor? Or the hunger for righteousness rather than material enrichment. Sadly. Those couplings seem to lack some basic cohesion. Plath comes to mind. Others as well. Sigh.

Yes. Hollywood has run off the rails. And Netflix is perhaps the worst example. Soon. They'll ruin Tolkien. A masterpiece of regenerative adventure. Where the heros' greatest strength is virtue and incorruptible courage. And his companions talents surround him like a coat of armor. Protecting him from the unrelenting darkness which cannot be broken by even the strongest warrior. No better fantasy has been written in the modern world. And Netflix would take an allegory of divine intervention through virtuous humans in fellowship. Halting the leviathan of war with the simple comfort of HOME as the prize. And RE-make it into a blinking Hollywood neon sign of same-ole-same-ole tired diversity mantras. With edgy role reversals (male-female/white-black/gay-trans) and forced memes of ambiguity of good and evil. There is a quote from LoTR seen in nearly every book on spiritual warfare:

Theoden: I will not risk open war.

Aragorn: Open war is upon you whether you would risk it or not.

Tolkien knew there are battles we choose and battles that come upon us without our choosing. It is what it is. Evil needs humanity to be apathetic to the fight. To ignore the drip-drip-drip of ones moral sanity under constant attack.

Put on the WHOLE armor of God.

Let's get past next week and see what we see. I am not opposed to making nice. But. As Ari Emmanuel would say..."What's in it for me?"

AgonyAunt said...

P.S. I have a soft-spot for Miss Havisham. Years ago. On a very public blog. I called Maureen Dowd "The Old Grey Lady's Miss Havisham". As I took umbrage with one of her snarkier op-eds. Back in the day. When I actually read the New York Times. And WaPo. Daily. The habits one sheds along the way. In the search for TRUTH.

I read 4chan now. Not because its TRUTH. Because in between the shills and bots and glow-clowns and incels and autists one finds glimpses of "IT". And on occasion the kind of rapier wit one doesn't often see in this NPC driven culture. After a while one SEES patterns forming. Cuz lies are often more telling. But discernment takes practice. Once developed. One separates the tares and wheat very quickly. I recommend it highly. Cuz at some point it will be shut down. And you will have missed one of the great "habbenings" of this era. If they're still writing history books in 50 years. 4chan will be much more than a footnote. Students will major in Meme-ology. What a world.

Sophie said...

I haven’t seen “A Private War” but all of the preliminary reviews are raving about it. Definitely will be discussed as a contender for an Academy award.

Possibly this work will garner Jamie an invitation to join the Academy.

Original Aunty said...

Oh Snoozle. You must be reading different reviews. The ones I read said it was "meh". At best. Though they were more artful in their description to be sure. But were universally underwhelmed with Rosemund Pike. And didn't mention Dornan at all. Other than to note which role he played. That won't keep him away from the Oscars, however. Cuz who the fuck else does Hollywood have to trot-out in a cattle-call, eh? They're all pretty gawddamn boring and disappointing these days. Dornan and #MWMM should feel right at home.

I'm a tad dismayed by your oh so obvious shilling. I expect it of Sandy-pants (and WME). But not you. Have you taken on new clients? Oh my. Perhaps I've given you wayyy too much credit. Ah well. Hope springs eternal. It is what it is.

Sophie said...

Hey Aunty,
Naw, I’m not shilling. The repetitive “love stories” that Dornan is doing do not look interesting, at all. Is he trying to milk the handsome heart throb look as long as possible? Because those 15 minutes are over.
Maybe it’s time to actually train - do live theater, where he can develop real acting skills. What do I know? But the golden torso will only pay dividends for so long.
And he will soon have another mouth to feed...

SD said...

So. (Re) watched the first lord of the rings movie. With a deeper appreciation. Must admit due to you. Yes. Home is compelling, and, alas, often elusive. As an aside, half-way through the film had a "oh noes" moment wondering if perhaps moi is being "MK Ultraed." And, if so, if this is worrisome.

The flick generated (yet more) thinking about myths, and how crucial they are. In particular, pondering the differences (and similarities) between U.S. and French Cinema, particularly post WWII. For the myths they purport and generate are (often) differen. Too busy (and tbh lazy) to elucidate on this now...but may pick up this thread later. (along with MH, AH and SP and TH, and the preponderance of ((( )))}

Speaking of myths. Julian Jackson's new book, simply titled De Gualle, is engrossing and nuanced. Jackson is a far deeper and better writer than Williams and does not deify as deftly as Lacouture did in his 3-vol. bio. Right now moi is deep into the page turning events of June-Aug 1944. Very, very interesting, and telling, to compare Jackson's rendition, and others recollections, with C d G memoirs. Often reads as different events. de G was a stubbornly brilliant myth-maker; never, not for a Paris minute, losing sight of the long game. What a bro!

During the events leading up to the liberation, de G was apparently more of a screamer than usual. (tbh, he was always a screamer) Seems he often, very often, would scream at peeps for a solid HOUR! (now who else indulges in such behavior? hmmm) Much is made of how de G had to be "handled" very carefully...or history watch out! Someone noted that de G, Churchill and Roosevelt's combined energy in a room was at times reminiscent of a pubescent girls school. lol

SD said...

p.s. Sylvia Plath was not Jewish, rather she was raised Unitarian. However, Assia Wevill, who TH left Plath for, was. Hughes had a toxic proclivity for deeply disturbed women, regardless of their religious affiliations, and scant awareness of how fidelity might strengthen intimate bonds.

Some may confuse Path's religious identity due to her poem "Daddy," written shortly before her suicide in which she revisions her long-dead father as a Nazi and herself as a Jew. To hear her read this poem (it is readily accessible) is to realize both how profoundly angry she was and, also, how deeply she self-identified as a victim.

As an aside, Plath had a long history of suicide attempts, hospitalizations, and maniac/depressive illness that predated her marriage to Hughes. She, and only she, turned on the gas that morning. Hughes, however flawed he might have been, was not responsible for her salvation, her healing, or her ultimate decision to die by suicide.

Original Aunty said...

You lazy bish. Don't watch the fucking movies. Read the goddamn books. I've NEVER watched LoTR. Everyone should read Tolkien. Holee shit. I hope they burn Hollywood to the ground. It's fucking ruined this country.

Sylvia Plath was ashkenazim. It's called DNA. Doesn't matter what religion she claimed. Anyway. Unitarian isn't much of a "religion". It's more like a lecture series. And yes. Hughes was a philandering asshole. Rather like Dornan TBH. But Plath was a fucking nutcase. (Typical of her DNA.) So his infidelity was perhaps understandable. Which may also explain Dornan's behavior. Tho that's where the similarity ends. Cuz Hughes was a great poet and writer. Dornan simply WISHES he were one. Anyway. There's a reason jews invented psychiatry.

I hear ya Snooze. Don't be so ready to compliment Dornan (or Dakota Johnson) for doing the bare minimum. Phoning it in. I've yet to see either pull off an impressive performance. They always seem to play a version of themselves. Tho' I disagree on his looks. While he's no longer a young man. Age looks well on him. But not Millie. She isn't aging well. Tho' Dakota appears more beautiful now than when this saga began. Dorian Gray???

Reading something that resonates gives one hope that the world isn't totally mad. It's the polar opposite of gas-lighting. The whole point of MK-ULTRA is getting peeps to do that which they would not on their own volition. And those who search for truth have neither time nor patience for lies.

SD said...

Come on. Give me a break toi. Actually i have read the Tolkien books, and I agree they are stronger than the movie. I misunderstood your post. Was actually confused, thinking you thought movies stronger than books.

No question. Plath was deeply disturbed. Yes. But she also wrote some strong poems. Hughes' lover Assia Wevill also committed suicide, killing her and Hughes 4-year-old child in the process, exactly the same way Plath did. Heart-breaking, no matter how it is sliced.

Pleeze. DJ is fucking 29. Jamie only 36. Most peeps physically look great at those ages. Particularly those like DJ who wear expensive clothes, indulge in endless "toning" and have access to "stylists" galore. I still think the best gift she and Jamie can give themselves is to go to college. The mind trumps the body always.

Look. Truth is an evolving, breathing energetic force. I believe it was Heidergeer who said the time to live authenticity is NOW.

Take care of yourself. And don't expend energy (now) being angry at me for my imperfections.

Sophie said...

Aunty,
Regarding Dakota...
I have noticed how politically active that she is - which is fine. But I just wish that she would make her contribution to society quietly.

Original Aunty said...

OH (must I call you C.R.H. now? Cuz I prefer Assy) STOP. I wasn't angry. That's me being "irreverent". And "witty". Do not mistake shit-posting for the genuine article. Hyperbole is NOT gospel. Sometimes its just to amuse.

No. TRUTH doesn't "evolve". We do. TRUTH doesn't change. Doesn't need to. But we DO change when we SEE and understand.

And yes. Ted Hughes was a sucker for fucked-up jews with big bewbs. Go figure. Maybe they were intoxicating to him. Or he liked women who fed his appetites. Who knows. I don't find selfishness "heartbreaking". Selfishness is disgusting. Self-pity stinks. And like Dornan. Hughes should have known better. But just as Dornan. Hughes likely knew better. And did it anyway. So when "tragedy" strikes. It isn't a great surprise. Maybe he needed the angst from great tragedy to produce great ART. Feeble excuse TBH.

I don't see either of them matriculating at college. But perhaps learning a trade. Carpentry. Or furniture-making. Or weaving. Tho' I tend to agree with Snoozle. Cuz doing REAL theater would be like going to college. But perhaps they're afraid of being around lots of talented actors. Movie stars and actors are seldom synonymous.

Try to be less thin-skinned when I bring the bants.

SD said...

Hughes famously, and dramatically, stated after Plath's suicide,"This is the end of my life. The rest is posthumous." Clearly, he was riddled with guilt, remorse, soulful lament. Did he indeed live out his remaining life in a state of grief-laced penance? I dunno. He sure as hell did seem to repeat himself with nightmarish frequency. Self-pity, even generated from a great poet, does suck. And inflicting lacerations of victim-hood over and over again, on and on, may generate some fine poems but lacks the velocity to walk-back the dead from self-imposed slumber.

For you. I will strive. To be less "thin-skinned." But that isn't an invite to "anything goes." Moi can't always discern the trees from the forest. Or is it the forest from the trees?

Original Aunty said...

Snark and shit-posting has its uses. As I recall. You give it out pretty good too. Cuz I was the recipient of some rather egregious gang-raping in the old crib. Remember? To which YOU eagerly participated. With several OTHER shitposting assholes who shall remain nameless. Tho'we ALL know them. Our little saga stars. My biggest complaint is that it lacked REAL wit. Banter and edge must be witty. Not simply mean-spirited. To have any REAL impact. It also requires a willingness to engage in self-deprecating humor as well as targeted snark. Otherwise it has no standing. One uses ones own foibles to highlight OTHERS. It's the saving grace. Better than wallowing in self-pity.

It's interesting Hughes cites Schopenhauer as one of his guiding lights. Schopenhauer is the antithesis of self-pity. He did, however, segregate natural WILL from metaphysical TRUTH. Every representation (i.e. choice) is an expression of human will. In the hands of the weak or manipulative -- this may be interpreted as ones choices are the conscious or unconscious result of WILL. And has an independent BEING which one follows much like a dog on the trail of a fox in heat. Thus WILL is a manifestation of things not necessarily related to "choice". Therefore one is "blameless" for any unfortunate results. This is a short-cut to "it matters not what we choose to do; only what we feel and experience". LOL.

Perhaps Hughes believed he needed to repeat "tragic mistakes" until he could "get it right". Figuring he'd use WILL to achieve a better outcome. His poetry was catharsis and documentation. Like a lab rat. Schopenhauer stated existence is characterized by suffering. Perhaps Hughes took it to mean we are given this laboratory of human existence to make all the wrong choices. Repeatedly. And by doing so eventually come to the RIGHT conclusions. Again LOL. Those who believe MOTIVES have more standing than choices or actions or outcomes tend to use this excuse. Kinda like "the ends justify the means". Or. "I never MEANT to hurt you. I was just following my dick (aka WILL)." It's all so tedious.

I agree with Schopenhauer. Human existence is characterized by suffering. That doesn't mean we magnify the suffering to beat it. Nor to end our "existence" by suicide or "where's the danger" living. The purpose of human life is to learn to how to turn away from desire. To deny WILL any POWER. It's not blindly following "rules". Nor blindly breaking them. It's the ability to choose RIGHTEOUSNESS over desire. Salvation comes in denying sin. And by reflecting TRUTH. Which requires us to stifle WILL whilst on this plane as fast as humanly possible. This isn't done by doubling down on it. It's LETTING GO. Transiting to the next "plane of existence" with the distinction of having ticked-off ALL the "wrong choice" boxes doesn't give one a priority seat assignment. "As a tree is felled so shall it be found...". We are given the tools to choose "better angels". It's metaphysics 101. Living with crazy tends to make one crazy and results in crazy outcomes. #SMH.

Hughes lost two children to suicide. This is what his WILL set in motion. It tracks to "sins of the fathers". Sour grapes indeed. Hughes would have MUCH MORE powerful in his art had he worked beyond his own WILL. And is how I understand Schopenhauer.

Do you think he's been told to stay off this thread? I do. Given his dislike for following rules. They musta threatened to take something REALLY valuable away. Otherwise. He'd be shitposting here too. Cuz he can't help himself. He LOVES it. Unless he's scared. Do you think he fears this thread? I KNOW Millie does. And his minders do. Whew faggots. That's what I call POWER. Lemme bask in the glow for a moment. OK. I'm done.

SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...

...after sylvia and ted depart
(and considering Martin Heidegger...)
*******

Not Ideas about the Thing but the Thing Itself

At the earliest ending of winter,
In March, a scrawny cry from outside
Seemed like a sound in his mind.

He knew that he heard it,
A bird’s cry, at daylight or before,
In the early March wind.

The sun was rising at six,
No longer a battered panache above snow . . .
It would have been outside.

It was not from the vast ventriloquism
Of sleep’s faded papier-mâché . . .
The sun was coming from outside.

That scrawny cry—it was
A chorister whose c preceded the choir.
It was part of the colossal sun,

Surrounded by its choral rings,
Still far away. It was like
A new knowledge of reality.

Wallace Stevens
1954

*****
Wallace Stevens lived in Hartford, Ct, where for decades he was a vice president of an insurance company. He lived, one might suppose, a very ordinary life. Each day he walked to work, composing poems as he went.

This poem was written shortly before his death in 1955.



SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Original Aunty said...

Nice poem. Thanks for sharing it. Long ago. I walked to work in Hartford. The wind blew down the river. It was cold. And snow didn't fully melt until mid-April. But June was glorious. Well worth the wait. And September sublime. Now I'm gonna hunt for my old copy of Ethan Frome.

You should stop deleting posts. It's pointless. No one gives a fuck. If they ARE tracking comments. They have them before you push the send button anyway.

It is what it is.

SD said...

Well...hopefully YOU do.

Your last post is overflowing, many nuances to unpack, dots to connect. My far too quick response was facile, flippant, at best. The internet makes communication supersonic, leaving contemplation, reflection and due diligence far too often out of the equation.

In the cold sad wake of Plath and Hughes a spirit needs some serious airing out. Stevens' steadiness, receptivity and awe not only raised, but trumped, their howls. And his vocabulary and metaphors-- vast ventriloquism!!!-- lifts the language and experience of the everyday to new vistas.

When you have a moment read Stevens long poem, "The Sail of Ulysses," written also in 1954, the year prior to his death. It REALLY resonates Heidegger, and shines a bright light on the rich complexity of being-ness.

My books. Saving graces. Particularly poetry.

Though, currently, a million de Gaulle words cover moi. That boy could sure talk/write. He often said if he not become a soldier he would have been a librarian. Consistently read 3 books a week throughout his life. No matter how busy.

In the Jackson bio, we are in 1944-45 and the General is (re) constructing HIS France. This is the de G that challenges moi the most: Steely, unbending, authoritarian, ruthless. Throwing massive temper tantrums seemingly daily, harsh and wildly, unpredictably temperamental. Executing journalists left and right! Erasing all signs of Vichy collusion and replacing it with myths of resistance and solidarity.

He was one mother fucker for the ages.

Original Aunty said...

It makes me sad to think we don't make them like THAT anymore. Perhaps its one reason for Trump. The confidence of righteousness. The certitude. And unwavering resolve. It's very appealing. On many levels.

I never watched The Apprentice. Not even once. Trump was a cartoon. A caricature. I wanted to sow chaos in the deep state. And Trump was the tool.

Now I view him as Cyrus. And give zero-fucks what others think. Or what he says. (Tho' his tweets are fucking GOLD -- the absolute madman.) Only what he DOES matters. And I see great similarities between his actions and CdG's.

I encourage everyone to watch "The Lobby" recently produced by Al Jazeera. The first two episodes are available on YouTube. Until they take it down.

I love books. Even the ones I don't seem to get around to read. Somehow having them around feels comforting. As if their presence alone makes me stronger. Sometimes the ones I read become bored af. Impatience with the story. Or the flow of information. Or maybe I'm looking for a stronger arc. Or more nuanced conclusions. And perhaps I'd write it better. Or come to a higher understanding of TRUTH than the author. It's not ego per se. I don't think I'm smarter or a better writer. But I'm searching more than most. And I don't want to be fed "answers". Which do NOT resonate.

When my children were young. We'd attend church (on occasion) with their father. Otherwise they went to mine. During the rectors sermon I'd whisper "corrections" in their ears. Cuz at times the message needed tweaking and clarity. And I wanted them to recognize metaphysical TRUTH. I fucking hated anthropomorphic brainwashing from the pulpit. And its echo'd everywhere by media and education and gov't and health care and religious organizations.

I tend to read books in the same critical way. Editing them in my own head. When I sense an author trying to slide me into a chute. Toward a specific outcome. Rather than provide me the tools to better understand TRUTH. I stop reading. Same with people. I've left more "frens" in the rear-view mirror than I can count. Cuz moral sanity and individual liberty is sacred. One becomes keenly aware of manipulation and all its sources.

To the extent art and literature deepens and encourages ones understanding. Its a service. When it morphs into brainwashing and propaganda and gas-lighting. Then not so much.

Sophie said...

Aunty,
I agree with you regarding Trump.
He uses tweets because he can communicate directly without his message being changed by the media. And each of us can interpret what he says for ourselves. ( he is not Shakespeare, but who cares)
I am not seeking a leader who is politically correct - because that BS has ruined our country. Being the most qualified candidate for the position is now over ridden by the need to fulfill EEOC guidelines. And I have answered to some imbeciles, who use terrible grammar, etc. but they got the job because of their specific characteristics.
So I applaud Trump - because he has the courage and stamina to speak out against the special interests that have run over the honest, hard working citizens of our country - and the veterans who have defended our freedom.

SD said...

Yes. I've suspected such motives for awhile.

CdG is inspirational, unique, compelling. A virtual force of nature. TBH, toi is the one (not DJT) who resonates temperamentally intellectually, energetically with the General. De G acted, always, from a place of passion, love, commitment, total belief, and unwavering determination. Plus he was smart as a whip. De G would absolutely despise Trump. Don't think he could even BE in the same room w/him. However, he would find toi of interest...with reservations. (your French doesn't meet THE standard, lol) Let's be honest, de G trusted NO anglo-saxons.(ok, maybe Jackie Kennedy--she did wrestle the Mona Lisa from him w/little effort. But then again, her French was impeccable)

Yes! To the life of the mind and spirit. Toi quickens moi. Fills in gaps, expands out the discourse, facilitates greater agility, a willingness-- nay excitement-- to dig in deeper. In ways that hark back to the beginning when books WERE moi's (entire) world. My "forevers." Through you, ideas, people, thoughts, a way of seeing, clarifies, is revealing. In ways that are increasingly fluid and transformation.

I too like to (need to actually) be surrounded by books...tho' I do attempt to winnow down the accumulation a tad, utilize intra-library loan more. I have books that belonged to my ancestors: my father's confirmation King James, some of the Harvard Classics my grandfather read in lieu of a college education and a book, in German, my grandparents carried with them through Elias Island.

Books are not static, fixed energies. They evolve and change, like people. What might offer little engagement at twenty is, perhaps, a lifeline at 60. Philosophy, metaphysics, history, poems once impenetrable have become guiding stars. I also get bored, impatient, intolerant almost, of certain books and writers. Little time for dumb, predictable, time-draining tripe. Or people.

BTW, I have never watched ANY "reality" TV show ever. Moi threw out our television when the kiddos outgrew Sesame Street and instated books in its' stead. (certain) Movies, on the other hand, were on the "ok" list...

SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
BBB said...

I'm not even American, I'm a proud European, so I probably shouldn't even be posting about this topic, but I will anyway, because Trump image and insane rhetoric makes me want to vomit, I despise Trump and it's hard for me to understand people who support him. Hopefully my confrère Mueller and his legal team will be successful and bring down Trump and those surrounding him, his dumb son Jr. will probably be the next in to be indicted.
A pathological liar, a crook that has no ethical values what so ever and spreads dangerous seeds of hate, and deeply ignores virtues like Prudence, Temperance, Justice or Fortitude, can't be allowed to risk Democracy values like he has been doing.
Lock him up Mueller, lock him up.

Sophie said...

BBB,

If you would like to share your location of citizenship, we can discuss your leader.

If you do not live here, you do not have any idea of what we have experienced with previous administrations, as well as the current administration.

Original Aunty said...

Anyone looking to Mueller for salvation or ethics will be sadly disappointed. I didn't vote for Trump's kids. And other than Barron I wouldn't be sad to see the last of them. Particularly Ivanka. And her husband. One wonders what Jarrod Kushner knew about Khashoggi. And when he knew it...

Same here. Never watched reality shows. Nary a one. That includes the dancing and singing ones. And bachelors getting laid on TV. Lowest common denominator.

It's doubtful CdG could tolerate American's. And NONE would pass muster these days. The French are horrible snobs. Not that I blame him. But Europe TODAY is nothing compared to Europe then. And they fucked themselves. So I have NO pity. One of my dear departed family was Jackie's roomie for a year at Farmington. I have a very sweet pic of them. And some fun stories. But the world has changed. And one must adapt. Or throw in the towel. Memories have a way of easing ones path.

I don't know about ya'll. But those fake-twitter poetry accounts are SO FUCKING HILARIOUS. It's one thing to write bad poetry. Everyone does. It takes practice. But lately its SO FUCKING BAD. Blah, blah, blah. Come fuck me now. Blah, blah, blah. I wanna lick your body all over. Blah, blah, blah. Your pussy is the best pussy evah. Hahahahaha. Holee shit. Does no one edit anymore???? The self-pity and navel-gazing is EPIC. I swear. Boomers may be totally pathetic. But millennials are SO MUCH WORSE. Gawd help civilization.

P.S. Do you think Deep State is taking direction from this thread? To be fair. I posted "burn Hollywood". Not "burn Malibu". Sadly for commie-libs. The deep state will sacrifice them. In a heartbeat. It is what it is.

Original Aunty said...

Hey Snooze. I gave up trying to explain Trump. Or what's happening. Ages ago. Some people refuse to SEE. Or take the red-pill. I understand. It's hard. Cuz the awakening isn't for the faint-hearted. But for those who do SEE. Even a little. Know that what appears isn't necessarily what IS. We are watching a movie. Call it "The Sting". Everyone is an actor playing a part. So when a guy like Lindsay Graham begins to act in ways TOTALLY INCONSISTENT with past actions. Know something BIG has changed.

I think everyone (last 50 years) in US politics was compromised by DeepState/Mossad/CIA. But in the last year 61,000+ sealed indictments have changed the field of play. Deepstate no longer holds the blackmail-cards. People who were DS puppets are NOW working for Trump. Today, I read Edward Snowden blamed Tel Aviv IT companies for enabling the Khashoggi murder! Hahahaha. This is the same traitorous-CIA/Mossad-twerp who wouldn't say it was Israel (not NSA) hoovering ALL our data and spying on Americans. But he's no longer working for Deepstate. And his script is being written by those who work for Trump. But its much bigger than Trump. MUCH.

This election was a sting operation. Remember the Alabama senate election? Yeah. No one wanted Roy Moore. Not Trump. Roy Moore was BAIT. They never planned for him to win. They used him to draw out, watch and collect EVIDENCE on dems cheating in that election. Vote rigging and outright fraud. NO ONE was arrested. Cuz Trump lulled the cheaters into believing they got away with it. And they used the same tactics THIS election. And ALL HELL is about to break loose. WATCH. Don't "trust" me. Don't "believe" me. JUST WATCH.

Nancy Pelosi is working for Trump. Yep. You heard it here folks. She has been for the last year-plus. Otherwise she'd be in gitmo. Not Speaker again. Where she'll be Trumps whipping-boy. And her House dems will be blamed for the financial CRASH that's coming. Love him or hate him. He's the best strategist I've ever seen. And I've seen alot. His instincts are prescient.

BIG SHIT is happening. Watch.

SD said...

PART ONE:

(somewhere in germany)
10.II.25

He picks up a pen, fumbles for a sheet of paper. And begins the (first) letter with: (trepidation, fear, ambivalence, cunning, evilness, Being-ness...) EXCITEMENT.

Dear Miss Arendt! (hmmm, exclamation point/was this 1920s Germanic grammar usage?)

"I must come see you this evening and speak to your heart."

(...just can't make this stuff up, letter flows enigmatically on for awhile. The word BEING is used twice.)

"But just once I would like to be able to thank you and, with a kiss on your pure brow, take the honor of your being {oops, third use of word being, but not capitalized} into my work."

(Wtf, not even out the gate, already he is passing her the keys to the "kingdom.")

Time passes...
a mere few letters later, still 1925:
"Das daemonische hat mich getroffen. Nie noch ist mir so etius geschehen.
(translation: I have been touched by the demonic. Nothing like this has ever happened to me before.)

much more time passes:
1961
Arendt to Karl Jasper, after MH did not acknowledge The Human Condition (secret) dedication:
"I know he finds it intolerable that I appear in public, that I write books, etc. All my life, I've pulled the wool over his eyes so to speak, acted as if none of that existed and as if I could not count to 3 and even sometimes to 4. Then I suddenly felt this deception was becoming just too boring, and so I get a rap on the nose."

and even more time passes:
1975
NYC

HA dies. A heart-attack. Found in her bedroom desk, in the top drawer yet, are a neat stack of letters. His all handwritten (some clearly marked, DESTROY this after reading. hahahah) Hers at the beginning also (copies of) handwritten, then carbons of typewritten letters.

Five months later, 1976, in Germany, MH dies. This is surprising only in that it took him so long to follow

The letters are immediately "sealed" for the next 25-years. (Though their relationship is common (controversial) knowledge, the fact that they were also lovers for a time is NOT nor that they corresponded always. He was, after all, much older (she a mere 18 when that first letter was set in motion), her teacher, and, always married w/2 children. (Indeed, a true he/she/she arrangement)

Yet more time passes:

Letters, 1925-1975
Hannah Arendt
and
Martin Heidegger
is publ.
first in German than English

The following is a sample "review" "reaction" to the publication:

"Sycophant,hypocrite, Jew-betraying, Hannah Arendt licked Nazi Martin Heigegger's jackboots for decades, betraying all that is good and decent in the world and, once and for all, confirming the over-rated and ill deserved reputation of both their writings. We urge good people everywhere to shun them both for all eternity."

******

SD said...

PART TWO:

She is running down the hill, towards the creek and the, then, the woods. Long legs, long, blond braids, she is, indeed, an Aryan princess.

"Run faster. Leap the creek" she hears from behind her.

She speeds up. Lifts off. Easily clears the creek. Before her the woods!! She had never, not once, reached their end. Her heart accelerates.
She pivots. Turns.

Toi!

"Hurry up. it is getting dark already, soon we will both be called home (alas.alas). What are you waiting for? JUMP. And then she (hesitatingly, shyly, cunningly, devotedly, sincerely...) EXCITEDLY stretches out her hand.

Same as it ever was.

******

Note: Part three forthcoming, later.

Original Aunty said...

Imagine. Sitting at the knee of Martin Heidegger. And lying your ass-off to him. About your REAL intentions. Pfffft.

Every. Single. Time.

SD said...

Come on.
In a fifty-year relationship a lot of things are said and a lot of stuff goes down. From the "outside" many assumptions can be made. Both HA and MH were magnetic and enigmatic. HA did throw shade but, then again, so did he. I thought that comment she made 30 years, or so, into their relationship was a RIOT. (But, then again, my humor often eludes toi.)

But it is true that he ALWAYS needed her admiration and devotion from the get go. Which she rather happily provided. Their letters to each other reveal, but also conceal. Lots of "coding" going on. No doubt they had a "Secret" language.

The bottom line is they went the distance for each other. Their intellectual work is of one cloth in many ways.

Her very public comments on the occasion of his 80th birthday are fiercely supportive of him, his contributions, and the importance of a life of the mind. She was absolutely unrelenting in her defense of him. Always.


BTW. Her coverage of the Eichmann trial was rigorous and brutal. The New Yorker almost did not run her articles on the trial. It is intensely controversial to this day. She was highly critical of Israel, raising in 1963 many of the concerns that are in The Lobby series.

SD said...

Part 3: The Point

Moi consults oracles, reads poems, listens to music, mediates longer than usual. Takes walks in the woods. Clears out. Focuses. Sends forth positive energy to the universe.

I ask, what is the "point?" Of a one-on-one, even if merely a private email account, between moi and toi? What's in "it," for toi? and for moi?

Firstly, this thread, CDAN as a site, is a ghost ship. What's with it? No moderation. Few peeps. It has exhausted for me. You however have not "exhausted." You are "more" than you've ever been. To me.

Here, on this thread, I feel at times as if I am a contestant on a reality internet/social media show. I don't like that. It is inhibiting and, frankly, unsettling. Who is watching? Like a peepshow.

Frankly. I am a very private person. Who leads a very private life. Intentionally so. Yet my energy expands when in relation with yours. It is a gestalt. Something worth protecting, nurturing, exploring. Not to lightly, casually, cast aside. In confusion. Because it defies "normal" or because you perplex me, sometimes.

Anyhow. Every oracle consulted. Every card drawn. I ching thrown. Or book consulted.
Offers the same "it." Again. And yet again.

THE MIDDLE WAY

Wow. A surprise. Totally non-scripted, as is par for the course. It resonates very clearly as an offering.

What say you?


Original Aunty said...

Do you think the attempts to assassinate Trump will equal the attempts to assassinate CdG? Kinda like estimating the number of marbles in a glass jar. Hard to guess.

I'm a poor pen-pal. And this venue suits my purposes. Developing personal contacts are a burden. One feels beholden. Inspiration is constrained by wanting to please. And personal agendas. And curating TRUTH to maintain relationships. All the ways one conforms to fit another's expectations. Like Hannah did with Martin. I wonder. Do you think she regretted all the years she spent trying to please him? Rather than being her OWN muse.

I am my own muse...

Original Aunty said...

...between the crosses, row on row...

Original Aunty said...

PM of Belgium. Seated on the third row. Behind Bibi. LOL. And where was the Aussi PM? Didn't they sacrifice a bunch of white goys for the Red-Shields too?

Tick-tock.

SD said...


I know your name. I can turn on my macbook pro and watch an image many times removed move through space, through time. But it is not toi. Toi is "here." Not "there." It is a true paradox. Moi is only "here." Toi can not dial her up "there" on command on his MacBook pro. Moi feels the longer she stays "here" the more she may hurt toi "there." This is increasingly intolerable.

To live is to be, as Aristotle postulated, always present. Present-ness is what unifies all the different modes of Being. Yet to be present is to also accept limitations. A body hurdles through space at thousands of miles per minute. At the end of the day in control of very little.

I am not a "target." Or a "contact." Or an abstraction in your philosophical system.


#notmoi




SD said...

"In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below."



#notmoi

SD said...

"You should stop deleting posts. It's pointless. No one gives a fuck. If they ARE tracking comments. They have them before you push the send button anyway."


Care to elaborate?

Is someone "controlling" the screen?





#notmoi

SD said...

...moi gets it. toi does not trust her. Or rather YOU do not trust ME. Actually toi may half-trust moi. Moi 100% trusts toi.

Do you feel this "issue" is immutable? Like a law of physics? But wait. Haven't the laws of physics changed. CHANGED. Yup, heard it here first. Change does happen.



#notmoi

SD said...

post script (last for now):

ok. 98% trust. Or maybe 92.5% Trust percentage appears to be dropping...even for moi. Who is the most loyal. On this board.


Are you trying to check (mate) me? If so Stop with the launching of multi-boards. Much fairer, and tbh more exciting, to play w/ one board, two people. All moves visible. With a time limit between moves...Or maybe we can negotiate (yup, NEGOTIATE) the time-between-move-rule.


#notmoi

#notme

Original Aunty said...

"Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit. And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many..."

You mistake me for what you WISH me to be. Not what I AM. And no. You are not my target. I don't have one. Not in human form anyway. So rest easy. My ONLY job is to witness TRUTH. Not proselytize the irredeemable.

The concept of "present-ness" is not limited by time or space. It's the recognition of Life as wholly spiritual. And Spirit is omnipresent. At every moment. "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?" Nay.

I do not SEE myself as ephemeral dust hurtling thru a physical universe. BEING is cause. Not effect. The only abstractions are the ones we make ourselves. Cuz TRUTH is simple. Lies and delusions and false gods destroy mankind. The poem was a call for more innocent young men. To sacrifice themselves on the alter of false gods. To benefit those who worship evil. No wonder the (((elites))) wear bright red poppies. Commemorating blood sacrifice of the innocent.

The fire rises.

How nice to afford a MacBook...

Original Aunty said...

Elaborate? Think "Prism". The spook "powers-that-be" who track everyone. And everything. Capturing every keystroke. That's NO secret. It's FACT.

There are "LEGIONS" in cubicles worldwide tracking online comments. My own PERSONAL fantasy is a team of chad NSA or MI analysts reading my posts. And chuckling at the bants. Sharing them with their supervisors. Gawd. How great is THAT image. Sadly. It's prolly a bunch of mossad-IDF-clowns in Tel Aviv.

SD said...

"All you have to do is decide what to do with the time given you"


Moi accepts toi for who he IS. I am NOT a missionary out to convert toi to the moi-way of Being. But does toi accept moi for who she is? Or, rather, is it all about hermenutics? For you, that is.

(yes, moi is getting ready to once again (try to) dive into Heidegger, thus the use of Capital B's, as in BEING, as a warm-up exercise. Next up: incorporating-lots-of-hyphens-to-examine-complexity-as-one-idea.)

Just out of idle curiosity... Who do YOU imagine moi wishes toi to BE? And what, realistically speaking, ARE you?

SD said...

erratum:

I take back "The Middle Way." Moi realizes she was intellectually lazy in thinking through the question, "what's in it for me?" Depended too much on the oracles. Not enough on "gut." And truly did not take toi into consideration enough in her answer.

Moi realizes that The Middle Way could be seen as running contrary to the motivations in toi's "there." And thus by extension pushing an "agenda." Which runs contrary to NOT having an "agenda." Which is what moi strives for with toi. Comprende?

Sometimes when moi mediates she sends forth, "may you be happy, may you know peace, may you remain safe."

p.s. A semantic clarification regarding "here" and "there." Henceforth, moi will refer to toi while "there" as VOUS.

Original Aunty said...

So. Lemme try and unwrap this package. You SEE "toi" as "he". Okay. Fair enuf. You have the right to SEE whatever you choose. He's not channeling thru me. Tho' I sense him knock-knock-knocking at my consciousness door at times. He KNOWS what he needs to do. And his job is to get about it. No different than each and every one of us. Channeling me (or CdG for that matter) will NOT get him (nor anyone) to where he needs to be. What his gut is trying to drive him toward. To BE HOME. We ALL need to BE HOME.

It's important to pray for mankind. For peace. And joy. And salvation. These are qualities of the divine Mind. The danger is praying FOR another without being asked to do so. Cuz the action of PRAYING is very powerful. It's the act of dis-intermediating between man (singular object) and God (subject). Intermediation is the office of The Christ. And such action -- without being asked to intermediate thru prayer -- is a slippery slope. Even the best of intentions fall short. And hexes always boomerang.

My rule is never pray for another unless specifically asked. I pray for GOOD to manifest in human lives (plural) and to SEE it unfold here. On this plane of existence. And for TRUTH to be seen and understood. We all make mistakes in honest efforts to direct metaphysical healing. TRUTH doesn't need our direction. It's always in operation. Always unfolding. Always healing. Always guarding and guiding us onward and upward. Our job is to SEE it. And manifest it in our OWN lives. Thru actions from CHOICES. It's pretty simple really.

SD said...

"AWARENESS"


Though (surprised, startled, bemused, apprehensive, suspicious) grateful that toi took time off from "getting about it" to read moi's letter (oops, post) she regrettably must inform him/her/it that he/she/it unwrapped the wrong package. It happens. No blame. We all have our blind spots.

Granted. Archetypes have their place in slogging thru what is what and why in the good 'ol collective unconscious. Form-holders to that which is shapeless. When a much (much) younger traveler I studied C. Jung. When his theories and writings became the stuff of posters adorning college bedroom walls I moved on taking the shadow, anima/animus and, most particularly, the Wise Old Man for future reference.

Though not wanting to give away too many "spoilers," suffice to say you are not THE HE. In simple laymen terms: toi=YOU (here) AND vous=YOU (there). Get it? Prolly not. But maybe at some point you might.

BTW. Moi does not pray. She meditates (mediates was a typo). Big difference. To meditate is to sink into the earth of Now. To sink into one's glorious life. And no matter where one is, one is Home. Not almost home, or longing and wishing for home, or making deals with the devil or archangels to secure safe passage, but already there. Home, simply, is not a place. No sir.

Did moi say she send forth a metta meditation specifically for toi? No she did not state such an intention. TBH, rather self-centered of toi to make such an assumption and then, further, to reprimand moi for her thoughtfulness. Moi meditates for all sentient beings. Breath in suffering, breath out maitri. No Big Guy gawd, per se, is ruling the roost in meditating. A different beast all together than prayer.

p.s. Practicing tonglen is very different from channeling.

AgonyAunt said...

It's impossible to engage in reasonable convos or bantz with a certifiable schizo satanist. Sad.

SD said...

You are very predictable. As soon as questioned, or challenged, in the smallest metaphoric, metaphysical or mundane way you lash out.

I am not a mirror for you to arrange, rearrange or break at will. Nor am I some 28-year-old easy-to-manipulate-4chan-soul seeking directives. My raison d'etre is not to entertain you, or anyone, between flights or places-to-be.

Sad...more like stupid, if you ask me.

SD said...

p.s. with all due respect, one can learn quite a bit by engaging in "stuff" that may at first blush appear unreasonable or even impossible. It's called "raising the bar" or, perhaps, "if you take a hand it may lead you down the path to Rome."

At this point in my life I want to touch the sky, not celebrate all the things I've done wrong...right now, right now, doing the best I can.

Sophie said...

Jamie has become pretty comfortable talking about Dakota these days - or “DJ” as he referred to her recently.

SD said...

a non-sequitur:

Moi never knew what a CDAN was till the winds of fate threw her down the chute. And since then never really perused other CDAN "threads" much. I would click my way right into "when the rubber hits the road (TREAD)"(this HERE thread) and "The CRIB."(a departed thread that moi did not archive like some. prolly 'cause there was NO moi active in the crib)

Anyhow. Yesterday I actually read a few past CDAN posts and holy shit!!!!! the long "enty" posts are good, solid writing. And funny too. The post "Two Broke Girls" (I forgot Lindsay Lohan's name, to reread post had to duckduckgo Jamie Dornan to retreive her name) and "Gran Torino." Both could just make it into the Paris Review. They are that good. It didn't even matter that I had no idea who the "stars" or "celebs" were that were being discussed in the stories. Now that is the litmus test of good writing!

In fact. The post brought to moi's mind J. Joyce's Ulysses, a 783 page book that takes place during just one day in June (16th) in Ireland, utilizing little punctuation and even, here and there, words that Joyce just made up.

No doubt about it, Joyce's Ulysses is a tough read. Requires a fair amount of concentration and FOCUS (not moi's strong-point). The beauty of enty's stories are that any jackass can enter into the narrative. (tho' there are a fair amount of posters that complain they are tooo long and complicated)

As a point of reference. Ulysses was for all extent and purposes banned in the U.S. in 1933 (for a few years). In other words, it was not allowed to be imported into the U.S. due to its' (alleged) "obscene" contents. (a guy masturbating, I think, was the obscene that was cited) Let's face it, if you are trying to fill 783 pages of "stuff" that happens in one lone day you have to touch on numerous activities, some perhaps not PC13 approved.

Another aside: half-way through "2 Broke Girls" moi had a WHAT THE FUCK revelation.

SD said...

p.s.s. to clarify. Enty post(s) and Joyce's Ulysses parallel a bit more.

Ulysses, despite highfalutin title, dives head first into "everyday" life, illuminating outer events and inner musings/monologues/dialogues of just a few people: some trivial, some poignant, some repulsive, and, now and again, some true bell-ringers.

In other words, reading Ulysses one gets the drift that there is substance and resonance in god-damn EVERY day. Enty "gets" this too as he depicts his adventures, trials and tribulations, in HW. Or at least I, as a reader, get that resonance when reading his posts. So that is something, even if it wasn't Enty's intent.

Go figure.

SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sophie said...

I just saw “A Private War” and I found it to be very impactful. This movie provides insight into the unbelievable risks that journalists take in order to bring us the news. I recommend that you see it, if you are so inclined.

(And by the way, Fifty Shades never entered my mind during this movie!)

SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
AgonyAunt said...

Is it safe yet?

Sophie said...

I hope that it’s safe

Kiki said...

Now back to our regularly scheduled program.....So apparently Rita Ora is "dating" Andrew Garfield. Given that Jamie and Andrew are good mates, do you think they compare notes?????

AgonyAunt said...

Whew. One seldom finds me for lack of words. Dumbstruck.

Ahhhhh. Rita. Even her trolls are bored these days. Very low-energy posting. Cuz #METOO. You think Andrew actually has sex with her? Like swapping fluids and stuff? I'm not feeling it. Perhaps SOHO House is repping them both these days. Like Harry and Meghan. In between trafficking kiddies. And eyes-wide-shut satanic sacrifices. Ugh. Such uninteresting low-brow tacky people. They ALL belong together. Behind locked gates. Far far away from humanity.

Sophie said...

It seems that if/when Robin Hood has a sequel that Jamie is up for a major role...
Too bad the film has been a flop at the box office

BBB said...

“I was sitting on the seashore, half listening to a friend arguing violently about something which merely bored me. Unconsciously to myself, I looked at a film, of sand I had picked up on my hand, when I suddenly saw the exquisite beauty of every little grain of it; instead of being dull, I saw that each particle was made up on a perfect geometrical pattern, with sharp angles, from each of which a brilliant shaft of light was reflected, while each tiny crystal shone like a rainbow. . . . The rays crossed and recrossed, making exquisite patterns of such beauty that they left me breathless. … Then, suddenly, my consciousness was lighted up from within and I saw in a vivid way how the whole universe was made up of particles of material which, no matter how dull and lifeless they might seem, were nevertheless filled with this intense and vital beauty. For a second or two the whole world appeared as a blaze of glory. When it died down, it left me with something I have never forgotten and which constantly reminds me of the beauty locked up in every minute speck of material around us.”
The Doors of Perception & Heaven and Hell by Aldous Huxley

Original Aunty said...

"For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."

BBB said...

“We neither encourage nor discourage. We accept it. Accept it as we accept that spiderweb up there on the cornice. Given the nature of spiders, webs are inevitable. And given the nature of human beings, so are religions. Spiders can’t help making fly traps, and men can’t help making symbols. That’s what the human brain is there for – to turn the chaos of given experience into a set of manageable symbols.”
Island by Aldous Huxley

AgonyAunt said...

*The life of Christ Jesus was not miraculous. But it was indigenous to his spirituality. The good soil wherein the seed of TRUTH springs up and bears much fruit. Christ’s Christianity is the chain of scientific being reappearing in all ages. Maintaining its obvious correspondence with the Scriptures. And uniting all periods in the design of God. Neither emasculation, illusion, nor insubordination exists in divine Science of Being.

To grasp the reality and order of being one must begin by reckoning God as the divine Principle of all that really is. Spirit, Life, Truth, Love,
combine as one. And are the Scriptural names for God. All substance, intelligence, wisdom, being, immortality, cause, and effect belong to God. These are His attributes. The eternal manifestations of the infinite
divine Principle, Love. No wisdom is wise but His wisdom. No truth is true. No love is lovely. No life is Life. But the divine. No good IS but the good God bestows.*

SD said...

How does sex factor into the divine? Or doesn't it?

AgonyAunt said...

Idunno. Ask madlad. He's the master at conjuring anthropomorphic sexual deities. Orally genuflecting at the pussy-altar. Do you think the sex-gods heal him of mouth sores? Ewwwwwww.

It's Happy Hanukkah season. Let's not get lost down rabbit-hole, Alice. If you choose to go there. You go alone.

SD said...

Rabbit holes can be weird and scary. No sir!! Count me out. wouldn't want to go down "there," even if you were along for "the ride."

Ah, well. I will continue to research sex gods on my own. Perplexing topic. No easy answers. Don't think answer resides with ho-hum actors tho'.

Original Aunty said...

Ho-hum actors? WOW. Times and tunes have changed. I recall one or several of your many alter-egos waxing poetic on the ethereally multi-talented Mr. Dornan. An "artist" of the highest. Deep sigh. I reckon even the most rabid fanfag gets weary of mundane and relentless navel-gazing. And repetitive failure of words and deeds. Oh Absalom, Absalom. A tale told by an idiot. Full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing.

Sex? As in creative. Or degenerate. There is little doubt which "sex-gods" madlad worships.

SD said...

What? Who is fucking up? holding onto outdated alter-egos? let it go

Hannah J said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hannah J said...

Just read an article Jamie did with a French Magazine. I liked Jamie but he comes off sounding like an idiot. First he proceeds to say that Dakota and Amelia love each other…..two times I saw them together it was a PR move and Dakota looked uncomfortable, while the wife grinned that toothy smile. Second his wife loves his beard and he loves his wife so much he keeps it for her (plus he hates shaving). Millie isn’t stupid, not many people like the lumberjack/homeless look that Jamie has been having lately. Then he explains that he will tell his children that Daddy was young when he decided to do FS and he had to make a name for himself. No you did Fifty because you weren’t getting any roles (Yes he got The Fall, but not many people even knew about that until he started becoming famous for FS) and your wife loves to be with famous men and loves the spotlight. So yes you can be embarrassed about Fifty but you knew what it was about when you took the part (you re-auditioned) and your wife knew it was going to put your name on the map! Now she (along with her mother) once again can ride the tails of someone very famous. Jamie just needs to stop giving interviews because he’s starting to sound like a d-bag! Believe me if it wasn’t for his looks and his popularity, he would be having a much harder time getting roles. All his obsessed fans will go see him reading the dictionary if they had to. Why do you think those morons wanted him so bad to be in Untogether. That movie wasn’t going anywhere without his name attached.

AgonyAunt said...

One yearns for TRUTH in a jaded and wicked world. In my "script". When asked the inevitable FSOG questions. Madlad would respond..."I knew what I was signing up for. It was money and exposure. FSOG fulfilled BOTH goals beyond my wildest dreams. Enabling me to care for my family; keep my wife in a style to which she is now happily accustomed; and be on a short list for other interesting roles. FSOG has given me #FUCKYOU means. People make far riskier decisions every day (than to simulate sex in a BDSM trilogy franchise) for much less reward. I have NO regrets."

But madlad isn't courageous. Nor honest. It is what it is.

BBB said...

Who could imagine their love story would have end up like this, both J and D suffering, hiding, pretending everything is fine... Trying to please talentless egocentric manipulative women with a sick PR agenda like MyWife and Goop. What a shame! They had everything to shine instead they choose the weak path like submissive little cunts.

Kiki said...

Hey BBB I got a bridge to sell you if you actually believe that Jamie and Dakota are star crossed lovers who are pretending......I mean even most of the die-hard Damies know that its over and probably never even started.

AgonyAunt said...

We ALL know the script, Kiki. Do yourself a solid. Don't go down as a lying shill. They can't pay you enough to destroy your integrity. Cuz that's what it is. Self-cannibalization. Moral insanity. The loss of ones AUTHENTIC being. Don't do it. Don't destroy your health and happiness. Step back from the abyss.

BBB is posting TRUTH. The old-fags still lurking here (from time to time) know the score. One takes a hiatus. Cuz 'reality' sucks. When it's the outcome of persistently bad choices. Sometimes one can't absorb the blows of entrenched stupidity. Doesn't make it easier on anyone to wag-ones-finger endlessly and drone on with "told you so". One strives to be BETTER. Not bitter. Sometimes that means leaving the field to coven energies. Watch them wither and self-destruct from afar. Some lessons are best learned the hard way. Over-and-over. Ad-nauseum.

The best metaphysical work is done in darkness. Alone with God. Not needing any other power. Or protection. Not working as a coven chanting and conjuring satanic delusions. There is NO power in darkness that appears as light. Exhibit 1: the GG's. At least Christian Bale had the honestly to acknowledge it. The goal is to be light that appears as darkness. To DO GOOD without fanfare or recognition or reward. This concept is antithetical to Fake-wood and its minions.

Did anyone watch the GG's? Not me. Only by periphery. Give them BOTH credit for avoiding it. At least there's that in their favor.

Isn't Millie about to birth the blue-balloon-release-scion? Another child supported by daddy-bare-backing-his-onscreen-offscreen lover? Ah well. The royal family did FAR worse for their largess. Perhaps that's the key. The greater the wealth the greater the evil required to secure it. Ever notice how reptilian they appear with age? Not even good surgeons can hide the lizard inside.

They had the choice to make something worthy. And chose money instead. Sad.



Sophie said...

So Kiera Knightly gave a revealing interview recently regarding her fragile emotional health about 11 years ago. She explained that between the ages of 19 - 22, that she could barely hold herself together. She took a break from filming and sought hypnotherapy.

What I find interesting is that she has never discussed her relationship with Jamie. She bared her soul and shared personal info - but she never mentioned his name. I don’t recall any of her previous interviews in which she spoke of him. Their relationship was active during the time of her struggles.

Jamie has openly discussed his relationship with her. He has taken responsibility for its failure.

Why does she eliminate him from the story of her past?

AgonyAunt said...

Hey Snooze,

Ride or die. Isn't that what (Fake) Aunty described many months ago. I'm too lazy to find the post. It's the one that describes his formulated family structure. Wives and lovers and kiddies and such. A script written by a man who wants his cake and eats it too. Doesn't that analogy fit perfectly? The cake-eaters. Cuz madlad has lots of cakes yet to sample.

The real question is why ANY good woman willingly agrees to such arrangements. Sets up her own bearding game with another "nice" guy who needs cover. Just to continue her REAL relationship with the cake-eater. Breeder-wife is kept happy with more babies. A fat wallet. And social status. Whilst the two lovers hook-up in various locales. If /ourgal/ marries her beard. She can have cake-eater's brats too. And pass-them-off as her husband's. It's not as if this living arrangement is a NEW concept. Just a puzzle that /ourgal/ would agree to it. Unless her view of relationships is also confused and damaged. From childhood. Those gals make good prey.

I reckon Kiera Knightly didn't like being Dornan's "prey". Perhaps she saw her parents relationship and wanted the same for herself. Instead. She got someone who messed with her head. At a critical time in her life. Someone who likely stalked her in ways she won't or can't reveal. Nor prove. There are some eye-opening twitter accounts out there. The kind of stuff only a dedicated sociopath spends energy creating. A relentless pursuit of people and things he sees as impediments to what he wants. And what he believes is his rightful due. If someone tries to destroy you. You may not feel able to talk about it. She doesn't want to be in the same crowded room with him. It's more than the remnants of a jilted love affair. Much more.

Dakota Johnson couldn't get away from Jamie Dornan if she tried. Whether she has tried or not is anyone's guess.

Kiki said...

@Suz Vic....maybe because he continuously cheated on her with people she knew.

Kiki said...

Speaking of Snooze....Aunty give it up. No one believes the Dornan/Johnson love affair. It's over, please for your sanity, wave the white flag!

AgonyAunt said...

Oh keeks. Or kikes. Whatever. Up for air, huh. I'd be happy to hoist the black-flag for dumping Dornan's sorry ass. But it's simply not believable. Given history. Granted. It may be better concealed these days. With the new baby and all. She wouldn't survive THAT kind of scandal. Regardless of what Mr. Cake-eater-fake-aunty hopes to conjure. How many young actresses' careers does he need to ruin? What the fuck is his problem? Does he HATE successful women? Yikes.

Whatever relationship she has with Chris Martin doesn't convince anyone of "authenticity". That's a bridge too far. She might-of chosen a more convincing beard. But Hollywood always targets lowest-common denominator. And drives it even lower. So that morons and degenerates are well fed. But it misses us outliers completely. Those who draw and trend energy. Cuz it lacks creativity. And soul. Had she bearded with Matthias I would gladly jumped on THAT bandwagon. You chose unwisely. Sad.

Hey Snoozle. I read the Keira interview. She's being totally slammed on DM. It's a shame cuz I like her MORE after reading it. And yes. She REALLY avoids mentioning his name. It's MUCH MORE powerful by its omission. The only thing better would be an interview with Tom Hardy or Cillian Murphy discussing the multi-talented Mr. Dornan. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Kiki said...

The only people not convinced that Martin and Johnson are a real couple are the crazies that still think Dornan and Johnson are secretly together and in love (I think there may 5or 6 left now). And we know their not the most stable bunch, hey Aunty! And you keep saying Johnson chose a beard, which typically means that she's not into men and hiding it. But then in the same breath you say Dornan and Johnson have been together. Last I knew Dornan has the Dornan D attached to him and that darn thing keeps getting Mz. Millie knocked up.

BBB said...

Oh shut up Kiki, everyone is entitled to their opinion around here specially Aunty, there are so few of us left so why do you insist in throwing sand into our eyes in a very clumsy way? Don't be a fool! You know, I spy with my little eye and have noticed your telegraphic posts on other threads about Dornan, you hate him, I don't blame you, its hard not to nowadays after all the shit he has done...

Personally I'm just here for Aunty and Dakota, so Dornan's fate is irrelevant to me unless he crosses Dakota's path again.

He's a disease, a drug and Dakota has been trying to get rid of him the best way she can, there are aspects of her personality that make her an easy prey for people willing to manipulate and take advantage of her, I see Jamie as a heavy burden, hopefully she will move on and erase him from her life for good.

It was the real deal until it wasn't.

Kiki said...

I don't hate Dornan at all. Just hate the way he and his wife and followers act like he is so above Fifty. He knew what the movie was about and yet he trashes it everyway he can. Yet he tried out for the roll twice and his brilliant wife pushed him to take the role. They got what they wanted FAME.

Yes everyone is entitled to their opinion BBB so telling me to shut up mean I'm not entitled to mine. You liked Dornan just fine until he knocked up his wife. And you're here because any chance you get you want to Bash Dornan. Why, because he doesn't love Dakota and he didn't leave his wife for her? You're blaming Dornan for something that never happened. Y'all are going to have to face it.... Dornan and Johnson will never be, if they ever were. This is why everyone is turning on either Dornan and Johnson.

Sophie said...

Dakota is an old soul, but she is actually still a young woman. Even so, she has handled the attention from Fifty Shades with much more integrity than Dornan. Someone is paying The Daily Mail to feature her grocery run each week, but she keeps her personal life in the vault. She could do worse than Chris Martin, but I don’t think that he will ever remarry.

The recent interview with Dornan saying that Dakota and his wife “love each other” could have been poorly translated, but I have heard him make embellishments like that in the past. He should stop talking about it, as Dakota has. He just makes himself sound ridiculous.

Yes, he is still impregnating his wife and has said that he will father as many children as his wife wants to carry. Wow.

We saw Jamie and Dakota together and we heard what happened off screen ( when they “practiced” in their trailers). But, I have to believe that it was Dakota who drew the line. She had her heart involved and he did not.



BBB said...


By the way, where’s our favourite Dakota's shill Sandy girl? Are you on vacations?
Since my comment is not going to be posted on shitty Daily Mail (yes, I've tried several times to submit it and nothing happens...must have MyWife friends on DM on guard today, bastards!) I have to use this platform to share this: It happened before here in this old Crib, the Fake Aunty account was created, first it was only a poster then it started being runned by two different users Jamie and his wife, now its happening again in another place, the Daily Mail articles about Dakota, there's a username called "OrangeTewel" I've been following that account( ans some others) for several months, it usually posts on every Dakota article, mostly calling out the "fake" relationship between Chris Martin and Dakota and saying it will never be like what she had with Jamie...He uses it to vent. Today it has a different vibe, a jealous nasty one, its MyWife posting... what a sad and pathetic woman.
Run Dakota run!

AgonyAunt said...

Lemme be clear. I don't believe Dakota Johnson is a lesbian. Whether or not she's dabbled is another matter. It would be simpler if she were a lesbian. Johnson strikes me as a woman who wants the kind of spiritual-physical fulfillment only a guy can give her. And Dornan does it. Unfortunately. In his case. It comes bubble-wrapped in a very tightly-tied-schizo-package full of kovens and kiddies and kinky-poetry. She's not the first young women who got fucked-up trying to untangle his snarls. As Keira's interview alludes. Sadly. She won't be the last.

The interesting question is the one about "hating Dornan". It's a cottage industry. Cuz he surely engenders strong opinions by fanfags and show-biz folk. But there's no one who loves or hates him more than Dornan himself. His own worst enemy. And most ardent enabler. But the more he exposes himself to the world. The worse he appears. Starting with his general behavior. On set. Including sexual exploits on and off screen. With various co-stars. And local barmaids. His sloppy and un-professional appearance. The rather foolish and ill-considered things he says in interviews. All this might be forgiven as "quirkiness". Except. His reputation and on-line conduct is deeply creepy. And as BBB reminds us. He partners with his baby-momma kaballah-koven-kunt to disrupt this thread. And sow seeds of misery toward those he aims to punish. Or critics he wants to bully. Or women he wants to manipulate. As victims. He and Millie deserve one another.

Candidly. I've grown weary of it. Of. Them. All. Not from disappointment. Cuz honestly. I have no illusions. No expectations. It's a function of being bored by the script. The relentless emptiness. Same shit. Different year. It's depressing. And like his acting skills. It hardly scratches the surface. Pouting. Grimacing. Blank-eyed-staring. The same scene played over and over and over again. Frankly. FSOG is one role I hope his children DO see. It will show their father had some emotional range. At least 'The D' knows how to deliver a performance.

To this day I don't believe she intended to become involved with him. Whether she continues to play the lover role is up for grabs. I sense yes. But I hope I'm wrong. (Tho' the likes of Kiki shilling here seems to give more likelihood to it being ON than OFF.) Cuz other than physical passion. Which he tries to conflate as spiritual fulfillment. And has the balls to expect her to be willing to accept him on cake-eater terms. Tethering herself to him. To his wicked-koven-kunt-wife. To his expanding brood. As HER personal albatross. And she comes up empty. Every time. Lately. One sees it in her eyes. There's a dullness to them not seen before. Her lovely eyes. Once full of hope and light. It affects the quality of her work. Stifling her potential. As well as her happiness. And well-being. She'll soon be thirty. And going thru the motions.

You know. It's exhausting. The "empathy" required to FEEL another. The energy it takes to tap it. Ones life and work and sanity significantly improves with freedom from sin. Johnson needs to free herself from him. Totally. No communication. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Cuz his "friendship for life" is a fucking one-way-street-no-off-ramp to rehab. If she does as Keira. Then little by little. She'll be better. Tho' trading koven-kunt for goopster isn't much of a step up. Different aesthetic perhaps. Same sacrificial alter. Run Dakota run.


Sophie said...

Aunty, I agree with you.

It looks as if Dakota has had the misfortune of becoming involved with men who have crazy women in their lives. Goop is certifiable and Millie is everything that you have listed. And there are innocent children being used as pawns in both relationships. Hollywood has a limited selection of good guys with no baggage, but I hope that Dakota will find a man that brings her what she deserves( not being in second place)

Jamie’s film, “Untogether” , looks unappealing in every way. And to think that he took the role because Millie wanted him to do it...
She wants his paycheck, but she undermines his potential to be a real actor when she encourages him to do such crap. The comments on Daily Mail repeat what we all know...Millie doesn’t worry about him in sex scenes, unless they are with Dakota.

I would love to see Jamie take some acting lessons and spend time in live theater. The heart throb type casting is not working anymore.

BBB said...

People are so naive...MyWife doesn't mind him doing sex scenes, why would she? In their marriage agreement he can f*ck who ever he wants, for real, but he must keep the
good husband mask. In exchange he gives her the kind of life she always craved. MyWife gladly pimps him, and he doesn't seem to care one bit about it, he's not worthy of better.

AgonyAunt said...

BBB - He and Millie are very well-matched. If Dakota Johnson chooses to play in that sandbox. It's on her.

Oh Snooze. Acting lessons would be wasted on him. He isn't an actor. He's a deceiver. On the other hand. She would benefit. Alot. Cuz she has the honesty and humility and desire to grow.

Millie takes her marching orders from the masons. He'll do what they tell him. Or he's truly fucked.

"Orange Tewel" is a rather lackluster diss. I much prefer the politics of his sad little toothless island run by pajeet-poo-grooming-gangs. But perhaps the sabbatean-frankists don't let him piss on their baby-eating-pedo-trafficking-Queen and her faggot-offspring. Sad. Or maybe mad-lad is getting nervous. Cuz his freemason handlers aren't the ONLY keepers of blackmail. It's wise to keep a low-profile online. You never know who may be watching...

Sophie said...

Goop says that she sees Chris Martin every day.

Run Dakota, run.

Hannah J said...

I doubt she see's him everyday, especially when he's in London and she's in NY or LA. Or when one is traveling and the other is not. I find it refreshing that a divorced couple can get along especially when they have kids. And bear in mind, Goop can be a pit of a pretentious a$$hole, she embellishes the truth a lot. Dakota comes from the same kind of family where her mom and dad spend holidays with their significant others and stepchildren from different people. I'm sure Dakota is ok with this, since this is how she grew up. Hell Mz. Millie had to spend time with all her husbands co-stars that he supposedly slept with. It's a new world out there Suz Vic.

AgonyAunt said...

Dear Hannah Montana,

Not sure what world you're describing. Cuz it appears to be a very different one than what most humans see. Sane peeps don't live in the Hollywood-satanic-pedo-Desmond-drag-kid world. Nor is it accepted as anything other than what it is. Sick. Depraved. Evil. And no. It's not normal nor healthy to hang out with your EX and their extended clan in such a suffocating and scripted manner. Unless one is into swapping or sister-wives or incest. Ewww. Or other strange predilections. While its preferable to maintain good relationships within extended families. Human nature being what it is. People tend to demand clear boundaries for primary relationships. Those requirements don't change just cuz Hollywood says so.

Martins relationship with Paltrow is anything but normal. Unless he's gay. Then it all makes sense.

Hannah J said...

Once Again Agony making something not so bad into something salacious. That really is a problems. Not sure what happened to you to make you so jaded, but it's sad. You need to take something that's not such a big deal and put your disgusting spin on it. They share children together and I'm sure whatever they are doing its for the kids. Hopefully what ever happened to you, you are g etting help for. It's not normal being so angry all the time.

Sophie said...

I read the story behind Dakota’s next project ( filming in Fairhope, Alabama). Wow, it will be raw. She will be portraying a young married mother who is diagnosed with advanced cancer. I admire her bravery in taking this role. It will be intense, but worthwhile.

Regarding her boyfriend.... sorry, but I can’t imagine how she must feel - being in second place to Goop all of the time. Goop doesn’t even live with her new husband. GP is so unusual- and she dominates relationships with her atypical ways of doing things.

Dakota is a beautiful, intelligent young woman. She deserves to have a relationship with a man who puts her first.

BBB said...

"Dakota is a beautiful, intelligent young woman. She deserves to have a relationship with a man who puts her first" AMEN to that!

That's why she shouldn't date divorced or separated man with children, she'll never be happy if she goes on like this... A toxic mixture between problematic ex wife’s that don't want to let go, weak man that use their children as excuses not to commit or use their children as pawns.

Jamie left deep scars on Dakota's heart and make her vulnerable and sad, she lost the joy and her light has been fading.

"The best revenge is to be unlike him who performed the injury" Marcus Aurelius


Hannah J said...

I'm just so confused....you are all hating on Dakota because she chooses to date a divorced man who puts his children first and actually gets along with his ex wife and they somehow manage to blend their families. Yet none of you had any problems when you all fantasized that she was having an affair with a married man with children. Lets be honest if she actually was having an affair with Jamie you would all justify it somehow. Seems to be a problem here!

Sophie said...

Please allow me to clarify my comments...

Children come first, no matter if the parents are married, or not.

It is the unusual set of arrangements that Gwynneth Paltrow is orchestrating that puts Dakota in a disadvantage. GP’s new husband doesn’t live with her, but Chris Martin has a bedroom in her home.

The concern isn’t that the children are a priority,( they rightfully are), but that Dakota is considered after everything else. Goop sets the rules and everyone follows. Chris Martin adores his children, but it would be healthy for him to grow a set of balls and stand up to her. If not, Dakota will always be at the bottom of the list.

Regarding Jamie and Dakota, there were several indications that they were more than friends. Comments that they made about each other, body language, eye contact— but, the most telling was the defensive behavior of Millie.

It would be wonderful if Dakota could have a relationship with a man without so much baggage. She deserves better.

Original Aunty said...

Oh Hannah. "Salacious spin". If it were ONLY salacious. I wouldn't bother. Cuz what's unfolding is downright evil. You know it. Your problem is knowing others know. And it troubles you. Whatever you want people to know. Or believe. Isn't happening. Cuz you don't believe it.

I have no clue whether Chris Martin or Gwyneth Paltrow are good parents. Nor do I care. Are there "good" parents in Hollywood? Cuz people who love their children wouldn't raise them there. Perhaps its foolish to expect those raised by degenerates to understand morality. Or make principled choices. Righteous anger at deceit, mendacity, greed and wickedness is always justified.

Go back to the beginning Hannah. Back to when two hearts, well-matched, struggled to find a way forward. To be together. There was a path. But it wasn't paved in FSOG gold. It meant giving it up. But they didn't make that choice. And the road has been long and hard and unforgiving. In the meantime. More children have arrived. To be raised in the Hollywood manner.

No Hannah. I don't encourage "DAMIE". That ship sailed long ago. Too much water under the bridge. Too little. Too late. Too too.

Aren't you tired Hannah. Weary of it all. Don't you yearn for TRUTH. Something that can't be twisted or manipulated or scripted or papped or sold. That can't be withheld or taken away. Oh Hannah.

"Touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm."



Original Aunty said...

Dear Snooze. It's been my observation people generally get what they deserve. Good and hard. She has every right to demand better. Of herself. And others around her. Especially those on whom she spends her energies. If she doesn't want "better". She won't get it. It's her choice. Always was. I save my pity for children caught in the crossfire. The ones used by those who claim to "love" them. And "care" for them. They "deserve" better.

Michelle said...

Where are Jamie and Dakota? And Millie? No news about them for some time, wonder why are they hiding?

AgonyAunt said...

Based on her publicity she spends her time shopping, buying latte's and playing yours-mine-ours with Gwynnie's EX. He's likely holed-up in some Belfast pub. Fondling some waitress. And crying into his whiskey. Wondering how many more babies he has to sire to be free from the masonic-curse. And Millie is busy birthing his brats in a big tub of udder-cream surrounded by her coven. Hence they're all doing exactly what one expects of them. Nothing of consequence.

It is what it is.

Michelle said...

Somehow I feel the description above is not what it is. I feel there is much more to it and they are hiding it big time. But there is no proof for this. They organised everything so that there may be no proof.

AgonyAunt said...

It's part of the game. To spin-facts. To push what they want you to see. And hide what they don't. They have become very adept at subterfuge. And yet. Whilst they curate what they want you to see. TRUTH exists free from restraint. Unimpeded by false impressions their script portrays. Everything stated in the last post is based upon observed behaviors. The things they let us see. Or share. On the other hand. You cite things which are unseen. But known to those who judge by intuition. Cuz we know there are other 'unobserved' events which are authentic. Whilst those they allow us to see are not.

Some people operate on faith. Faith without critical thought is delusion. Growth without moral compass is corruption. Unchecked appetites lead to deep spiritual depression. The script we do not see is a parable of the effects of sin on human mind, body and soul.

It's been a long road. Lots of trauma to unpack, understand and heal. Trying to grapple with a brutal history of poor parenting and bad choices. Whilst trying to create a kinder, less harmful, more hopeful reality. We all share in the human struggle. So whatever reality one chooses. It comes with responsibilities. And consequences. Whether one is dating a divorced man. Or a long-term relationship with a man not divorced with a pregnant wife and young children.

Give us grace for today. Feed the famished affections.

BBB said...

"...It's been a long road. Lots of trauma to unpack, understand and heal..." Those are wise words dear Aunty, while they try to heal they struggle with sadness and depression, will they ever heal?

A strong love bond was born between Jamie and Dakota sadly they actively corrupted that feeling to the exhaustion and are now paying the price, they tough they were fooling the audience, the fans, the damies but they were fooling themselves first, now madness is upon them.

We are all trying to survive the harshness of life. Jamie, Dakota and Millie are wealthy but morally bankrupt, all this saga kind of reminds me of one of my favourite films called "Brutti, sporchi e cattivi", somehow Jamie is a bit like Giacinto Mazzatella the family patriarch... The difference is that this film holds in it the sad, the funny, and the grotesque ugly life of poor people in the 70's on a garbage dump outside Rome. While Jamie, Dakota and Millie are wealthy, young and good looking, but so ugly in the inside... maybe they all could live together in the Big Stone Prison in the Cots like Giacinto Mazzatella bizarre family did, eh? I bet Jamie would like that.

Michelle said...

Why would Dakota walk her dog dressed all in black? With sunglasses? Could the baby have been born?

AgonyAunt said...

Dearest BBB,

You're right of course. The suffering is palpable. Perhaps its the reason we keep a finger lightly on the pulse. Waiting for something EXTRAORDINARY to occur. Something liberating. Redemptive. We ALL partake in the glory of salvation. The regenerative effects of healing. Hope springs eternal.

She has the most to lose. Not just materially. Tho' there is that too. Her's is a spiritual degradation. The greatest loss of all. She knows it. Which is why Hannah and others show up to kick against the pricks. I hoped she'd be wiser. But there was nothing for me to base it on. Her background and past choices left little doubt what she'd do. She was born and raised in moral relativity. Whilst creative mind is quantum -- not relative. It's a heavy burden for her to bear. Gwyneth and Millie have no soul to lose. They are empty vessels. Their job is to rob her oil.

HOPE is the precursor to FAITH. I hope she's able to see herself thru. Not because I think she "deserves" better. Because I am confident she KNOWS better. And that UNDERSTANDING will make her miserable until she makes righteous choices. That's how IT works.

It's clear what he wants. When he gets it. It won't satisfy his hunger. He is doomed to search until he is satisfied by TRUTH. Not lust. It may take many washing cycles for him to grow in grace. No physical mating will heal him. Ever. Amen.

I will watch your film. Reminds me of other Italian films I haven't seen for ages. With Sophia Loren and Marcello Mastroianni. When film making was an art. And a joy. Not simply an avenue for Hollywood kikes to market degeneracy and pedophilia. Sad.

AgonyAunt said...

Funny. Several days ago the thought of her doggo came to me. Very strong. And I wondered why she hadn't been seen walking him. For a long time. And hoped Z was fine. Cuz there's nothing more precious than a "good boy".

Yes. She was messaging. Notice the time stamp on those Just-Jared pictures of her and Z? It was 11:11. There are no coincidences.

Michelle said...

There is another theory that might me taken into account. I saw once something posted on an IG account. The Brazilian women fans seem to have a keen eye and to know many details about this trio. The theory was/ is that Millie has been with another man for a long time, perhaps the kid is his. Perhaps what Jamie and she display is a mere contract. To me this sounds like the only sane theory possible. Everything else is simply too much. If the baby is Jamie's, what is Dakota hoping for? for Jamie to acknowledge he is bigamous, or what?

AgonyAunt said...

There many theories. Occams razor leads to the simplest. Babby#3 is his. He's indentured to Millie. And to break the agreement will cause greater hardship and pain. To himself. And those he claims to love. He has a history of luring women into his snare. Using them for his advantage. Women who lack self-confidence. And are smitten by the physical nature of his web. He mirrors many faces. None of them reflect TRUTH.

She's a woman raised by people who lack moral filters. The only thing they fear is being bankrupt and abandoned. By Hollywood bosses. Or sex partners. Or the physical ravages of aging in a life lived unwisely. It's a very sharp edge. She wants to be loved. And she has convinced herself thru tarot and astrology and necromancy that he is her soul-mate. That destiny demands she relinquish righteousness for iniquity. It requires her to beard other cake-eaters. And hide behind pap-walks and red-carpet appearances and mediocre movies and fake smiles and empty eyes. She has chosen this life. Do not pity her. Pity the children who are raised by these monsters. And crave something better. The ones being groomed as whores and fuck-boys and trannies. The ones harvested so that genetically inferior evil can live and reproduce. Hollywood is a sewer. Some poop rises. Temporarily. Until newer shit is dumped on top. It is what it is.

Ask your Brazilian fren how she likes the SOHO sex-parties?

Michelle said...

I don't have a Brazilian friend. I wish I had. As I said, I spotted once on Instagram this info, it was in Spanish, I didn't understand the translation very well, but it did say Amelia was with another man and that poster was very sure about that. I wish I had more proof for this, but I don't. one thing I know for sure, they will fade with time, as actors, especially him, the horny women and housewives will soon replace him for younger actors, he will fade, and when he starts fading, something will crack inside him. But it's not sure he will have the power to change. This is it.
I still don't get why Dakota accepts her name to be associated with Chris Martin.

Michelle said...

P. S. Suddenly, Dakota goes on a shopping spree with her siblings, half siblings, strange message, isn't it?

AgonyAunt said...

Messaging demons. It's all so pointless. She's being systematically separated from her own divine nature. And it shows. Using her family and doggo to assuage demons. Like that evil-eye she wore. Sad.

The bible is mistranslated to confuse earnest Christians. And to encourage spiritual wickedness. Christ, TRUTH, did not come to save us but to restore us to our own divine sovereignty. The word 'sin' doesn't mean doing bad things. It means separation. From God. We have been separated from our own innate divinity. And Christ came to help liberate us from that illusion.

The bible uses the word from the Greek 'sotiras' meaning savior. Instead of lytrotis which means liberator. It also means redeemer. Christ came to liberate us from the illusion of dis-empowerment that has been forced upon us. That is what "saves us" from the demons attempting to enslave us. Salvation from sin.

Do you think her new movie is another "Steel Magnolias" redux? To wave around at award time. Hollywood kikes fapping to white southern X-ian genocide. Suffering from horrific diseases. And terminal illnesses. No white babies. The Wall cuts their brown baby supply. Oh dear. LOL.

AgonyAunt said...

Michelle

WOW. Didn't recognize her sister at first. She looks much older than 18 or 19. They sure grow up fast in Hollywood. No blushing ingenue. The brother was easy to spot.

In the normal scheme of things her relationship with Chris Martin makes little sense. She could certainly DO wayyy better. Neither Martin nor his EX helps her credibility. So if she isn't dating him to help her get roles. Or for status. (Cuz Cold Play is a poor imitation Radio Head wannabe. A band for 6th-formers who read the Guardian. Pffft.) Or LUV (which NO ONE sees between them...). Then its something else important enough for her to endure the shame of having her name constantly associated with Gwynnie (ugh). And pretending to be "in love" with a guy who is wayyy less cool than her normal crowd. Plus all the over-the-top commentary about their relationship was just downright weird. Like why the fuck would Diane Keaton say something? And why does media report her vacay'ing with them -- when there was NO evidence of her being anywhere near those people. She may have been somewhere else. On holiday with someone else.

This 'relationship' feels different than straight-up bearding. Or even some place-holder "Oh he's really so good to me" relationship. Chris Martin and Jamie Dornan are both SOHO House assets. And there are NO coincidences. Especially in Hollywood. All roads lead back to Marcus. So. What if she negotiated a deal with the SOHO freemason-mafia as payment to allow Dornan his double-life. She agrees to give a needed PR-boost to their aging barely-talented rocker who's EX left him cuz he was boring and his influence with the zoomer-6th-formers is nil. (Remember when Jennifer Lawrence made a similar deal -- before she cut her losses and decided to bang Harvey on the regular instead?) He makes more babbies, stars in bad movies and finances copious amounts of udder-cream for the Mrs. They meet up for global-trysts-n-tears as often as their schedules and SOHO House permits. And they all follow-the-money. All the way home. Like good little piggy's. Oink-oink.

Sophie said...

This conversation takes me back to Dakota’s former flames... Masterson was with her on location for the first installment of 50 shades - until that ended. Then she “dated” Matt, the gay guy during the filming of the remaining 2 installments. Afterwards, she was “single” for several months until Chris came into the picture. Matt and Chris aren’t really believable boyfriends. Let’s face it, she is a cool girl. No one ever believed that Matt was a legitimate boyfriend ( but Jamie had entered the picture at that time). And then, the Daily Mail and other third party sources were the reason that anyone thought about Dakota and Chris together. ( no one else would confirm it).

And since you mentioned Markus...he has disappeared since Megan Markle got married. I thought that he and Millie were best friends.

Hannah J said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hannah J said...

So let me get this straight....everything in Dakota's life is a lie and wrong, except that she had an affair with Jamie (a married man)????? You people should all get together and write a book, because you are all spinning some mighty crazy tales! Bet if she was with Jamie, y'all would be praising everything she did. Enough. She's not, never has been or never will be with Jamie. Get over it.

AgonyAunt said...

O Hannah-banana. Give it a fucking rest. You're talking to thinkers. And seers. Not a bunch of low-brow fanfags and Hollywood whores lined up to eagerly suck kike dick. Zero-fucks here. She CHOSE to spend her life in misery. Don't be mad when her script and performance isn't believable. Not OUR fault this bullshit doesn't cut the mustard. Maybe you need to make some tactical adjustments. Rather than spend your faggotry shooting messengers.

Don't presume this thread would cheer her running off with Dornan. Had they done so at the get-go. Doing the honest and honorable thing. There were many to support her. Instead. They chose to deceive. To follow-the-money. And push contemptible fake PR garbage all over the media. Sending "shills" everywhere to bash anyone with the temerity to wonder out loud what the fuck was happening. And why. They're BOTH scumbags. Using their "families" as shields. Leveraging the covens and freemasons and Hollywood 'celebrity' to hide their corruption. So NO Hannah. She hasn't earned a free-pass to run-away with Dornan. She's doomed herself to misery. And will continue to suffer. It is what it is.

P.S. You remind me of a recently departed who spewed ubiquitous insanity on this thread. She liked to delete comments too. And was a devoted fan-fag. Hmmmmm.

AgonyAunt said...

Hey Snoozle. Yeah. It rather begs the question whether she is really much of an actor. Or just groomed-Hollywood-nepotism. Cuz she doesn't make ANY of these romances believable. The only one which had potential "legs" was Matthias. But I doubt he was interested in bearding. He's a alpha-male looking for the real deal. Not a gay-boi-beta-placeholder for the Dornan-D.

Markus was promoted to upper-management. I reckon someone else is responsible for babby-sitting the "D". The Harry-Markle conscious-coupling must-of launched Markus into the freemason-stratosphere. LOL.

Sophie said...

Oh my. There is a new blind that is attributed to Chris and Dakota —- he is growing tired of her.

Kiki said...

@Suz Vic...I learned awhile ago not to believe these blindsabout Jamie and Dakota. I mean this site had a ton about Jamie cheating on his wife and how their marriage was in trouble.....now she's pregnant and about to give birth again. And we never hear blinds about Jamie anymore, except when he has a new female co-star. Because according to Enty, Jamie cheats with all his female co-stars. I believe its crazy fans who send these in. Because, you know, according to Jamie, he's very happily married.

AgonyAunt said...

Oh look guise. KIKI's back! Up for air. Eh. Glub-glub.

ENTY is a KNOWN gatekeeper for Hollywood. Otherwise he wouldn't be able to publish what he does. And not get door-knobbed. Call it 'controlled-opposition'. Notice how nothing reported on CDAN ever gets resolved. No actual "arrests". CDAN is merely another blackmailing scheme. A way to keep wayward assets in check. A way to warn them to back-off. And to distance the industry from those who've become TOO dangerous to protect. Once Dornan was under Markus-freemason-control. Not contemplating making a run-for-it. Into the arms of his lovely co-star. The blinds miraculously stopped. (Link his total capitulation to BOTH the LA house sale and the babby-boi just hatched...). The PTB who run CDAN and SOHO made a trade. Good PR vibes for one asset (those risible DM stories) in exchange for NO MORE BLINDS for another. And Dakota Johnson sweetened the deal by bearding SOHO's rapidly-depreciating-and-talentless-rocker-lite-Chris-Martin. To her OWN career detriment. She's a fool. Sacrificing everything at the alter of the Dornan "D". Sad.

P.S. CDAN allows this thread to continue cuz it keeps them informed. They realize the power-of-prophecy. That THINKERS and SEERS rule. And they try to harness it. Dakota Johnson isn't the ONLY fool. Hollywood is full of 'em.

Kiki said...

And there goes Aunty with all her crazy conspiracy theories. Ehh, at least it gives you something to do!

AgonyAunt said...

In 1928 Edward Bernay's published a book entitled "Propaganda". In it he outlined how to use media and marketing to control populations. It was a step-by-step guide for marxist-bolsheviks takeover of USA. The CIA used it as their bible to brainwash Americans. And hide TRUTH. Historians trace the term "conspiracy theory" to zionist-controlled elements within CIA. As a way of undercutting critics of the Warren Commission’s report that President Kennedy was NOT NECESSARILY killed by Oswald. And Mossad-CIA were directly involved in the assassination. The use of this term is heavily promoted in the media by the CIA.

It's ironic that you -- Kiki -- use the same manipulation and scare tactics as the CIA. To shut up skeptics. Branding them "conspiracy theorists". And hiding the evil perpetrated by your ilk on normies everywhere.

Go back to sucking flaccid tiny kike dick Kiki. It's the one talent no one may deny you.

Michelle said...

Jamie looked tired in the latest interview. With bags under his eyes. Very prominent ones. For a happy new dad, he should be beaming.

AgonyAunt said...

Good. Newborns are exhausting. And 3 kiddos 5 and under is alot of work. Puts a real crimp in pub-crawling sessions. Makes it hard to keep up with twitter stalking. And whinging poetry porn. Sad.

Rennie said...

Since Dakota has been dating Chris, her light has dimmed. She is different somehow. It’s very noticeable. I was glad to see her holding her god baby on yesterday. She seemed really happy and the old Dakota. I was also glad to see her with her siblings last week. Dakota need her family and friends around her, they keep strong, happy and grounded.

AgonyAunt, I agree with most everything you write. It’s sounds scary, but I’ve read it from more than just you. Hollywood is a horrible place that play dangerous games,

Michelle said...

Given the fact that I only found my way back here recently, and I was so happy to rediscover Aunty again, there are still some things that I don't understand. How do you know that Jamie sold his house in LA? At some point there was a pic of his car in front of Dakota's house or smth like that. And, one more thing, did you notice that at the premiere where Amelia came pregnant, in the dark blue dress, she was full of cuts on her hands? Of scars? She didn't have those before. Could she have threatened to kill herself? Where are the scars from?

Michelle said...

Oh, one more thing, I cannot help not saying this, but the article Fifty shades of Fatherhood is a bunch of crap, definitely not Jamie's words, I mean it smells of putrid lies, it emanates that toxic smell of lies, definitely PR is dictating Jamie's life and he accepts it I don't know why. I mean we saw so much and grasped the truth between him and Dakota, and now he comes and says that his main goal in life is to raise his children with Amelia? That is stupid, it is so stupid. I am a simple person, the only thing I can do is not to pay for any ticket for a movie involving these 2. I thought Jamie was the only lier, but Dakota has disappointed me too, walk with CM just to cover her escapades with this identity-less man called Jamie Dornan, I mean, for F sake, I would have exposed him in the newspapers, and that would have coupled with a hot sexy man, her age, be him from the business or not. That woman has lost her soul, for a reckless man. They are both as stupid as the fans they write those articles for. Zero credibility.

MZ said...

Yikes....I see all the crazies are back on this board!!! I mean really after all this time, you are all still believing Jamie and Dakota are in love? And I see Aunty is still as crazy as ever and gets so defensive and nasty when you question her crazy conspiracy theories. Hey maybe Aunty is really Amelia....because you know, she's not letting go!!!!!!!!!!!!

AgonyAunt said...

Holee shit. The ENTIRE Hollywood coven is here to play. Hey Maze. Little no-nose. How's tricks. Still turning. Ehhh?

Y'all. It's very challenging for decent, honorable peeps to fathom the depths of depravity and degradation Hollywood "celebs" engage in and legitimize. The things they DO for fame and money and roles. CDAN is a mossad psyop. Same glow-spooks who fund Scientology. They ALL know it. "Stars" get "protection" from one cartel or another. Why do you think Harvey hired his mossy pals to scare his victims into silence. "Actors" and celebs sell their souls. If they are famous and "successful" they are totally compromised. Period. Full stop. Once inside they never get out. At least not alive. (i.e. Robin Williams). They do and say and rep whatever their handler tell them. Trafficking children is JOB ONE. Anytime you see a celeb doing "charity" or philanthropic work having to do with "saving children" its a front for pedos and trafficing and child sacrifice. There are 70,000+ sealed indictments. Celebs are on many of them.

When you take off the rose coloured-glasses. And look at Hollywood as IT IS. Not the bullshit they feed you. Then the long-term and deeply immoral relationship between Johnson and Dornan begins to make total sense. Cuz in a strange way IT IS their escape. In those moments together, they can pretend (which is what they DO for a living) the horror of what they aid and abet isn't REAL. They can pretend the only reality is what they FEEL between them. In those moments. They feel clean.

From the get-go this saga is an allegory. A parable. An awakening to systemic evil which has tried to enslave the world. Using Hollywood as a means. Those of us who grew fond of these two actors -- and what we saw between them -- hoped for an escape. Sadly. They don't want one. The ending has been written. It is what it is.

In the meantime. It's up to good and honorable people to hold the wicked and compromised responsible for heinousness acts against innocent children, women and men.

"...let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream."

AgonyAunt said...

Michelle,

Not sure I have answers to your questions. They are good ones. Months ago I checked the MLS listing for his property. It was on the market. Didn't check to see if it sold. No reason why it wouldn't. It's a nice house. To be honest. I don't spend time tracking them. Unless the pics are on DM. It simply doesn't interest me to know their specific whereabouts. Not judging others who do. There's an entire cottage-industry of fans and paid shills who do. My talent is more metaphysically inclined. And frankly. Physical aspects tend to get in the way. Like the pap runs she does. Walks on the beach with CM. Sharing a smoothy with two straws. I see things others don't. It's not necessary for me to play "gotcha" with evidence they're together. I KNOW they're together. And the Hollywood coven (Mazie and Kiki and the like) showing up here confirms it.

Millie is a VERY sick woman. Physically and spiritually. Her lack of talent is remarkable. Especially given the support she gets from team-freemason. I reckon she was groomed by them from a young age. Her mums literally sold her to them. Poor Millie. She's not even a particularly good witch. If she were. Dakota Johnson would be out of her life. But Millie likes the money too much. So she's stuck with sharing her husband with Dakie. And others too. Tho' she prolly doesn't mind the others as much. Just fodder for reigning him in. I doubt she likes the arrangement much. She has the kiddos. Tho' one doesn't sense she enjoys motherhood. Not in the normal way. She likes having them as a shield. Or a bludgeon. Take your pick. It will backfire on her. BIGLY.

Can't help you with the cuts on her hands. There are various satanic rituals which require cutting ones hands. I rather suspect she is deeply into the moloch-stuff. If I were a Cots neighbor with young kiddies. I'd keep them FAR AWAY from the Dornan tribe. It's a deeply disturbing family. Something wicked their way comes.

Kiki said...

Yes, Aunty you do see things....there is medication you can take for that. I mean do you actually believe half the stuff you write? If you do, maybe you need to take a little break from this board...it's making you delusional!

AgonyAunt said...

Not to throw salt on your gaping tranny vay-vay wound Keeks. But did you notice the digits? Even your homie moloch bows to TRUTH. It is what it is.

Rennie said...

Did anyone else see Jemima Kirke on the Busy Phillips show? She was describing filming the sex scene with Jamie and how realistic it was. She was getting excited just talking about it. She had never filmed a sex scene with someone who looked like Jamie. In her words “sculptured”. She said the love scene was fifty shades. Now, I can only image the love scenes between him and Dakota.

MZ said...

I saw it and first, if that was Dakota saying it, the marriage fans would have gone after her saying its disrespectful to their "queen", but since it's someone else, they think she's refreshing and so funny, hell even Jamie's stalker JDO posted it.
Second, pretty positive Jemima is probably the only female co-star Jamie wouldn't even be remotely interested in sleeping with! That's why Mz. Millie encouraged him to take the role...you know the role that he doesn't even talk about!

AgonyAunt said...

Oferfuckssake. Dornan bangs ALL his co-stars. How else does he get them to help him thru his performances? He was banging the MILF until the last season of The Fall. Cuz at that point he was OUT and Anderson wasn't gonna DO anything more for him. It's all so tawdry and despicable. A bunch of low-to-no talent cake-eaters whoring and trafficking to the tune of follow-the-money. And fan-fags like Maze and Keeks inhaling their farts as if they're on life support. Whilst prophets pray without ceasing. And see shills and enablers and moloch-minions hanging from the nearest doorknob.

Soon pet. Soon.

MZ said...

Oh Aunty why don't you put us all out of agony and take a break. You are an angry little troll and it's starting to affect you. Its so sad.

Michelle said...

Mazie, if Aunty and us are such lunatics, why do you keep coming back here? Really, mind your business! If everything we post here is a lie and a fantasy, why bother coming here and reading all this crap? Unless you know the truth and you are afraid one day it might come to the surface and it might stink into your face, really badly.

«Oldest ‹Older   1401 – 1600 of 1688   Newer› Newest»

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days