Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Movie Review By Mooshki- Hit & Run


‘Hit and Run’ is the movie that just about every recent Katherine Heigl or Jennifer Aniston action/romantic comedy has tried to be, but failed. It’s smart and FUNNY, and the cast is talented and wonderful, from the leads down to each of the supporters. (And here I thought I couldn’t possibly love Kristen Chenoweth any more.)

Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell have been living a quiet life in a small town in the middle of nowhere. Kristen is offered an interview for her dream job, but it’s in LA, the city that Dax fled when he joined the witness protection program. Because he is the kind of boyfriend who will track down a sloth to be a guest at your birthday party, he decides it’s worth risking his life to go back to LA so Kristen can follow her dream. Tom Arnold is Dax’s bumbling US Marshall protector who isn’t willing to let Dax leave until he fills out the proper paperwork. Michael Rosenbaum (Lex Luthor from Smallville) is Kristen’s ex, who hasn’t begun to let her go. He contacts Dax’s former partners in crime, hoping they will remove Dax from the picture so he can have Kristen back all to himself. This sets up a wild and crazy multiple-car chase that takes up most of the movie. Tom Arnold, Lex, Lex’s sheriff brother who is unwittingly helping him with his stalking, and the bad guys (Bradley Cooper, Joy Bryant [Dax’s stunningly beautiful partner from ‘Parenthood’], and Dick from ‘Veronica Mars’ [Kyle Bradway from ‘Party Down’ to you, Enty]) all are trying to get to one or the other of the traveling couple. Along the way, Lex manages to spill the beans to Kristen that Dax wasn’t the innocent bystander she thought he was, adding yet another layer to the who’s running from who game.

As per the usual formula, hijinks ensue, but they are not the usual clichés. (How often do you walk in on a “real life Lemon Party?” Warning: Google at your own risk.) Dax Shepard wrote and directed the movie as well as starring in it, and although I’ve always been a fan, I had no idea he was this talented. There were a couple of awkward moments (Including the bit about the prison rape, which I can’t figure out why they’d make that the main part of the trailer? I guess they’re always trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator…) but that and the unpolished filming style give it a nice semi-indie feel. The soundtrack is also great. Not in a Zach Braff/Wes Anderson hipster way, but more like in ‘Harold & Kumar,’ where the song choices add to the tone and humor of the movie.

I’m known to be easily amused, but there were many laugh-out-loud moments for the whole theater, so I know I wasn’t the only one who found it very funny. The romantic parts are sweeter and more sincere from knowing that Dax and Kristen are a real-life couple. Another warning: There is some bloody violence, in case you try to stay away from that sort of thing. That, and the fact that the movie doubles as a pretty great commercial for GM cars, means this is a good movie for both guys and gals. If you’ve got a date night planned for next weekend (it opens on the 22nd), I highly recommend this fun flick.

(Note: This is not a "hard R" - the rating comes from some very comical nudity. The violence is closer to PG-13 level.)

Friday, July 22, 2011

Movie Review - I Got Smurfed!

(guest post by Deanna - resident blog designer and occasional mom blogger)

I was a bit skeptical when I heard there was going to be a live action/cgi movie made about the Smurfs. I didn't think the current generation of kids would be interested in the little blue guys (and girl!) and all their smurfiness -

Get Smurfed

I am willing to admit when I'm wrong :)

I was invited to be part of a press event at Sony's Imageworks studio to get a sneak preview, see some behind-the-scenes action and interview a few of the people involved with the movie - AND to get my smurf on! (go chicky, get your smurf on, go chicky, get your smurf on...)

While we only saw a few clips from the movie, I can confidently say this is one movie we won't be missing - producer Jordan Kerner (Stuart Little, Charlotte's Web) and Director Raja Gosnell (Scooby Doo, Never been Kissed) spoke about "suspension of disbelief" and they were spot-on...the cgi and live action blended seamlessly, and it was easy to ENJOY the movie and not be conscious of that how-did-they-do-that aspect. My favorite part of the day was talking with two of the live action actors. Jayma Mays (Miss Pilsbury from Glee) plays Grace Winslow, who is a newly pregnant woman married to Neil Patrick Harris (lucky girl!).

Hank Azaria plays Gargamel, the smurfs' arch enemy and nemesis. Hank may be well known for his voice-over work, but he's been a part of some of my favorite movies, like Quiz Show, The Birdcage, and America's Sweethearts. (have to admit a slight crush here)



It was fun to ask them about acting against the stickers and wires representing the smurfs, and I got to ask Hank about creating a character who was only played by one other person (the iconic Paul Winchell). He said he at first tried to create a voice that was NOT like the original, but as the character evolved, it became much closer to Paul Winchell's original voice-over. (/total geek moment)

We then got to try two different technologies involved in making the movie - animating a character using Mya software, and doing a voice over of one of the Smurfs! Animating a smurf was so much fun - it took a bit of getting used to, but once you get the hang of it, it wasn't super hard, just time-consuming. It was amazing to find out how many hours of work it took just to create a small bit of cgi animation.

Now about getting Smurfed - we got to choose which character we voiced, and since there is only ONE female smurf, I picked Smurfette (voiced by Katy Perry). We were given a script, and viewed the bit of the movie we would be voicing. Then we went into the voiceover studio, which was a small, simple room with a screen and mic. After a couple of rehearsals, it was time to record. Let me tell you, it is NOT as easy as it might seem, but it was LOTS of fun! Here is me in all my smurfy glory:



I got Smurfed! from Deanna on Vimeo.

I am looking forward to taking my kids to see this, and it will be even better having the little bit of behind the scenes trivia in my head while I watch :) The Smurfs movie will be released July 29.





I give it 5 (out of 5) chickies!

Disclosure - I was invited to this press event, but was otherwise not compensated by Sony for this review - all opinions are strictly mine, including that Hank Azaria is dreamy...

Photo credits - Sony, Me, Me. :)

Monday, March 28, 2011

White Irish Drinkers


Not too long ago, I got an e-mail from a reader of the site. A fairly long time reader and commenter who wanted to tell me about a movie that she and her husband financed on their own and made and wanted me to go see it. Well, it turns out the movie was written and directed by John Gray. Yes, the same John Gray who created Ghost Whisperer. My first reaction was, "You do know that I make fun of Jennifer Love Hewitt every chance I get right? You still want me to go see this movie with that in mind?" Apparently there are no hard feelings about that and yes, they wanted me to go. Well, when you hear about a movie called White Irish Drinkers the first thing that comes to your mind is probably a bunch of guys sitting around singing Irish songs and drinking. With that in mind, I naturally am going to take my dad and we are going to sneak in a flask of some Bushmills and get loaded and sing songs with everyone. In my family we call it bonding. Well of course, mom was not going to let us all go out without her on a Friday night. Seeing the need for a designated driver we readily agreed.

Well, when we pulled into the Arclight, the flask was almost empty, so the first stop was to the bar. I cannot sing the praises enough of movie theatres that have bars. Bless all of you. Anyway, right away I saw Tim Curry and my mom was like, "who?" I said, "you know, the guy from Rocky Horror." My mom said, "who?" So, I went with Home Alone 2 and she got it. The man has really good posture and much to my annoyance apparently does not make it a habit to go out in public with a corset. Then my dad spotted Tia Carerre and took his 80 something self and shuffled off behind her muttering, "Party on." When a 20 year old does it, she probably finds it annoying but when an old man does it, somehow, it is ok and the next thing you know he was buying her a drink and wondering how he could probably get away from us for the night.

Fortified by more drinks we made our way to the theatre. It was filled with lots of the cast and crew and their friends so it was definitely a pro White Irish Drinkers crowd, but surprisingly few flasks.

I don't like to read reviews about movies before I go in to see them so I really did not know what to expect, but did know that John and his wife (Hi Melissa) spent a great deal of their money making a movie based on their families and lives they had growing up. Well, it is a good thing to know that Ghost Whisperer syndication money is going for something great like this movie.

The movie stars Nick Thurston, Karen Allen (who had Tim Curry practically in tears and ready to give her an Oscar that night) Peter Reigert (Animal House reunion anyone?) and a bunch of newcomers including Leslie Murphy. Yes, there is drinking in the movie, but it is so much more than that. It is the story of a family in the 1970's who are struggling to make it through each day. It has a Good Will Hunting kind of vibe to it and Nick, who plays Brian Leary, is an amazing artist who struggles between wanting to explore his talent and being a good brother which involves criminal activity with his brother who is played by Geoffrey Wigdor who is great. Set among all of this is Karen Allen as the mom who is trying to remain faithful to her wedding vows while dealing with two sons she does not understand and a husband who enjoys getting drunk and beating her.

This is 1970's Brooklyn and you can see John Gray's passion and heart come through in this movie. You can see that he inspired his actors and his crew to give their very best. The great thing about indie films is that everyone is so devoted to making sure everything is real and authentic and this movie succeeds in that. There are no wasted scenes or words. Everything has a purpose. Every character is developed. You can feel the backstories of everyone. You feel what they were living and going through. It is raw and intense and by the time it is over, you find yourself so grateful that someone took the time to make a movie that is actually worth spending your money on.

George Clooney movies notwithstanding, there is no more honest critic when it comes to movies than my mother. This movie had her so excited that she said she was going to sign up for that Facebook thingy just so she could tell people to go see it. She would not stop talking about it all weekend. That alone is good enough reason to go. Her only criticism. Nick, who was at the screening wore a pair of construction boots to the premiere. She said, "Did he steal those from the 90's Ice Cube?" Yep, my mom threw out an Ice Cube reference. Have to love her.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Movie Review - King's Speech - Gladys Kravitz


My partner loves any drama that the British produce for film. On rainy, dreary days, there’s nothing that cheers her up quite like the BBC production of “Pride and Prejudice.” I watch “Pride and Prejudice” and “Love, Actually,” and “Bleak House,” because my partner wants me to watch them with her. She finds it healing to know someone loves her enough to share her films. I find it healing to know that someone loves me enough that she wants to share beloved films with me. For her, the soulful, long looks of Rene Zellweger and Colin Firth can only be matched by a stammering Hugh Grant. So of course we had to see “The King’s Speech.”

For those of you who have lived in a hut for the last year, or who merely aren’t blessed enough to have an Anglophile as a partner, “The King’s Speech” is Colin Firth’s latest vehicle in his drive toward an Oscar. Last year, we had “A Solitary Man,” which made good use of Firth’s deep brown eyes and dark good looks. Firth didn’t win, but his portrayal of a bereaved gay man trying to cope with the death of his partner felt so real that I got out the google button to prove that he was gay. There’s nothing quite like lesbian gaydar gone awry. Colin is not only dreamy, but he’s also apparently straight. That means that in some alternate universe in which I am straight, 10 years younger, 30 pounds lighter, and immeasurably more beautiful, Colin Firth could be my boyfriend.

“The King’s Speech” is another British slow-to-move-but-worth-it dramas. It’s a lot like “The Queen”: one can feel the leisurely pace of the leisure class. The film swims in deep wood, gilding, fine china and aristocracy. Co-starring with Firth, Geoffrey Rush plays a commoner—his wallpaper is peeling, his couch is worn past threadbare—who, without formal training, is able to help the future king overcome a stammer. Perhaps Hugh Grant should pay him a visit.

But the film is about far more than speech therapy. At its core, it is about our lives’ malleability. Not only does the Colin Firth unexpectedly become King when his brother, played by Guy Pearce , abdicates the throne to marry Wallis Simpson, but his wife, played by Helena Bonham Carter, must also learn to play the role of Queen. Rush, playing a man who wanted to be an actor, describes the Shakespeare character of Richard III as a “deformed creature yearning to be King.” As Firth stumbles and stutters his way through the film his “deformity” overshadows any King-yearning he might harbor. Radio and film were transforming a world that would soon reel from Hitler’s duplicity and aggression; the role of the monarchy could no longer hide a stutterer.

Bonham-Carter plays Queen Elizabeth, and she manages to look more normal in a period costume than she normally looks in candid photos. I’m so used to seeing her wear “outfits” that her movie outfits look natural on her. She does a great job in the film of showing a loving wife caught in a maelstrom; she loves her husband more than she loves the position in which his circumstances have thrust them.

“The King’s Speech” has a few sly asides. The minister from “Pride and Prejudice” (the ten million part BBC version to which I’m often subjected), David Bamber, shows up as an unnecessarily cruel theater director who rejects Rush’s audition; Crispin Bonham-Carter, who played Mr. Bingley in “Pride and Prejudice” (Marathon BBC Version) is a distant cousin of Helena Bonham-Carter. Jennifer Ehle starred as Elizabeth Bennett in that same series; she plays Geoffrey Rush’s wife in “The King’s Speech.” Interestingly, she also used to date Firth, and their relationship ended about the time he began to date his now-wife.

Firth spends the film portraying a man battered by circumstance, by duty and by his family of origin. Sometimes he looks like a troubled Robin Williams, his good looks washed away by a clenched jaw and an unhappy childhood; other times, his eyes become headlights of rage. Rush is more of a therapist to him than a speech coach, teaching him how to speak by allowing that his voice has worth, advising him that he doesn’t “have to be afraid of the things that you were afraid of when you were 5.” It is one thing to say that to a friend; it is another to say that to a king.

But more than anything else, more than reminding us that we are haunted no matter what station in life we occupy, more than reminding us that we all need friends, more than reminding us that our voice is only as loud as we allow it to be—and this film reminds us of all of that---more so, this film shows us that our place in life is malleable, and is only a construct of our own beliefs about who we are. It’s a story of transformation, and transcendence. It reminds us to have faith in our own voice, and to trust that others are listening not just with their ears, but with their hearts. It reminds us that each of us has the power to overcome whatever wounds we’ve suffered, but only by allowing other people close enough to love and heal us.

Friday, March 19, 2010

DNfromMN - Movie Review - City Island


CITY ISLAND
Release Date 3/14/10

The Story: Jake Rizzo (Andy Garcia) is prison guard keeping a secret from his wife Joyce (Juliana Marguiles). Their college-going daughter is keeping a secret from her parents. Their teenage son is keeping his own secret. It all comes to a head when Jake takes pity on Tony (Steven Strait) an inmate who is eligible for home detainment, if he had some family, and so Jake invites him home.

City Island, the place, is a small fishing village in The Bronx, and despite a lot of exposition about this small town, this really could have taken place anywhere in New York. Or L.A., or really anywhere. The only thing that relates to it is the Italian American/Bronx accents all around.

What’s never explained is, why? Why is everyone keeping secrets? The kids have secrets because they’re salacious, and really, what teenager doesn’t keep secrets from their parents? But why is Jake keeping secrets? Why does his wife seem to disparage him? It gives some conflict to the story, but it’s never justified. That may be over thinking this otherwise simple movie.

The highlight of the film is Ezra Miller (from cable shows “Californication” and “Royal Pains”) as Vince, Jr. Either this kid nailed every line given to him, or just got all the good lines, I couldn’t decide. Emily Mortimer is great as Jake’s friend and mentor from class. And Steven Strait’s chest is a work of art.

What It’s Worth: $4.75, or about the cost of a rental. It’s almost worth it to zip through the first 30 minutes and get the gist of it, and then watch the last hour when it starts to get decent. It’s an entertaining flick, but not something anyone will be writing down on their favorite movies of the year or that you’ll go back to more than once. CITY ISLAND is a movie that you’ve seen before, and probably done better. It’s a family dramedy that would’ve made an entertaining TV show on Showtime or FX.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Mooshki - Movie Review - Hot Tub Time Machine


‘Hot Tub Time Machine’

Plot summary: Four guys go to a ski resort, get wasted in a hot tub and wake up as themselves in 1986. (Well, 3 of them as their younger selves - the fourth hadn’t been born yet in ‘86, so he goes back as his 2010 self.)

I love John Cusack, Rob Corddry, Lizzy Caplan, Craig Robinson and Crispin Glover, and I love ‘80s nostalgia (as long as they don’t bring back the fashion - for the love of god, people!) but this movie didn’t blow me away. I think it suffered by comparison to ‘The Hangover.’ I did laugh quite a bit, but it wasn’t ‘hard-to-breathe-clutch-your-gut’ laughter. Also, most of the ‘80s gags we’ve seen before. “Oh look! It’s a giant cell phone!”

Rob Corddry is the Zach Galifianakis equivalent, and he was funny, just not quite as funny. Part of the problem was that half of his jokes were gay jokes. “Oh my god, he’s getting naked in front of other guys!!! He must be gay! Hahahaha!” (Or not.) Not to get all pc on you, but most of it was ‘straight white guy’ humor, not ‘funny for anyone’ humor. Chevy Chase’s character was pretty much a waste. There were, of course, some ‘Back to the Future’ references, but I wish they had utilized Crispin more for that, although his character is one of the best parts of the movie. Clark Duke was also great. I hadn’t heard of him before this, but I think he’s going to have a solid career ahead of him. The rest of the cast - good, but I’ve seen them better.

My favorite things: “Two dollars,” “I write Stargate fanfiction,” and including “I Will Dare” by the Replacements in the soundtrack.

So, basic review: good but not great. I think it’s worth seeing at a matinee, or definitely as a rental, but I wouldn’t pay full price for it. (Release date: March 26th)

Monday, November 23, 2009

Gladys Kravitz - Movie Review - Precious


First off, a disclaimer. I’m a do-gooder liberal and a sucker for films that point out the inequities of our society. I couldn’t wait for “Precious” to be released in Sacramento, and considered driving 80 miles to the Bay Area just to watch it a few weeks ago, before it was in wide release. I was ready for a good liberal fest. But if that’s the film you’re looking for, too, you’re going to be disappointed. “Precious” isn’t about the inequities of society. “Precious” is about being human, about life, about finding joy in the smallest of victories.

What you’re reading about the film “Precious Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire” is true. It’s going to win some Oscars this year: the only question is for whom and how many. By the way, that’s the whole title, clearly a product of some fancy negotiations on the author’s agent’s part.

What you aren’t reading about the film is that it’s not only good, but it’s funny too. It is not an easy task to make physical abuse, illiteracy, hopelessness and incest into something that will not only make you laugh, but will also leave you guilt-free about your laughter. Don’t go to this film expecting a comedy, but don’t be surprised when director Lee Daniels skillfully guides the audience to laugh. Like a good comedian, he’s engineered pauses in just the right places, allowing us to relieve some of the intensity that he has just as skillfully built.
You’ve probably already heard the plot, and if you’re anything like me, you think you’ve seen a PG version of this film as an after-school special a couple of dozen times. You haven’t. Clareece Precious Jones (Gabourey “Gabby” Sidibe ), goes by the name Precious, even though she clearly is not considered precious by anyone. Sidibe portrays Precious as a remarkably unattractive and overweight African-American 16 year old girl who is pregnant with her second child; both children were conceived from Precious’ father raping her. Precious’ mother (Mo’Nique) only offers Precious more abuse, and the world of taunting boys and impersonal administrators and teachers seems downright warm in comparison to Precious’ home life. Precious enters an alternative school, and the teacher (Paula Patton) helps her to see that she has value in the world, assisted by a social worker (Mariah Carey) and a nurse’s aide (Lenny Kravitz) who take interest in the slow-moving, slow-talking, wall-like blank presence that Precious presents to the world.

Daniels explores race relations, but not from the role of victim—in one scene, Carey’s social worker challenges Precious, who asks her, “You some kind of black or something?” “Tell me what color do you think I am?” responds Carey, who plays her role with a deliberate understatement that is refreshing to see (plain makeup, no unicorns, no low-cut blouses, no Nick Cannon carrying her bags in the background) In a movie that is not overtly about race, Daniels plays with our own arbitrary boundaries: when does brown become black? When does brown become white? Interestingly, Helen Mirren, who is about as white as they come, was originally cast as the social worker. Using Carey, with her own mixed racial heritage, reminds the viewers that race is rarely the sole determiner of who is safe and who is not.
The rape scenes are thankfully short, but intense. Daniels takes the audience with Precious as she disassociates herself from the myriad methods of abuse that her family and the rest of the world seem to offer her. It becomes rapidly clear that the only way that Precious can live in her world is to live outside of it, escaping into imaginative glamor and obtainable only outside of reality. She wishes to die, but “ain’t no plug to pull.” She is a ponderous mountain of a girl, all hefty rolls, barely contained within the confines of the desks or chairs in which she is forced to sit.

Mo’Nique might win an Oscar for her portrayal of Mary, Precious’ mother, and she’ll be robbed if she doesn’t at least garner a nomination for her work. There is little to like about her character, and Mo’Nique does an excellent job of showing the audience exactly how much there is to dislike. Ultimately, the only compassion we can work up for her is tempered by sheer disgust as she justifies allowing Precious’ father to continue to rape his young daughter by asking, “But who else was gonna love me? Who would make me feel good?” She portrays the tough, sad, abused and abusing Mary with a depth that sends an uneasy shock of recognition. We know this woman, we’ve seen her in grocery stores, or in the apartment next door and perhaps we did nothing to stop the abuse we saw, worrying about the consequences to our own hides.
Patton, playing a teacher named the improbable Blu Rain becomes a lifeline for Precious, presenting a quiet performance in compassion. Sapphire, who wrote the novel Push, on which the movie is based (in case you couldn’t figure it out from the long title of the film), was a teacher in an alternative school. It’s not much of a stretch to infer that Sapphire is Blu Rain, and that Rain’s role as Precious’ gentle hero is a reflection of the author’s own role as an educator in Harlem. If there’s a weakness in the film, though, it rests with Geoffrey Fletcher’s writing of Ms. Rain’s character. She is somewhat one-dimensional: Ms. Rain is so kind, so compassionate, so committed to Precious that she is too good to be true. That works for the typical Hollywood movie, and Sapphire may have made it work for the novel (I haven’t read the book), but it is the only complaint I can find about the film—I want Ms. Rain to have a flaw. Or even two.

In a time of films by and about men, though (and, except for Oprah Winfrey’s involvement, this film was directed and produced by men—Tyler Perry was the executive producer), “Precious” has only one male character with significant screen time, the nurse’s aide played by Lenny Kravitz. Kravitz does a good job with his role, showing a homey ease with Precious and her classmates. The preponderance of women in the film, though, their performances of strength, gives me hope that film companies might take note of the possibility that “women’s films” can reach across the gender divide, both artistically and in the form of box office cash.

This is Sidibe’s first movie role, and her talented portrayal of Precious provides an anchor for the rest of the cast. Looking at publicity stills of her, and watching her during her fantasy sequences in the film, she is a beautiful woman. Looking at her onscreen, she is anything but beautiful: walled off, unable to express her essence. It is her touching performance as an imprisoned victim of her family, of society, of herself, that keeps the film’s heart front and center. The audience cares about Precious, we’re rooting for her, and it’s because Sidibe’s performance is stellar in its relentless adherence to Precious’ character.

In a historically inaccurate but moving movie montage, a lone protester is shown facing down a tank in Tienanmen Square (the movie is set in 1987—the Tienanmen Square protests occurred in 1989). The symbolism is clear, though. One person, fighting a giant opponent for all. What “Precious” does, though, is present a portrait of a character who is buoyed by others in her slow, steady battle with the monolith of forces that are aligned against her. Precious will never be middle class—when Ms. Rain is in conversation, Precious says, “They talk like people on tv shows I don’t watch.” Precious fantasizes the ceiling opening while her father rapes her, giving her an escape to another world. In reality, though, it is not fantasy, but learning to read and to speak, to communicate, that ultimately allows Precious some small measure of freedom and even pleasure.

This movie is not about racism, or incest, or the black culture or whatever it is that people are telling you it’s about. “Precious” is a movie steeped in the question of how we can best free ourselves from prisons that are forced upon us, and prisons that we create for ourselves. Who will help you to free yourself? Who can you help to find their freedom? What miracles of being human are grounded in the every day acts of pushing forward, with our hands out to help someone else following behind?

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Mim - Movie Review - The Proposal


Directed by the multi-talented Anne Fletcher (27 Dresses, Step Up), ‘The Proposal’ is a light-weight slice of classic rom-com, bordering at times on the absurd and even downright strange – in this case just enough to prevent the film from becoming yet another saccharine re-telling of the boy-meets-girl scenario. Like other films of this genre, it doesn’t always attempt to make too much sense of the occasional gap in the plot, nor does it trouble itself with resolving all of its character arcs or tying up all its loose ends – but there is more than enough here to satisfy, not the least of which is the sight of Ryan Reynolds almost naked (so close to FFF material Enty!)…and let’s face it, for most of us anyway, seeing Ryan in the altogether would be worth the price of admission alone.

Damn you Scarlett!!!

Playing second fiddle to Ryan (well, at least in my mind anyway…I’m only human) is Sandra Bullock, in a mostly satisfying return to form after what has seemed like an endless string of meaningful roles in meandering films, designed to showcase her as a ‘serious’ actress. Whatever Sandy! Stop boring us and stick with what you do best, okay?

It has to be said that Bullock plays a very believable hard-arse, her Margaret Tate calling upon equal parts Miss Congeniality and Hillary Clinton in her portrayal of this morally void and emotionally neutered book publisher, who finds herself about to be deported back to Canada pretty much solely through her own arrogance and belief that rules are for other people.

Reynolds plays her long-suffering assistant, aspirant editor Andrew Paxton, who soon becomes Margaret’s ticket to residency. The fact that he loathes her and she treats him like shit is of little consequence to Margaret, and Andrew finds himself blackmailed into going along with the whole charade in order to keep his job. Of course, it isn’t long before the authorities get wind of these questionable plans, and during an interview with a particularly smarmy visa official (played to perfection by Denis O’Hare), Margaret shamelessly invites herself along on a trip to Alaska that weekend for Andrew’s ‘Gammy’s’ 90th birthday…the same one she had forbidden him to attend only hours before. Bitch.

We follow Margaret and Andrew to Alaska where the fun – and confusion – really begin. I say confusion because there is a lot that doesn’t add up here and some things that are just quite simply odd about the whole outing – from the simple mechanics of the film, with some dodgy green-screen action and some terrible continuity blunders – to the vague and unresolved characterisations and situations that pop up here, leaving us either wanting more, or simply wondering why. The good part is, most of these peculiarities create some great belly-laugh material, but one wonders if this was deliberate, or simply a happy coincidence.

The reliable Mary Steenburgen plays Andrew’s mother Grace, tasked with playing straight woman to the ageless Betty While, who quite simply steals the show as Grandma Annie. Steenburgen grins inanely throughout, propped up next to White like some sort of ventriloquist doll on Prozac…in her defence, there was very little she could do to shine next to White, who turns in an outrageously off-beat performance and shows here she has lost absolutely none of her charm, charisma or acting chops, her comedic timing as perfect as ever.

White plays Grandma Annie somewhere between a sundowning nanna and a complete oddball earth mother who has quite possibly seen a few too many Alaskan summers. The scene where Bullock comes across her in the woods chanting to…well, I’m not quite sure what she was chanting to…and dancing around in a blanket tricked out like some kind of ‘Craft Corner Deathmatch’ version of a Native American ceremonial robe, is one of the highlights of the film and sure to raise a laugh, especially when Margaret happens across Gammy, and winds up shakin’ her own thing alongside her in the woods.

It takes a while for Margaret to get to that point of course…suffering the weekend with Andrew’s family is a price she’s willing to pay to get her way, but for the glacial Margaret, pretending to be in love is quite another thing. As family and friends gather for Gammy’s party at the palatial Paxton family compound in a remote (from New York at least) and stunning part of the Alaskan wilderness, Andrew and Margaret have nowhere to hide from the scrutiny of their ‘relationship’.
Andrew’s family is of course delighted to have the prodigal son and his fiancée home for this momentous weekend, but before we know it, Gammy’s birthday celebration is hijacked and the happy couple find themselves on the way to the altar in a matter of hours, as Andrew’s mother tries to patch up his fractured relationship with his father (which is never satisfyingly explored). But of course! Because this is what you do when you’ve only just found out your only son is engaged to a woman he’s been calling ‘the barracuda’ for the past three years!

Did I mention unlikely plot twists that don’t quite add up? Anyway.
Everything is played very broadly and for maximum laughs, and for the most part this shallow schtick works really well. Especially hilarious is the turn by Oscar Nunez as the slightly disturbing Ramone, “the island’s only exotic dancer” (the fact that his services are in any way in demand in this community does it no credit, believe me) and Margaret’s newly-minted stalker. Along with Betty White, Nunez provides the star comedy turn of the film, despite leaving you feeling faintly creeped out by his performance.

Bullock and Reynolds fit perfectly together as a romantic duo, each very sure of their turf and both very strong comedy leads in their own right. They play off each other confidently through both the light and dark moments of the film, which is just as well because apart from Nunez and White, their supporting cast is left floundering and indistinct – along with Steenburgen, Malin Akerman as Andrew’s ex girlfriend Gert, and Craig T Nelson as Andrew’s father Joe are both lost in the story somewhere, and you definitely get the sense that much of their story was trimmed away to draw the focus back to our two leads.

In any case, we never really figure out what their stories were meant to contribute to the film’s plot, and they’re both left dangling as afterthoughts in the larger scheme of this film.

Despite its faults, there are some great moments to this film and plenty of laughs throughout. Reynolds is sharp and funny and makes great eye candy, and Bullock is fun and capable as always. It’s not brain surgery, but like Fletcher’s ’27 Dresses’, you won’t be going to see ‘The Proposal’ expecting anything other than pure candyfloss entertainment…and in this I can promise you won’t be disappointed.

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days