Perez Hilton Lawsuit Commentary - Because you asked JeezeLouise
Copyright infringement is very tricky because the US Constitution protects both copyright and freedom of speech. Therefore, when the two collide it can be complicated.
The balance is such that the Constitution wants to protect the artist (X17) but at the same time wants to limit their copyright because the works (photos) themselves may be useful to the public.
Perez's defense will be "fair use."
Once X17 has proved they own the copyright, the burden will shift to Perez to prove fair use which involves four factors the court looks at.
1. The first factor is the purpose and character of the use. If the use is commercial in nature, then you are less likely to prevail than if it is for non-profit. If you are using the pics to try and get profit, you may be in trouble, but if profit is incidental, then you may be ok. Further, if you just use a thumbnail rather than the entire photo, you are likely to be ok. Perez will have a tough time with this factor.
2. The second factor is the nature of the work - Is the work unique or is it fact? In this case, I would argue it is more fact than artistic and so would be in Perez's favor.
3. The third factor is the portion of the copyright used. So, if for example it was a group photo and you cropped all but one, you are more likely to prevail. This factor is a tossup
4. The fourth and most important factor is how the posting affected X17. If x17 can prove they were damaged by a reduction in sales or a the number of visitors to their site, then they would prevail. The numbers need to be real and verifiable and not just guesswork.
If the facts are true as reported in the press release, and they may not be, then X17 has a strong case.
I do not usually comment directly on legal matters so the following disclaimer is needed.
DISCLAIMER - The Information is not intended to constitute, and does not constitute, legal advice. Moreover, the Information is not intended to constitute, and does not constitute, a solicitation for the formation of an attorney-client relationship; no attorney-client relationship is created through your use or viewing of the Blog. Anyone reading the Information should not act on it without first seeking legal counsel. Further, the Information is general in nature, and may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances.
Showing posts with label fair use. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fair use. Show all posts
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
What happens when you decide to leak some information about the wife of one of the biggest drug dealers/killers ever and the wife's cel...
-
This long running north of the border teen dominated show has been filming in what seems like an out of the way place. It is the basis for ...
-
Over the last week I have had a number of discussions with people about jobs and careers and being laid off and taking what they can find. I...
-
This actress was permanently A list. She had two of the biggest names in the world fighting for her. One of them was super rich and the othe...
-
For the next month, all of the closeted celebrities and their publicists will be holding their breath that nothing gets said about them in t...
-
May 14, 2026 This alliterate actor's "dramatic new look" has nothing to do with the gym and everything to do with the sketchy ...
-
May 14, 2026 This former A- list actor who had one big movie franchise went a little too far in the swinging lifestyle he had with his wife...
-
It might have been the wedding of the century. It was certainly the wedding of the 60's. Hollywood. The Mamas And Papas performing. An O...
-
Every time she comes off stage, the A list actress/singer is being fed the same stuff they give marathoners during a race.
-
The foreign born model/really bad actress just threw her religious singer ex under the bus by admitting how much she was cheating on her whi...



