Which story involving a B list television and movie actor and his singer wife should be corrected by a national tabloid but isn't because they have paid so much money to the person who gave them the original story. Now you may be asking why the B list actor doesn't sue. Well it turns out that although this time he is not guilty that hasn't always been the case and he doesn't want those stories to come to light.
Posted by
ent lawyer
at
1:58 PM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
22 comments:
Josh & Fergie.
DITTO
OOOOOHhhhhhhhh....
That explains everything!!
Josh & Fergie fit Ed Zachary.
omg, what a fabulous blind! i love this...josh/fergie ftw!
Wait...does that mean the stripper didn't have text message after all? I am confused, but that is a daily state.
messages - sorry, if I could type I would be dangerous.
Not pretty boy and meth head, the last one was a no-doubter.
oh wow i finally got one!
Josh and Fergie!
Wouldn't you have known all along that he was innocent this time araound, being that you are in the know in hollywood?
Once a cheater, always a cheater.
Josh & Tiger should become roomies.
I found this blind confusing-- the accuser was lying?
I agree with all of you about Josh and Fergie.
I think the fake story is Tom paying Katie 80 million for another child. I think he paid Josh Hartnett off for the last one.
oops, singer wife, tv actor, silly me. I think I need an adult beverage.
BTW, that Melody above isn't me and I'm the usual Melody. I don't even know who these people are (okay, I know who they are but I'm too old to care).
I'd like the (non-blind) story about the rotten person who sold a lie and the scummy reporter that bought it and ran with it.
Josh & Fergie immediately came to mind. That stripper even admitted she got paid for her story
Didn't the stripper take a lie detector test to prove she had an affair with Josh?
Shit! There goes all of their credibility. lol!
Chris Klein fathered Suri, not Josh Hartnett...
Suri's bio dad is definitely a Mapother--William aka that guy from Lost. The nose is not Klein-ish.
As for the above BI, Fergie and Josh have been having three-ways with SoCal co-eds for several years. Josh cheats on every shoot and Fergie on every tour. That only one has come out is surprising.
duh, Josh & Fergie
Post a Comment