Tom Cruise Drops Lawsuit Against In Touch
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
In darker corners of society where people practice strange rituals are where two photographs are passed around to murmurs of awe and respect...
-
This 2020 wannabe A++ lister who had to settle for a consolation prize is splitting with his significant other. This is a huge deal. This wi...
-
Having sex with dozens upon dozens of underage girls is apparently not a disqualification to being hired for this A- list actor/singer who i...
-
Apparently this A+ list politician in his own state is trying to save his own skin by throwing a national A+ list politician from the same s...
-
Needing money, the safekeeper of certain items of evidence which have been in hiding for nearly thirty years, wants to sell them. They are i...
-
Congrats to the former A+ list celebrity/reality star who has opened up about some of her past during this past year. She is expecting a bab...
-
The police have quietly reopened their investigation into a murder that took place decades ago. The reason for this was an episode a couple ...
-
February 7, 2021 Have I seen it? Not in person, but have seen several photos. Three years ago she even made a 20-30 second video highlightin...
-
This B/B- list celebrity with a very unique look, who used to be A/A- list not so long ago, has some things coming out which are not good. I...
-
This A list celebrity all of you know, and either love or hate with no middle ground was nearly an hour late to get her pap photo taken beca...
19 comments:
uhhh.... i think he won to a certain extent. He cost them a LOT of money (which he is not required to reimburse) and they had to apologize.
@MsWool
Get what you're saying, but anyone that is so in the right would not have dropped the case. And who knows what the actual terms were. Yes, they have to issue a carefully worded apology, but it's to save face. If I knew that I would win, I would have pursued it. Tom knew he would have really lost this one big time for a little man.
he didn't win. by anyone's standards, he's dropped out of his child's life. seriously, when IS the last time he saw her? he says they skype---that's not the same thing as 'seeing' your child.
he knew going in this wouldn't go all the way. he just did it to make a big splash by filing the suit with much hoopla and claiming they lied. they really didn't lie.
I think it was all smoke and mirrors to interrupt the speculation that Tom is not Suri's biological father.
Ms Wool I imagine Tammy has some kind of liability insurance or will write this off as a PR expense. Or if not this is a blip to his finances.
I thought Suri was supposed to be the next Jesus of Scientology (after Tom) I'm surprised they let her go so easily. (I'm sure there was a lot that we didn't see but still, I wouldn't put taking Katie Holmes out past them)
4 months…….please it's much longer…show me the photo proof…
There is always the chance that he is, indeed, seeing his daughter but not calling the paps or parading her in front of them. I'm sure Scientology is still organized enough to figure out how to use an underground parking garage, elevator to a hotel suite, etc.
I dunno. I think when two voluntarily famous adults trot out their romantic relationship, real or arranged, for public consumption - Tom and Katie, Kim and Kanye, Brad and Angie, Justin and Jennifer, Ryan and Julianne - it's hard to claim any right to privacy, even when things turn sour.
Kids don't sign a contract. Suri didn't, North didn't, none of the Jolie-Pitt kids did. I don't know what right we, the public, have to follow their lives and measure their time together with either parent.
f they want to go public someday, Cheryl Crane or Christina Crawford style, so be it. But when they're kids, I think they should be off-limits for the publicity machine.
Not sure what Paul McCartney and Heather Mills have done, but I know pretty much nothing about their 9-year-old daughter Beatrice, and that's as it should be.
there was a photo of Sir Paul and Beatrice yesterday…doing Christmas shopping.
@Nutty Flavor
I think Tom is careful not to be seen with Suri. Other Scientologists would get angry at him getting special treatment. Isn't Suri supposed to be a suppressive person?
Exactly. Suri is suppressive. I am sure he sees her without a lot of cameras around although they did do that public trip to Disneyland.
Run Tom, Run!!!!!!!
Damn. Really wanted to see the little freak take the stand and answer questions about who really fathered Suri, but of course that was never going to happen. Cruise would kill himself before he would admit he is gay.
Ms. Wool, I am certain that In Touch retains its own in house legal division, as virtually all large businesses do.
And his lawyer wasn't exactly free...
While I don't think Tom is Suri's biological kid(how else would Katie get custody so easily otherwise?) that alone doesn't mean he's gay. Could he be? Sure but not fathering Suri isn't the smoking gun. And the gay rumors existed long before she came along.
Now do I think he's sterile? Yes.
Agreed, Nutty. Preach it
It's none of our business who is Suri's biological father. Tom and Katie don't owe us that. I am much more curious about what Katie has over Tom and/or Scientology that allowed her to basically walk away with their child without the shit storm they give other celebs.
Rose, that is where the real story is. I wonder if we will ever find out?
Post a Comment