Thursday, October 11, 2018

Blind Item #13

This foreign born A+ list author always wanted to meet her childhood crush, so she hired him. Her crush apparently can do no wrong and it doesn't matter that he is a drug addicted woman beater. Now, all the others in his situation she would condemn, but not this A list actor. Nope. 

49 comments:

MDAnderson said...

Jk Rowling and Depp

MontanaMarriott said...

JK Rowling and Depp?

Ophelia said...

Wow imagine having that big of a crush on Johnny Depp lololol

theotherginger said...

JKR... :((((((((((((((((((((((( This hurts.

sandybrook said...

Yeppers

Sara, Making It Work said...

JK was 19 when Johnny"s first movie came out.
So either it's someone else, or this is a bullshit blind.

DDonna Tarttty said...

Black birds of a feathers.

J said...

Hilarious having a crush on that tries-too-hard drug-addled loser.

But I can see someone who writes wizard books going that way.

MontanaMarriott said...

Hmmmm Enty usually calls Depp Perm A but he's been known to not be consistent with his ratings.

BestMan said...

Noooooo

Lonely Bastard said...

JK Rowling is shit in every department except her rack.

kiki71 said...

@ Sara. His first MOVIE? He was known for 21 Jump Street wasn't he?

Lonely Bastard said...

@kiki71.

Jump Street isn't really a thing here in the UK. It was never shown here. So Depp's movies would be the first anyone here would see
of him.

SteveD said...

I doubt anyone in the UK new Depp before the early 90s when JK was in her mid 20s.

SteveD said...

*knew Depp

Damelon Brinn said...

Depp's first movie role was in A Nightmare on Elm Street, which came out in the fall of 1984 when Rowling was 19. Maybe a bit part, I don't know, but it doesn't take much to start a crush. He starred in Private Resort the next year. 21 Jump Street began later in 1987.

I wouldn't put it past Enty to say a 19-year-old had a childhood crush. If it's not those two, surely we can think of someone else who fits.

Brayson87 said...

If not JK then what other female foreign born A+ list author has hired an A list actor who is a drug addicted woman beater? Process of elimination should really narrow the pool.

LB whosthischick said...

Entertainment weekly just released an article in including...

Another controversy surrounded your participation in the film. The director, studio, and Rowling issued statements of support. What was that like for you, and is there anything you’d say to fans on the fence about seeing the film?

I’ll be honest with you, I felt bad for J.K. having to field all these various feelings from people out there. I felt bad that she had to take that. But ultimately, there is real controversy. The fact remains I was falsely accused, which is why I’m suing the Sun newspaper for defamation for repeating false accusations. J.K. has seen the evidence and therefore knows I was falsely accused, and that’s why she has publicly supported me. She doesn’t take things lightly. She would not stand up if she didn’t know the truth. So that’s really it.

Sara, Making It Work said...

I mean, yeah, it sure looks like them but calling Johnny her childhood crush is ridiculous. Hence, bullshit blind.

J said...

Actually, childhood crush is the only explanation for anyone admiring this shithead.

Moedoodle said...

She could have developed her crush from 21 jump street.

MDAnderson said...

Childhood crush might be pushing it but the blind is right about calling out JKR’s defense of Depp.

Green Tea said...

Margaret Atwood and someone? Is she A+?

Tea said...

I think it's all gonna come out in the court case next month.

Hortensia said...

Johnny Depp did not beat Amber Heard. Amber Heard appears to be a narcissist, and a psychopath with her behavior.

J said...

Hortensia, you mean "Johnny Depp, though undeniably an insufferable buffoon and laughingstock..."

Adrastia said...

It's sad when someone has such big stars in their eyes that they can't see the forest for the trees. or they just refuse to look hard enough because deep down they're still in 6th grade with posters on their walls.

Was Depp the guy that gets clawed apart on the ceiling near the beginning of A Nightmare on Elm Street?

When I saw that movie I was like seven years old and had no idea who Depp was at the time even though I think by that point 21 Jump Street should have been on the air. I did sometimes watch 21 Jump Street. But I was a little kid and didn't make much of a connection until years later. I don't know how well known he was back then. But he couldn't have had much international fame yet. He was still pretty up and coming.

In the 90s I remember he was pretty big. But then years later he made all those weird films and it wasn't like I remembered him at all. My idea of Johnny Depp is different from what younger people remember. XD

The blind could be using childhood crush as a little red herring.

BRAD PITT said...


i hope someone gets drunk and punches JK in the face

if she knew what it felt like she wouldn't be so fast to ignore it when it is done to other people

Unknown said...

hope the Hollywood bigshots and/or Aqua Whore paid you well. stop pretending u have any integrity or morals. this man is no saint, but he is a victim who doesn't deserve this hate and smear campaign. you're like a bunch of diseased, decaying vultures. Long after all of u are forgotten alongside the dried excrement known as SCAMber Turd, he'll be remembered as one of the acting greats, who was also kind and generous to many and to many who didn't deserve it.

Unknown said...

Depp is close buddies with and has worked with most of the adult Potter cast, including the famous actors who played Snape, Hagrid, Dumbledore, Bellatrix, Wormtail, etc. Rowling bought Depp's yacht over 5 yrs ago. She's no doubt met him many times before through those people, knows his personality and reputation, and clearly did not hire him just to meet him.

Viking Song said...

No, what's "sad" is when people keep regurgitating the same bullshit when they clearly have not read up on the case. Depp did not punch Amber Heard. He threw his phone at a wall and a piece of shrapnel caught her. It was an accident. The charges against him was dropped because there was no evidence of domestic abuse. A heavily edited video of Depp banging cupboard doors is not evidence of DV, which is why it was inadmissible for court.

Amber "shits in the bed" Heard, however, was arrested and prosecuted for domestic violence after she punched her girlfriend (Tasya Van Ree) in an airport, which no one seems overly bothered about. She then had the audacity to accuse the arresting officer of being "homophobic" even though the police officer is gay herself and had even informed Heard of that fact.

She has a criminal record going back to her teens. Fraud, theft, domestic violence, to name a few.

Is Depp a drug addict? I don't doubt it. Is he an alcoholic? Almost certainly. Does he need to get his act together? Absolutely, but that doesn't mean he deserves to be falsely accused of domestic violence.

But please do keep posting your "facts" and continue to deride those of us that have actually bothered to read up on the case before forming an opinion.

Viking Song said...

Just to add, it was obvious from the way JKR's statement was worded that she had seen the evidence stacked against Heard, but the morons who went berserk at her are obviously incapable of critical thinking or have at least rudimentary reading skills. But then, they want Depp to be banned from movies and imprisoned because he threw his phone at a wall, yet don't think Heard should be met with the same punishment for actually punching her girlfriend.

Depp's next move should be to release the texts of Heard and a make-up artist discussing how to use make-up to fake bruises (for the record, I don't think the MUA was aware of what Heard was planning on doing with that information). Maybe then the penny might finally drop amongst these idiots and they'll finally realise they've been duped.

Amber Heard, Rose McGowan and Asia Argento are a trio of liars that should be locked up for life. It is morally bankrupt to faux cry domestic violence/rape. Not only does it destroy the lives of those falsely accused, idiotic misogynists accuse all women of lying about DV/rape when the majority of women are telling the truth.

Thot Crimes said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Thot Crimes said...

@Viking - So it's the wall's fault Amber got hit with phone shrapnel, and not the person who threw the phone?

Or maybe it's Amber's fault for standing too close to a wall with known alcohol, drug, and anger issues?

Anything or anybody but your childhood crush... Is this you JK?

annie roo said...

Amber poops in bed, does she have an incontinence problem, if so it is not kind to reveal it.

Unknown said...

Yup so she woke up with her face battered and the text messages exchanged between she and his assistant where the assistant apologized for Johnny kicking her was false? The number of people who worked for them who said it did indeed happened lied too? The video where he was going off on her was faked too? He said he wasn’t a violent person but he assaulted a man on the set of his new movie and the producers LIED for him but the truth came out.. that’s a lie too?

Unknown said...

If Johnny had any proof he didnt do that to her he would’ve released it back in 2016 he definitely would’ve responded to the loads of evidence she had especially text messages where HIS assistant was speaking to her about Johnny kicking her on a plane and “feeling bad” for it

Unknown said...

What does her cases have to do with anything? And that “domestic violence” case wasn’t really dv. You claim you read up on shit but you obviously haven’t. She was in an airport having an argument with her ex and was arrested. You do know when that happens in public especially at an airport that can happen to ANYBODY right?...... you’re seriously dismissing all the proof she has against him.. he has NONE if he did he would’ve pushed to take the case to trial so it would clear his name and smear hers. He’s a woman beating MONSTER. Ever find it funny why Kate Moss never said a word? If you wanna talk about pasts didn’t they have a abusive relationship and he abused her too?.......

Viking Song said...

@Thotcrimes - The phone being thrown at the wall indicates that the wall, not Amber, was the intended target. I never implied it was her or the wall's fault that he threw his phone either. Given your misogynistic username, I'm not surprised by your inability to think critically.


@Unknown - Her face wasn't "battered." She had a small bruise which didn't follow the natural progression that contusions normally take. Did you actually see Depp give her that bruise? Did you see him hit her? No, you didn't. All you have are photos. As for the kicking incident, the assistant has said they never actually saw Depp kick her. And she didn't have "loads" of evidence. You Heard defenders keep prattling on about this mythic itinerary of evidence that Heard supposedly has against Depp yet you never use it in your arguments? So what is this evidence then?This is the same woman who, repeatedly, refused to sit for her deposition after all. As for the video. There is no DV in it. None. It had also been heavily edited which is why it was inadmissible for court.

@Unknown - She was arrested because she PUNCHED her girlfriend. She was PROSECUTED for DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Or are you calling the police officer who witnessed Amber hitting her girlfriend a liar? If you want Depp blacklisted in Hollywood and imprisoned because he threw his phone at a wall, then the same has to be applied to Amber Heard for PUNCHING her girlfriend. Anything else is pure hypocrisy.

And I have "read up on shit." It's clear from your post that YOU haven't.

longtimereader said...

Rowling outed herself on twitter as a mean, racist, entitled billionaire. The Woman started out on benefits but these days want's to strip fellow poor people of all the help she received when she was coming up. F*** her.

Paul Saint John said...

There are hundreds of better-looking b-list actors out there than Johnny Depp in his prime. I just don't get it.

LB whosthischick said...

Depp was the defendant. Amber the plaintiff. Once she withdrew her case there was nothing to defend against.
A third party overheard the argument and called the police, not amber. They did not know the police were coming. When the police got there they refused to let them in, the cops were adamant once they get a domestic disturbance call they must investigate. She finally let them in, they saw no bruise, redness or anything on her face and they saw no damage inside nor outside the condo. They made no report, because as the police said, there was no need for one. There was no abuse, no crime. Few days later they file their TRO and in the legal declaration her friend Raquel states “as soon as Johnny left her face was red and swelling and I took that picture then that I am submitting now”. She also said “Johnny was banging a magnum bottle of wine around breaking everything in his path and continued to do so outside the condo”. That’s what she stated in her legal declaration...they didn’t expect the police to step forward as they made no report. But California police take abuse very seriously since the OJ incident, And we know she refused to sit for her deposition multiple times As did her two witnesses,who only knew her stories. Never witnessed abuse, the text messages were looked at on her computer backup, not her phone per a tabloid. Neither the text messages. The assistant or this supposed IT Tech was listed as one of her witnesses. Depp has to pay the $7m as mandated by California property laws with no prenup. I believe in their overall settlement, he agreed not to sue her if she would donate all the money. NOW the Sun decided to step in and defame him out right calling him a wife beater, he is now able to use all his evidence to prove they defamed him. That’s his legal right. And he is legally able to use the deposition she finally gave which his lawyer claims she freely admits to hitting him and injuring him many times, And if you look back over her photos since the divorce with no makeup. She has that mark in the same place reoccurring. She has been spotted several times going to a dermotologist. She probably suffers from reoccurring cystic acne,

Bottom line the lapd cleared depp that night. If it wasn’t for Weinstein’s and metoo this would have never come up again. She is disgustedly using this to keep her name in the news As no one wants to hire her to act, metoo never embraced her, that should be a warning sign there,

T R said...

Woman here, and you women forgot Amber is a angry not level headed individual. Did you all forget she is a known aggressor and she is violent, did you all forget her beating her girlfriend?

Thot Crimes said...

@Viking - "The phone being thrown at the wall indicates that the wall, not Amber, was the intended target." And you know what Johnny was aiming at how? Are you a mind reader? Did you childhood crush tell you what he was aiming for the wall? That you pretend to not comprehend he caused the phone shrapnel to hit her, is indicative of logic not being your agenda with your incessant anti-Heard drivel.

Viking Song said...

Well said, @LB whoisthischick.

@Thot Crimes, do you actually read posts? You've, yet again, ignored vital information that proves Amber has been more than economical with the truth. The more you post, the more you prove your inability to process facts and to think critically. As for "drivel," my posts used facts. Your poorly constructed posts are what I would describe as being "drivel."

MattDaddy said...

Depp. Just got confirmed for a third movie. Unfortunately.

LB whosthischick said...

I’m not sure where this phone hitting the wall cane from. In recent court docs

“Depp said in the UK court filing that he only "tossed the phone on to the sofa" and that it "did not hit Ms. Heard on the face or elsewhere."

He also alleges that the LA police officers who interviewed Heard "saw no injuries or bruising or swelling," and denies destroying property.”

There was no injury. Either it’s makeup or more likely a separate incident. Like Heard passed out or fell asleep on her phone. Throwing a phone 20 feet would not leave a flat rectangular mark. The phone would mostly likely hit at the corner

Paul Saint John said...

My pet theory is that Rowling wants to join the satanic inner circles that Johnny Depp and his pal Marilyn Manson are privy to. I mean, its not like they're even hiding it.
https://youtu.be/otSSwS_Nh9A

Thot Crimes said...

@viking - If you're not just typing Depp-stan drivel, then answer the question... How do you know Johnnhy was aiming at the wall and not Amber?

I'll answer for you because you just can't seem to drag yourself to do it; you don't. That makes it your "opinion" what he was aiming at, not a fact.

Now that we've established that, by all means continue driveling on about how Depp is the victim in all of this.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days