Tuesday, September 23, 2008

What About The Other Two Kids?


There is something funny going on over at Sharon Stone's house and it isn't the 1,000 people from China she has hired to try and make things personally right with that country. Nope, it is something much more. Not even one year ago, a judge in the Sharon Stone/Phil Bronstein ongoing custody battle determined the couple should have joint legal and physical custody. Not anymore.

A judge ruled last week that Phil has been awarded permanent sole physical custody of their eight year old son. Sharon must have done something or not done something she should have to lose custody like that in less than a year. I mean you generally have to go off the deep end or get arrested or have some really big issue to totally lose out like that Britney style.

Now though the question is what about her other two kids? What about Quinn and Laird? Are they ok? Those two kids were adopted solely by Sharon and so they don't have anyone else looking out for them. I'm worried for them. Something went on that made Sharon lose Roan like that. Whatever happened though, her other kids are still with her, so hopefully they are ok.

42 comments:

Molly said...

did we hear about a custody battle? no. do you honestly think she fought for custody? no. she didn't want custody. you cannot lose what you didn't want and didn't fight for.

Mooshki said...

Molly, these people never give up custody, even if they don't want the kids. It's about power and maintaining your image. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if she finally tipped over the deep end. Hopefully the nannies are the ones raising the other kids anyway.

Quintessential Southerner said...

it is reported that she is wacky and on the dope. i don't think her wackiness comes from the dope per se.
maybe their is a mental illness or disorder going on with her.

Molly said...

mooshki, i think she's such a selfish bitch that she's going to concoct some story that phil provides a more stable household than she can due to her travels for business. she really does not want to be a mother. she never portrayed herself as a mother.

amster said...

It's too early to jump to conclusions. I think this was an amicable arrangement, not a battle.

Robin said...

I hope they get whatever the CA version of Children Services involved on behalf of the other children. In order for something this drastic to occur there would have to be documented situations where Stone was found to be an unfit mother. It sounds like she didn't bother to file papers to contradict it.

It doesn't sound amicable. According to court papers, she didn't meet the burden of proof. This does not sound like a mediated solution; the court is removing her from custody permanently. Pretty strong language. Even a faded star like Sharon has to realize that there's no way to put a positive spin on this. This on top of the karma comment is not the best way to promote yourself or your career.

I found this on X17's page. I have no idea what their credibility is --
http://x17online.com/celebrities/sharon_stone/breaking_news_sharon_stone_loses_custody_of_son-09232008.php

Quintessential Southerner said...

also take into consideration, that she may know that she is unfit to be a parent. if that's the case, then i applaud her for not fighting.

but that leaves the other two.

Tea Lady said...

X17 says "house is very often a party place for the actress and her girlfriends and that there is an 'inappropriate sexual atmosphere'".... Hmmm.

not a famous adrian said...

Didn't she leave her kids in a car last year while she was on a date?

Molly said...

between her and courtney love it's going to be a real close race for mother of the year.

Mooshki said...

"Phil Bronstein 'shall have permanent sole physical custody of child.'"

My mom is child psychologist, and it takes a LOT for this to happen. If X17 is right, my guess is the situation constituted sexual abuse.

Quintessential Southerner said...

tea lady,

it's rumored that sharon participates in orgies with other hwood ladies. it is extremely disturbing if her kids were around during those times.

Molly said...

based on what i'm reading now it does say she fought for custody and lost. you have to have done something really bad as a mother these days to lose custodial rights. mooshki, either that or she was doing drugs in front of the kids. either way, she's fucked up.

Mooshki said...

"...either that or she was doing drugs in front of the kids."

If that was grounds for permanent loss of custody, we'd have orphanages on every street corner.

Grace said...

Makes me wonder if she is under investigation with the other two kids.

Yeah, she can't put a "work-travel too much" spin on this, since it involved only one child and not the other two.

And I do hope it's the nannies who are doing the care-taking. Aren't they supposed to report abuse and/or neglect?

Molly said...

yea mooshki, you're right. maybe she was giving the older one drugs. that's not so far out there, remember the video of the two year old smoking a joint? sick!

grace, like robin said above, i hope the child support services or whatever they're called in CA goes after the other two kids and gets them out of there.

Paisley said...

If the kid is in school, how would joint physical custody work if one parent is in SF and the other is in LA? I thought the judge said that custody would be revisited if Stone moves to SF. Has Stone lost joint legal custody as well or just physical custody?

ElsieFire said...

Wow, managed to tar and feather the woman already huh?

Here's a quote from the COURT:

The court does not find that (a) move away is in child's best interest," "(Bronstein) can provide a more structured continuity, stable, secure, and consistent home that child, Roan, needs."

He's enrolled in school in SFO and she still has joint custody.

Unless of course the judge hears about the orgy filled, drug pushing atmosphere she is raising him in.

libby said...

Sharon Stone adopted three healthy, natural-blonde, blue-eyed boys at infancy. Any White infant is highly sought after, but Blondes are VERY popular.
The time and expense it would take to find three Aryan-type, adoptable infants PROVES there was an 'image' element to her becoming a mother, I've always thought so.

And now this? I can't wait to find out what the hell she's been doing, and I hope the other two can be safe.

Mooshki said...

Elsie, couldn't happen to a more deserving person. She said the Chinese earthquake was because of karma. I'm gonna leap at any chance I get to badmouth her, facts be damned. :)

ElsieFire said...

Ya know, Mooshki, I am usually on board too, but the level of vitriol being displayed against her is pretty amazing. In no way am I defending her insane comments about China, and her other looney bird behaviour, but if she was truly doing what most people here are accusing her of (including, according to Libby, of being a white supremacist) I gotta think the judge in this case might be concerned about the little guys at home too. It sort of works that way, no?

Mooshki said...

I also heard that her short-selling helped bring the market down and she told people not to evacuate for Ike. ;)

Mooshki said...

Oh, and she eats puppies for breakfast.

ElsieFire said...

Mooshki, you ol' baiter you ;>

Sexecution said...

I am just so surprised all of this was going on under everyone's noses and we had no heads up.

There is another hearing on Nov 18, to discuss attorney's fees. Bronstein is going after attorney's fees. From what I can gather, Phil has had the boy for a while and Roan was going to school in SF so Phil wanted to make it permanent, as Roan seemed happier, which is when Sharon wanted him home with her. The court took it all away from her. If she has the money she will appeal, if she's broke she won't appeal.

The reason this was off the radar is court was in SF not LA. Note to Celeb's if you truly want to be left alone move to SF, which is an hour flight to and from LA and you can have your kids taken away from you and nobody will figure it out for a month or more.

libby said...

elsie-fire, I was NOT implying she's a white supremacist, my use of term "Aryan-type" was just a way for me to say "natural blonde, blue-eyed" in a shorter form. It was wholeheartedly MY clumsy abbreviation, NOT an accusation. I had no idea that someone would interpret it that way.

But adopting the most sought after type of child IS extremely difficult and expensive, and getting three identical kids tells me that IMAGE played a huge role in her becoming a mother.

BTW, "Aryan" is not, in itself, a white supremacist word. It's like the word Negro, just a technical term that happens to have a negative context because of the times in which it was used.

not a famous adrian said...

libby--all you need is enough cash & a good attorny & you will get a blonde/blue-eyed baby. Image isn't as important.

libby said...

N.A.F adrian---getting three identical kids, especially the most expensive and difficult type, going to that trouble, IS, IMO, VERY image-y.
And the way she dresses them in ridiculous lil' outfits for the paps, when they're out in public. awful.

Merlin D. Bear said...

Here I can offer my personal experience re adoption - my adoptive mother was in her 50's and my adoptive father was in his mid 40's when I was adopted as an infant in the early 60's - recently found out conclusively that a bunch of money changed hands to make my adoption happen, so yeah money does make a lot happen - but having a not so reputable attorney makes it even easier.

Ernestine said...

She's so fucking revolting. If she had her way, that dress would be made out of real leopard(s).

Yeah. Something horrendous had to happen. That's pretty sick and sad, but I never really held this overrated cruella in high regard to begin with. She doesn't strike me as a very compassionate person.

BlahFrickinBlah said...

I wonder if the ex has something on her that she doesn't want public (orgy stuff etc) and that is why the kid is with him now. He agrees that they give off the appearance of a fight so she can save face and poof, done deal.

brendalove@gmail.com said...

My God, even Courtney got custody back.

bionic bunny! said...

i just think she's batshit crazy.

i don't remember who posted it, but joint custody between two cities usually works out to six months to each parent, or a similar arrangement. once they get to school age, that totally has to suck for the kid.

but PERMANENT, SOLE PHYSICAL custody means what it says. no visitation (legally), no rights, but i think she still has to pay support.

and if her nannies are not legal, they're not going to say a word to the authorities. you think she's above hiring and torturing illegal immigrants? i don't.

Judi said...

Merlin, it doesn't happen that way now. The process is very much regulated by state law. I think she wanted her kids to look like her... which is still lame. I just hope Roan's brothers can visit him often. Nevermind Stone.

SisterMaryHotPantz said...

I am an attorney. She didnt lose visitation rights.

They had a prior joint custody agreement. That doesnt always mean 50/50 split of time. Joint custody means you jointly parent your child. Joint custody can be any amount of parenting time with each parent (i.e. 50/50; 60/40; 80/20).

It is extremely difficult to win sole custody AFTER you are in a joint custody arrangement with your ex-spouse. Something went down with Sharon BIG TIME! I mean BIG!

The burden of proof to terminate joint custody is on the Britney level of behavior.

Sole custody means Sharon no longer is consulted or has a say for any decision making regarding her child. NONE! Her husband has total control. TOTAL!

As Heidi Klum would say "that's baaaaaaaaaaad."

Molly said...

The burden of proof to terminate joint custody is on the Britney level of behavior.



ohhhhh, that's what was meant when the judge said she failed to provide burden of proof? it was up to her to provide info that would show it being harmless to share custody? i wasn't getting that part until now. thnx, sistermaryhotpantz.


watch for the drama queen to use this because she's such a dramatic lying media whore. remember when she LIED about having breast cancer?

stiffkittens said...

She gives off the Melanie Griffiths weirdo vibe to me - i don't think anything can surprise me about this one. If she is truly Britney-level nuts then we would have heard about it (like anyone would try to hide the crazy for her sake), so therefore im thinking she's a devil woman and is being punished.

Hopefully the father is doing a good job with his son, and if there is any justice, he will be able to have custody of the other two so they can all stay together.

Paisley said...

From what I've read, the boy has been going to school in SF for at least a year. Sharon is the one who filed in April to change the custody agreement (I'm guessing to send him to school in LA). The judge said the kid was fine where he was and Sharon didn't meet the burden of proof to change it (she's the one who filed the motion). The visitation schedule agreed to last year is still in place. Bronstein only keeps sole physical custody as long as he lives in the Bay Area or until Sharon moves to SF.

Ayesha said...

I still say the reason we didn't hear too much about this is because Bronstein is exerting his influence to keep it quiet. For the kid's sake.

Mooshki said...

So she reacts to the news getting out by going to a coffee shop with 20 paparazzi hanging out front and telling them to leave her alone. Bright.

stiffkittens said...

She probably called them...

shakey said...

Mooshki said: "Oh, and she eats puppies for breakfast."

So THAT'S what happened to Paris Hilton's dogs!