Tom Cruise Drops Lawsuit Against In Touch
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Advertisement
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
February 8, 2020 The a-hole actor/singer is gloating to friends over the critical mauling of the latest DC movie. He says if they had cas...
-
January 26, 2020 This foreign born back in the day A/A- list singer who may or may not have been replaced by a body double sure did get s...
-
February 3, 2020 This A-/B+ list actress who is seemingly on the television every ten minutes, just had a breast enlargement/lift to land...
-
February 4, 2020 Apparently the foreign born permanent A list female author has a thing for racist, serial cheating, serial sexual assaul...
-
February 9, 2020 Despite it being a private event and earning in excess of $1M, this couple didn't contribute a dime to the security ...
-
February 2, 2020 This A/A- list singer/sometime actress put the A list everything in her mind performer on blast. She knows there will be...
-
February 9, 2020 I wonder if the alliterate permanent A lister will ever discuss the things she did with her husband to women he would br...
-
February 8, 2020 The foreign born former back in the day A/A- list singer from a group is probably regretting the way things were handled...
-
January 26, 2020 This disgraced A- list mostly movie actor knows everything he did with this A- list mostly movie actress is going to loo...
-
January 30, 2020 One thing the permanent A++ list celebrity likes to keep quiet is the huge amount of money she makes each year from a pu...
19 comments:
uhhh.... i think he won to a certain extent. He cost them a LOT of money (which he is not required to reimburse) and they had to apologize.
@MsWool
Get what you're saying, but anyone that is so in the right would not have dropped the case. And who knows what the actual terms were. Yes, they have to issue a carefully worded apology, but it's to save face. If I knew that I would win, I would have pursued it. Tom knew he would have really lost this one big time for a little man.
he didn't win. by anyone's standards, he's dropped out of his child's life. seriously, when IS the last time he saw her? he says they skype---that's not the same thing as 'seeing' your child.
he knew going in this wouldn't go all the way. he just did it to make a big splash by filing the suit with much hoopla and claiming they lied. they really didn't lie.
I think it was all smoke and mirrors to interrupt the speculation that Tom is not Suri's biological father.
Ms Wool I imagine Tammy has some kind of liability insurance or will write this off as a PR expense. Or if not this is a blip to his finances.
I thought Suri was supposed to be the next Jesus of Scientology (after Tom) I'm surprised they let her go so easily. (I'm sure there was a lot that we didn't see but still, I wouldn't put taking Katie Holmes out past them)
4 months…….please it's much longer…show me the photo proof…
There is always the chance that he is, indeed, seeing his daughter but not calling the paps or parading her in front of them. I'm sure Scientology is still organized enough to figure out how to use an underground parking garage, elevator to a hotel suite, etc.
I dunno. I think when two voluntarily famous adults trot out their romantic relationship, real or arranged, for public consumption - Tom and Katie, Kim and Kanye, Brad and Angie, Justin and Jennifer, Ryan and Julianne - it's hard to claim any right to privacy, even when things turn sour.
Kids don't sign a contract. Suri didn't, North didn't, none of the Jolie-Pitt kids did. I don't know what right we, the public, have to follow their lives and measure their time together with either parent.
f they want to go public someday, Cheryl Crane or Christina Crawford style, so be it. But when they're kids, I think they should be off-limits for the publicity machine.
Not sure what Paul McCartney and Heather Mills have done, but I know pretty much nothing about their 9-year-old daughter Beatrice, and that's as it should be.
there was a photo of Sir Paul and Beatrice yesterday…doing Christmas shopping.
@Nutty Flavor
I think Tom is careful not to be seen with Suri. Other Scientologists would get angry at him getting special treatment. Isn't Suri supposed to be a suppressive person?
Exactly. Suri is suppressive. I am sure he sees her without a lot of cameras around although they did do that public trip to Disneyland.
Run Tom, Run!!!!!!!
Damn. Really wanted to see the little freak take the stand and answer questions about who really fathered Suri, but of course that was never going to happen. Cruise would kill himself before he would admit he is gay.
Ms. Wool, I am certain that In Touch retains its own in house legal division, as virtually all large businesses do.
And his lawyer wasn't exactly free...
While I don't think Tom is Suri's biological kid(how else would Katie get custody so easily otherwise?) that alone doesn't mean he's gay. Could he be? Sure but not fathering Suri isn't the smoking gun. And the gay rumors existed long before she came along.
Now do I think he's sterile? Yes.
Agreed, Nutty. Preach it
It's none of our business who is Suri's biological father. Tom and Katie don't owe us that. I am much more curious about what Katie has over Tom and/or Scientology that allowed her to basically walk away with their child without the shit storm they give other celebs.
Rose, that is where the real story is. I wonder if we will ever find out?
Post a Comment